Tag: science

Late May As Well Be Never

The CDC tacitly admits that vaccinations are irrelevant with regards to Covid.

The CDC’s COVID-19 prevention guidance will no longer differentiate by whether people are up-to-date on their vaccinations. Testing to screen for COVID-19 will no longer be recommended in most places for people who do not have COVID symptoms.

In other words: Jabbed or not does not matter. Never did, by the way, as Birx has admitted she knew before the jabbing started. She lied, the CDC lied, Brandon lied and Trump lied. They all lied. This was not an error it was intentional false claims that were made stating that “if you got jabbed you were a dead-end to the virus.” They all knew that was bullshit yet it was the entire premise behind both the urging and attempted mandates.

Testing people who are not ill is stupid. The definition of disease requires a disorder or malfunction of some kind in the body. If you’re not, you’re not. To be challenged your immune system must be infected; its obvious that something that does not assault you can’t lead to an immune response, so by definition if your immune system prevents you from getting actively ill you still got assaulted.

Furthermore, this is hard proof that had we done nothing we’d be in the same place here and now. If we had not mandated anything, two years hence we’d be….. right here. How do we know this? Because that’s what has happened every other time; 1918, when we had no jabs and tried to mandate masks which did nothing to cut off the virus, in the 1890s with what we are reasonably sure was OC43’s emergence, another coronavirus, myriad flu infections and strains in the 100 years since and more.

Unfortunately, the adverse effects of the CDC-mandated vaxx, including Suddenly, stillbirths, and infertility, will continue to afflict everyone who go themselves vaxxed for nothing. For those unfortunates, the CDC’s admission that the vaccine cannot prevent Covid is simply too late.

On a related topic, the CDC appears to have quietly erased its false claim that the mRNA and the spike protein do not last long in the body. The area highlighted in red was recently vanished.

DISCUSS ON SG

Depopulation Vectors

A Midwestern doctor explains that the Covid vaxxes are far from the first global depopulationist assault on human fertility by the pharma-medical complex, they are merely the most effective:

We are all the prey now.

As there is no good way to go about population control, a lot of very messy approaches have been tried. In the last article I attempted to highlight some of the horrific examples from the past, in order to show there is a clear case precedent for this being implemented on a large scale.

Given that vaccines are unconditionally trusted by most people and are very easy to administer, if a vaccination could produce sterilization or at least reduce fertility from a single injection, it would provide a technological solution to a dilemma the ruling class has faced for over a century. The only possible superior alternative I can think of would be a highly contagious respiratory virus (or “self-spreading vaccine”) that impaired future fertility without otherwise causing too much damage (and to some extent has been observed in men after COVID-19).

As a result, methods of making fertility-impairing vaccines have been repeatedly researched. Each of the candidate vaccines I was able to identify worked in a similar manner: they carried an antigen that was similar to a protein necessary for fertilization or pregnancy, and thus created an autoimmune response that impaired fertility.

There are basically two ways this can be done. The first is to produce the needed antigen and mix it with an immunostimulatory adjuvant. The second is to genetically engineer an infectious organism that has the antigen within it, and as with rheumatic fever, the damage to fertility will occur because the immune system is programmed to fight this pathogen.

In the previous article on the military’s anthrax vaccination program, I discussed a class of bioweapons originally developed by Russia that spliced necessary human tissue onto infectious organisms to create a time-delayed autoimmune bioweapon. One of the curious aspects of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is that it has a high number of similarities with normal human tissue, which I suspect may have been deliberately engineered in the virus to cause severe autoimmunity.

A friend who worked in this field was at the site of the original SARS outbreak in Canada and told me they were relatively certain the original SARS outbreak was an accidental lab leak. As that virus is very easy to modify and is an excellent delivery platform, they said it has been a favorite subject for everyone in the field to mess around with engineering. From the start of this pandemic, they were also positive SARS-CoV-2 was artificial (which was painfully obvious from the gene sequence), but like many others they did not publish their views for fear of retaliation.

Due to the long history of population control measures and the ruling class’s increasing need to develop an effective tool for it, I suspected the COVID vaccines would eventually be found to reduce fertility. After all, this was a once in a lifetime opportunity I could not see the eugenicists would let themselves miss.

Early on Dr. Mike Yeadon recognized an overlap in the spike protein with a protein necessary for maintaining a pregnancy (Syncytin-1) created a clear risk for fertility. At great personal risk, he filed a formal petition to the regulators to protect women of childbearing age in the initial vaccine trials. His concerns were not addressed and subsequent regulatory document leaks from the European FDA revealed Pfizer exempted themselves from testing the fertility risk, something that is typically always required.

Once the vaccine emerged on the market, it was discovered that one of the most common effects was severe disturbances and alterations to women’s menstrual cycles. This side effect was initially denied by every medical authority (it does not occur with other vaccines), but eventually acknowledged and rationalized as being an insignificant manifestation of inflammation (so once again “that means the vaccine is working”).

The depopulationists are considerably more evil than anyone but the most paranoid conspiracy theorist ever imagined. The recent vaxx offensive was the culmination of literally decades of efforts to substantially reduce the number of human beings on the planet; in most cases, the vaccines are observably more detrimental to the human body than the viruses they purport to be preventing.

DISCUSS ON SG

Filthbloods Die Faster

As I said back when the vaccines were first announced, watch the mortality rates. Because the one thing they can’t easily hide are the bodies.

An official report published by the UK Government confirms the mortality rates per 100,000 are the lowest among the unvaccinated population in every single age group in England. And the data reveals the gap between the unvaccinated and vaccinated population in terms of mortality rates is widening by the month.

This has resulted in the partly vaccinated, double vaccinated, and triple vaccinated populations being more likely to die of any single cause than the unvaccinated population among all age groups in England as of May 2022, the most recent month with data made available by the UK Government.

It’s going to get harder and harder for the pro-vaxx forces to defend, distract, and deny the observable facts. It will take years, more likely decades, to assess precisely how badly the vaxxed have had their lifespans shortened and their fertility reduced, but the statistics already indicate that they are considerably less healthy and will die much sooner than the average Pureblood.

DISCUSS ON SG

Natural Immunity FTW

Karl Denninger conclusively proves, with incontrovertible evidence, that natural immunity to Covid is vastly superior to the Covid vaxxes even if one doesn’t take into account the way the vaxxes are reducing human life expectancies and birth rates:

As those of you know who read my column almost exactly one year ago I got Covid. Delta, in fact.

All the so-called “experts” said that your IgG titer would disappear within months, and thus after three months you really ought to get jabbed.

Bluntly: They lied.

I ran this a few minutes ago.

That is a quite-strong IgG titer. It has been one year, almost exactly, and that is arguably stronger in terms of IgG than what it was about 2 weeks after I recovered. At the time I also, as expected, had an IgM titer. That is obviously now gone as it should be…

It is proof that I have IgG antibodies circulating in my blood right here, right now, today and I was infected exactly once almost precisely one year ago.

In fact I still have a photograph of that test with a nice timestamp on it. This IgG read is stronger than the one I had two weeks post-recovery, implying that my protection was still building at that time and has not materially waned over the entire year since.

There was never, ever, any need for a Covid vaccine, even one that was, unlike the existing Covid vaxxes, genuinely safe and effective.

The so-called experts were wrong. The science lied. And the filthbloods all harmed themselves, and their children, for nothing.

UPDATE: A pilot adds his two cents.

I just got tested again, third time in 18 months via blood draw/lab. Same experience here. My IgG levels are nearly the SAME as they were over 2 YEARS AGO.

DISCUSS ON SG

Depopulation Watch: North Dakota

Live Births

  • 2020: 10,051
  • 2021: 10,106
  • 2022: 4,668 (through June 30)

This means North Dakota is on track this year for 9,336 live births, a 7.6 percent decline from the pre-vaxx average. Could be worse, but it’s not a good sign since it is further evidence that the vaxx inhibits human fertility, as has already been observed in Taiwan, Germany, and the United Kingdom.

UPDATE: On a related front, stillbirths appear to have increased nearly 3,000 percent over the last six months in Waterloo, Canada. All 86 mothers were reportedly vaccinated. This rise in stillbirths may account for a substantial portion of the observed fall in live births.

UPDATE: Hawaii is on track for a 9.3 percent post-vaxx decline in the number of live births.

DISCUSS ON SG

Trust the Fiction

Canadians were told to “trust the science” of vaccine passports. What “science” was that? There was neither science nor any scientists involved in the entire process.

There was no scientific basis for Canada’s discriminatory, offensive vaccine passport system that helped launch massive countrywide protests.

Among many issues, the report details that no one in the “COVID Recovery unit,” which was responsible for enacting the policy, had any training in epidemiology or public health, instead, the director-general has a degree in literature:

“No one in the COVID Recovery unit, including Jennifer Little, the director-general, had any formal education in epidemiology, medicine or public health.

“Little, who has an undergraduate degree in literature from the University of Toronto, testified that there were 20 people in the unit. When Presvelos asked her whether anyone in the unit had any professional experience in public health, she said there was one person, Monique St.-Laurent. According to St.-Laurent’s LinkedIn profile, she appears to be a civil servant who briefly worked for the Public Health Agency of Canada. St.-Laurent is not a doctor, Little said. (Reached on the phone, St.-Laurent confirmed that she was a member of COVID Recovery. She referred other questions to a government spokesperson.)”

The worldwide response to Covid was not merely a crime against humanity, it was literally fiction invented by literature majors, failed actors, and corrupt bureaucrats funded by evil billionaires devoted to global depopulation.

All of those gullible victims who got themselves and their children vaccinated against Covid and thereby reduced their fertility and expected lifespans did so on the basis of a series of fairy tales told by wicked halfwits. This may have been the single stupidest collective action by a large group of people since the Children’s Crusade of 1212.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Damage is to the Totality

To say that Karl Denninger has no sympathy for the vaxxed would be putting it mildly. But his ire is not unreasonably based on a much better scientific understanding of what they did to themselves, and what was done to them, than most.

This was just published in Nature, and thus one cannot argue its “mere opinion” or a “conspiracy theory” since it went through the journal’s review process. It is no longer mere speculation that the jabs could wind up causing serious immune damage — and that said damage may well be permanent.

Recently, The Lancet published a study on the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines and the waning of immunity with time. The study showed that immune function among vaccinated individuals 8 months after the administration of two doses of COVID-19 vaccine was lower than that among the unvaccinated individuals. According to European Medicines Agency recommendations, frequent COVID-19 booster shots could adversely affect the immune response and may not be feasible…. These clinical alterations may explain the association reported between COVID-19 vaccination and shingles.

Notice a problem in that language — the damage isn’t specific to Covid and it is not transient either as one might expect from an immune challenge by vaccination (or infection) — even at eight months, likely the duration of the study, immune impairment from these jabs was persistent. That’s extraordinarily bad, and exactly why you don’t rush out new things without testing over a long period of time so you can not just find such potential problems but definitively run them into the ground before you go stabbing a couple hundred million people in America alone and billions more world-wide.

The impact may be irreversible and notice that the article talks about mitigating rather than reversing the impact, specifically limiting other drugs that might otherwise suppress or interfere with immune function even on a short-term basis. May I remind you that beyond the impact when it comes to being impaired in fighting off other diseases every single person on the planet today has cancerous cells in their body and it is your immune system that keeps those in check and prevents you from developing clinical cancer. If this damage is permanent then your lifetime cancer risk has been permanently and materially increased, perhaps by a LOT.

What’s worse is that the younger you are the greater the harm because you have more years in front of you for those abnormal cells to get out of control.

Let me point out another very nasty aspect of this: This paper does not describe a random chance event; rather it describes mechanisms of action that are caused when you are given these jabs. Indeed it is logical, given this data, to believe that myocarditis is simply a bad roll on how ugly it was for you in that myocarditis is inflammation which, in the absence of a pathogen is evidence of significant immune dysregulation. That is, every person who took the jabs got screwed. The degree of screwing of course varies from person to person but everyone who took the jab got nailed to some degree because the mechanism of harm was introduced into the body. Whether there is variation with the technology used is not something that is yet in evidence but the presumption at this point has to be that at best it is a result of what I have described as a nasty biological parlor trick through the inducement of the body’s cells to produce spike protein, a trick that was chosen in an attempt to avoid the history of ADE that has repeatedly developed in trials of whole, inactivated virus for various coronavirus strains. What’s worse is that the spike was intentionally genetically modified in the jabs to prevent it from folding and breaking down in order to enhance the immune response and thus it has now been found in the circulation months after vaccination.

We did all of this despite having zero long-term evidence that hijacking the cellular machinery to produce the spike was safe and much worse we had scientific evidence prior to the mass roll-out of these shots that the spike alone, absent the rest of the virus, was capable of producing direct harm to the body. I warned of this repeatedly in my column right here before we started this idiocy on a mass-basis and now, it appears, I was not only right I underestimated the risk in that my assumption was that the damage would be coronavirus (and maybe Covid) specific.

The evidence now strongly suggests that the damage is to the totality of immune response.

To be honest, I’m less concerned with the vaxxed living with damaged immune systems and lower life expectancies than I am with regards to the a) effects on fertility and b) the effects of vaxx-shedding on the fertility of the purebloods.

The human race can survive just fine with much shorter lifespans than are presently enjoyed, but it cannot survive without a sufficient number of healthy children annually being born.

DISCUSS ON SG

Scientology > Science

Tom Cruise was correct about psychiatry and its snake oil solution for nonexistent “chemical imbalances” all along.

TOM CRUISE: Here we are today, where I talk out against drugs and psychiatric abuses of electro-shocking people against their will, drugging children, with them not knowing the effects of these drugs. Do you know what Adderall is, do you know Ritalin? Do you now that Ritalin is a street drug? Do you understand that?

MATT LAUER: The difference is that this was not against her will, though.

TOM CRUISE: Matt, I’m asking you a question.

MATT LAUER: I understand there’s abuse of all of these things.

TOM CRUISE: No, you see, here’s the problem. You don’t know the history of psychiatry. I do. All it does is mask the problem, Matt. And if you understand the history of it, it masks the problem. That’s what it does. That’s all it does. You’re not getting to the reason why. There is no such thing as a chemical imbalance. I’m saying that drugs are not the answer. These substances are very dangerous. They’re mind-altering anti-psychotic drugs. And there are ways of doing it without that, so we don’t end up in A Brave New World.

MATT LAUER: Yes, there are abuses. And yes, maybe we’ve gone too far in certain areas. Maybe there are too many kids on Ritalin. But aren’t there examples where it works.

TOM CRUISE: Too many kids on Ritalin? Matt, you’re glib. You don’t even know what Ritalin is. If you start talking about chemical imbalance, you have to evaluate and read the research papers on how they came up with these theories. That’s what I’ve done. You go and you say, where’s the medical test? Where’s the blood test that says how much Ritalin you’re supposed to get?

MATT LAUER: It’s very impressive to listen to you, because clearly you’ve done the homework and you know the subject.

TOM CRUISE: And you should. And you should do that also, because just knowing people who are on Ritalin isn’t enough.

After decades of blindly assuming that depression is caused by chemical imbalances, and subjecting tens of millions of people to mind-altering drugs, scientists have finally begun to catch up to Tom Cruise and the Scientologists.

A scientific review has concluded that depression is not caused by chemical imbalances in the brain, and may be more closely linked to stressful life events.

The review, conducted by University College London and published in the Molecular Psychiatry journal, examined the “serotonin theory of depression”, an “influential” and long-held belief that lower serotonin levels may make an individual more likely to experience depression.

A link between serotonin levels and depression was first put forward in the 1960s, and antidepressant use has increased since the 1990s with the development of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor antidepressants. One in six adults in England are currently prescribed antidepressants, many of which help to adjust serotonin levels.

“Many people take antidepressants because they have been led to believe their depression has a biochemical cause, but this research suggests this belief is not grounded in evidence,” said Professor Joanna Moncrieff, the study’s lead author.

The authors examined studies into the chemical’s impact on depression, including studies where participants’ serotonin levels were artificially lowered through dietary methods. In both cases, a link could not be established.

Better late than never. Now do vaccines…. And keep this in mind someone tells you to “trust the science”. The official science narrative is observably less trustworthy than the Xenu science fiction cult.

DISCUSS ON SG

IQ Estimation Guide

Pursuant to a discussion on SocialGalactic, I put together a rough guide based on IQ rarity. Obviously, there are outliers in both group and individual terms, but if you’re an average individual of European descent and you have literally no information with which to base an estimate, this should suffice as a starting point.

A rough guide based on IQ rarity:

  • 110 = Smartest person in your close friend circle.
  • 124 = Smartest person in your extended family.
  • 140 = Smartest person in your entire social circle of friends and acquaintances.
  • 180 = Smartest person at your college or university.

To estimate your own intelligence, deduct 2 points for each person in that group you believe to be smarter than you.

NSB: It is absolutely not necessary to explain that this rough guide does not apply to you, your friends, your extended family, or your social circle because you are such a smart and special boy. And yes, NSB stands for Nota Smartus Boyum.

The Matter is Settled

Scientist and Social Justician Titania McGrath not only explodes the myth of “biology”, but also answers the question that has plagued scientists and intellectuals for centuries.

Anyone who asks the question “what is a woman?” is thereby revealing that they have the intelligence of your average garden slug. This is why we shouldn’t trust these so-called “archaeologists” who claim to be able to determine whether those ancient skeletons they’ve uncovered are “male” or “female”. This is pure pseudo-science. Next they’ll be telling us they can work out their pronouns by measuring the femurs.

Let me settle this matter once and for all. A woman is anyone who says she is a woman. A woman is a feeling, a shimmering nimbus of possibility, an echo of distant dreams reverberating gingerly through a winter’s gloaming. She is a mewling constellation, a bagful of semi-felched pixies, the enchanted stardust that pirouettes luminously on the spindle of time.

This is logical and inevitable, in that science was defined as “anything that scientists do” more than a decade ago. Forget politics and self-determination, self-identification is now the ultimate scientific determinative.

DISCUSS ON SG