Tag: immigration

Immigration and Outsourcing

Immigration and outsourcing are not the answer to greater profits over time. To the contrary, they are a certain path toward destroying the very organization for which they are supposed to be generating increased profits.

Ubisoft is on the verge of complete collapse due to terrible decisions like trying to develop the new Prince of Persia in India, as legendary WoW producer Grummz explains:

Prince of Persia, why it was REALLY cancelled. Insider tells all. “The game is so bad…” This from my Ubisoft sources:

  • 90% developed by Ubisoft India.
  • Project was a disaster.
  • Transferred last minute to Ubisoft Montreal to “fix” it.
  • Game unfixable.
  • Cancelled.

Note that Ubisoft Montreal spent FOUR YEARS trying to fix it and they couldn’t. I can attest that my one experience working with Indian developers for 3M on a sales training software project was an absolute and utter catastrophe. They couldn’t implement even the simplest, most basic features with any degree of reliability, and as far as the graphics went, they appeared to be limited to the stick-figure level.

DISCUSS ON SG

The End of Australia

The dirt isn’t magic and foreigners don’t care about your so-called “rights” derived from a god in whom they don’t believe:

The nation I knew and loved just died yesterday. Actually, it didn’t die, it was murdered by treasonous politicians and lobby groups.

All those people who would hear about tyranny and oppression and then bleat about “oh, it could never happen here” are about to get a good dose of reality – and they will get it good and hard.

The reason tyranny rarely did happen in Australia (nowhere is perfect) was because of legal and political principles which had developed in the mother country for centuries and continued here because the people believed in them.

The Mulit-culti brigade who wanted to replace the people with others from non-British/European backgrounds insisted that all we needed to do was to keep those ideals and principles.

It didn’t occur to them (or they didn’t let on) that different peoples would naturally have different ideals and principles.

They wouldn’t admit that we didn’t have magic dirt in Australia that foreigners could step onto and immediately be transformed into “Aussies” with the same beliefs and cultures as the locals.

Yesterday, the Federal Parliament passed the Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism legislation.

Despite the title, the bill doesn’t adequately define Antisemitism, Hate or Extremism. In other words, these will depend largely on the Government to decide what they are.

That doesn’t sound like a big deal but it should terrify you.

That’s because the Government now has the power to define these terms mostly as they like and prosecute people they don’t like with up to 15 years in jail.

The real poison in this bill, however, is that it smashes no less than four of the founding principles of British governance which have held sway here since its founding.

To be honest, I find it very difficult to be concerned about the fate of Australia, since it’s already a foregone conclusion that it’s going to be a Chinese colony by 2050 or so. This is exactly the sort of thing that is inevitable when you disarm yourselves, turn your government over to women and foreigners, and then… profit? This outcome was inevitable from the moment Australia abandoned the last vestiges of its White Australia policy in 1973.

So posture bravely all you like about “don’t mess with Texas” or “try that in a small town” or whatever, but no words, no ideology, and no bravado will ever prove an adequate substitute for simply keeping those who don’t share your heritage, your history, your religion, or your values out of your midst.

DISCUSS ON SG

The H1B Disaster

Karl Denninger quite rightly condemns President Trump’s failure to stand up for the American worker:

So Trump has once again betrayed the tens of millions (the majority of the whole, this time) who voted for him. He has recently stated, in a sit-down interview, that if the Democrats would consent he would support “immigration reform” that includes a path to citizenship for those who are here.

In other words: More flooding of the zone, more cheating, more degradation of America and letting those who broke the law stay.

The uncovering of scams in these people as a population group continues. More than half of all “non-domiciled” CDL issuances in NC, for example, are now known to be unlawful. That is, scammed. Thousands of immigrants scammed nursing tests and credentials and got hired; the nurse at your bed may well be an unqualified immigrant. Nobody — and I do mean nobody — has been prosecuted for any of this. Not the principles nor those who enabled the scams and issued the credentials. Not one person has gone to prison or been indicted thus far in any of these scams.

The Somali problem is clear; even after a decade of being in the United States they cannot speak English competently and most of the families headed by said persons (approximately 80%) are on welfare. Most. This compared with less than one in five of households headed by those born in America and not of said heritage.

It is often claimed that the H-1bs are “of great help” to American business. They are — to cutting employment cost. But that’s all. They also, once any of them get into management, start practicing the very same caste system nonsense that they have been inculcated with in their own nation which is illegal in the United States but they do it anyway, and nobody goes to jail.

Every economist who said that “immigration is good for the economy” needs to be jailed for malpractice. Every single one. Immigration is not, and could never be, an unqualified good, and in its current form, is an obvious socially-destructive evil.

DISCUSS ON SG

Immigration and IQ Matter

Here’s why IQ matters.

Look at the percentage of problem causers vs problem solvers in a 100-avgIQ group vs 85-avgIQ.

Imagine MOST of your population is problem causers, a tiny sliver is problem solvers, and no geniuses? A place like that would look like, well, like somalia or india.

Then imagine a place where most people are maintainers, and you have more midwits and problems solvers than problem causers? Well, that would look like America (30 years ago before we let in india and somalia)

HoeMath is absolutely correct. I addressed this very issue eleven years ago in Cuckservative. It’s interesting to see how some of the concepts, and even some of the terms, have now permeated the mainstream discourse. That’s encouraging for the state of discourse ten years from now, when for some reason that no one will be able to explain, no one believes in evolution anymore.

The fundamental challenge is that neither midwits nor maintainers are capable of seeing problems coming from down the road. Their perspective is always a limited one of the last 15-20 years. If something hasn’t caused a problem yet, that means it never will. The maintainers ignore everything but their day-to-day responsibilities and the midwits devote themselves to aggressively attacking every problem solver or genius who is concerned about the problems the midwits can’t yet perceive.

Here’s a genius-level future problem for you: explain why PZ isn’t being actively suppressed.

Think that one through if you want a sleepless night or two. Although it could be worse. If it gets featured by any of the major book reviews, or appears on The New York Times bestseller list, and I start getting requests for puff-piece interviews, Houston will definitely have a problem.

DISCUSS ON SG

Greenland: the 51st State

There is no reason the USA shouldn’t take Greenland. Hell, Minnesota has enough SOMALIS to occupy Greenland. At least then they might serve some useful purpose for something more than child care scams.

US President Donald Trump has warned that Washington could obtain Greenland the “hard way,” saying he would not allow the strategic North Atlantic island to fall prey to Russia or China. The Kingdom of Denmark, which holds sovereignty over Greenland, has opposed the US push to acquire the island.

Speaking to reporters at the White House on Friday, Trump said that the US is “going to do something on Greenland whether they like it or not,” arguing that “Russia or China will take over Greenland” if Washington does not act. “I would like to make a deal, you know, the easy way. But if we don’t do it the easy way, we’re going to do it the hard way,” he stressed, without elaborating on how far he was ready to go. Trump, who has acknowledged that a military option is on the table, also did not rule out paying Greenlanders when asked about compensating residents.

Greenland is an autonomous Danish territory with a population of less than 57,000 despite being larger than Mexico, and the US already has a military presence there.

Demographics matter, people. Demographics have always mattered. Nobody gives a quantum fragment of an airborne rodent’s backside that a few Danes were there first.

Ask an American Indian how much the US government cares about that.

DISCUSS ON SG

Greenland Needs Americans

I really fail to understand the wailing and gnashing of teeth on the part of the Danes and the rest of the European Union. If there are millions of Americans who are just seeking a better life in Greenland, then who are the European Union to stand in their way?

Especially considering the way in which the free movement of peoples is enshrined into the EU constitution as a fundamental human right. Because mass immigration is just neo-colonialism.

If Americans want Greenland, they have a right to it. Greenland is just an idea. It belongs to the world. And it isn’t even green, anyhow.

The amusing thing about the morons of Clown World is that they never seem to anticipate the inevitability of their own rhetoric being used against them by others operating in their own self-interest.

Besides, once Americans get to Greenland, they’re as Greenlandian as every other Greenlander. Haven’t we been repeatedly assured of this from the “X has always been a nation of immigrants” crowd? America is just exporting its idea to Greenland, and who can possibly oppose that?

On a related note, I give Australia about twenty years before it’s as formally Chinese as Taiwan.

DISCUSS ON SG

Another Year, Another War

And another new set of incoming refugees, this time from Venezuela:

US forces have captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife during Washington’s strikes on the nation’s capital, US President Donald Trump has announced, adding that the two have been flown out of the South American country. Venezuelan authorities have long accused the US of attempting to topple the government in Caracas.

In a statement on Saturday on Truth Social, Trump confirmed that the US had “successfully carried out a large scale strike against Venezuela.”

“Its leader, President Nicolas Maduro, who has been, along with his wife, captured and flown out of the Country. This operation was done in conjunction with US Law Enforcement,” he wrote, adding that additional details would be provided at a news conference in his Florida residence in Mar-a-Lago at 11am. Unnamed US officials told CBS that the operation had been carried out by Delta Force, the US Army’s top special mission unit.

I’m sure we can expect the European Union and all the usual suspects to denounce this attack on the head of a sovereign state, right? Vladimir Putin has to be thinking that he could have saved himself a lot of trouble if he’d simply captured Zelensky and his wife back in 2022.

Anyhow, the long list of failed US interventions and occupations provides no reason that this invasion of Venezuela is going to turn out well for Americans anytime soon. Although I suppose Venezuelan-run child care centers can’t be any worse than the Somali-run ones. Because you know that an influx of Venezuelan immigrants is the only reliable consequence of this action.

DISCUSS ON SG

Replacement 3.0

Americans haven’t been in control of New York City for a long time. Once you start letting immigrants run things, you can’t be surprised when the process continues considerably further than you’d originally imagined and declared would be just fine:

Zohran Mamdani has been sworn in as New York City’s 110th mayor, the first Muslim and African-born person of Indian descent to hold the position. The 34‑year‑old took his midnight oath on a centuries-old Quran in a long‑closed subway station beneath City Hall on Thursday.

At a public inauguration speech outside City Hall later in the day, Mamdani leaned heavily into his democratic socialist ideology, vowing to “govern expansively and audaciously.”

“My fellow New Yorkers – today begins a new era!” he declared in a nearly 25‑minute address before a crowd of about 4,000 people. I was elected as a Democratic socialist and I will govern as a Democratic socialist,” he said. “I will not abandon my principles for fear of being deemed radical.”

It doesn’t really matter at this point. New York was lost in the early 20th century, it was just disguised by the redefinition of “American” under the immigrants’ civic nationalist propaganda. All of the various political moves now are just laying the stage for the shape of the eventual breakup.

What does Mamdani have to offer, and how can he represent heritage Americans in any way when he stands against everything that they stand for? He can’t, of course, nor does he wish to do so. Which is why dissolution is now not only inevitable, but obvious.

It’s the gates of Toledo redux.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Logic Holds

If we can suspend the constitution in its entirety over a 99.999% survivable virus, we can suspend it to expel all the Somalis and the Democrats facilitating their welfare and election scams.

Without question. Furthermore, the Somalis, naturalized or not, have no Constitutional rights as Americans. The Constitution was written to protect the rights of the Posterity of the Founding Fathers of the American Revolution. Regardless of what immigrant judges may have declared over the years, no one else resident in the USA has any claim to any rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.

You can point horse and say cow all you like, but that doesn’t make the horse a cow.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Inevitable Arrives

I have always said that feminism is the dumbest, most incoherent, most violent, and most destabilizing ideology in the history of ideology. Now Great Britain is discovering one of the many reasons why:

Britain’s leading abortion charity has been criticised for encouraging ‘sex-selective’ terminations – amid fears these are on the rise among the country’s Indian women. The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), which carries out 110,000 terminations a year, suggests that aborting a baby on the basis of sex is not illegal – despite Government advice explicitly stating it is against the law.

Furious campaigners called the advice ‘irresponsible’ and pointed out that many pregnant British-Indian women are under huge pressure to have boys, and may be coerced into having an abortion as soon as a scan reveals a female foetus.

Women of Indian origin are likely to have aborted 400 girls on the basis of their sex in the five years up to 2021, the latest figures reveal.

But Department of Health guidance issued to doctors in 2014 states: ‘Abortion on the grounds of gender alone is illegal. Gender is not itself a lawful ground under the Abortion Act.’

But the BPAS website says: ‘The law is silent on the matter. Reason of foetal sex is not a specified ground for abortion within the Abortion Act, but nor is it specifically prohibited.’ BPAS carries out almost half the abortions in the UK, through drugs it sends by post or surgical procedures at its 55 clinics nationwide.

If women have the right to choose abortion, then they have the right to choose abortion for any reason. The entire concept of the freedom of speech is literally founded upon the undeniable observation of the freedom of thought, which is not a right, but a definitional tautology: one man cannot know what another man thinks.

Human Action was written on the basis of acting man alone knowing the basis for his actions. Or, in this case, her actions.

A society cannot have both a) abortion rights and b) laws against women having abortions for the wrong reasons. Obviously, there is no such thing as a “right” to murder unborn children simply due to the physical location of the child and abortion should be illegal.

But in places where it isn’t, these issues will inevitably arise, as I pointed out nearly 20 years ago. Now, what was once a problem in India is now a problem in the UK thanks to the joys of mass immigration.

DISCUSS ON SG