Category: Uncategorized

Podhoretz tries the mathematically ignorant con on The Corner:

Derb, You Need… [John Podhoretz]

…to read Can She Be Stopped?, a book that explains why the third-party temptation for people on the Right is nothing less than a vote for the Left.

Yes, because to these Republican geniuses, 1+0=2. No wonder they can’t balance the budget. Perhaps I should explain for those of you who are too slow to grasp basic arithmetic.

Take three individuals, one Democrat, one Republican, and one Libertarian. The Democrat votes Democrat. The Republican votes Republican. Now, here comes the part that is too hard for the political pundit.

If the Libertarian votes Libertarian, how many votes have the Democrats received?

If you answered two, you just might be a Three Monkey Republican.

Update – Unsurprisingly, the faux conservative is pushing Giuliani as the Lizard Queen Killer. Yeah, I seem to recall that was going to be the strategy to keep her out of the Senate too. The amazing thing is how Podhoretz even attempts to explain away Murdoch’s fundraiser for Hillary as an attempt to keep her in the Senate instead of the White House. It’s hard to believe how much contempt this man has for his readers! One NROnik, Tim Graham, responds thusly:

J-Pod, I heard your third-party spiel on Hannity yesterday (nice), but you’re recommending running Rudy Giuliani. How is that not a vote for the left? Hey, let’s run a pro-gay, pro-abortion, liberal Republican with a tabloid-disaster marital record. Cut out his mayoral record on crime and his tough stand on terror, and he IS Hillary. (Well, actually he’s Bill on the cheating, but you know what I mean.) If you don’t want a third party in the race, don’t push for Rudy. Even a “nomination conversion” on social issues isn’t going to save him.

If Giuliani is the Republican nominee, we may only see a Hillary win, but a Hillary landslide. Republicans might as well put up an official “no conservatives allowed” sign as nominate that self-promoting shyster.

This is John Hawkins from Right Wing News. On Thursday of this week, I am going to be putting up an article entitled, “Right-Of-Center Bloggers Select Their Favorite Columnists”. This is a once a year poll and you can sort of think of it as the “People’s Choice Awards” for conservative columnists.

Here was my list. And lest the usual suspects think I’m angling for votes here, time is up and it’s an invite-only vote anyhow. I actually forgot to put two of these on my ballot, but no matter, my choices tend to fair poorly anyhow, except for Coulter, Steyn and Goldberg. I do, however, expect Mike Adams to do well.

1. Ann Coulter
2. John Derbyshire
3. Pat Buchanan
4. Mark Steyn
5. Jonah Goldberg
6. Mike Adams
7. Joseph Farah
8. Thomas Sowell
9. Jay Nordlinger
10. Victor Davis Hanson
11. Ilana Mercer

This doesn’t mean that I necessarily agree with the columnist, only that I like something about their perspective or writing style. For example, I think Hanson regularly draws incorrect conclusions from history, but I like how he at least attempts to seek a historical perspective, unlike almost every other political pundit except Buchanan. I think people would be shocked if they truly grasped the vast difference in historical knowledge between a Hanson or Buchanan and the Malkin/Shapiro sort.

And while I’m not a fan of Farah’s occasional tendency towards histrionics, his consistency is impressive considering that he writes a column every day. If I had to do that, I can’t even imagine how bizarre and meandering my column would become.

From Drudge:

Rupert Murdoch has agreed to host a political fundraiser for Hillary Clinton this summer, the FINANCIAL TIMES is reporting!

Murdoch’s surprise decision to raise money for Clinton in July, on behalf of NEWS CORP., parent company of FOXNEWS and the NEW YORK POST, underlines a dramatic turn of relations between Murdoch and Clinton, who in 1998 coined the phrase “vast rightwing conspiracy” to denounce critics of her husband.

Some say the move by Murdoch reflects approval of her Senate career, notes FT’s Caroline Daniel. Others point to Murdoch’s record for picking future national leaders. Last century, he threw over the British conservatism he’d long supported to back longshot Tony Blair. Clinton surprised Washington and media watchers recently by attending a FOX NEWS anniversary party, where she toasted Murdoch.

Political powerbroker and studio head Harvey Weinstein is said to have convinced Hillary that Murdoch could be a friend, not a foe, in her ongoing political maneuvers.

Hillary has now cornered the NY media market, by winning support from the NEW YORK TIMES, NEW YORK DAILY NEWS owner Mort Zuckerman — and now Murdoch and the NY POST.

CNN and Fox will never have me on as a political analyst because there’s not much to discuss when I can correctly call the presidential elections years before the nominating primaries.

PC reveals a certain ignorance about pretty much everything I’ve ever written:

He’s your Baby. You people have been shilling for this train-wreck of an administration since the day he was crowned by the Supreme Court. Now that it’s apparent to all but the borderline retarded that Bush and his handlers are both totally incompetent and barely closeted fascists to boot, you are trying to distance yourselves. Sorry, but it won’t work. Bush is the albatross tied around the neck of everyone who voted Republican in 2000, 2002, or 2004. You are guilty of hypocrisy and intellectual dishonesty. Your bio says you are a member of Mensa. Seems they let anyone in these days.

Seeing as I didn’t vote Republican in 2000, 2002, 2004 or nearly every election before that, I fail to see how Dear Jorge could possibly be considered my baby. And considering that I’ve been openly ripping Bush as a globalist tool since 2001, I conclude that the aptly named PC didn’t bother to look before he leaped.

Hee-hee! (spin-and-a-crotch-thrust)

Eqquus Pallidus, come on down! You are the next participant in the VPFL! Please let us know if you will be fielding your own squad this fall, or if you would like to nominate a general manager to run a team.

His guess of 53,531 was high by only 476. The second edition of War was actually its third printing, it turns out.

And just to set things straight, Wrath was not cut by the publisher. In fact, it survived two general kill reviews, but the delay due to the publisher’s annual reorganizations gave me the opportunity to reclaim the rights to all three, which I did. The Wrath of Angels will be available on December 1 via online orders only; I have no plans to place it in the bookstores. For those curious about the books but not interested in purchasing them, free PDB files of all three books will be made available.

David Frum illustrates what is either the illogic or the blatant lying of the pro-war crowd:

Read this,the horrifying account in the London Times of the kidnapping and murder of the Iraqi journalist, Atwar Bhajat….

And then ask yourself this: How can people who decently and humanely call for someone to do something to end the cruelty and violence of Darfur – then turn about and call for leaving Iraq to the killers of Atwan Bhajat?

Gee, that’s a really tough one for anyone capable of scoring above 400 on their SAT verbal. It’s because the former is being perpetrated with the force of government on an unarmed people. The latter is being perpetrated by a group, that, we are repeatedly assured by the likes of David Frum, is a small, unpopular group of violent extremists who are not in charge of Iraq nor are likely to be once we end the occupation.

Unless, of course, Frum means to say that the elected purple-finger government of Iraq, of which he and the neoconservatives are so proud, were responsible for murdering Miss Bhajat.

Sometimes it astounds me to see what passes for an intellectual star in the “conservative” commentariat.

Your window of opportunity is over, neocons. America is not interested in Iraq or Iran any longer. That will of which you all speak so highly and being so vital to win a war? It’s not there. Deal with it.

A few horror stories about bad evil worse-than-Hitler terrorists killing Muslims in ugly ways isn’t going to rile anyone up, especially not a country that enthusiastically goes to see a nasty piece of work like Saw 2.

While public opinion on the quality of my fiction tends to vary widely, no one considers me to be much of a success in that line, including me. That’s fine, I continue to write for pleasure nevertheless and if I’m not getting rich off my book contracts, well, there are other opportunities out there.

But having recently been apprised by my publisher of precisely how many books of mine remained in stock, (and thus how many had been sold) as part of the amicable severing of our relations, I found it interesting to consider the facts of the Viswanathan scandal. Remember, the young “authoress”, (or rather, the firm marketing her “writing”), received a $500,000 advance and had a film deal going with Dreamworks.

Some writers spend decades trying to break into the biz, and even then, they often can’t make ends meet. For legitimate writers, an unproven teenager landing a $500,000 deal to write two books adds insult to the obvious injury of plagiarism. (Latest reports counted 40 close parallels between Viswanathan’s novel and books by Megan McCafferty.)

Compare that to the princely $2,500 advance Stephen King received in 1974 for his first novel, Carrie. (Even adjusted for inflation, that’s still only about $10,000.) King ultimately made much more from paperback and movie rights, and he’s now known for the blockbuster salaries his books command. Still, I think his first earnings highlight the logical disconnect of a teenaged writer with no experience — or product, for that matter, when the deal was made — getting a contract worth half a million.

All 55,000 unsold copies of Viswanathan’s How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild, and Got a Life is being pulled by Little, Brown. Apparently, 9,600 copies had been sold by April 23, before the plagiarism controversy came to light. The movie deal Viswanathan had secured with DreamWorks SKG is off, too.“

Given how unknown they remain, and what a small fraction of that advance they were worth, how many copies of The War in Heaven and The World in Shadow would you guess were sold? 1,000? Maybe as many as 2,500? Note that according to Amazon, World is only 466,504 spots behind Viswanathan’s now-infamous tome.

Whoever comes closest wins the right to claim or name a participant in the VPFL this fall.

An all-too predictable headline from the New York Times:

Rove Is Using Threat of Loss to Stir G.O.P.

In meetings at the White House, aboard Air Force One and in candidates’ home states, Mr. Rove is trying to rally Republicans to stand by the president and his agenda.

He has focused in particular on uniting them behind the administration’s proposals to overhaul immigration, which include guest worker provisions that conservatives despise; the Iraq war, which has driven Mr. Bush’s poll numbers sharply downward; and the Medicare prescription drug program, which the administration says will cost $872 billion from 2006 to 2014 and which Mr. Bush backed enthusiastically despite complaints from conservatives that it was a vast expansion of the social welfare state.

That’s an interesting strategy. Instead of offering them what they want – which many of them wouldn’t buy at this point anyhow – sell them harder on what they hate. The thing is, not even Hillary is enough to scare conservatives to vote for the faux conservatives anymore.

And remember, these programs were supposed to be part of a pragmatic program that would make the administration more popular. The lesson, as always, is that sticking by your principles is not only the correct moral stance, in the long term it is the more effective one.

I quite look forward to the increasingly frantic whining and pleading from the desperate “conservative” commentariat already. You made your deal with the devil, folks, now enjoy the flames.

From the Telegraph:

The wife of the one-time Liberal Democrat leadership contender Mark Oaten, whose political ambitions were ruined by the disclosure of his relationship with a male prostitute, has described to Hello! magazine how she struck him and threw her wedding ring at him after he confessed to the affair….

“It was something almost too big for me to handle,” she explained. “I said an awful lot of horrible things to him at first. I took off my rings and threw them at him and told him never to come back, and I hit him about three times. I’d lost all respect for him.”

Lest you think the PC notion that women can never commit a crime is limited to the USA, note that it may actually be worse in the UK. Do you think the husband of a leading US politician would be left alone by the press after publicly announcing that he’d punched his wife three times?

Also in the UK last week was the interesting juxstaposition of two stabbing cases, one where a woman arranged to meet her husband’s mistress, brought a knife and then stabbed her eighteen times, and another where a man randomly stabbed a pregnant woman he did not know as she passed him in the street.

As you might expect, the man’s attack was lethal, the woman’s wasn’t. As you might not expect, the woman was acquitted of attempted murder despite the premeditated attack and she was ordered to spend 15 months in jail for causing “grievous bodily harm”, which included a punctured lung and permanent blindness in one eye.

Alethea Foster, 61, gasped and stumbled in the dock after a jury of nine women and three men acquitted her of intentionally trying to kill or harm Julie Simpson, 45, a mature student at Cambridge University, last October.

The man’s case hasn’t yet been resolved, he’s in psychological detention. But even being obviously crazy probably won’t prevent him from being convicted of premeditated murder since he is, after all, not one of the Innocent Sex.

To close on a tangential note, if women won’t vote to convict women that they know are guilty of stabbing someone 18 times, do you really think they won’t vote en masse for Hillary Clinton regardless of her many and manifest evils? The temptation to break that unfair glass ceiling will be too great for many Republican women, especially since the Republicans will run someone whose political positions are practically identical to what will be her public positions in 2008.

Remember, she’s always been a Yankees fan….

Howard Dean defines the difference between the parties:

“I was recently asked about the difference between the Democratic and Republican parties,” Dean said. “When it comes right down to it, the essential difference is that the Democrats fundamentally believe it is important to make sure that American Jews feel comfortable being American Jews.”

The Chairman of the Democratic Party informs us that the only difference between Democrat and Republican is the perception of comfort on the part of a miniscule fraction of the populace.

Naturally, Jonah Goldberg of National Review considers this to be “the dumbest, weirdest, goofiest explanation of political differences ever offered” because there are such major differences between the two parties, such as:

Government spending
National sovereignty
Immigration
The United Nations
Invading foreign countries
Occupying foreign countries
NAFTA, FTAA and the AU
The federal deficit
The Federal Reserve
Women in the military
Government-defined marriage
Public schools
Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security
Campaign Finance Reform aka repealing the 1st Amendment
The 10th Amendment

Clearly you’d all better get out there and vote this November! After all, it will be the Most Important Election of Our Lifetimes! Or is that 2008? Wait a minute, did I miss something? I seem to recall that it was 2004!