Guilty On (almost) All Charges

Yes, Virginia, Manchester City did break the financial regulations:

Manchester City have been found guilty of all but one of their 115 rule-break charges concerning the Premier League’s financial regulations. The competition accused the club of widespread financial cheating over an era of sustained success – with an independent panel hearing concluding in 2024.

There has since been a frustrating wait for a verdict but sources have disclosed that clubs have been informed that the panel has now reached a decision – and there is a belief it’s a win for the top flight. It is understood that the Premier League have triumphed on the vast majority of charges.

The verdict could lead to a variety of punishments including huge points deductions, financial penalties, and even relegation. Points deductions could even be applied onto previous seasons, raising the chance that City will be stripped of their Premier League titles.

I’m genuinely surprised. I was expecting the usual whitewashing. Of course, there is still the likelihood that the punishment will be a slap-on-the-hand involving ten points and a monetary fine. I’d suggest one level of relegation per season the rules were broken. Juventus and AC Milan had no trouble working their way back to Serie A, and it would make for a great multi-season saga to see the once-mighty City playing away games on tiny fields that usually average 200 spectators.

It would be a fittingly humiliating punishment and good for the sport.

DISCUSS ON SG

She’s On Record

@Tardus-d5y: Is there going to be a video fully dedicated to debunking Vox Day or will you only address his nonesense in the next stream?

@GutsickGibbon: full video

This promises to be absolutely hilarious.

A young woman who is still in school for biology and probably hasn’t even passed a single math exam at her fifth-rate university genuinely believes she is going to record a full video disproving the mathematical demonstration of the impossibility of evolution by natural selection as well as the irrelevance of neutral theory, genetic drift, and neutral substitution, both constructed by the man who solved the Agrippan Trilemma.

Never mind that the MITTENS math has been repeatedly stress-tested by the oppositional Red Team of Grok, Gemini, and ChatGPT, two world-class physicists, five professional mathematicians, and just last week, a Professor of Mathematical Statistics at Stockholm University. Or that very little of the math that is the basis of my separate Neutral Theory argument is original, but is mostly derived from the mathematical work of Dr. Fabio Chalub, PhD in Mathematics and Professor at Universidade NOVA de Lisboa.

It’s not as if she doesn’t have fair warning in her comments already.

I have a PhD in maths from Cambridge and am working my way through Vox Day’s rather dense books and publications on this subject, and I’m yet to find any major issues with his maths.

Of course he won’t, except for the N/Ne error that I identified myself, but has not yet been corrected in a few of the older papers. There have been nearly 2,000 downloads of my paper dissolving the Trilemma since February, mostly by professional philosophers desperate to find a place where I was wrong so they can call me out for it. And there has not been a single response, not one single attempted criticism from any of them, because the solution is airtight. Given that, how does she think she’s going to find an error in my case against something much more obviously and hopelessly wrong like Neo-Darwinian natural selection, especially when she didn’t immediately recognize the citation of the LTTE or that parallel fixation is built into those numbers?

Note that I’m definitely NOT appealing to my authority or the authority of any of the various machine intelligences, physicists, or mathematicians referenced here. By all means, I encourage absolutely anyone and everyone who has any doubts about my arguments to work through the relevant math for themselves. Take your best shot. Critique it. Dig as deep as you can. That’s the purpose of the Red Team. Find the errors. I did, and others have, and my case is now far stronger for them. Ironically, my most significant error to date came from taking the evolutionary biology textbooks at face value!

I just find it amusing that an inveterate little credentialist like Ericka would pay so little heed to what any rational individual would realize is an absolutely formidable set of intellectual adversaries. Because hiding behind name-calling and butterfly collectors simply isn’t going to cut it here.

Which is why I very much doubt that the promised video is ever going to be recorded. I expect that just like she did with regards to debating me directly, she’s going to find an excuse to avoid addressing the math and the arguments on camera since she doesn’t want to be publicly eviscerated. But perhaps she’ll follow through, and maybe even produce some little tangent, hitherto unaddressed, that will allow us to drive yet another nail in the coffin, like Dennis McCarthy did. That, too, is a service.

It is also amusing to observe that these I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE retards have absolutely no comprehension of how I utilize AI. They appear to imagine I use it to generate or to support my arguments. But, as everyone who has read HARDCODED knows, I use it in exactly the opposite way.

DISCUSS ON SG

Take the W

In which a woman complains that others are utilizing her ideas without attribution:

So some of the team animals on YouTube are starting to « borrow » my ideas re: Political orientation being a natural biological divide.

As usual, people plagiarize my ideas years later without attribution or ever boosting my signal. Disgusting pigs.

Here’s reminding you that these are my ideas: THANKS.

Tell you what, I am VERY tired of people whose shtick is repeating everyone else’s original ideas cockblocking those of us who HAVE the original ideas.

Somebody is going to get killed eventually.

Having your ideas repeated is exactly what intellectual success is. Don’t expect credit and don’t expect most of those repeating your ideas to have any idea who first came up with them. Just take the W.

The most widely adopted ideas are seldom propagated by their originators, but by their popularizers. Think about how many people are familiar with Richard Dawkins instead of E.O. Wilson.

I see people using the terms “sigma” and “midwit” all the time. I would bet none of them have any idea that both terms were not only my original ideas, but neologisms I coined. And both The New York Times and Nature quoted my proof that religion doesn’t cause war, citing the precise numbers I calculated, without ever mentioning me or the book in which those numbers appeared.

Die Gedanken sind frei in more ways than one. If people were wiser and had more foresight, they would value original thinkers more highly. Instead, they grift off them when they’re not gatekeeping or cancelling or killing them. But they’re observably not, nor have they been since the Thirty Tyrants were making Socrates drink hemlock.

The only reward an intellectual can reasonably hope for is that his ideas will stand the test of time. Anything else is just a bonus.

We’ll know that my mathematical disproofs of natural selection and neutral theory are starting to go mainstream when people start denying that I had anything to do with them.

DISCUSS ON SG

Mailvox: They Lost the Atheists

You know evolution is dying fast when not even crying “Creationism!” can keep the atheists on their side anymore. A gentleman wrote in today to share his godless thoughts on my recent posts.

TENS is a most ridiculous hypothesis and is laughably wrong on its face. Evolution is so obviously intelligently directed that claiming otherwise can only be ridiculed. I’m not a theist so I don’t attribute any specific causative factor but that in no way weakens the clear evidence of utilitarian, non-random evolutionary adaptation.

I’m glad that you have taken the time and effort to destroy the supposedly mathematical/”scientific” foundations of their blathering, which seems akin to and indistinguishable from similarly “mathematically rigorous” workups of astrology.

I remember the thrust of your argument back when you debated Gariepy: what is the rate of fixation? And the fact that he could neither answer nor even grasp the basis of the argument illustrates the same dynamic in these midwit human parrots: they are incapable of rational independent thinking (which is probably why they chose the pseudoscientific fields they’ve pursued in the first place). They should’ve just gotten their PhD’s in the similarly substantive fields of exobotany or gender studies.

Evolutionary biology actually makes astrology look scientific by comparison. I mean, in the case of astrology there are at least actual planets and stars and constellations one can observe even if they don’t influence anyone’s destiny or behavior. Evolution by natural selection and genetic drift is rather like astrology if there weren’t any planets, any stars, or anything at all in the sky.

The amusing thing is the way that evolutionists keep trying to point to birds and butterflies and bones as somehow proving anything at all. It’s exactly like the man, who upon being challenged on his claim of having walked from Los Angeles to New York City in five minutes, argues that if you will only turn on the television, you will see that there are, in fact, people living in not only Los Angeles, but also San Francisco and Chicago!

Well, yes, that’s all very true, but it’s also beside the point.

You can’t reason with these retards, which is why I have no interest in engaging with them. They simply don’t have the mental capacity to understand the concept of a “rate” or how it absolutely and always applies to anything that changes over time.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Bubble is Popping

The corporate giants are already attempting to brace for impact:

Oracle is seeking to protect itself ​from potential cost increases related ‌to a large data center project in New Mexico by sending a “force ​majeure” notice to developer ​Blue Owl, Bloomberg News reported on ⁠Thursday. Shares of the company fell ​around 4% in premarket trading ​after the report, which cited sources familiar with the matter. Reuters could not ​independently verify it. Oracle is aiming ​to delay payments should the data center ‌dubbed ⁠Project Jupiter get derailed and fail to come online in 2028 as planned, rather than exiting ​as the ​main tenant, ⁠according to the report. Companies typically invoke force majeure ​to free themselves from ​contractual ⁠obligations when problems arise beyond their control. Oracle and Blue Owl ⁠did ​not immediately respond to ​Reuters requests for comment.

It’s becoming increasingly clear that most of those data centers are not necessary. So it’s not going to sustain the economy any longer. And there aren’t a lot of other options for a replacement bubble, except perhaps a real estate boom in Greenland.

DISCUSS ON SG

So That’s a No

You know when you send an email, and about thirty seconds later, you find yourself regretting having sent it and you wonder what the eventual consequences will be? I have to admit, though, that I did not see this one coming. But it is an answer to our request. And it’s fine, as always, we will abide by the rules, and we will switch releasing to two titles per week.

It’s the exact opposite of a problem.

We are updating the title creation limits on KDP to help maintain a positive publishing experience for all authors. Starting Monday, September 21, 2026, you can create up to 2 titles per format per week.

Your weekly limit resets every Sunday at 12:00 AM UTC.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this affect existing or already published titles? No. This limit applies only to creating new titles. Your existing or published titles are not affected.

What formats does this limit apply to? The title creation limit applies to eBook (Kindle), paperback, and hardcover. You can create 2 titles per format per week.

What happens if I reach the limit? If you have reached your weekly limit, you can try again after your weekly limit resets on Sundays at 12:00 AM UTC.

This does not slow us down in the slightest, of course. We will be putting at least two titles on our new site every single day. I have just finished translating one monster work that we start releasing next week once the ten volumes of Sangokushi are all out. And for those who have been asking about print editions, there will be three new Soseki novels available in hardcover later this week, Kokoro, Sanshiro, and Botchan.

DISCUSS ON SG

She Already Ran Away

That was fast. As I predicted from the moment Will Duffy suggested that I should talk to her, Ericka the Biology Student has already found an excuse to bravely run away from defending evolution by natural selection against the mathematical critique that she is in no way capable of comprehending, much less addressing successfully:

Hi everyone,

Vox Day has made a blog post about this stream: https://voxday.net/2026/09/22/zero-probability-zero-clue/

I spent a few hours this morning looking into Vox Day, both on my own and through some emails you guys sent!

It it unambiguously the case that Vox Day is a white supremacist. His blog, https://voxday.net/, is my primary source for this. I hope it goes without saying but this channel does not host white supremacists. Of course, Day (or rather, Beale) is not wrong with his critiques of evolution because he is a white supremacist, that’s just a factor that will keep him off this channel.

I’ve also begun to look into his math and I’m reaching out to those who know this area (and are formally educated in it) unlike both Vox and I.

We will be covering this in depth soon, stay tuned 😉

My critiques, or rather, my conclusive and comprehensive mathematical disproofs, of evolution are not wrong, period, as anyone who is sufficiently competent to comprehend both the math and its correct context will soon grasp. Whether they tell her the truth or not remains to be seen. We’ve already seen that the first population geneticist who reached out to her provided her with information that was both a) incorrect and b) irrelevant.

It’s probably best that Ericka runs away now, considering what happened to the last woman who tried to debate me. For those of you who weren’t around then, she literally abandoned the debate after three rounds and ran off to Las Vegas to start a new career as a prostitute at a legal brothel. I’m neither kidding nor exaggerating for effect. You can look it up. You can probably still buy her services, for that matter.

It doesn’t matter in the least. The historical events of the last six million years already took place. They don’t depend upon me. Natural selection never produced homo sapiens sapiens. It never produced any species. And neither did genetic drift, neutral substitution, ILS, sweeps, ancestral polymorphism, or any other undirected mechanism for transferring genetic data that these desperate post-Darwinist polythesists can dream up.

It is perhaps worth noting that the very nice Christian anti-evolution crowd aren’t necessarily any more enthusiastic about my reputation than the I FUCKING LOVE SCIENCE crowd, although it’s understandable that the evolutionists might be just a little more sensitive about anything that smacks of the historical political application of their pseudo-scientific beliefs, and yet the mathematicians in their midst take what I’ve developed very seriously because it is really that serious.

Here’s the thing: I don’t even care about evolution anymore. It’s dead, done, and dusted, and little Ericka and her enthusiasts can play with fairy tales and dinosaurs like toddlers all they like. It isn’t going to change anything, and there is no chance those midwitted retards were ever going to help solve the genomic catastrophe that they still haven’t noticed because they’re too busy doing makework and trying to find new ways to write “is consistent with the theory of evolution by natural selection”.

DISCUSS ON SG

China Was Prepared

Larry Johnson notes that China is the dog that isn’t barking about the oil shortages:

Outbound tanker traffic through Hormuz has fallen to almost nothing, and yet China — the world’s largest crude importer — is not the one panicking. It runs much of its supply through pipelines that no tanker rate can touch, and in August it pushed refined-fuel exports above pre-war levels, with jet fuel exports hitting an all-time high. The country that everyone predicted would be crippled by a Gulf shutdown is instead exporting fuel into the shortage, at its own discretion and on its own terms.

That is the shape of it. The world’s fuel crisis has three legs, not two: the crude that cannot leave the Gulf, the refineries that cannot run, and the ships that cannot get where they are needed at a price anyone can afford. The West is exposed on all three because it moves its energy over open water. China, having spent a decade laying pipe instead of chartering ships, is exposed on almost none of them.

Clown World’s strategy has been so wildly counterproductive that one is almost tempted to conclude that the White Hats really are in charge of the Trump administration. If we look at what has actually been accomplished, as opposed to the relentless rhetoric and the aggressive philosemitism, things actually look fairly positive for the complete collapse of Clown World.

Of course, we still have to survive the economic collapse, the political unrest, the regional wars, and the general instability, but that was always going to be necessary. But the economic and military might of Clown World have already been observably broken.

DISCUSS ON SG

Kimura’s Intrinsic Irrelevance

The Intrinsic Irrelevance of Kimura’s Substitution Rate


Kimura’s neutral substitution rate (k = μ) is the most widely cited result in molecular evolution. We show that it is intrinsically irrelevant to every single real-world question it has ever been utilized to answer. The identity contains no time term and therefore cannot address whether any number of fixations can complete in any given window. Its sole practical application, the calibration of the molecular clock, is both circular and logically invalid because divergence dates are derived from the identity, then cited as independent confirmation of the identity. When the time-dependent fixation dynamics that Kimura’s own framework supplies are properly integrated into the substitution calculation, using the exact transient formula E[F(T)] = μL ∫₀ᵀ F_X(u) du rather than the naive product μLT, the leading-order correction subtracts the mean fixation time from the available window. The correction scales with effective population size and, at realistic human values, ranges from 16 percent to 100 percent of the total available time frame. While Kimura’s derivation is mathematically correct, it is a limited steady-state identity that is almost always improperly applied and the results it produces answer no material questions in population genetics or evolutionary biology.

The full paper is available on Zenodo. It is a tactical nuclear strike on both Neutral Theory as well as on the Postmodern Polythesis that many evolutionary biologists erroneously describe as “the Modern Synthesis”. It’s much more destructive than my previous critiques of Kimura’s algebra, as it is constructed upon the foundation of a Portuguese mathematician’s correction of Kimura’s math and it serves to demonstrate how his famous equation is a steady-state identity that can never be used for the purposes for which it has been improperly used for decades by population geneticists and evolutionary biologists alike.

It has not been submitted to peer review for the obvious and observable reason that I have no peers.

DISCUSS ON SG

Books Unlimited

We’re expanding the translation and publication program to speeds that the conventional distribution simply cannot handle. We’re also taking a poll on how many books we have to have on the shelf to interest people in access to the rapidly growing library. If you are a reader, please visit Castalia Library and answer the one-question survey there. There is no correct answer; if you’re not interested, then please let us know. If you’re an inveterate KU subscriber who needs at least one million books before you’ll bother, let us know that too.

And thanks to all the existing subscribers for your support. This week’s book has already gone out to you.

DISCUSS ON SG