Tag: Christianity

Denninger on Heresy

Even the Boomers are rejecting the religious subversion of the American right now:

I’ve talked about dispensationalism a few times in various formats over the years on this blog and how it is utterly unsupportable when it comes to calling someone “privileged” from the standpoint of Christianity particularly as applies to Jewish people and/or Israel.

But Tucker Carlson went there in his recent show and in fact echoed what I’ve said for a long time: As a Christian if you espouse this you have committed Heresy and worse, you’ve stated a belief that those who disagree will be literally killed by God.

Tucker is right, by the way.

Israel, like every other nation, can deal with us as a peer and with respect but at no time will I or should anyone else consider them to have any means of “control” over the United States

Ever.
Period.
Full stop.

Tucker further points out something even more important, which is that while heresy is an offense before God (assuming you believe in it, of course) when committed by people in political power, such as Lindsey Graham, it becomes something much more-serious in the secular world.

I think it’s a very easy and straightforward question for any honest individual. When do you consider America to have been more blessed?

  1. Prior to 31 January 1949
  2. After 31 January 1949

If your answer is (1), then there obviously is no reason to accept the Dispensationalist heresy or the subordination of Americans to any foreign people. And the point is further underlined by a historical question. When would you consider Spain to have been more blessed?

  1. Prior to March 31, 1492
  2. After March 31, 1492

The Golden Age of Spain is generally considered to begin in 1492, marked by the end of the Reconquista, Christopher Columbus’s voyages, and the publication of Antonio de Nebrija’s Grammar of the Castilian Language. It ended around 1659 with the Treaty of the Pyrenees, though some extend it to 1681, after the death of Pedro Calderón de la Barca.

Now, keep in mind that I don’t accept the Dispensationalist metric in the first place. I certainly don’t regard heretical theology as a sound basis for making decisions about financial budgets or foreign policy. But it’s always most effective to answer one’s opponent in the terms he is capable of understanding.

DISCUSS ON SG

Rebuking the Fake Pope

Carlo Maria Vignano demolishes Fake Pope Bergoglio’s attempt to claim that immigration and the genetic destruction of the nations are somehow “Christian” values:

Jorge Bergoglio’s monomaniacal obsession with indiscriminate immigration and miscegenation finds a zealous proponent in Robert Prevost. The handover did not represent any radical change, either doctrinally or morally, or politically or socially. The conciliar-synodal Church is and remains the “Ancilla Novi Ordinis,” the courtesan of the globalist elite.

We know well that the migratory phenomenon is not spontaneous: it is not caused by famine, war, or religious persecution. Instead, it was desired and planned as a means of destabilizing Western nations, and illegal immigration is used as an instrument of social subversion. This is stated in a United Nations document of March 21, 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration.”

The Bergoglian and post-Bergoglian Church is at the forefront of promoting immigrationism, ethnic substitution, and the invasion of Western nations, aiming to erase their Christian identity, culture, and history. This is confirmed by the emphasis placed on the audience granted by Leo to Amy Pope, Director General of the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM), and on the Jubilee of Migrants.

The Holy See is complicit in the subversive plan hatched by the globalist elite: it presents illegal immigrants as victims and maintains relationships with those who organize their trafficking, while blaming the invaded population, victims of the heinous crimes and degradation these hordes commit in our cities. Finally, abusing the moral authority of the Papacy, the Synodal Church equates immigration, the death penalty, and abortion, to the delight of the woke Left and to the great scandal of pro-life movements.

The collusion of Leo and his bishops with the globalist elite is deliberate, intended, and a source of profit for Catholic institutions and organizations. This also occurs in civil governments, whose leaders are all emissaries of the Davos Forum, the Fabian Society, Soros’s Open Society, or other supranational entities conspiring against the people. And it is scandalous—to say the least—that progressive American bishops are fueling this artfully created controversy, exploiting it for political gain against President Trump, when they cowardly remained silent during the Biden presidency in the face of far more serious moral issues…

This subservience of the Catholic Church to the criminal plan of the Great Reset and Agenda 2030 will be judged by God and by history, and will remain as an indelible stain on the already severely compromised reputation of this renegade and apostate Hierarchy.

The fury of the young European men at organized Christianity in general and the Catholic Church in particular is well-founded, which is why it is important to make sure they are informed that the fake church led by a fake pope are neither Catholic in the proper sense nor Christian in even the broadest sense of the term.

Regardless of whether you are Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, or atheist, you can certainly agree that the official institution presently headquartered in the Vatican that calls itself the Roman Catholic Church is an organization that was infiltrated, subverted, and is now led by those who worship the god of this world and are the self-professed enemies of Jesus Christ as well as those who seek to follow him.

But paganism is not, and will never be, the answer to satanry. A brief look at India, or any post-Christian culture in Europe and the Americas, should suffice to conclusively prove that. There is only one force that is capable of defeating global satanry and that is Jesus Christ.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Lesson of Lepanto

A reminder that God loves His warriors and helps those who help themselves:

In 1571 as the Muslim fleet threatened Europe, Christendom was deeply divided. Protestants fought Catholics. France fought the Holy Roman Empire. Christian princes even allied WITH the Muslims against their Christian brothers.  They were all too self seeking to see the threat and and answer the call. 

But one man—a bastard with no lands and barely even a title—takes weapons from the wall and rides to the sea.  Don John of Austria.

Who was Don John? He had no throne. He was the bastard son of Charles V and a burgher’s daughter from Regensburg. Raised in obscurity, not even told who his father was. When his half-brother Philip II finally acknowledged him, it wasn’t with lands or title, just a name and a small allowance. Among the princes of Christendom he was the last man you’d pick: No inheritance, no wealth, no claim to rule.

Yet when the Ottoman fleet gathered in the waters just beyond Italy, this forgotten son was the one who answered. Because no one else would.

Yes, the Pope called for the defense of Christendom, and that is more than we have today.  But no one sent Don John personally. No one gave him the wealth to outfit an army. The most likely outcome was that they’d all die.  Don John went because someone had to.

That’s the pattern of every important battle in Christian history. One man, alone, often betrayed by his Christian brothers, under resourced, with only a small band of bedragged warriors, standing in victory against the pagan hordes.

No Crusader victory was ever a triumph of Christian unity. Most of Christendom sat Lepanto out. France stayed home. Protestant Europe stayed home. Even most of Italy stayed home. The Holy League was a minority of the willing. A handful of ships and a handful of men who made the decision to go. And that’s the truth.

History turns on the ones who go. Not on the ones who wait for orders. Not on the ones who whine about the hierarchy. The ones who go. Western man today stands on another shore. The pagan fleets are at pur shores again.  Our clergy are cautious, our politicians are compromised, our institutions asleep.

So what now?

The Churchians aren’t going to save the civilization they despise. The foreigners, immigrants, migrants, and refugees aren’t going to save the nations they hate. The governments aren’t going to defend the peoples they have betrayed. The priests and pastors aren’t going to defend the faith they subverted.

And yet, all we need are twelve.

DISCUSS ON SG

Hiding the Bodies: A Dialogue

Clown World can’t hide the bodies, but they have been able to hide the cause of death and the growing number of post-vaccine deaths using a variety of statistical “corrections”.

ETHICAL SKEPTIC: On left is the raw unprocessed infant death data fm the CDC – a 25-year legacy trend. On right is the disciplined inflection analytic. It removes 1) seasonality, 2) noise, 3) false trend/inflection. Those who can’t/won’t see this are obtuse, malicious pharma sycophants.

In your opinion, what is the specific incentive behind this murderous system?

ETHICAL SKEPTIC: My opinion—speculative yet consistent with observed patterns in ponerology—is that a kind of tacit contract is struck between these flesh-and-blood servants and the darker intelligences they host. The transaction is simple: if they deliver suffering, particularly of the innocent, they generate a form of energy or “currency” that sustains their demonic patrons. In return, they are rewarded handsomely in this life with wealth, power, or influence. Research into destructive ideologies and totalitarian personalities (cf. Andrzej Łobaczewski, Political Ponerology) hints at such dynamics: suffering becomes not a byproduct but a cultivated resource, systematized and exchanged in what amounts to a pathological economy.

Whether one interprets this literally as spiritual commerce or metaphorically as the sociopathic reward system of oppressive hierarchies, the observed outcomes remain strikingly similar. Yet this bargain is no ordinary addiction. It cleaves the soul into an immortal entourage that extends beyond one’s lifetime. In the end, each person chooses the allegiance of their energy—whether to align with the destructive current that feeds on innocence, or with its opposite, which fosters life, dignity, and spiritual renewal.

DISCUSS ON SG

Churchianity

Jon Del Arroz’s new book, Churchianity: How Modern American Churches Corrupted Generations of Christians, is out today. The Foreword was written by a certain dark lord of your acquaintance. It’s a pretty long one, as these things go, so I’ve broken it into two parts, the second of which will run tomorrow.

Churchianity: The Great Apostasy

The modern Church in the West stands at a crossroads, though many of its congregants appear blissfully unaware that they have already chosen a wide and easy path to Hell. What passes for Christianity in the twenty-first century would be unrecognizable to the Church Fathers, incomprehensible to the medieval scholastics, and abhorrent to the Reformers. We are witnessing nothing less than the attempted replacement of Christianity with its heretical doppelganger: Churchianity.

Churchianity is the systematic subordination of Christian doctrine to the prevailing ideology of social justice. It is the elevation of worldly concerns above spiritual ones, the replacement of timeless Biblical authority with the dynamic mainstream Narrative, and the transformation of the Church from a beacon of eternal truth into an echo chamber for Earthly politics. Most damning of all, it represents the complete inversion of Christianity’s fundamental premise: instead of being in the world but not of it, Churchianity insists on being entirely of the world while maintaining an increasingly unconvincing veneer of theological legitimacy.

Churchianity is not just another in the long line of traditional doctrinal disputes. This is apostasy wearing a clerical collar, heresy draped in liturgical vestments, and blasphemy proclaimed from ten thousand pulpits every Sunday morning. The tragedy is not that wolves have entered the sheepfold—Jesus Christ himself warned us they would come. The tragedy is that the sheep now bleat in self-righteous pride as they are led astray by those who seek to destroy them.

At its core, Churchianity represents a fundamental misunderstanding of the nature of both God and man. Whereas Christianity proclaims the fallen nature of humanity and the absolute necessity of divine redemption, Churchianity preaches the perfectibility of man through political correctness. Whereas Christianity promises the Kingdom of Heaven, Churchianity prioritizes earthly justice. And whereas Christianity demands repentance from sin, Churchianity demands repentance for a whole host of invented man-made sins, including failure to adequately genuflect before whatever victim class currently sits atop the intersectional hierarchy.

The mechanism of this theological perversion is breathtakingly simple: take any Biblical command, strip it of its soteriological context, and reinterpret it through the lens of contemporary social justice politics. “Love thy neighbor” ceases to be about individual charity and becomes a mandate for open borders and mass immigration. “Care for the poor” transforms from personal almsgiving into advocacy for higher taxes, foreign wars, and welfare states. “Welcome the stranger” transforms from basic hospitality into a divine command to facilitate the demographic replacement of the nation.

This hermeneutical vandalism not only does violence to individual verses, but to the entire Biblical narrative. The God who destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, who commanded the Israelites to maintain their distinctiveness among the nations, who confused the languages at Babel to create the nations—this God is reimagined as a cosmic social worker whose primary concern is ensuring equal outcomes across all demographic categories. The savior who said “My kingdom is not of this world” is recast as a proto-hippie community organizer whose death was not intended to atone for personal sins, but for 17th-century colonization.

No Christian Church has shown itself to be completely immune to this subversive contagion. The Roman Catholic Church, which for centuries stood as a bulwark against heresy, now finds itself led by clerics who are more concerned about climate change than for the salvation of men’s souls. The current occupant of Peter’s throne speaks more passionately about carbon emissions than abortion, more forcefully about income inequality than sexual morality, and far more frequently about migrants than martyrs. The Church that once launched the Crusades to defend Christendom now declares it a moral imperative to welcome to the West those who would see every cross destroyed and every cathedral burned to the ground.

The Anglican Communion, already weakened by its centuries of compromise with secular authority, has completed its transformation into the Conservative Party at prayer—if the Conservative Party were still conservative and one could find a Tory who was not Hindu, Muslim, or Jewish. Canterbury’s pronouncements are all-but-indistinguishable from Guardian editorials, complete with the requisite hand-wringing about colonialism, slavery, and the urgent need to make monetary reparations for crimes committed by people long dead to people who were never wronged.

The mainline Protestant denominations have fared even worse. The Lutherans who once thundered “Here I stand” now whimper “Here I kneel”—before every fashionable cause and politically correct crusade. The Methodists, Presbyterians, and Episcopalians compete to see who can more thoroughly repudiate their theological heritage in favor of sexual perversion, rainbow flags and moral relativism. These churches have hemorrhaged members in recent decades, not because Christianity is dying, but because Churchianity offers nothing that cannot be found in a political party or a gay disco.

Even the evangelical churches, which initially resisted this insidious corruption, have begun to succumb. Megachurch pastors discover that sermon series on “social justice” fill more seats than expositions of Romans. Youth pastors find that endorsing movements like Black Lives Matter provides them with more social cachet than leading Bible studies. Entire denominations that once prioritized evangelism now prioritize “racial reconciliation,” which in practice means white self-flagellation and endless apologies for nonexistent sins neither committed nor inherited.

CHURCHIANITY by Jon Del Arroz is now available in ebook and paperback from Amazon from Rislandia Press.

DISCUSS ON SG

Anti-Racism is Inversive

Just in case you were still clinging to the faint hope that Christianity is not inherently racist, and that all of the anti-bigotry and anti-racism and manufacture of new sins so ostentatiously displayed by the Churchians is anything but inversive, subversive, and satanic, I invite you to consider the so-called Church of England’s portrayal of St. Augustine as a Negro:

St Augustine has been depicted as a black man in a children’s book written by Church of England officials as part of its diversity drive. The saint, one of the most influential figures in Christian history, has been illustrated as black in a new book called Heroes of Hope.

This book says it seeks to inspire children with examples of ‘Black and brown saints, often erased and whitewashed from history, who formed the church and therefore modern society as we know it today’.

Aurelius Augustinus was born in 345 AD in a Mediterranean coastal town now in modern-day Algeria, going on to become a bishop of the North African settlement of Hippo.

Over the years, most depictions of St Augustine have been of a white man. At that time in history, the area was a Roman province, although Augustine and his mother Saint Monica may have originated from the North African Berber ethnic group.

Although this would not make him black, there have been efforts to apply this identity to him by some groups, including at the Catholic University of Villanova in Pennsylvania. An official at the university wrote in 2023 that it was important to depict the saint as black because ‘depicting St. Augustine as a Black man actively decentres whiteness’.

Unlike most people, I have actually read St. Augustine’s work. And while his attention to theological questions centered around rape are indeed a little eyebrow raising, there is absolutely zero chance that the author of his works is a Negro.

This is just another example of the historical and geographical illiteracy of the modern faux literati, who assume that anything related to Africa thereby necessarily means “negro”. Which obviously isn’t true, but when have the inversives every concerned themselves with truth, except, of course to subvert and invert it.

Heroes of Hope was co-authored by The Rev Dr Sharon Prentis, who was appointed the deputy director of the Church of England’s Racial Justice Unit in January 2023. The unit was set up in 2022, in the wake of Black Lives Matter protests, to help meet the Church’s commitments to achieving racial justice. Dr Prentis’s co-writer was Alysia-Lara Ayonrinde, the Church’s national education lead for racial justice.

As F.A. von Hayek demonstrated, social justice is not justice. The adjective modifies the noun. Therefore, racial justice is not justice. And it is not Christian either.

I have come to feel strongly that the greatest service I can still render to my fellow men would be that I could make the speakers and writers among them thoroughly ashamed ever again to employ the term “social justice”.
—F.A. von Hayek

DISCUSS ON SG

Definitely Bad News

There are four obvious things to be gleaned from this very long article about Nick Fuentes, who is an even nastier and more pathetic piece of work than I’d ever imagined.

  1. He is definitely fake, almost certainly gay, and there will very likely be a continuing series of underage sex scandals about him and those close to him.
  2. He’s obviously attempted to imitate the VFM with his RKD4NJF.
  3. His cartoon Catholicism runs more shallow than the average pedophile priest.
  4. He’s not very intelligent. Midwit at best.

“Take the loyalty pledge. I will kill, rape, and die for Nick Fuentes. Raise your right hand. Everybody raise your right hand. Raise your right hand, repeat after me: I will kill, rape, and die, for Nicholas J Fuentes.”

Nick repeatedly told his followers to take this pledge.

“I swear my undying allegiance to Nicholas J. Fuentes and the America First movement, so help me God. So help me God. Raise your hand and hold it high. I swear I will defend the white race; my nation, America; and my savior Jesus Christ. And, my loyalty to the America First movement, Nicholas J. Fuentes. So help me God.”

As I stated on last night’s Darkstream, Fuentes is the new breed of gatekeeper, the fake Christian Nationalist gatekeeper created to serve as controlled opposition to the Conservatism Inc. gatekeepers now that their gate was breached by the course of events and they are on the left side of the Overton Window rather than the right.

What is, at best, Nick’s sterility, and is much more likely something more twisted and dark, is an obvious Talmudic caricature of genuine Christian Nationalism. It’s an attempt to divert the generation of warriors for Christendom into a tangent of perversion and lies that will render them harmless to Clown World. What sort of Christian, what sort of nationalist, demands that anyone vow to commit rape for him?

Given his gift for rhetoric, it’s no surprise that Milo summarized it best:

Literally the only thing Catholic about Nick Fuentes is how soft he is on homosexual predators.

But God will not be mocked. The downfall of Nick Fuentes is certain. He can run away from me, from Owen Benjamin, and from other men, but he cannot run away from his accountability to God.

DISCUSS ON SG

Book of Ephesians

I suppose you might consider it a modern psalm of sorts given how many of them are devoted to God crushing His enemies. Anyhow, I had the impression there might be a Christian or two in our community who could use the reminder and the encouragement in these times of ceaseless Clown World retardery and incessant satanic inversion.

There is also the Cradle to Cavalry version of THE WORD DESCENDED.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Smartest Conclusion

If you’re relying on an appeal to intelligence, it’s just not looking very good for atheists or satanists these days.

I had severe depression and anxiety disorder. I even tried to end my life. But when I met Jesus, everything changed. He healed me and set me free. I’m living proof that Jesus is God. He is the only way. Heaven is the only rational conclusion because only in Heaven can the human mind find eternal meaning, and perfect justice be fulfilled. And it is Jesus Christ, who rose from the dead, who guarantees both.

I’m just a humble 3SD myself, but I note that although YoungHoon Kim came at it from a different direction, his reasoning and his conclusion is essentially the same as Greg Boyd’s.

DISCUSS ON SG