Tag: vaccines

Third Time’s the Charm

A dark and disturbing interpretation of the German omicron data:

In Germany 70.53% are fully vaxxed, 2.97% are partially vaxxed and 26.5% unvaxxed.

So unvaxxed have 186 cases out of 26.5% of the population
Fully vaxxed have 4020 cases out of 70.53% of the population.

So the vaxxed Omicron case incidence is 57.0 per percent of population (830,000 is 1% of the 83 million German population) And the unvaxxed Omicron case incidence is 7.02 per percent of population.

So the vaxxed are 57.0/7.02 = 8.12x more likely to be infected with Omicron than the unvaxxed in Germany That is what vaccination has done for the people of Germany.

The Koch Institut failed to produce its normal vaccine effectiveness table in its December 30 weekly report. This may have been due to the holidays or may have been because the table would be disastrous for the vaccines. But we can help the Germans out here by doing the calculation for them using Pfizer’s vaccine effectiveness formula.

Vaccine effectiveness = immune system effectiveness = (1-8.12)/8.12 = -7.12/8.12 = -87.7%.

So the vaccinated have an 87.7% lower immune response than the unvaccinated have to Omicron.

This means that the average German is down to the last 12.3% of his or her immune system for fighting certain classes of viruses and certain cancers etc. etc.

Here is the prediction, the extrapolation from UKHSA Vaccine Surveillance Report data from Weeks 35-42 that we first made on October 10th. The predicted figures are in olive green.

So Germany, at 87.7% immune system degradation, has done 6.7% worse than our model which predicted, an 81.0% degradation this year.

One can’t call this a prediction because it concerns events that have already taken place. And it can’t be ignored that the data is in line – in fact, it is even worse – than the previous extrapolation indicated. So, the best-case scenario is that the Pfizer vaccine effectiveness formula is nonsense. And, considering that it is a Big Pharma model utilized to sell vaccines, there is a reasonable probability that the formula is more or less irrelevant to the actual state of the human immune system.

But if it isn’t nonsense, then things could be looking rather grim indeed for those foolish enough to have submitted to a third or even fourth vaccination.

DISCUSS ON SG

Vaxx is Murder

A series of autopsies reveals that the Covid !vaccines are killing considerably more people than the current medical records indicate:

The vaccines are bad news. Fifteen bodies were examined (all died from 7 days to 6 months after vaccination; ages 28 to 95). The coroner or the public prosecutor didn’t associate the vaccine as the cause of death in any of the cases. However, further examination revealed that the vaccine was implicated in the deaths of 14 of the 15 cases. The most attacked organ was the heart (in all of the people who died), but other organs were attacked as well. The implications are potentially enormous resulting in millions of deaths. The vaccines should be immediately halted.

If the autopsy findings are confirmed by other pathologists with additional samples, and if they are combined with the findings of Dr. Hoffe (>60% inoculant recipients have elevated D-dimer tests and evidence of clotting) and Dr. Cole (increase in cancers after inoculation, including twenty-fold increase in uterine cancer), we are seeing a disaster of unimaginable proportions. The conclusion (if supported by further data) is that essentially EVERY inoculant recipient suffers damage, with more damage after each shot. Given the seriousness of the types of damage (autoimmune diseases, cancer, re-emergent dormant infections, clotting/strokes, cardiac damage, etc.), these effects will translate into lifespan reduction, which should be counted as deaths from the inoculations.

This makes a considerable amount of sense, given the way that the depopulationists faced the same dichotomy as a virus does: how do you kill a sufficient amount of people without alerting them to the danger quickly enough for them to avoid it?

The vaccines couldn’t inspire an immediate Ebola-like reaction, or no one would permit themselves to be injected. On the other hand, if the vaccines were as harmless as the common cold, they would not serve the depopulationist agenda. That’s why I suspected, from the start, that they would target human fertility in some manner, as it would take years before the adverse effects would be sufficiently recognized by the public.

However, the evidence being presented by the Bhakdi/Burkhardt pathology results shows a plan that is very nearly as insidious as a fertility-targeted attack. Instead of triggering lethal results among a reasonably small percentage of the population, the !vaxx is designed to reverse the recent advances in life expectancy. This lifespan-reduction approach is also much less disruptive and more efficient than the fertility-targeting approach, because it specifically targets the removal of the least productive and most expensive segment of the population, the elderly.

Lifespan reduction is also less dangerous to the depopulationists, as it’s easier to explain away a general decline in life expectancy than a massive increase in stillbirths and sterility, and perhaps more importantly, avoids infuriating tens of millions of young men and women in their twenties and thirties who are in their physical prime.

DISCUSS ON SG

Scott Adams Doubles Down Again

If you ever wanted to know how far a Gamma will go to avoid admitting that he was wrong despite conclusive evidence that he was wrong from the start, just review the Scott Adams post-vaccination rationalization dance. And as an economist, it’s fascinating to see him argue that making a logical assessment based on the known probabilities is not “a rational decision”. DISCUSS ON SG

The Pandemic of the Vaccinated

They have been repeatedly caught lying to you before. They will absolutely lie to you again. Don’t trust a single “fact” that is presented to you by a) the government, b) the media, or c) the medical community. Ever.

I’ve just had this news in from a Maidstone hospital consultant surgeon.

There are currently 45 people in Maidstone hospital with COVID. They are listed as half unvaccinated and half vaccinated. A 50/50 split.

But here is the realty of what I’ve been informed.

50% have had two jabs and the booster. The other 50% have had two jabs and no booster but have been marked down as unvaccinated!

Do not believe a word the government and their supporting corporations say. Not one person completely unvaccinated is in Maidstone hospital.

It was obvious that they were going to try to pull this sort of thing from the moment they introduced the “fully-vaccinated” language, because deceivers rely heavily upon the manipulation of definitions. Both “fully-vaccinated” and “unvaccinated” are moving targets, so don’t take any news report using either term at face value.

Omicron is the pandemic of the vaccinated.

DISCUSS ON SG

Enhancing Your Vaccine Experience

Omicron isn’t the problem. Vaccine-Enhanced Infection is now the problem.

Worried about Omicron? Guess what? After 90 days, the vaccine they gave you is going to make you MORE likely to get infected from Omicron, not less. The longer you stay on the vaccine treadmill, the harder to get off in the future and the easier you’ll make it for the virus.

In short, we’ve been lied to about the vaccine. It is protecting you less and less over time. While you may get a benefit for earlier benefits, the benefit for other variants (and likely other diseases) is going to be negative. In short, you are getting a short term benefit against Delta, but at the expense of a degradation of your overall immunity to everything else.

In short, these vaccines may help you win the war against a variant that may soon be rate, but the price you pay is that you make your immunity to everything else worse…. This paper means we will need to inject people every 30 days if we want to “protect” them. Based on the harm that the vaccines do to our immune system, it’s likely that the needed interval will shorten with each booster.

If people don’t get boosted as required, they will be MORE vulnerable to Delta and Omicron than if they weren’t vaccinated. That’s what NEGATIVE vaccine efficacy means. It doesn’t mean the protection wears off (like we were told). It means the OPPOSITE of what you were told: it means the vaccines helps the virus to infect you (by suppressing your immune system, probably permanently each time we are injected according to Dr. Ryan Cole).

It means we were lied to.

Forget “unsafe and ineffective”. Forget “one jab and everything gets back to normal”. The vaccines are now observably “unsafe, dangerous, and quarterly”. And vaccines as a service are going to work about as well for its users as software as a service has. Look at it this way: do you want your immune system being managed by the same sort of people who manage The Cloud?”

DISCUSS ON SG

If At First You Don’t Succeed

Jab and jab again!

Britain is considering giving out fourth Covid vaccines in a bid to stop the surge of Omicron cases, following the lead of Germany and Israel.

The rollout of a second set of boosters is being examined by experts on the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI). They will weigh up the levels of immunity granted by the extra jab as well as hospitalisation figures, The Telegraph reported.

Those with weakened immune systems are already entitled to a fourth jab but the elderly and other vulnerable groups could soon be included. The fourth jab would likely come four months after the third if it gets the green light and could be available in the new year.

Professor Anthony Harnden, deputy chair of the JCVI, said: ‘We need to see more data. We are in different circumstances to Israel and we need to see more data on waning immunity and vaccine effectiveness against hospitalisation.’ An Israeli health expert, who is sharing findings with the UK, said they are already seeing waning immunity from the third jab, prompting the extra round of vaccinations.

What sort of “safe and effective” vaccine needs to be injected four times in a single calendar year in order to not prevent people from being infected with the disease being “prevented”? If, at this point, you submit to a FOURTH injection, you’re officially retarded. And that’s without even taking into account the subsequent effects of the vaccine-caused microclotting on your brain.

DISCUSS ON SG

Americans Have Had Enough

No more boosting, bro:

CDC has ranked states based on Covid-19 booster rate. This is the number of “fully vaccinated” residents who have also gotten a booster.

No state has reached close to half of its vaccinated residents getting the extra recommended shot.

Vermont tops them all with 44.9% of “fully vaccinated” also getting a booster.

Next are Minnesota, Wisconsin and Iowa.

At the bottom are West Virginia, Hawaii and New Hampshire. New Hampshire has just 9.8% of fully vaccinated residents choosing to get a booster, so far.

It’s obviously better to have never submitted to the vaccine regime. But purebloods should enthusiastically help those who are determined, however belatedly, to get off the depopulationist vaxxicoaster.

DISCUSS ON SG

Austrian Inversion

There is no ADE! There is no VEI! In fact, scientists say that being twice-vaccinated and infected is the best protection against the common cold! And papercuts!

People who are unjabbed but previously had the Delta Covid variant may have very little protection against Omicron infection, a lab study suggests.

Austrian scientists tested the blood of those who had beat the older strain of the virus against the new super-variant to measure their antibody response.

They found only one out of seven samples produced enough of the infection-fighting proteins to neutralise Omicron.

It suggests that prior infection from Delta alone offers virtually no protection against catching Omicron — but the jury’s still out on severe illness.

Antibody studies look at one very specific part of the immune response to Covid and do not take into account T cell and B cell immunity, which are vital for protection against severe disease but more difficult to measure.

Most scientists believe people who have had Covid still enjoy some protection against serious outcomes, but immunity is known to wane significantly after six months.

The latest study, by the Medical University of Innsbruck, found that if Delta survivors go on to get a vaccine they become ‘super-immune’, even against infection.

British experts reacting to the study said it highlighted the importance of getting a booster jab. The findings appear at odds with the low severity of cases in South Africa, which first alerted the world to Omicron.

South Africa’s epidemic already seems to have peaked with just 370 daily hospital admissions on average despite only a quarter of the population being vaccinated.

We’re WAY beyond incompetence at this point. We’re past the point of simple lies now too. The Fake Science we’re supposed to trust is now literally inverting observable reality. What this “super-immunity” of post-infection vaccine actually does is strip the body of the immunity conveyed by the natural antibodies, as the vaccines have been observed the body’s ability to build “N” protein recognition – while generally weakening the immune system overall.

DISCUSS ON SG

Hospitals as Hit Men

In his pre-Christmas letter, Archbishop Vigano referred to “the deliberately wrong treatments that have been given in order to cause more deaths.” And as I pointed out on last night’s Darkstream, one can no more expect a hospital, once converged, to perform its primary mission of saving human lives than one can reasonably expect a converged university to provide its primary mission of providing higher education.

Upon admission to a once-trusted hospital, American patients with COVID-19 become virtual prisoners, subjected to a rigid treatment protocol with roots in Ezekiel Emanuel’s “Complete Lives System” for rationing medical care in those over age 50. They have a shockingly high mortality rate. How and why is this happening, and what can be done about it?

As exposed in audio recordings, hospital executives in Arizona admitted meeting several times a week to lower standards of care, with coordinated restrictions on visitation rights. Most COVID-19 patients’ families are deliberately kept in the dark about what is really being done to their loved ones.

The combination that enables this tragic and avoidable loss of hundreds of thousands of lives includes (1) The CARES Act, which provides hospitals with bonus incentive payments for all things related to COVID-19 (testing, diagnosing, admitting to hospital, use of remdesivir and ventilators, reporting COVID-19 deaths, and vaccinations) and (2) waivers of customary and long-standing patient rights by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

In 2020, the Texas Hospital Association submitted requests for waivers to CMS. According to Texas attorney Jerri Ward, “CMS has granted ‘waivers’ of federal law regarding patient rights. Specifically, CMS purports to allow hospitals to violate the rights of patients or their surrogates with regard to medical record access, to have patient visitation, and to be free from seclusion.” She notes that “rights do not come from the hospital or CMS and cannot be waived, as that is the antithesis of a ‘right.’ The purported waivers are meant to isolate and gain total control over the patient and to deny patient and patient’s decision-maker the ability to exercise informed consent.”

Creating a “National Pandemic Emergency” provided justification for such sweeping actions that override individual physician medical decision-making and patients’ rights. The CARES Act provides incentives for hospitals to use treatments dictated solely by the federal government under the auspices of the NIH. These “bounties” must paid back if not “earned” by making the COVID-19 diagnosis and following the COVID-19 protocol.

The hospital payments include:

A “free” required PCR test in the Emergency Room or upon admission for every patient, with government-paid fee to hospital.
Added bonus payment for each positive COVID-19 diagnosis.
Another bonus for a COVID-19 admission to the hospital.
A 20 percent “boost” bonus payment from Medicare on the entire hospital bill for use of remdesivir instead of medicines such as Ivermectin.
Another and larger bonus payment to the hospital if a COVID-19 patient is mechanically ventilated.
More money to the hospital if cause of death is listed as COVID-19, even if patient did not die directly of COVID-19.

There was no “Covid pandemic” per se. What actually happened was the deliberate weaponization of cold and flu season, made to look more lethal than normal by the intentional euthanization of elderly patients in hospitals and nursing homes. This isn’t a “conspiracy theory”, it is a fully-substantiated, copiously-documented observation that you yourself witnessed in real time.

The bonus for the remdesivir protocol is particularly damning. An experimental drug for Ebola that killed a substantial percentage of its test subjects is obviously not a reasonable treatment for a virus that doesn’t kill 99.98 percent of the patients infected.

The Ebola virus spreads through direct contact with broken skin or mucous membranes in the eyes, nose, or mouth. The World Health Organization estimates that the virus kills about half of the people who contract it…. After results from the first 499 participants had been reviewed, the trial’s safety monitors recommended that two drugs—ZMapp and remdesivir—be dropped from the remainder of the trial. These two drugs were much less effective at preventing death.

Note that 51.3 percent of the patients who received ZMapp and remdesivir died, compared to 49.7 percent of those who received only ZMapp.

DISCUSS ON SG