#Arkhaven INFOGALACTIC #Castalia House
It’s not the perfumed princes, selected for ideological conformity and corrupted by their promised pensions and corporate advisory board positions, who matter. It’s the young men who actually fight:
The biggest cheer of the day at the 121st annual Army-Navy game Saturday was reserved for President Donald Trump.
“USA! USA!” roared the crowd moments after the president took the field for the pre-game coin toss. He also received a warm reception from members of players representing both academies.
Unbeknownst to most of his supporters, that is what the President is presently fighting.
As practically existing, the age of wars being a matter of moving weapons and soldiers has still not been translated into history, but as a concept it has already begun to noticeably fall behind. Following the increase in the number of international treaties limiting the arms race and the proliferation of weapons, the United Nations and regional international organizations have enlarged their intervention power in local wars and regional conflicts and relatively decreased the military threat to national security; on the contrary, the springing up of large amounts of new high technology will actually greatly increase the possibility of non-military measures threatening national security, and the international community, which is at a loss of what to do upon being confronted with non-military threats with such destruction no less than that of a war, at the least lacks necessary and effective limitations. This has objectively accelerated the occurrence of non-military wars, and at the same time it has also resulted in the old concepts and systems of national security being on the brink of collapse.
Aside from the increasingly intense terrorist attacks, as well as the hacker wars, financial wars and computer virus wars which will dominate the future, there are also the present various types of “new concept wars” to which it is difficult to fix a name and are already sufficient to have the security view of “resisting the enemy outside of one’s national gate” become something of the past in the space of an evening.
I would argue that you cannot possibly understand what has been happening for the last twelve years, or understand the nature of the current Constitutional crisis, if you have not read UNRESTRICTED WARFARE by Qiao Lang and Wang Xiangsui, first published in English in 1999. Ignore the histrionic subtitle of the 2017 edition, it is not “China’s master plan to destroy the USA”, but rather, a brilliant explication by two Chinese colonels of the then-new concept of “Total Dimensional Warfare”, to which I prefer to refer as “comprehensive warfare” and is, regardless of what one calls it, the real 5th Generation Warfare that so many glory-seeking would-be William S. Linds have attempted, incorrectly, to coin.
The current election crisis is not about Biden, or the Democrats, it’s not even about the Constitution. It is actually about defeating the world’s dominant military and rendering it hors de combat without firing a shot. And that, you see, is why I am confident that there is absolutely no way that President Trump ever even considered relying upon the state legislatures, or the courts, to ensure that he remains Commander-in-Chief for the next four years or more, for one single moment.
We should probably keep in mind that the fact a war has been waged with non-military means to date does not mean that it will remain that way indefinitely.
It’s appears to be obvious why the Michigan judge is attempting to lock down the information being gathered from the voting machines in Antrim County.
CDMedia has been informed by sources close to the investigation that cyber teams which examined Dominion Voting Systems machines in Antrim County, Michigan last weekend have found concrete proof of massive cyber election fraud.
There is more coming on this story but essentially fake ballots in massive amounts were counted and ‘approved’ in Europe, in either Spain or Germany.
The examination was ordered by a local judge. The Michigan Secretary of State has intervened in the case to prevent the examination results from being released.
CDMedia has learned the error rate for ballot verification was set to 1000s of times the legal rate. Then, fake ballots were sent over the internet for ‘adjudication’ in Europe, either Germany or Spain. The ‘adjudication’ was done in batches. “The evidence of fraud was not where we were looking,” said our source. “It was cleverly hidden in the error rate.”
If correct, this would explain the huge numbers of votes being inexplicably adjudicated in Georgia and Pennsylvania, as well as two dozen other states. It would also explain the Barcelona and Frankfurt connections.
Many readers here won’t even remember the name “cisbio”. He’s a gamma troll who was banned back in 2011 after his No True Atheist arguments were slapped down. Nine freaking years later, he’s back trying to take shots at me for having “run away” from the USA nearly 25 years in advance.
First of all, I had little choice considering the bio-nuclear conflagration that will consume every living creature in North America once the war between the US military and the aliens from the hidden fourth planet orbiting Alpha Centauri begins in late 2021 when the defeated Harris forces successfully convince the aliens to abandon their neutrality and provide them with advanced weapons technology…. wait, I’ve said too much… Never mind all that. How about that Supreme Court decision? Pretty lame, am I right?
Second, observe how insanely vengeful gammas are, and how long they will wait in silence to strike back at you in revenge for the public humiliation they suffered at your hands. No wonder women don’t want to allow gammas to get anywhere near them at any time. They instinctively grasp that merely smiling at a gamma could lead to literal decades of needing to be on their guard against the long-delayed gamma revenge attacks.
On a side note, there are a remarkable number of shills appearing in the comments today. I’d estimate 3x to 4x normal, most with Google accounts and names you won’t recognize as regulars despite the breezy sense of familiarity they exude. There are over 300 comments caught in the spam trap already and it’s not even 9 AM yet. So, be aware that most of the blackpilling and regretful acceptances of Trump’s defeat you’ll see is Paid Fake Comments. The mods have nuked the most overt stuff, but we’re leaving the more subtle stuff so you can learn to recognize it.
Here’s an example from our friend “Peter”, whose comments I’m sure all of you will know and recognize from all of his many previous posts that you somehow can’t recall ever seeing.
Look guys.. Trump did his job and is now done. His personality flaws eventually over came his policies but you can take solice in that the political landscape has been changed forever. Out of everything that he did, the one thing most important is to present an example of what will work in the future (and what doesnt). Imagine a future candidate with the same policies but without the significant personality flaws. Dont shed a tear because what happened could not have been better.
And don’t worry about Biden.. he is a one term president by nature of his age, he is middle of the road and in some case more conservative on some issues that Trump. Four years as vp will not be enough to get Harris elected and there are several possible candidates for 2024.
It’s the “look guys” that amuses me. He’s just one of us. Just one of the guys. Hello, fellow guys!
President Trump is quite clear on the matter.
The Supreme Court really let us down. No Wisdom, No Courage!
And what, pray tell, do you think courage might be required for? But it’s apparent that he wasn’t counting on the Supreme Court to save the USA. Don’t forget this:
If the two Senators from Georgia should lose, which would be a horrible thing for our Country, I am the only thing that stands between “Packing the Court” (last number heard, 25), and preserving it. I will not, under any circumstances, Pack the Court!
He also knows he is the only thing that stands between the end of the US Constitution and preserving it.
(ORDER LIST: 592 U.S.)
FRIDAY DECEMBER 11, 2020
ORDER IN PENDING CASE
155, ORIG. TEXAS V. PENNSYLVANIA, ET AL.
The State of Texas’s motion for leave to file a bill of complaint is denied for lack of standing under Article III of the Constitution. Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognizable interest in the manner in which another State conducts its elections. All other pending motions are dismissed as moot.
Statement of Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins:
In my view, we do not have discretion to deny the filing of a bill of complaint in a case that falls within our original jurisdiction.
So, by a 7-2 vote, the Supreme Court renders itself irrelevant. This is hardly a surprise; I never had any more faith in Barrett than in Roberts. Perhaps there are a few more permutations and a little more drama before the court option is entirely closed, but it is becoming increasingly likely that the decision to preserve the Constitution will fall to President Trump.
May God grant him wisdom and inspire him to make the right decision.
It’s worth noting that prior to the decision, Alexander Macris shared his doubts that it really mattered what the Supreme Court decided:
No matter what the Supreme Court rules, 70 million Americans are going to be very unhappy. For 46 states, 4 legislatures, 3 territories, and 2 governors of the Union to be involved in this lawsuit tells us that the stakes are incredibly high. Indeed, this is the gravest Constitutional Crisis since 1860. As such, there’s little reason to believe that the Supreme Court’s decision will put a definitive end to the crisis. Dred Scott didn’t stop the US Civil War, and Texas vs Pennsylvania may not stop whatever comes next.
Indeed. But, as always, wait two days AFTER Trump’s initial comments in response to this abidication by the Supreme Court before reaching any conclusions. My immediate thought is that the president needed to all all the other options to be exhausted, and allow all other hopes to be extinguished, before taking on the burden of crossing the Rubicon by invoking the Insurrection Act.
Texas GOP responds:
Perhaps law-abiding states should bond together and form a Union of states that will abide by the constitution.
Perhaps indeed.
Joe Biden will not set foot in that White House. 170k votes in Michigan have just been discovered to not have a trace to a registered voter in Michigan. For those asking, this information is in the Texas lawsuit. 174k ballots in Wayne County Michigan can not be tracked to a registered voter in the state.
Those votes are all absentee ballots to whom no registered voter can be connected. It’s right there in the previous post in the Texas response to Michigan. That is clear and incontrovertible evidence of fraud. Trump clearly won Michigan on that basis alone.
Michigan also admits that it “is at a loss to explain the[] allegations” showing that Wayne County lists 174,384 absentee ballots that do not tie to a registered voter. Mich. Br. 15; Compl. ¶ 97.
Texas doesn’t hesitate to shoot right back at the assertions made by the four states about its claims. This is just the first section, which deals with the various assertions made in the four responses that Texas’s claims have no basis in fact.
Defendant States’ factual defense of the administration of the 2020 election lacks merit. Thus, Texas states a claim on those issues.
A. Pennsylvania’s critiques of the evidence are false.
Pennsylvania attacks Dr. Cicchetti’s probability analysis calculating that the statistical chances of Mr. Biden’s winning the election in the Defendant States individually and collectively, given the known facts, are less than one in a quadrillion. Penn. Br. 6-8. Pennsylvania argues that Dr Cicchetti did not take into account that “votes counted later were indisputably not ‘randomly drawn’ from the same population of votes” in his analysis. Penn. Br. 6-8.
Pennsylvania is wrong.
First, Dr. Cicchetti did take into account the possibility that votes were not randomly drawn in the later time period but, as stated in his original Declaration, he is not aware of any data that would support such an assertion. See Supplemental Declaration of Charles Cicchetti (“Supp. Cicchetti Decl.”) ¶¶ 2-3. (App. 152a-153a). Second, although Pennsylvania argues that such data is “indisputabl[e]”, Pennsylvania offers in support nothing other than counsel’s assertion. Unsworn statements of counsel, however, are not evidence. See Frazier v. United States, 335 U.S. 497, 503 (1948).
In fact, Pennsylvania’s rebuttal to Dr. Cicchetti’s analysis consists solely of ad hominem attacks, calling it “nonsense” and “worthless”. Penn Br. 6, 8. Notably, a subsequent analysis by Dr. Cicchetti, comparing Mr. Biden’s underperformance in the Top-50 urban areas in the Country relative to former Secretary Clinton’s performance in the 2016 election, reinforces the unusual statistical improbability of Mr. Biden’s vote totals in the five urban areas in the Defendant States. See Supp. Cicchetti Decl. at ¶¶ 4-12, 20-21. (App. 154a-158a).
Pennsylvania also tries to explain away the reported 400,000 discrepancy between the number of mail-in ballots Pennsylvania sent out as reported on November 2, 2020 (2.7 million) and the figure reported on November 4, 2020 (3.1 million) as described in the Ryan Report. Penn. Br. 6-8; Compl. ¶ 59.
Pennsylvania again conclusorily asserts that the discrepancy is purportedly due to the fact that “[o]f the 3.1 million ballots sent out, 2.7 million were mail-in ballots and 400,000 were absentee ballots.” Pennsylvania Br. 6. However, as fifteen Pennsylvania legislators stated in the Ryan Report, signed on December 4, 2020: “This discrepancy … has not been explained.” Compl. ¶ 59. Compl. ¶ 59 (App. 143a-44a).
The Ryan Report states further: “This apparent discrepancy can only be evaluated by reviewing all transaction logs into the SURE system…” (App. 144a). Pennsylvania’s unsupported explanation has no merit.
Notably, Pennsylvania says nothing about the 118,426 ballots that had no mail date, were nonsensically returned before the mailed date, or were improbably returned one day after the mail date. Lastly, Pennsylvania argues that it did not break its promise to this Court to segregate ballots received after November 3, 2020. Penn. Br. 6. Justice Alito’s order dated November 6, 2020 belies that argument. See Compl. ¶ 8. And because Pennsylvania broke its promise to this Court, it is not possible to determine how many tens, or even hundreds of thousands of illegal late ballots were wrongfully counted. Compl. ¶ 55.
B. Georgia’s critiques of the evidence are false.
Georgia argues that the “[r]ejection rates for signatures on absentee ballots remained largely unchanged” as between the 2018 and 2020 elections, referring the Court to Wood v. Raffensperger, No. 1:20-cv-04651-SDG, 2020 WL 6817513, at *10 (N.D. Ga. Nov. 20, 2020) (“Wood”). Georgia Br. 4. Georgia’s reliance on Wood is misplaced because the analysis therein related to rejection rates for absentee ballots—as opposed to the mail-in ballots analyzed by Dr. Cicchetti. Supp. Cicchetti Decl. ¶¶ 13-19. (App. 158a-60a). Georgia’s rejection rate comparison is therefore inapposite. Id.
Specifically, the district court in Wood cited to “ECF 33-6” (id. at n.30) which is the affidavit of Chris Harvey, Georgia Director of Elections. First, the Harvey Affidavit itself does not cite any evidence for signature rejection rates; rather, it relies solely upon a complaint in an unrelated action. Supp. Cicchetti Decl. ¶¶ 14-15. (App. 158a-59a) (citing Democratic Party of Georgia et al. v. Raffensperger). Second, as explained by Dr. Cicchetti, the Harvey Affidavit relies on 2018 data which does not provide an accurate comparison with a presidential election year. Id. ¶¶ 19, 22. (App. 160a-62a). More importantly, the Harvey affidavit discusses absentee ballots—not mail-in ballots at issue here and as analyzed by Dr. Cicchetti. Mail-in ballots are subject to much higher rejection rates. Indeed, in 2018, the rejection rate for mail-in ballots was actually 3.32{e61d147451bc60549e96d95b5c07be35845e0345eab7ed5d54cc3d49f812ab5c} or more than twenty times higher than the rejection rate for the absentee ballots that Georgia incorrectly compares to dispute Dr. Cicchetti’s analysis. . Id. at ¶¶ 16-18. (App. 159a-60a). In short, Georgia’s attempt to rebut Dr. Cicchetti’s analysis fails. Id. ¶ 22. (App. 161a-62a).
C. Michigan’s critiques of the evidence are false.
Michigan’s argument against the evidence of irregularities in Wayne County’s election process fares no better. First, Michigan concedes that, with respect to the ballots issued pursuant to the Secretary of State’s unlawful mailing of ballot applications and online ballot applications—which also did not comply with statutory signature verification requirements— “there is no way to associate the voter who used a particular application with his or her ballot after it is voted.” Mich. Br. 9; Compl. ¶¶ 81-87. Michigan’s “heads we win, tails you lose” defense should be rejected. This is a problem solely of the Secretary of State’s own making.
Michigan also admits that it “is at a loss to explain the[] allegations” showing that Wayne County lists 174,384 absentee ballots that do not tie to a registered voter. Mich. Br. 15; Compl. ¶ 97. That is precisely the point. And it illustrates exactly why the Court should grant Plaintiff’s motion.
Similarly, Michigan’s argument that the fact that 71{e61d147451bc60549e96d95b5c07be35845e0345eab7ed5d54cc3d49f812ab5c} of Detroit’s Absent Voter Counting Boards (“AVCBs”) were unbalanced provides no basis not to certify results is false. Mich. Br. 16. In fact, while Michigan asserts that this “can happen for a number of innocuous reasons” it nonetheless offers no explanation for the highly suspicious circumstances: that this out of balance situation resulted in more than 174,000 votes not being tied to a registered voter; that two members of the Wayne County Board of Canvassers initially voted against certification based on these issues, then voted in favor of certification after receiving both threats and assurances of an immediate audit; and then rescinded their certification votes after the promised audit was refused. Compl. ¶¶ 99-101. Texas understands that these issues involving Wayne County’s irregular votes have not been adjudicated, and Michigan does not contend otherwise. But it is suggestive at this preliminary stage of the proceeding.
Lastly, Michigan’s attempts to argue away the evidence showing that Wayne County had a policy of not performing signature verifications as required under MCL § 168.765a(6) are misplaced. Mich. Br. 14-15; Compl. ¶¶ 85-87, 92-95. Michigan cites the affidavit of Christopher Thomas, a consultant for Detroit, used in litigation in Michigan state court, as evidence for its assertion. Mich. Br. 11, 15-16.
Thomas, however, does not state that he personally observed signatures being verified in accordance with MCL § 168.765a(6). That statute requires that the clerk place a “written statement” or “stamp” on each ballot envelope where the voter signature is placed, indicating that the voter signature was in fact checked and verified with the signature on file with the State. Compl. ¶ 92. Thus, contrary to Michigan’s argument, Thomas’ assertions do not rebut the testimony of Jessy Jacob, a decades-long City of Detroit employee stating that election workers were instructed not to compare signatures. Id. ¶ 94. In fact, a poll challenger, Lisa Gage, testified in an affidavit that has not been submitted in any prior litigation, that not a single one of the several hundred to a thousand ballot envelopes she observed had a written statement or stamp indicating the voter signature had been verified at the TCF Center in accordance with MCL § 168.765a(6). Affidavit of Lisa Gage ¶ 17. (App. 165a).
D. Wisconsin’s critiques of the evidence are false.
Wisconsin argues that “Texas offers no proof of a single voter who cast a ballot in the general election who did not qualify for indefinite confinement status.” Wisc. Br. 31. Under Wisconsin law, “indefinite confinement status” allows a voter to avoid Wisconsin’s statutory photo identification and signature verification requirements. Compl. ¶¶ 115-17. The number of people claiming this special status exploded from fewer than 57,000 voters in 2016 to nearly 216,000 in 2020. Compl. ¶ 122. Wisconsin claims this increase was due to more people voting by mail in 2020. Wisc. Br. 31.
Voting by mail, however, has nothing to do with being classified as “indefinitely confined.” Wisconsin offers no plausible justification for this nearly four-fold increase in voters claiming this special status.
Wisconsin also ignores the fact that the Wisconsin Supreme Court found that clerks in Dane County and Milwaukee County had earlier violated Wisconsin law by issuing guidance stating that all voters should identify themselves as “indefinitely confined” on absentee ballot applications because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Compl. ¶¶ 118-19. Despite that order, the WEC again violated Wisconsin law and issued a directive to the Wisconsin clerks prohibiting removal of voters from the registry for indefinite-confinement status even if the voter is no longer “indefinitely confined,” thereby cementing this improper practice in the 2020 general election. Id. at ¶¶ 120-21.
Lastly, Wisconsin ignores the sworn testimony of Ethan J. Pease, a box truck delivery driver subcontracted to the U.S. Postal Service (“USPS”) to deliver truckloads of mail-in ballots to the sorting center in Madison, WI, who testified that USPS employees were backdating ballots received after November 3, 2020. Compl. ¶127. (App. 149a-151a).
Further, Pease testified how a senior USPS employee told him on November 4, 2020 that “An order came down from the Wisconsin/Illinois Chapter of the Postal Service that 100,000 ballots” had been misplaced and described how the USPS dispatched employees to “find[] … the ballots.” Id. (App. 150a).
It’s pretty clear already that Texas has both the facts and the law on its side. That doesn’t mean it will win, of course, because the law is really little more than a game of giving the judge(s) the legal justification to do what he thinks best. But Texas has provided the Supreme Court with considerably more ammunition than the PA-GA-MI-WI cabal.
I especially like that Texas has called out the “heads we win, tails you lose” defense that Michigan is trying to play. I find that sort of Catch-22 nonsense to be particularly obnoxious.
First, in the interests of efficiently communicating with the Library and Libraria subscribers, we have sent out invitations to SocialGalactic to all of them. So if you are a subscriber and you’re not yet on SG, please accept the invite and join, as this is the best way to keep abreast of the latest Library news.
Second, we have decided to push back Aristotle’s POLITICS. Book 8 will now be the classic children’s novel HEIDI by Johanna Spyri, and will consist of both volumes in their entirety. Book 9 will be Aristotle’s RHETORIC, as per the request of several subscribers who would prefer to see it first. We will be doing POLITICS, but most likely late in 2021. Other books planned for 2021 are the first volume of A THRONE OF BONES, at least one volume of THE ARTS OF WAR, and SWISS FAMILY ROBINSON.
Third, both editions of THE DIVINE COMEDY have been stamped and will be bound early next week. You can see the Libraria edition below; that is an actual photo of the stamped goatskin ready to have the interior block cased inside. All four editions of PLUTARCH’S LIVES are being stamped today and will also be bound next week. They may or may not arrive in time for Christmas, depending upon where you live and how quickly the bindery is able to process and ship the books.
