Tag: health care

The NFL and CTE

It’s not looking great for ex-football players:

A new study from The BMJ finds that at least 24.5 percent of all former NFL players who died between 2016 and 2021 had CTE. Of the 878 who died during that period, at least 215 had CTE. Of the remaining 663, 643 of the players’ brains were not studied for the presence of CTE. Which means that the real percentage could be much higher.

It almost certainly is. A friend of mine married, and eventually divorced, a former college football player whose personality and behavior changed drastically over time. She suspects that he’s got CTE, but of course there is no way of knowing for sure until he dies. I wouldn’t be at all surprised if it turns out that more than half of the former NFL players had it.

It’s a violent game. And the players should be given every opportunity to know what they’re getting into.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Manufacture of Alzheimer’s

Pre-Covid, it was very hard to believe that the entire medical establishment was actually trying to kill people. Now that 75 percent of the population has been injected with heart attack and turbo cancer machines due to a man-made disease that never threatened the vast majority of the population, people are starting to look a little harder at other serious medical issues:

DOCTORS ARE LITERALLY MANUFACTURING ALZHEIMER’S

Dr. Joel Wallach: “Alzheimer’s is a PHYSICIAN-CAUSED disease.”

Your brain is 75% myelin insulation. And myelin is 100% cholesterol.

Statins shred that cholesterol — stealing 75% of what your brain desperately needs to stay insulated and functional.

No myelin = no brain. That’s why Alzheimer’s went from virtually unknown to the 4th leading killer over age 65.

They told you to lower your cholesterol…while your brain was starving for it.

This isn’t “aging.” This is medical malpractice on a massive scale.

This observation is just anecdotal, but I only know three people in the two previous generations who had some form of dementia before they died. However, all three of them were on statins…

At this point, you couldn’t pay me to take any medication or prescription that doesn’t have an immediate, obvious, and observably beneficial effect. No matter what the numbers on the printout say.

DISCUSS ON SG

Skip the Sunscreen

Another lesson in what trusting the science and the media gets you:

The LARGEST sunscreen-skin cancer study EVER conducted found sunscreen users faced FAR higher risks of EVERY major skin cancer.

  • INVASIVE MELANOMA: +292%
  • MELANOMA IN SITU: +258%
  • BASAL CELL CARCINOMA: +140%
  • SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA: +126%

Large increases in all major skin cancers can NOT be explained away by the “sunscreen paradox” given that lab tests found BENZENE, a known human CARCINOGEN, in 27% of sunscreen products tested.

Slathering rapidly absorbed carcinogens all over your body will unsurprisingly raise skin cancer risk.

At this point, your best bet is to ignore absolutely everything the media reports that The Science is recommending. Some of us can still remember when microwaving carbohydrates in margarine, then going outside covered in sunscreen was optimizing your health.

DISCUSS ON SG

Distrust the Science

A partial chronicle of how trusting the science will reliably kill you.

If you trusted “settled science” throughout history, you’d have:

  • Taken heroin for your child’s cough (1890s)
  • Had your healthy teeth pulled to cure mental illness (1910s)
  • Drunk radioactive water for vitality (1920s)
  • Smoked cigarettes for your throat, on doctor’s orders (1940s)
  • Eaten lead paint chips as a calcium supplement (1940s)
  • Lobotomised your sister for being unhappy (1940s)
  • Sprayed DDT on the children in the playground (1950s)
  • Used asbestos to insulate your child’s bedroom (1950s)
  • Taken thalidomide for morning sickness (1960s)
  • Eaten margarine for your heart (1970s)
  • Avoided all fat and eaten carbohydrates to lose weight (1990s)
  • Replaced butter with trans-fat spreads on the doctor’s recommendation (1990s)

Every generation has its medical catastrophe dressed up as health advice. Endorsed by the experts. Printed in the textbooks. Recommended by your doctor. Featured on the front of the magazines in the waiting room. Future generations will look back in horror. Just like we look back at radioactive tonics and cigarette prescriptions and wonder how anyone fell for it.

Now we are told to take statins, vaccinate our children, inject experimental RNA-modifying spike protein factories into our bodies, avoid nicotine and alcohol, and cure cancer with chemotherapy.

One guess how the probabilities are going to turn out over time. Never forget that peer-reviewed published science from reputable journals has proven to be less reliable than a coin toss.

DISTRUST THE SCIENCE. Because scientists and doctors are not only fallible, but their primary incentives are intrinsically corrupt.

Remember, we have a word for science that is reliable. And that word is “engineering”.

DISCUSS ON SG

The End of the COVID Psy/Op

Unfortunately, the damage has been done to a significant percentage of the human race:

Two of the major pharmaceutical companies connected with the controversial COVID vaccines were forced to abandon a new research study after failing to garner enough participants. Pfizer and German vax maker BioNTech had sought to research an updated version of the vaccine in adults ages 50 to 64, but were unable to generate the data needed due to the low enrollment in the trials, Reuters reported.

The study was needed in order to meet new guidelines imposed by the Food and Drug Administration that require the pharmaceutical companies to provide data on the efficacy of the vaccine in comparison with a placebo.

Jeffrey Tucker, president of the Brownstone Institute said the recent fizzling of Pfizer offered a long-awaited dose of poetic justice: “Essentially, the market itself is taking the Covid shots off the market. It amounts to a humiliating repudiation of one of history’s largest and most destructive inoculation attempts. A fitting end to a hideous story.“

One hopes that people have learned their lesson. The next time the global satanists announce a terrible problem and miraculously provides the solution to it – and they will – don’t believe them and don’t go along with it.

It’s really not that hard to know who the bad guys are if you refuse to be blinded by media-manufactured fear.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Dancing Nurses of Covid-19

I never understood what purpose those stupid dancing nurse videos were supposed to serve, nor did I realize how prevalent they were since I wasn’t on Twitter, Tik-tok, or Facebook. But since I was personally acquainted with two nurses during that time, I was aware that they were nonsense and that real nurses working in real hospitals weren’t wasting their time learning choreographed dance routines and performing them for the purposes of their own morale.

Dancing nurses were never about the morale of healthcare workers or stress relief. They were a test, a sorting mechanism, revealing who would accept the contradictions and who would resist them. These videos on TikTok, which appeared simultaneously across all continents while governments declared medical emergencies, represented something unprecedented in the history of propaganda: the authorities showed that they could make populations accept two mutually exclusive realities at the same time.

What we witnessed was not traditional propaganda aimed at persuasion, but something more akin to what abuse experts recognize as gaslighting on a large scale. The psychological mechanism was elegant in its cruelty: it presented citizens with an apparent contradiction—hospitals that were both overcrowded and empty enough for choreographed routines—and then punished them socially for noticing it. Those who pointed out the inconsistency were labeled “conspiracy theorists,” while those who defended the videos unwittingly became pawns in the operation.

This essay explores how this technique fits into the broader context of psychological warfare described by researchers from Paul Linebarger to Michael Hoffman, from Peter Pomerantsev to Annalee Newitz. It examines how the “revelation of the method“ — which shows the audience the manipulation while remaining powerless to resist it — serves to discourage and fragment resistance.

The dancing-nurses were a test for the distortion of reality. Once populations accepted this initial contradiction, they were prepared for more: masks that worked, except when they didn’t, vaccines that prevented transmission until they stopped preventing it, two weeks to “flatten the curve” that ended up being two years. Each accepted absurdity weakened the public’s ability to trust their own observations.

Almost four years later, we can see how this enterprise created precedents that persist. The infrastructure of cognitive control—digital identity systems, social credit mechanisms, curation of reality through algorithmic manipulation—continues to expand…

This technique seems to draw inspiration from what Michael Hoffman calls “method disclosure“ — the practice of cryptocracy revealing its activities in plain sight, knowing that public inaction in the face of such a revelation produces a discouraging effect. The message becomes: “We can show you the contradiction between our words and our actions, and you will do nothing. You will accept both the lie and the evidence of it.” It is a form of ritual humiliation that works not through concealment, but through unabashed display.

The dancing nurses were not trying to convince anyone that the hospitals were functioning normally—they were trying to show that the authorities could make citizens accept two mutually exclusive realities at the same time. It was not simply a matter of controlling information; it was about breaking the public’s trust in their perception of reality.

The lesson of Clown World is this: if it doesn’t make sense, then it is definitely fake and probably gay.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Vaxx’s 5X Kill Effect

A massive Japanese study has revealed some very informative details about the short- and medium-term effects of the vaxx.

Dr. Murakami’s conclusion was blunt: “…the more doses you get, the sooner you’re likely to die, within a shorter period…”

According to Dr. Murakami, there was no noticeable spike in deaths among the unvaccinated. But among the vaccinated, a clear peak emerged—especially between 90 and 120 days after the shot. “A significant peak forms at three or four months,” he said, pointing to the vaccine as the likely cause. “It’s probably due to the vaccine’s influence, with adverse reactions occurring leading to death.”

The first graph compared death rates between vaccinated and unvaccinated groups.

Then came a graph that was impossible to ignore. It showed a clear pattern: the more vaccine doses a person received, the sooner they died after their final shot. The title translates to: “Number of days from final vaccination to death and number of deaths.” The note on the right reads: “As the number of vaccine doses increases, the peak in deaths appears sooner.”

Each line represents people grouped by the final dose they received before death. In other words, those counted under the third dose curve had received three shots and died before receiving a fourth. What stood out most was the steep green spike representing deaths after the third dose. Not only was it the highest, but it also appeared earlier, around 90 to 120 days. The trend held across the board: as the number of doses increased, the peak of death consistently moved closer to the time of the last injection.

Now, the good news is that it appears that the death rates for the vaxxed return to normal after a period of 10 months after their last shot. It’s also clear that those who only ever received a single shot are considerably better off than those who received more, as their death rates returned to normal within just two months.

How then to account for the continued rise in deaths from rare turbo cancers, strokes, and heart attacks? Well, the death rates are still observably much higher than normal even 16 months after the fifth or sixth shot, so presumably these deaths are largely accounted for among the heavily boosted.

But this is much better news than I’d expected at this point, although it must be cautioned that the Japanese public did not receive exactly the same mRNA therapies that other nations did, so there is likely to be at least a modest amount of variance from one country to another. The point is that risks appear to be decreasing rather than increasing over time with regards to reductions in life expectancy.

This doesn’t mean we’re entirely out of the woods yet, however, as what I always considered to be the more insidious angle, the fertility angle, is showing some signs that the suppressive effect of the vaxx is lingering much longer. We’ll look at those adverse effects another time.

DISCUSS ON SG

Vampires Hardest Hit

And suddenly, just like that, we all became de facto Jehovah’s Witnesses:

Dr. Ben Marble: “We need to quit accepting blood from people who took the poison. The entire blood supply in America, and basically the whole world, is contaminated with the spike protein poison bioweapon. We’re seeing patients that get blood transfusions that are unvaccinated, and suddenly they get blood clots or have heart attacks or strokes.”

I was concerned about the likelihood of this, and unlike some of our previously unfounded concerns, such as Case Nightmare Kitty, this one appears to pose a legitimate crisis.

DISCUSS ON SG

World Health = Converged Population

“The World Health Organization is about as interested in world health as the arms industry is interested in world peace.” – Christine Anderson, Member of the European Parliament

She’s not wrong. Note that like all converged Clown World institutions, the WHO subverts the very definition of health.

The WHO’s purpose is to achieve the highest possible level of health for all the world’s people, defining health as “a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity.”

Sounds familiar, doesn’t it. It echoes John Stuart Mill’s concept of universal forced global convergence, and redefines human health as comprehensive “state of being” that meets with the approval of the organization’s evil masters. And every human possessing a state of being that doesn’t meet with that approval is supposed to be removed from the population.

However, it’s the organization and its masters that are now being removed. The mass vaxxing of the world may not have been its last desperate attempt, but it was likely one of the last ones it will be able to muster.

DISCUSS ON SG

A Tragic Trust

Smart Boys who love science and trust modern medicine will literally die before they will question their assumptions of who is credible and who is not, as we’re witnessing in real-time with Scott Adams:

Scott’s story is tragic. He has been repeatedly betrayed by Modern Medicine.

Let me explain.

Scott took COVID-19 Vaccines. He trusted his doctors who would have assured him they were “Safe and Effective”. You can count that as a life-changing betrayal.

Since then, Scott has made it very clear that those who didn’t take the COVID-19 Vaccines made the right choice and didn’t have to worry about impacts of the jabs on their health. It is probable that he suffered bodily injury as a result of the jabs.

Scott was then betrayed by his Oncologists. It is clear that his Prostate Cancer was not treated properly. Prostate Cancer patients can live many years, even decades without progression, with the proper Cancer Treatment.

I don’t know what Prostate Cancer treatments Scott took, who his Oncologists were or which Cancer Center he was treated at. But they failed to stop Scott’s cancer from progressing rapidly to a “terminal stage” in a short period of time.

In addition to failing to treat his cancer properly, Scott’s Oncologist lied to him, repeatedly.

First, he told Scott that Ivermectin wouldn’t work, even though he had no way to know whether it would or wouldn’t.

Second, he told Scott that he had 0% chance of survival and would die shortly.

I wish Scott had told us the name of his Oncologist, and the name of the Cancer Center he was treated at, so that other Cancer patients could avoid them and save themselves from harm. Unfortunately, he hasn’t given us these names.

Instead, he has given the world my name, for reasons I don’t understand.

I have never been Scott’s doctor. I was his Health Coach, very briefly. Our Health Coaching relationship lasted 1.5 months, at which point Scott left.

Scott supposedly tried Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, for a total of 1 month.

Scott never completed my Ivermectin Protocol, which is a minimum of 3 months with follow-up blood work and imaging. So we will never know if Ivermectin and Fenbendazole would have worked for him or not. Trying it for one month and then stopping, is not sufficient to make any sort of conclusion.

It is the equivalent of doing one chemo cycle, stopping and declaring chemo doesn’t work.

It takes approximately 3 months to see significant changes on blood cancer markers and imaging. During that time, PSA may go up due to cancer cell killing and release of cancer antigens.

What is both tragic and stupid is the way in which Scott simply refuses to question any step in his headlong, self-imposed failure cascade. But instead of stopping, taking a look around, and assessing exactly how he has put himself in his present position, Scott insists on doubling down, then doubling down again.

It’s neither honest nor rational behavior. If he was honest, Scott would have identified everyone as well as his specific treatment protocols. If he was rational, he would have given the alternative treatment a fair shot; he is literally treating himself with less care than Spacebunny has successfully treated one of our dogs. The fact that he continues to act as a gatekeeper in the medical context despite his condition is sufficient to render his situation entirely unsympathetic.

Their trust is not only tragic, it is woefully misplaced.

DISCUSS ON SG