Category: Uncategorized

Unc D can’t stop himself:

“I LOATHE political correctness. However, while I agree with your assesment of that piece on MM’s blog, that’s an obnoxious way to start off your post. If MM was black, I doubt you would have written: “Michelle says ‘Yes Massa’ to the Feds?””

You don’t think so? O ye of little faith! And for one who reportedly loathes political correctness, you seem to be focused like a laser on the PC aspect, considering that I’ve already a) labled her a media whore, b) called her a bootlicker, and c) implied that she is committing adultery with a Philippino terrorist. That’s all fine, apparently, but a dismissive reference to Ms Malkin being Asian and female suddenly gets your panties in a bunch. That PC sensitivity just sneaks in there, doesn’t it.

Was it obnoxious? Sure. But obviously you’re mistaking me for someone who gives a flying rat’s posterior. Ideas are what they are, equally valid regardless of how they’re couched. If I say “Peter Jennings, you handsome hunk of Canadian salt pork, 2+2=4” it is no more or less valid than “Peter Jennings, you loathesome Canadian cretin, 2+2=4”. I often express myself in terms of venomous contempt because that is how I view the ideas being expressed by many of the charlatans infesting the commentary pages like rats infected with lethal intellectual buboes.

No matter what the issue might be, the answer is always the same. Trust Big Brother and love Him, and then you will be safe. THAT IS A LIE AND IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN A LIE.

If my words weren’t dripping with venom, I’d be frothing at the mouth like Mogambo. Wake up, you cretins! This country, the noblest political experiment in the history of Mankind, belongs to you, and you are pissing away your birthright for nothing but empty words and false promises.

Rich unwisely plays with metaphor:

So, Suicide is a requirement of being an American. Interesting

The only form of national suicide is the one in which we are gradually engaging, sacrificing our liberties and Constitutional safeguards in favor of a security that will prove to be a mirage, dangled as false bait in front of frightened fools. Our demise will prove to be entirely of our own doing.

Rich’s comparison is particularly nonsensical, as even the most pacifist society falling to the force exerted by another would be more accurately equated with murder.

Speaking of fantasy football and attack dogs, I have to complain about the complete madhouse that is my fantasy football league. During this year’s draft last weekend, I took some merciless ribbing for my misplaced affection for Kelly Holcomb. Hey, the guy plays great, gets injured, comes back for the AFC playoffs and throws five touchdowns. What’s not to like?

Sure, he turned out to be a disaster, which is why Garcia is now starting for Cleveland, but it was a reasonable mistake. This didn’t prevent numerous cracks about my inability to judge QB talent, my drafting incompetence, etc. But here’s the point which demonstrates that my fellow GM’s are, without any doubt whatsoever, complete idiots. I NOT ONLY NEVER DRAFTED KELLY HOLCOMB, I NEVER HAD HIM!

I drafted two quarterbacks last year. Peyton Manning and Matt Hasselbeck. That’s two of the league’s top five QBs last year. The year before that, Brett Favre was my starter. The year before that, Donovan McNabb in his one great fantasy year. The year before that, I was alternating Daunte Culpepper and Jeff Garcia to overwhelming E-F-F-E-C-T otherwise known as effect.

It was the White Buffalo who drafted Kurt Warner and Kelly Holcomb last year, two misjudgements of stunning magnitude, only a few short years after DRAFTING RANDALL CUNNINGHAM #1 OVERALL in 1999 when his wheels were obviously about to fall off. And I’m the one who can’t judge QB talent? I am reluctantly forced to conclude that next year, we’re going to have to institute pre-draft drug-testing.

BT brings up the only subject that matters right now:

You and I differ politically but… who are your sleepers and guys poised for breakout years? I’ve got my own thoughts…Chris Brown, Thomas Jones, David Carr, Joey Harrington, and Carson Palmer.

Also, my general strategy is RB in the first & second round then best available in rd. 3. Share your strategical insights as I need all the help I can get.

Lastly…I disagree with 95% of what you say but you make me think and you’re firm in your beliefs. Too many people just regurgitate the crap spoon fed to them by the politicians and talking heads. You don’t and I respect that. I love reading your blogs and WND columns. Thanks and keep up the good work.

Yes, BT’s missive demonstrates why I really prefer to consider myself a healer and a uniter, crossing the vast chasm of America’s ideological differences and joining hands together in those small, but vital points of commonality, blah frickin’ blah. I can’t even write that without my stomach getting queasy. If I was Pope – don’t shoot, ET – I think I’d call for a Albigsenian-style Crusade against Unitarians. They just sit around looking all innocent and harmless, with their obese women pastors and “blessed bes”; if that’s not grounds for a good auto-da-fe or three, well, I’m not Pope John al-Mansur the Victorious.

Sorry, got a little off track there. Anyhow, strategies… mine is twofold. If you analyze the numbers, there are two to four players at each position that seriously outperform their peers. It’s more important to get as many of these overperformers as possible, which trumps the position concept BT mentioned. So, I took Ahman Green, (#3 RB) with my first pick, then grabbed Daunte Culpepper (#2 QB) with my second even though a number of very good RB and WR were available, because none of the RB and WR left were overperformers. I drafted Mike Vanderjagt (#1 kicker) a little early as well.

The other part might well be called the Schadenfreude strategy, (just to continue a theme), as I will not only be enjoying, but celebrating the pain of others when Marshall Faulk and Stephen Davis go down with injuries. Why? Because I picked up Stephen Jackson and DeShaun Foster late in the draft, both of whom are reasonably likely to see serious playing time this season.

As for your sleepers, I very much like Chris Brown and am very annoyed with my brother for snagging him first. Thomas Jones, it’s hard to say. The Bears will be better, of course, if only because it’s hard to gain yards or points with Mr. INT always turning the ball over at the first opportunity. I like David Carr, but don’t see him breaking out and I think Harrington will disappoint. Yes, he’s got weapons but I don’t think he’s got what it takes to get it to them. Of course, I could be bitter about picking him up as a third QB instead of Bulger last year and essentially handing the title to the Wheeler Dealer. I debated that one for ten minutes, going back and forth and back and forth, and I still rue the day.

I am optimistic about Carson Palmer, which is why he’s backing up Daunte. Kitna was more than solid last year, and one hopes that Cincy knows what it’s doing in promoting Palmer over him. And I need him to perform even if he never starts a game for me, since Chad Johnson is my #1 receiver. That darned White Buffalo snatched Randy Moss right from under my nose; I was forced to make do with CJ and Marcus Robinson. I did get McCardell late, for a nice value pick if he gets his contract worked out soon, and Jerry Porter could work out very well indeed now that Brown is gone if Gannon comes back to form.

The best thing about our league this year is that last year’s champion and the most serious player couldn’t get online until the third round. So much for months of pre-planning! He got stuck with the most fragile backfield in the history of fantasy football, Marshall Faulk and Fred Taylor. It couldn’t happen to a nicer guy… heh heh heh.

Michelle love the FBI long time:

Oh, give me a break. Getting shocked with cattle prods for practicing one’s faith is the “stuff of totalitarian regimes.” Getting locked up in an iron maiden for losing a soccer match is the “stuff of totalitarian regimes.” Answering a few questions about possible domestic terrorism is the stuff of responsible citizenship….

Some of those who have been questioned by the FBI say they were “harassed” and scared by armed agents who visited their homes. Boo hoo. What do they want the agents to do? Would showing up in clown suits with squirt guns in their holsters make them feel less frightened? These are serious men and women doing serious jobs in serious times. Grow up.

Is shooting an unarmed woman in the head the stuff of totalitarian regimes? I’m just looking for clarification here. And did she actually say “grow up”? I know some lefties have made the comparison, but I tell you the truth, Michelle Malkin isn’t fit to replace the color cartridge in Ann Coulter’s inkjet. Be responsible, comrade, and answer the questions. Er, that is to say, citizen. Interesting to see how quickly the Federal focus has insensibly shifted from foreign terrorists to suspected domestic troublemakers… never forget that in the government’s eyes, we are all potential terrorists and those who are committed to freedom are considered more potential than most.

Anyone who’s had an encounter with the FBI, the DEA, the ATF or the IRS and the way they throw their thuggish weight around knows that Michelle has no idea what she’s talking about here. Who wants to further her education in matters of federal comportment by placing an anonymous call to the DEA and informing them of the meth lab in her basement? And is it not imperative that the FBI learn of her intimate relationship with an Abu Sayyaf leader?

Smile when you answer those questions, Ms Responsible Citizen.

ihatedaShrub practices what passes for liberal logic:

if the 240+ Vietnam vets are so ardent in their opposition of Kerry why did they wait until a scant 3 1/2 months before a presidential election to release their greivances…. A couple of these vets have been very dogged and very public in their three decade long pursuit of Kerry.

So, the Swift vets are damned if they opposed John Kerry from the start, and also damned if they didn’t? That’s an interesting defense. Also a completely circular and implausible one. When would have been the appropriate moment for them to publicly oppose Kerry, exactly 15 years ago?

Applying Occam’s Razor would suggest that they all saw him as a fraud from the start, but most of them didn’t bother worrying about it. That’s the normal human reaction to someone with whom you had a brief and unpleasant contact once they are no longer a factor in your life. But once the previously indifferent veterans realized that their former companion might become the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and their president, they decided it was necessary to get involved.

Also, Kerry’s defenders are significantly less credible than his attackers, as Captain Ed demonstrates in a manner most devastating. As for Rassmann, I’m curious to know if anyone is paying for his appearances with John Kerry. Is he being paid for his story and staunch support? His story is critical, as simply pulling someone from the water isn’t all that heroic if you’re not under fire. Heck, by that standard, the Perfect Aryan Male and the Terminator would seem to have a Bronze Star due them for pulling me out when I had a bad wipeout and injured myself waterskiing a few summers back.

JC lays down the word:

I know you are extremely busy so let me get right to the point.

1. I am a black guy, and we black men find Jennifer Lopez attractive not because she’s opposite of what MAXIM and those type of magazines say, but because she’s got nice big buttocks. That’s what our culture finds attractive. You need to wise up by looking at KING, Smooth and For Black Men magazine will show plenty of women who are in Jennifer Lopez’ league and women like Melyssa Ford and Gloria Glory Velez who blow Jennifer out of the water. The MAXIM, FHM, STUFF, etc. . . skinny females with large shapely breasts don’t appeal to us, well most of us. (and definitely not me).

2. I agree with the over all tone of the article, and what the article says, you are by far one of the true Conservative geniuses, your knowledge is even beyond that of Rush Limbaugh.

3. You were right about Bill O’ Reilly, I love his show, but more for shock and entertainment value not for any true substance.

This is, without a doubt, the email of the day. Nothing like getting directly to the point… and no, JC is not JC Watts…. I freely admit to being ignorant of much of what JC says in such succinct and inimitable fashion, so in the interest of wising up, I will be sure to ask Space Bunny for a subscription to Smooth and for Christmas. As for me, I quite like skinny females with large shapely breasts, but hey, we are libertarians here, are we not? To each his own, my brother.

This should illustrate my point about the pleasure we derive from the suffering of others. I don’t think JB is feeling this woman’s pain, and if he is, let’s face it, he’s getting off on it. And rightly so, I say.

“Light rail? Why, yes, I do indeed support it. I mean, I’ll be able to WALK from my house to the stop and ride to my little urban heart’s delight. As a strong supporter of the community’s diversity, I imagine I will take it downtown to experience all the city has to offer.–just make sure it doesn’t affect me negatively in any way, matter or form.”

That pretty much sums up the attitude of the losers who are incensed that people they don’t know are parking on their streets to take the light rail.

The boondoggle isn’t working out as publicized? I’m shocked.

Rhone writes:

FACTS, not personal attacks, should be the basis for any ‘argument’.This is why i objected to Coulter [at the risk of offending Vox regarding one of his personal icons] because she wastes so much time on them…. Pointing out shortcomings in arguments, or going completely overboard like Mogambo Guru did today is one thing: personal attacks for personal attacks sake turns thinking people off.

Right, that’s why Ann Coulter is the most popular, best-known political commentator in the country. That’s why polemicists like Al Franken, who don’t harbor a single original thought and whose works consist of nothing but ad hominem insults and pointing out trivial objections, are best-selling authors. This is what I consider to be the Coulter Myth, which is that Ann would be “more effective” if only she wouldn’t [fill-in-the blank]. And of course, if Ann had been dumb enough to take the advice, no one would ever have heard of her. I will grant you, however, that the unrelenting nature of the single-minded attacks on the same targets can get just a smidgeon tiresome from time to time.

Facts should be the basis for any argument. I try to use them as a basis for mine whenever they are available, with logic as a strong alternative. Ironically, Rhone is stating this in defense of O’Reilly, whose argument can be accurately summed up as the notion that it is the facts that should be off limits in any discussion of Kerry’s military record.

Furthermore, the facts are that people love personal attacks, people love insults, people love cruelty and watching the suffering of others. All humor, it is said, is based on pain. Why do you think women indulge in the emotional pornography of Oprah and Jerry Springer? Why do you think men bet on everything from crickets to pit bulls to human beings tearing each other apart? We love blood sports, intellectual and physical. So much so that the concept of inhuman as the word is commonly used is inherently oxymoronic.

I also reject Rhone’s theory that the purpose of attacking people is to demonstrate my intelligence. I daresay that those esoteric columns that cause a good part of my readership to give up halfway through do a much better job of that, not that it’s the point in either case. The purpose of attacking people is to destroy the credibility of those who repeatedly make false arguments and ludicrous assertions. Some commentators deserve credibility, many, in my opinion, don’t. As to my own credibility, I have no problem leaving that for others to decide.

Bill O’Reilly proves that he’s not only a coward, but synaptically-challenged to boot:

What should we on the sidelines make of all this? Well, it’s a judgment call. It is absolutely wrong for Americans to condemn Kerry’s war record because he demonstrated provable valor. However, those who distrust him do deserve to be heard, although facts, not emotion, should be demanded.

I think the Swift boat political advertisement calling Kerry a charlatan is in poor taste, and if this kind of thing continues, it might well backfire on the Kerry haters. Most Americans are fair-minded, and bitter personal attacks do not go down well with folks who are not driven by partisanship.

So, it is wrong to condemn Kerry’s war record… how could it possibly be wrong to condemn something that shows every indication of being largely fictional? Kerry is a proven liar, he has a few sycophants supporting his story versus hundreds who dispute it – including some veterans that Kerry was using as part of his campaign until very recently – and if he’s the officer who wrote himself up for some of those awards, as has been alleged, then the war record should not only be condemned, but corrected as Kerry is made the national laughingstock that he so richly deserves to be.

And as for Mr. O’Reilly, we are once more inspired to burst into song:

Bravely Bold Sir William did pucker up his lips

He was not at all afraid to bend over at the hips

He was not in the least bit scared to kiss John Kerry’s ass

Brave, brave brave Sir Bill won the Brownnoser First Class.