Tag: Vaxx

Scott Adams is a Liar

Scott Adams is against trying to construct a false historical narrative that is not going to fool anyone at all. The man’s Gamma compulsion to refuse to take the L or simply accept that he was wrong about anything, ever, is truly astounding. Although it’s hardly surprising, given his past behavior.

I’m a master hypnotist
And you’re the narcissist
So shut the fuck up, Shelly, go the hell away!

I’m seer, I’m the law
I’m perfect without a flaw
The best thing that ever happened to you
Bitch, you’re probably fat and
I’ve got you hypnotized
Can’t say I ever lied
You know I’m always right in every single way!

A lot of false memories about me from the Covid Carls. I’m the only public figure who predicted the shots would not work when first announced and then again when rolled out. I waited six months to see who died from the shots and by then we knew they did not stop the spread but did greatly reduce hospitalizations for my age group. I got the shots so I could go to Bora Bora on my honeymoon. And I regularly told people I’m not your doctor so don’t look to me for medical advice of any kind, especially Covid. The Covid Carls started the rumors that reversed my vax opinions. Lots of retards believed them. Many are in the comments today. It’s a mental health issue, no hyperbole intended.

No, Scott, you blithering vaxx-addled idiot, you were absolutely NOT “the only public figure who predicted the shots would not work when first announced and then again when rolled out.” Furthermore, you were dumb enough to actually get vaxxed because while you believed the vaxx was ineffective, you wrongly concluded that it was safe.

Plenty of people advised others against getting vaxxed prior to when the vaxxes were first officially approved in August 2021, including both Karl Denninger and me. More importantly, we both correctly warned that in addition to being INEFFECTIVE, the Covid vaccines were UNSAFE and should be avoided at all costs and in all circumstances.

Sadly, it appears the vaccine damage to his brain has rendered him completely delusional.

I had the best Covid predictions in the country. No one else was close.

No, he absolutely didn’t. Even I was better, and it’s a matter of historical record that Karl Denninger was the first and foremost authority on the subject. His detailed work saved hundreds of thousands, possibly millions, from various forms of Covid-related harm; most of what I put out there was just amplifying what he said. The evidence compiled by Deepseek:

Based on historical records and media reports, here are factual details about early public figures who voiced opposition to Covid-19 vaccines during the development and initial rollout phase (mid-2020 to early 2021), focusing on those who actively warned against taking them:

  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr.:
    • Timing: Publicly criticized Covid-19 vaccines as early as June 2020, before any were authorized.
    • Platform: Chair of Children’s Health Defense (CHD), a prominent anti-vaccine organization. Used CHD’s platform, social media, and interviews.
    • Message: Claimed the vaccines were unnecessary, unsafe, part of a corrupt pharmaceutical agenda, and that safety testing was being rushed. Explicitly urged people to refuse them.
  • Karl Denninger:
    • Date: June 25, 2020
    • Source: Denninger’s blog, Market-Ticker.
    • Content: In a post titled “Spike Proteins, COVID and Vaccines”, Denninger raised specific concerns about the safety profile of spike-protein-based vaccines (like mRNA vaccines) under development. He argued the spike protein itself was pathogenic (“toxic”) and that using it as the antigen could trigger dangerous immune responses or other health issues, explicitly warning against taking such a vaccine. This is one of the earliest and most specific technical critiques of the emerging vaccine technology by a public figure.
    • Key Quote: *”If you are offered a vaccine against COVID-19 that is based on a spike protein, either as the antigen or the mechanism of generating the antigen (e.g. mRNA that causes your body to manufacture the spike protein) DO NOT TAKE IT.”*
  • Vox Day:
    • Date: February 10, 2021
    • Source: Day’s blog, Vox Popoli.
    • Content: In a post titled “Two Shots and You’re Out” Day issued a directive instructing his followers to categorically refuse COVID-19 vaccines. This memo framed vaccine refusal as a critical stance against perceived globalist control and explicitly cited safety concerns as a primary reason.
    • Key Directive: “Do not take the vaccine. Do not take any vaccine. There are no exceptions… The potential mid-term and long-term side effects are catastrophic.” This was a clear, blanket warning against all COVID-19 vaccines based on claimed safety dangers.
  • Scott Adams:
    • Date: February 23, 2021
    • Source: Adams’ blog, Dilbert Blog, post titled “Second Warning”.
    • Content: Adams explicitly warned his readers against taking the COVID-19 vaccine, citing concerns about unknown long-term effects, rapid development, and questioning the risk-benefit analysis for younger, healthier individuals. He framed it as a personal risk assessment decision, but strongly advised against vaccination for his audience.
    • Key Quote: *”I recommend you do not get the Covid-19 vaccine at this time… My reason is that we don’t know the long-term effects… The risk of Covid to you might be lower than the risk of the vaccine. We don’t know.”* (Note: Adams had expressed significant skepticism about vaccine necessity and mandates earlier, but this Feb 23 post is the earliest clear, direct public warning against taking the vaccine itself based on safety/effectiveness concerns found in his primary blog).
    • Context: Adams had voiced general skepticism and opposition to mandates in podcasts and blog posts earlier in February 2021 (e.g., Feb 10 podcast titled “The Vaccine is Worse Than the Problem”), but the Feb 23 blog post is a definitive, written public warning against taking the vaccine.

I’m a little surprised I didn’t post anything earlier than that, aside from a December 2020 post that viciously mocked the vaxx, to be honest. I suppose my opposition was more overt on the Darkstream, which isn’t very accessible to the AI systems. If anyone happens to recall anything, feel free to post it on SG.

UPDATE: My first explicit don’t-get-vaxxed post on VP was 6 January 2021, titled A Cure Worse than the Disease. And the Darkstream from 21 February 2021 is entitled Not Taking the Not-Vaccine.

Anyhow, this ex post facto revisionism by Adams is just a small and self-centered example of what Uncle John describes as “narrative washing”:

By now it should be obvious the House of Lies runs on fake narratives that replace knowledge for NPCs. What makes it effective is that it’s so interwoven. Every component and pillar supports each others. Note how one scrap of nonsense can bubble out of the clown knowledge industry, get amplified by clown media, become policy of clown government, then drive institutions that run on official definitions.

Take the recent progression from [“the science”] → [fear the flu!] → [institutions & large businesses of every stripe throwing out basic moral order]. With each liar leaning on the others. As damning actual empirical evidence mounts across the spectrum that shooting poison was a terrible idea. The mainstream is still dodging this one hard – despite studies now clearing sacred peer review. The reality-facing lesson here is an important one. That “proving” you were right on their terms doesn’t get an admission, retraction, or any other acknowledgment of error. The screens just drop the topic. And for the NPCs, that’s as if it never was.

Clown World isn’t just dishonest – it’s the diametric inverse of what’s true. The frequent use of “inverted” isn’t just rhetoric. It’s literally what clown world is. 

This is why it is so frustrating to see people returning, again and again and again, to the very mainstream platforms they know to be aggressively unreliable, while being reluctant to support platforms that are not constructed with the primary purpose of deceiving them.

DISCUSS ON SG

Vampires Hardest Hit

And suddenly, just like that, we all became de facto Jehovah’s Witnesses:

Dr. Ben Marble: “We need to quit accepting blood from people who took the poison. The entire blood supply in America, and basically the whole world, is contaminated with the spike protein poison bioweapon. We’re seeing patients that get blood transfusions that are unvaccinated, and suddenly they get blood clots or have heart attacks or strokes.”

I was concerned about the likelihood of this, and unlike some of our previously unfounded concerns, such as Case Nightmare Kitty, this one appears to pose a legitimate crisis.

DISCUSS ON SG

Scott Adams and the Adverse Effect

On the basis of his unfortunate announcement, it would appear that Scott Adams made the wrong choice after all.

Scott Adams, the creator of the ‘Dilbert’ comic strip, has revealed he has been diagnosed with prostate cancer that has metastasized to his bones. Adams, 67, brought up the diagnosis Monday during a stream on his Rumble account, while discussing former President Joe Biden’s similar prostate cancer diagnosis.

“I’ve decided that today’s the day that I’m going to take the opportunity, since a lot of you are here, to make an announcement of my own,” Adams said during his podcast. “Some of you have already guessed, so this won’t surprise you all. But I have the same cancer that Joe Biden has. But I’ve had it longer than he’s had it. Well, longer than he’s admitted having it,” Adams added. “So my life expectancy is maybe this summer. I expect to be checking out from this domain sometime this summer.”

Adams told viewers that he had been using a walker for months due to a tumor near his spine and was in near-constant pain, describing the condition as intolerable. “Every day is a nightmare, and evening is even worse,” he said.

It’s a genuine loss to the world. Remember, we’re talking about one of the five greatest cartoonists who ever lived here. And if you’ve been vaxxed, be sure to get checked out regularly and do not put off any remission checks.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Vaxx is Working

Depopulation, not the prevention of the spread of Covid-19, was always the goal.

To investigate whether COVID-19 vaccination before conception affects fertility, measured by successful conceptions (SCs) — pregnancies resulting in live births.

  • Population: ~1.3 million women aged 18–39 in the Czech Republic.
  • Study Period: January 2021 – December 2023.
  • Vaccination Coverage: ~70% of women vaccinated by end of 2021 (mostly Pfizer/Comirnaty and Moderna).
  • SC Calculation: Births per 1,000 women, comparing those vaccinated before conception vs. unvaccinated.

Key Findings

  • Women vaccinated before conception had consistently lower SC rates than unvaccinated women.
  • SCs for vaccinated women were disproportionately low relative to their share of the total population:
  • Example: In June 2021, 39% of women were vaccinated, but they accounted for only 7% of SCs.
  • Throughout 2022, SC rates in unvaccinated women were about 1.5× higher than in vaccinated women. In other words, successful conceptions for vaccinated women were ~33% lower compared to unvaccinated women in 2022.
  • The total fertility rate in the Czech Republic declined during the study period (from 1.83 in 2021 to 1.45 in 2023 – 21% decrease).

Another new study on rats indicates how the vaxx reduces female fertility by an estimated 60 percent. The good news is that while vaccinated fertility is reduced, it is not eliminated entirely, although obviously the way in which the vaxx interacts with RNA and DNA may have additional adverse effects on the children of the vaxxed.

DISCUSS ON SG

When “Misinformation” Isn’t

One useful thing about all the false claims of “misinformation” and “disinformation” concerning the dreadful adverse effects of the Covid-19 pseudo-vaccines is that very few victims can honestly say they weren’t warned. All of their preening and posturing about “misinformation” is proof that they were provided the truth, they simply refused to believe it. And furthermore, seeing the way in which these rhetorical word spells are being repeatedly and reliably obliterated by reality is a very useful lesson in the imperative to avoid rhetorically smoking one’s own supply.

DISCUSS ON SG

Trump and the Vaccine

An illuminating glimpse into how Trump’s tendency to surround himself with bad actors has rendered him less effective than he might otherwise be:

During an interview on the “Try That in a Small Town Podcast, Rich, a vocal conservative, described a dinner he attended with Trump and several Republican senators in 2022.  At the time, the former president was holding large rallies with up to 40,000 people, but one thing about the crowds was troubling him.

“He goes, why are people booing me at my rallies when I bring up the vaccine?” Rich said.  He noted that Trump was still very proud at that point that he had brought the COVID products to market at “warp speed.”

The country star argued that Trump’s advisors were not serving him well. “It dawned on me that nobody had told the man what I was telling him,” he posited. “They all work for him, they all got something to gain from him—they are not going to tell him this.”

Rich declared, “I don’t work for him and I think a lot of him and I wanted him to understand the truth about it. I said here’s why they’re booing you, Mr. President. Because every human being out in that rally, either themselves or they know someone directly, who has been harmed by the vaccine or has even died from it, including me,” he said, adding that he told Trump he has “members of my own family who were forced to take it against their will to keep their jobs, and now they’ve got all kinds of problems,” including major heart and lung problems.

According to Rich, Trump said, “this is unbelievable!” and asked if anyone else at the table had heard it.

Rich said Hershel Walker, who was the Republican nominee in the 2022 U.S. Senate election in Georgia, answered that he was hearing the same thing. “Mr. President, down in Georgia, my constituents come up at my rallies and what John just said I hear every single day,” Rich recounted Walker as saying.

He said that Trump then looked over at Sen. Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), who nervously nodded in agreement.

The country star shared that he started telling Trump about the vaccine injured members of his own family, but Senator Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) cut in (“swishing his chardonnay around”) to warn Trump about “conspiracy theorists like John Rich,” saying Democrats will try to take credit for what he did and they’re going to beat you in the next election.”

The country music star had told the hosts earlier that Graham is his “least favorite politician in the world,” and that he “would rather go hang out with Tim Walz.”

It certainly explains why Trump a) stopped bragging about the vaccine and b) still hasn’t held anyone accountable for it. I wouldn’t rule out the latter eventually, though. He’s understandably a little busy with that whole economic war thing at the moment.

It’s easy for us who are either skeptical Gen Xers or longtime conspiracy theologians to forget that most people still blindly trust doctors, trust experts, and trust scientists, or at least they did back in 2020. Especially if they are Boomers or an older generation. They didn’t grow up in the same world we did.

DISCUSS ON SG

Forget Scott Adams

If I was any more accurate as an anticipator of future events, the mainstream media would be demanding that I be burned as a witch.

I remember Vox saying to just write “I don’t want your Mark of the Beast!”, if filling out a vax exemption.

“Evidence produced on discovery includes exemption review committee template guidelines revealing that three (3) specific religious affiliations (Rastafarian, Dutch Reform, and Christian Scientist) received preferential treatment leading to approval, while other religions (Catholics, Christians, et al) received harsh scrutiny and demand for more information likely leading to denial.” 

“72. On October 5, 2021, RERC updated the approval/denial criteria adding “Template Responses.” Under “Approved,” is stated, “With at least a basic explanation of faith and its opposition to vaccination, requests based upon the following organized religions should be approved: Christian Scientist, Dutch Reform Church, and Rastafarian.” Also newly added, those who mention “Mark of the Beast” in their request have a lesser burden of explanation. Under “Denied” — “… Catholics, Christianity, Judaism, Muslim, Buddhism …” would be denied without elaborated explanation. Also added under “Denied” — anyone writing that “the vaccine will modify one’s DNA” or “the vaccine will prevent future reproduction.” 

Remember, rhetoric is always much more convincing than dialectic when dealing with NPCs, particularly NPCs on a mission of some kind. For example, which statement do you think is going to be more effective in convincing a die-hard Democrat with Trump Derangement System to shut the hell up and avoid talking politics with you after she asks a leading question about what you think of Drumpf.

  • Well, I don’t agree everything the President is doing, but I think he’s, you know, doing some good things. I mean, you have to admit he’s uncovered a lot of government waste!
  • You mean the God-Emperor? I love the God-Emperor! 3,500 more years!

Notice that both appeals to Christianity and science were rejected, whereas merely mentioning “Mark of the Beast” was met with approval. Why? Because the rhetorical message sent by the latter indicated that the individual was a) not inclined to cave, b) serious about their beliefs, c) a hard out.

Never attempt to moderate or be circumspect about your sincerely-held beliefs. And remember, no one is more contemptuous of the lukewarm than God.

DISCUSS ON SG

Vaxx-Altered Behavior

I have to admit, I haven’t seen anything like this myself. But then, most of the people to whom I am closest never got vaxxed, or got the bare minimum. And how does one distinguish it from the quotidian retardery?

Leading researchers in South Korea confirmed that the injections are altering human behavior.

The troubling study found that people’s emotions, personalities, feelings, fears, stress levels, mental well-being, and general outlook changed after they were injected with the “vaccine.”

The peer-reviewed study, which included over 2 million participants, was published in the renowned Nature Journal.

The study was led by Professor Hong Jin Kim of the Department of Orthopedic Surgery at Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital and the College of Medicine at Inje University in Seoul, Republic of Korea.

The researchers confirmed that the Covid injections are responsible for increasing global reports of major personality and behavioral changes in people in the last four years.

They explain that the “vaccines” cause “psychiatric manifestations” among the vaccinated.

The study found that these psychiatric changes resulted in spikes in mental health disorders.

Patients described feelings of inner turmoil, fear, dread, and depression.

The study found that Covid shots triggered a 68.3% spike in depression, a 43.9% increase in anxiety disorders, and a 93.4% surge in sleep disorders.

One hopes there isn’t, as several priests have suggested, a spiritual component to all of this.

DISCUSS ON SG

Gender Discrepancy in Cancer

British women under 50 are around 70 per cent more likely to develop cancer than men of a similar age, worrying data has revealed. A similar pattern has emerged in the US, with women under 50 now 82 per cent higher than men of the same age — compared to a difference of 51 per cent two decades a go. The gender discrepancy comes amid a soaring rise in disease among young people on both sides of the atlantic, with global cases of cancer in the under 50s rising by 79 per cent since the 1990s.

It’s not a mystery.

  1. Women are more likely to have taken the Vaxx.
  2. Women are more likely to be overweight.
  3. Women take far more medications.

Not all cancers are caused by lifestyle, but an awful lot of them are caused by putting things in your body that you shouldn’t. If it’s not Vitamin C or Vitamin D, don’t put it in your body unless you absolutely have to do so.

DISCUSS ON SG

95 Percent Vaccinated Deaths

They could lie to you, gaslight you, and coerce you. They could disemploy you, and threaten you, and turn your friends and family against you. They could do everything but hide the bodies.

Official data released by the UK government has exposed an alarming explosion of deaths that only impacted people who received Covid mRNA “vaccines.” The data shows that the vaccinated population suffered a huge surge in deaths compared to the unvaccinated.

In the UK, approximately 30 percent of the population has never received a dose of the Covid “vaccine.” According to the UKHSA’s figures, 63.4 million people were eligible for vaccination at that point. 34 percent were not double vaccinated, and 50 percent were not triple vaccinated.

However, the vaccinated population accounted for 95 percent of all COVID-19 deaths between January and May 2023.

The unvaccinated population, meanwhile, accounted for just five percent of Covid deaths.

The vast majority of the deaths are among those vaccinated four times. This quad-vaxxed population accounts for 80 percent of all COVID-19 deaths, and 83 percent of all Covid deaths among the vaccinated.

DISCUSS ON SG