New York City refuses to respect the Hollywood values of Harvey Weinstein:
Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., today announced the filing of a superseding indictment containing additional charges against HARVEY WEINSTEIN, 66. Pursuant to the D.A.’s Office’s ongoing investigation, the Grand Jury has charged WEINSTEIN with an additional count of Criminal Sexual Act in the First Degree for a forcible sexual act against a third woman in 2006, as well as two counts of Predatory Sexual Assault, a Class A-II felony which carries a minimum sentence of 10 years and a maximum sentence of life imprisonment. [1]
The new charges are in addition to those contained in the previous indictment of WEINSTEIN on charges of Rape in the First and Third Degrees, as well as Criminal Sexual Act in the First Degree, for forcible sexual acts against two women in 2013 and 2004, respectively.
What we have to recognize when we’re talking about the Right is that the ideology that hitherto was the leading expression of right-wing politics in the United States, the conservative movement, is effectively dead. Donald Trump killed it.
And it’s not so much that Donald Trump killed it as he exposed the fact that it was an ideological zombie vampire, and the dates 1951 to 2016 that you see on the tombstone date from that first famous book of William F Buckley, the founder of the modern conservative movement, and its end with the presidential election of 2016. Because the legacy of conservativism is this: it never conserved anything! And that is the most damning thing that you can say about all the conservative organizations, all the conservative opinion leaders all the various Republican groups, all that kind of stuff, all of it was a failure. None of it conserved anything.
Conservatives couldn’t even conserve the ladies room. This is an illustration of how badly how completely the conservative movement has failed, and if you talk to a conservative, they love to talk about the Constitution, and yet what they always ignore is the purpose of the Constitution. We have seen that the Constitution has completely and utterly failed in its purpose, a purpose that is stated very clearly in the Preamble. The Preamble states that the purpose of the Constitution is to defend the rights of American posterity, and what “posterity” means is the direct genetic descendants of the people who established the country in 1789.
It does not refer to immigrants, it does not refer to refugees, it does not refer to the descendants of those immigrants who came over much later. You know, this is something that I got in some very intense discussions and arguments with various conservatives(1) who are genuinely good people, genuinely smart people, but they are entirely unable to wrap their heads around the fact that their friends, their family members, people they like, people they approve of, are not and never will be American posterity, and that the Constitution was not written for those people. It wasn’t. This is a basic fact, this is an established fact, and the amount of intellectual dishonesty and self-deception that one has to engage in in order to deny the very clear meaning of these words is rather remarkable.
So you know, now we see the same concept being expanded further and further, and what’s funny about conservatives is that while at the one hand they push away and they deny the actual historical meaning of various concepts, they also try to deny the obvious consequences of their own positions. You know, if you’re running around saying that because all men are created equal that 19th century immigrants therefore equal and their descendants therefore qualify as American posterity, then you cannot deny the position of Iranian president Ahmadinejad who says that America belongs to all the world and that the American government does not have any right or any ability to deny the movement of people into the United States of America. That is the absolutely correct logical conclusion to the conservative argument.
(1) In the public sense, this primarily refers to my debate on Posterity with Tom Kratman. If you take issue with any of my assertions here, I strongly recommend that you read it first before commenting on this issue.
What intellectuals don’t get about MIGRATION is the ethical notion of SYMMETRY: OPEN BORDERS work if and only if the number of pple who want to go from EU/US to Africa/LatinAmer equals Africans/Latin Amer who want to move to EU/US. Silver Rule in #SkinInTheGame Gabish?
Controlled immigration is based on the symmetry that someone brings in at least as much as he/she gets out. And the ethics of the immigrant is to defend the system as payback, not mess it up. Uncontrolled immigration has all the attributes of invasions.
As a Christian Lebanese, saw the nightmare of uncontrolled immigration of Palestinians which caused the the civil war. & as a part-time resident of N. Lebanon, I am seeing the effect of Syrian migration on the place. So I despise these virtue-signaling open-borders imbeciles.
Pat Buchanan observes that the Fourth Wave immigrants are pushing the Second and Third Wave immigrants out of power in the Democratic party.
Just as Crowley’s congressional district had changed, so, too, has his party in Congress. Columnist Dana Milbank, who sees it as progress, writes, “A majority of House Democrats are … women, people of color or gay.” These rising forces in the Democratic coalition are looking to bury the Democratic Party of yesterday, where white males and older ethnic groups — Irish, Italians, Poles and Jews — were dominant.
Ask yourself this: why were those older ethnic groups dominant in the Democratic Party in the first place? Why, it’s almost as if they were practicing… identity politics? Of course, John Locke described the entire process as well as the debate that surrounds it, right down to the ex post facto rationalizations, back in 1690, in his Second Treatise on Civil Government:
No damage, that men in the state of nature suffer from one another, can give a conqueror power to dispossess the posterity of the vanquished, and turn them out of that inheritance, which ought to be the possession of them and their descendants to all generations. The conqueror indeed will be apt to think himself master: and it is the very condition of the subdued not to be able to dispute their right.
Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has won the Mexican presidential election. Lopez Obrador, better known by his initials AMLO, will be the first candidate from the left-wing political coalition Juntos Haremos Historia to hold the Mexican presidency after Sunday’s election.
A late-night official quick count from electoral authorities forecast that Mr Lopez Obrador would win with between 53 and 53.8 per cent of the vote, a remarkable margin not seen in the country for many years.
His rivals, José Antonio Meade of the long-dominant centrist PRI party and Ricardo Anaya of the center-right PAN, both conceded the election shortly after polls closed.
US President Donald Trump congratulated Lopez Obrador in a tweet late Sunday: ‘Congratulations to Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador on becoming the next President of Mexico. I look very much forward to working with him. There is much to be done that will benefit both the United States and Mexico!’
Lopez Obrador, 64, has fiercely opposed Trump’s policies on immigration, saying it is ‘a human right’ for people around the world to be able to resettle in America.
‘Soon, very soon, after the victory of our movement, we will defend migrants all over the American continent and the migrants of the world who, by necessity, must abandon their towns to find life in the United States; it’s a human right we will defend,’ Lopez Obrador said in a June speech reported by El Universal.
It’s going to be very interesting to see which conservatives finally abandon their ahistorical equalitarian-based civic nationalism and which follow Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador, Moammar Gaddafi, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, and Sarah D’Almeida Hoyt to the logical conclusion that the contemporary United States is not a nation, but rather, an idea that belongs to all nations and that immigration to the USA is a basic human right.
This choice always going to be made. The logic involved was always remorseless and inescapable, all that was required was for events to catch up to it. That’s the core reason for consistent conservative failure; it reliably requires one to defend an illogical and intrinsically untenable position due to its basis in rhetoric rather than science, history, or logic.
And make no mistake, AMLO has a serious mandate for a headlong dive into revolution. His popularity is off the charts.
The 64-year-old former Mexico City mayor won with the widest margin in a presidential election since the 1980s, according to an official quick count that showed him taking more than half the vote — some 30 points ahead of his nearest rival.
Castalia House is extremely pleased to announce thatSUPERLUMINARY: THE WORLD ARMADA by John C. Wright is now available for Kindle and Kindle Unlimited.
Although the Lords of Creation survived the awesome onslaught of the world-killing space vampires, there is nowhere in the lifeless galaxy that they can hope to hide their planets and people forever. How can they hope to destroy what is already dead? The vampiric necroforms are a massive empire of anti-life, terrible beyond all imagining, ruling a vast network of dead stars and planets they have drained of all life. Aeneas, the Emperor of Man, realizes that if the human race is going to survive, he is going to have to find a way to re-seed the entire galaxy with life while burning down the interstellar undead empire with the precious light it cannot bear. And not only does Aeneas have to do the impossible, he is going to have to do it while keeping a wary eye out for the ruthless betrayer at his back. SUPERLUMINARY is the latest and most brilliant creation of science fiction grandmaster John C. Wright, the Dragon-award winning author of THE UNWITHERING REALM, THE GOLDEN AGE, MOTH & COBWEB, and AWAKE IN THE NIGHT LAND. THE WORLD ARMADA is the third and final book in the trilogy. Rather like Awake in the Night Land, you cannot appreciate the full brilliance of Superluminary until you have read the whole thing and see how John C. Wright manages to pull the whole thing together on multiple levels. In my opinion, with Superluminary, John C. Wright firmly establishes himself as the greatest science fiction writer of his generation and one of the all-time greats. It’s the combination of brilliance, originality, and consistency that serves to elevate him beyond the likes of Neal Stephenson and China Mieville, both of whom are indubitably great SF writers, but unlike Mr. Wright, they simply do not manage to scale the literary heights again and again with such magnificent reliability.
I initially thought Superluminary was over-the-top fun, John C. Wright amusing himself by seeing if he could go the notorious Worldkiller one better. Then, when I reached the part about why faster-than-light travel is a very bad idea and why there has been such a mysterious lack of alien contact with the solar system, I realized that it was something deeper and darker than that. But not until finishing THE WORLD ARMADA did I grasp just how uniquely astounding is the work as a whole. And it is not a coincidence that every single one of the 41 reviews for the first two books in the series rate them both 5 stars.
From the earlier reviews:
Grand design space opera turned up to 11! For everyone who liked The Golden Age but thought it might have been just a bit too talky, this has the same over the top world building but starts off with the main character’s assassination…and then things start to get really wild.
What an amazing mind to think up this story (with all its intricate and entangled details) and then make it understandable!
Seriously, WAR DYSONS? I didn’t think he could do it. I didn’t think Mr Wright could take the already delightfully extravagant story begun in The Lords of Creation and make it bigger and wilder…. Oh ye of little faith, how wrong I was.
Spectacular classic space opera. If you know your classical SciFi and loved the family politics of Nine Princes in Amber, the weird super science of The World of Null-A, the immense galactic war of the Lensmen series, then you need to buy and read this book right away.
A reader realizes that his church is politicized, cucked, and anti-Biblical. Time to find a new place of worship:
We’ve been attending a church for some time now that has pretty good doctrinal foundation, but there have been noticeable cracks. I was content to stay for the time being, but today was the last straw. After the worship set, we were subjected to a morbidly obese, unmarried, nose ring-wearing black woman, claiming the title and mantle of a Deacon, taking to the pulpit and instructing us as a congregation to have a time of special prayer on behalf of the children being separated from their families at the southern border. She was sure to say “this is not political”, but then proceeded to levy Deuteronomy 10 in order to emotionally blackmail us, deceitfully using “sojourner” to represent permanent and illegal invaders. The Lord has a heart for these children, of course, and so should we, but the political implications and undertone were clear.
Furthermore, not once have I heard anyone take to the pulpit and ask for a special time of prayer for orphans in our own state or city. Not once have I heard them ask for a special time of prayer for something that substantially affects our own community, such as the opioid epidemic. Not once have I heard them address the severe negative effects that our society has borne (and will bear) due to mass immigration – from crime, physical and career displacement, increased debt/taxes, to the eventual collapse of federal finances due to the increased welfare, etc. No, we had to have a special time of prayer over a mere 2,000 children that might have been temporarily separated from their “parents” as their bullshit asylum claims were adjudicated. It was all I could do to not stand up and confront this shameful display by shouting her down.
The wife and I left immediately after, and are now seeking a new church home, however I have little hope that we would be able to find any American church that will boldly stand up for our own people first. If I were so equipped, I would start one myself. For now, the best I can do is to try and positively influence my family and friends to be aware about what is happening to our civilization, and do what we can to stem the tide.
If Christians would simply do a better job of a) following the clear instructions in the Bible, and, b) policing their institutions and organizations, this mass exodus would not be necessary. But for some reason, welcoming everyone is almost always accorded a higher priority than anything else, despite Paul’s explicit warning about wolves in sheep’s clothing.
The one thing I would recommend to the reader is to not disappear, but be sure he informs the pastor and the board of deacons why his family will not be attending that institution that used to be a church. Any church that has female priests, pastors, or deacons is already dead, I am not aware of a single example of a church that has adopted them that has not subsequently seen a rapid decline in both its teachings and its attendance.
I really, really do. I mean, I understand it is necessary to reach a broader, post-literate audience, and I am committed to mastering the medium eventually, but I genuinely do not understand how these morons can so confidently, and so publicly, take the absurd positions they do.
Κέννυ Αντονέσκου All you seem to do is just say “this won’t work because its not applicable to X” and other statements that you do not back up with logic, reason, evidence, etc. Maybe your brain-dead followers won’t challenge what you are saying but I will, unsubscribing from you because you are obviously a pseudo-intellectual who constantly brags about how you have super high IQ when its clear you are not high IQ.
Perhaps if he was able to read, or obtain material from some other medium, he would understand that I reliably back up my assertions in what is generally considered to be comprehensive detail. He doesn’t seem to be aware that there is considerably more information available beyond that which is presented on YouTube in the Darkstreams.
It’s like someone told these morons that all you have to do is say the magic words and declare that it seems like someone doesn’t back up a statement with logic, reason, and evidence, and this will suffice to not only disprove the statement, but also permanently disqualify the source. He quite clearly doesn’t understand that saying X won’t work because it’s not applicable to Y is, in fact, a logical syllogism. I really wish he was telling the truth about unsubscribing and not watching future videos, but we all know what the chances of that are.
I don’t see the hosts surviving a vastly superior Spanish team, or even keeping it close. As for Croatia vs Denmark, both teams are tough and disciplined, but the Croats have more skill than the Danes.
UPDATE: Holy cow, Russia winning on penalties after holding Spain to 1-1 through extra time. I did NOT see that coming.
A transcript of the Littlest Chickenhawk’s appearance on Bill Maher
chief of the daily wire and host of the nationally syndicated Westwood one radio show and podcast the ben shapiro show ben shapiro i appreciate it i always say this the conservatives will come on our show I’m a little jealous of their guts because they’ve more guts than the liberals liberals don’t go on conservative shows they didn’t come on this show sometimes so I appreciate cuz you know the crowd is not with you I got that impression yeah and but yeah we should but we ran let’s be civil right that’s the tone of the day and I’m the fan okay so I’m a fit well let’s see if I’m a fan see each other’s fan at the end admire but I just want to say we seem to be living in a time of utter tribalism and I think you and I have a few things in common besides we were both uninvited at Berkeley but we’ve been coy about our affiliation of like I’ve never really wanted to say I was a Democrat I always voted Democratic but they disappointed me a lot you know you’ve been coy about a you were Republican you’re conservative or I think right now I’m a Democrat and and since all the Republicans are now backing Trump except for the ones who are leaving but he totally owns that party now if you’re if you’re a conservative aren’t you really team Trump
well it depends on on what so what I’ve called myself is sometimes Trump okay there the people said there’s never Trump and there’s always from sometimes Trump meaning that when he does something that I like I cheer and when he does something that I hate which happens then I boo and I’m blowing as loudly as you are when he does something that’s really bad but listen you’re very upset about the Supreme Court nominee I am very pleased about the Supreme Court nominee as a conservative right he’s doing a lot of things that I like in terms of policy now that doesn’t mean that I am cheering his character because I think that it is very difficult to cheer Donald Trump’s character nor do I think it’s appropriate well what do you like okay so I like the tax cuts I like to tax it hurts me by the way in California but I like it as a general policy
ladies he’s rich. okay okay but see I don’t even know what the Republican beliefs are I mean you’re a young guy but you certainly remember two years back when they were beliefs were completely the opposite of what they are now when it’s free trade they were giant deficit hawks yep the Tea Party was all about we’re gonna solve the deficit but they didn’t did that well the Democrats ain’t can do it either so I know but they didn’t say they were right the Tea Party kept said we have got to get this deficit down this motherfucker has ran up a trillion dollars in six months what what what about Russia they used to be the enemy what about free trade I mean how do you turn on a dime so quickly in a couple of years
I mean obviously it’s been very frustrating to me watch so many Republicans do exactly that I’ve been incredibly critical of Republicans who have suddenly become fans of Vladimir Putin or have suddenly become fans of tariffs I think all of that is idiocy but again I think that with regard to judges with regard to taxes with regard to Middle Eastern policy particularly Iran in Israel I’m much more of a fan of President Trump than I certainly would have been of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama and by the way I didn’t vote for president from the last election because of my concerns about him okay so you would not vote for a Democrat under any circumstance or some circumstance I mean I would say some circumstance but the Democratic Party would have to stop being insane meaning that they would actually have to approach something like moderation in terms of policy and also present a face that doesn’t look like people shouting down people at gas stations or entering restaurants and trying to throw them out okay well if you’re talking about the civility thing why don’t we start with the Republicans stop saying lock her up you don’t think that’s a worse a bridge winter just lock her up he talked about locking co me up he talks about locking journalists up there’s a guy who said locked tim kaine up how about we stop the lock them up shouldn’t disability arguments start there before we care about who gets their entree well it isn’t just about who gets their entree I’m not gonna make excuses for which is more important well I think that all of it is important if you’re going to ask me is bad across the board yes but you can’t be advisors that we’re only imposed okay you’re only opposed to incivility when it’s Donald Trump inclusive but but suddenly Maxine Waters auntie Maxine because Ben you can’t walk into a Roman tea an elephant in a mouse and not know which one is bigger but it’s not no offense any Mouse it’s two years really yes threatening to walk six hundred officers to protect me at Berkeley yes it’s an elephant and an elephant yes it’s an elephant an elephant a trilobite in 2010 Romney that he’s gonna put y’all back in Chains about black people this stuff pre-existed that productive is terrible didn’t come from the president at Berkeley it came from the vice president when he was saying Mitt Romney the cleanest person ever okay was a guy who’s gonna put y’all back and change to pretend in civility started with Donald Trump not instability at the level to which it’s at were your time great you do you really think Donald Trump respects the rule of law I mean if somebody no and I think the Constitution itself is a pretty damn durable document thank God I’ve read your tweets like about Kamala Harris yeah I have some problems with her too but you would vote for Trump over her yes tell me why okay so the reason I’d vote for Trump over her is because I agree with him a lot more on policy and I actually believe a lot of the damage that he has done to the country in terms of social fabric has already occurred so I said I didn’t vote for him in 2016 the reason I didn’t vote for him in 2016 is because I feared the damage he would do to the social fabric and I also didn’t think he was going to govern conservative because I didn’t see a lot of indicators of that he’s government a lot more conservative than I thought he was going to and as far as the damage to the social fabric if he’s already done it I’m not actually mitigating against the damage to the social fabric by not voting from in 2020 can I read your here’s something where we sort of agree and then I’ll show you where we don’t this is Kamala Harris tweeted children are our nation’s future we must listen to them about what they care about and give them a voice in our government and you wrote ridiculous I’m with you their children they don’t get a voice and I think I know what she meant but it’s poorly worded and you wrote children should not have a voice in our government their children and you’re right this is where the left drives me crazy but then you wrote about children they are also incapable of fully rational thought thoroughly uncivilized and completely driven by immediate emotional response I can’t think of a here more perfect description of Donald Trump you didn’t see the irony when you wrote that tweet and described children that way you did it didn’t never entered your mind that Donald Trump fit that perfectly well I don’t believe that Donald Trump is a person whose views are leading in in my in my imagination where the country ought to go I mean I don’t look to Donald Trump’s a thought leader I would look to a child’s thought leader I don’t look to those it’s not leader so are you talking about he’s the president says he’s not the thought leader nope couldn’t he have some thought I don’t know Kenny you tell me I don’t know well it seems like his only thoughts to me are to work with Vladimir Putin to make Russia great again and I what I don’t understand Obama was but harsher on Putin you got in terms of his rhetoric his actions his armed his armed the people of Ukraine with deadly weaponry which Obama would not do 200 Russian soldiers were killed in Syria by US forces under Donald Trump not under Barack Obama Barack Obama who sang to Dmitry Medvedev that he wanted to bribed him with flexibility in 2012 it Crimea was annexed under Barack Obama Wow this reminds me of when people Hitchin just to come on the show and and try to convince me that Saddam Hussein was you know a radical Islamist when he was actually a secularist you have to go a long way to make that argument I mean he tweeted yesterday defending Putin against what our own agency say that he said Russia says again they did in metal not election what a lot of crappy stuff why a lot of wood why have there been 19 indictments and six conviction so far in the mullah ring Creek why so many lies about so many meetings with so many Russians so many attempts to have back-channel sources what actually think that Donald Trump collude admitting yes I do not because I watched that campaign I don’t think that Donald Trump could collude with his own left foot well I don’t think he did it but his you know his son did it his the people who and when the evidence comes out I’m happy to go for the indictments I’m fine okay great criminal activities criminal act but you see didn’t do but wearing his to ignorance who have done it well he’s not too ignorant he’s not too ignorant to be a criminalist all life [Applause] into the Trump Defender here but is he a doofus or is he an evil genius you gotta pick one okay actually you don’t you don’t have to pick one really look I’m not saying he’s like Hitler here is I marry bud Hitler was crazy and he was a genius at what he did which was lie and manipulate people so you can be both oka y but let’s get back to Russia because I first of all why a nice Jewish boy like you wants to be on Team treason I have no idea dude I’m happy to wait for the Muller indictments and come down and they target Trump I’m happy to see them impeach work that I need to see evidence but you know that the Republican Congress we saw it this week with Rosenstein on the at Congress they are trying to impeach Rosenstein so they can get rid of him so they can so we don’t ever see they don’t want us ever to see it they know there’s something probably a thousand things in there that are incredibly damning okay you don’t think that if they impeach Rosenstein yes some presento line for you i don’t know it’s the final line because there’s still another step that has to happen Rosen scene has to be replaced by somebody who then fires Muller so frozen Steen is fired and Muller is left to his own devices which is basically by the way what happened with this investigation when Comey was fired then I don’t see where the line is Muller is the one who matters here not report goes to the Deputy Attorney General and if Trump puts Scott Baio in that position he can just throw it in the trash and if he throws it in the trash or quashes the muller investigation then yes impeachment should be on the table Thank You Ben I want to do it again I appreciate you coming by I know Friday night’s a tough one for you all right Ben Shapiro I’ll give him the hands
NeverTrump was just another word for neoconservative. Or, as they were originally and more accurately labeled, Trotskyite World Revolutionary. But conservatism is even deader than neoconservatism, because there is nothing left to conserve.
With the installation of Neil Gorsuch to the Supreme Court, and a yet-to-be-named reliable replacement for the unreliable Anthony Kennedy, Donald Trump will have confirmed himself as the most consequential conservative president of the modern era (or a close second to Reagan if you’re nostalgic). This will be complete vindication for Trump supporters, which means it’s really the end for the so-called Never Trump conservatives. Of course, there have been so many humiliating defeats for that crowd that we are spoiled for choice. What was your favorite blunder, or blown prediction, which marked their ignominious end?
For some, it must have been in March when Bill Kristol, longtime editor of the conservative magazine the Weekly Standard, showed up in New Hampshire telling people he would run against President Trump in 2020. Or in April when the conservative website RedState was taken over and purged of writers who were “insufficiently supportive” of the president. Some go back to October 2017 when a Twitter spat broke out between Stephen Hayes and Brit Hume of Fox News over the Weekly Standard’s anti-Trump editorials. With the death last week of Charles Krauthammer, the revered neocon commentator and prominent Trump skeptic, the eclipse of the neocon intellectuals is complete.
One thing’s for sure: it wasn’t really a war so much as a rout. The Never Trump intellectual crowd has no momentum and no popular following these days. Consider the trajectory of their would-be leader Kristol, who appears to be indulging in a personal fantasy by putting himself forward as a candidate, as his rapport with GOP voters includes trying to run Evan McMullin in Utah to throw the 2016 election to Hillary Clinton. When that stunt failed, Kristol personally insulted the pro-Trump writer Michael Anton for his influential essay “The Flight 93 election.” Then Kristol’s commentator gig with Fox was not renewed, and he was soon accusing Tucker Carlson of “ethno-nationalism” and “racism.” Overshadowing all of these breaks was Kristol’s personal history of being the conservative’s answer to Bob Shrum, a political “pro” who was always very wrong about politics.
Of course, Kristol was not alone in his contempt for Trump — he was only the most vocal and unhinged. Alongside him were other conservatives like Jennifer Rubin and George Will and Michael Gerson at the Washington Post; Bret Stephens at the Wall Street Journal; David Brooks and Ross Douthat at the New York Times; Jonah Goldberg and David French at National Review; Ramesh Ponnuru at Bloomberg; and Erick Erickson at RedState. A number of others, people like David Frum and Ana Navarro, committed political seppuku early and endorsed Hillary Clinton. Needless to say, the careers of most of these people have been curtailed dramatically.
Notice the studious omission of the Littlest Chickenhawk, who was second only to Bill Kristol in his furious denouncing of the God-Emperor during the campaign. After all, did Donald Trump not condone the RAPE and MURDER of whatever her name was by his own campaign manager? What this tells us is that the authors of the media narrative still believe that Benny Shapiro is salvageable; notice that no one else from the Intellectual Dark Web is on the list of NeverTrump conservatives, probably because none of them can even be considered as “conservative” as Jennifer Rubin, the controlled opposition figure who was a Democrat and Hollywood lawyer before she suddenly appeared as an Important Opinion Leader in the so-called conservative media.
Where is Thomas Sowell? Dana Loesch, Michael Medved, and Cal Thomas? They are all anti-Trump conservatives who were featured in National Review’s deeply heretical Conservatives Against Trump issue. They should all be purged from the Right and cast out into the outer darkness, where the glory of the God-Emperor is but a distant glimmer.
Below is the list of the intellectually unfit, whose names are anathema to anyone genuinely of the Right. We can no longer be accurately described as the Alt-Right or the Alternative Right, because we are not the alternative and there is no longer any legitimate right-wing alternative to us. There are merely various flavors of anti-nationalist left-wing globalism, regardless of whether they happen to call themselves “conservatives” or “liberals” or “communists”.
