Cancelling history

This attack on historical artifacts in the British Library is being portrayed as a mere “relabelling” of history, but it is obvious that this is little more than a precursor to eliminating it entirely.

Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales are to be relabelled in the British Library to explain how it once came to be owned by a slave-trading family.

The relabelling of the collection is part of the institution’s ‘anti-racism action plan’ which was put in place after the Black Lives Matter protests last year, internal documents seen by The Sunday Telegraph reveal.

It will see an overhaul of all 210 items in the library’s public-facing Treasures Collection which includes invaluable literary artefacts such as Shakespeare’s First Folio, some of which have links to the slave trade in their history.

Labels will explain how the item came to be in the country and if it has at any point changed hands via dubious means, i.e. being ‘taken, captured, seized or looted’.

For the case of Geoffrey Chaucer’s manuscript of The Canterbury Tales, written between 1387 and 1400 – before the Portuguese started the Atlantic slave trade – it will be explained how the book came to be owned by the Harley family of slave-traders around 300 years later.

The family became wealthy through the exploits of Robert Harley (1661 – 1724) who, as Chancellor of the Exchequer, established the South Sea Company in 1711 and was connected to plantations in Barbados, Antigua and Surinam.

The South Sea Company was responsible for the transportation of around 64,000 enslaved Africans between 1715 and 1731 to Spanish plantations in Central and Southern America.  

First they label your history bad. Then they revise it. After that, they eliminate it. Then they eliminate everyone with glasses.

They always seek Zero History.



The end of contract law

A seller’s experience being ripped off by a buyer with the full legal assistance of the payment processor shows how the Internet economy is increasingly post-contractual.

So I went back to court today with the impression that I would have a quick and simple trial with the buyer. A couple of amateurs. It was before the same judge as my trial with PayPal. So the judge consolidated the two cases. So I was again met by a high-priced attorney representing PayPal. We end up in the court room for another 2 1/2 hr trial in what can only be described as a legal menage a trois between myself, Paypal, and the buyer. Three different parties, three different interests. To open, PayPal‘s attorney presents about an inch thick file with all of the research and case law as he sees pertains to the previous trial that is still under consideration. At one point, the judge made a comment that PayPal has to have spent more than $14,000 to defend a small claims case. I suspect that PayPal is taking this so seriously because for $70 and no experience, I think I have made a worthy case to punch holes in their user agreement. I suspect this may have much larger implications and consequences on the line for them.

I found it somewhat awkward and put me at a disadvantage to first have to argue that I fulfilled all of my obligations to the buyer as a seller. There are many unnecessary details to this case that I won’t go into detail here, but in our communication, the buyer was offered insurance and declined and agreed to be responsible for the risk of shipping. So I had to argue that he was responsible for any potential loss. At the same time, I had to argue that the transaction between the buyer and myself was complete. It was PayPal who came in after the fact to reverse those charges and take the money from me. And I argued that this was done in breach of their contract as it specifically does not cover financial product or investment of any type. The buyer argued that since he paid with PayPal, he believed he was under the terms of PayPal which required confirmation of shipping, signature confirmation, etc. The judge also made the comment that the buyer could say he completed his obligation by making payment. It was PayPal that took the money from me, not the buyer. This was something he would have to consider. PayPal argued that because we were both in breach of contract and had a dispute between us, that it is their right to arbitrarily decide.

In short, it is a triangular mess but with some important points to consider for the judge and PayPal as a whole that could have much wider ranging implications. The judge states that he will have to research the decision and it would be 3 to 4 weeks, at a minimum, before he would have a written decision….

I received a 24 page verdict from the judge.  I have honestly not read it in its entirety as it has many references to previous case law and legal minutia that does not interest me.  In summary, unfortunately things did not break my way.  My first case against the buyer was dismissed for the small claims court lacking jurisdiction over a Canadian citizen.  There are many pages of explanation, but basically I can file in a Canadian court, if desired.  In reading the judge’s commentary and perhaps reading between the lines, I believe I would win the case.  The question is would it be worth the hassle.  I will consider whether or not to refile in a Candian small claims court, or their equivalent.  I do not believe I will be shipping to Canada again in the future.  Not worth the hassle. 

As for the case against Paypal, again the verdict did not break in my favor.  While I was successful in showing precious metals are in fact not covered under the Buyer’s Protection Program, ultimately the judgement states I can not say Paypal was in breach of contract while I myself was also in breach of the same contract.  By failing to acquire pre-approval for shipping of precious metals, I breached the contract.  This breach, in essence, gave Paypal the right to decide at their discretion.  In summary, I do not plan to accept or utilize Paypal for any transactions involving precious metals in the future.  I see posts that others view this as a “red flag” and they would not enter into a transaction with a seller who does not accept Paypal.  I suppose I am more than willing to pass on those buyers.

Hope this can help someone else in the future.

One thing that is now eminently clear is that both judges and arbitrators only give lip service to the idea that the consumer cannot reasonably be expected to be aware of all the legal fine print. Arbitrators in particular will absolutely hold the consumer responsible for every jot and tittle they know perfectly well that he hasn’t read, and they will do so despite being completely unfamiliar with their own arbitration rules. And by “completely unfamiliar”, I mean literally not knowing what the actual Rule 1 says. This is why the California legislature is regularly passing stronger and stronger protections for consumers, because both the legal system and the private judging system refuse to accept the reality of the corporate deck being stacked completely against the consumer.

Thus, they will readily ignore the contract, the law, and even their own rules in order to let the corporation off the hook if they can find any excuse to do so. Fortunately, the law, especially in California, is considerably harsher on corporate misbehavior than people commonly believe, so it is very far from impossible to beat them in court, so long as no obvious mistakes are made. For example, it is obvious that a state court has no jurisdiction over a Canadian, although of course if the seller had originally filed in Canada, Paypal’s lawyers would probably have argued that the seller had no standing in Canada and who knows what a Canadian judge would have to say about that.

Anyhow, this post-contractual legal environment spells eventual disaster for the neo-liberal global economy, and is another indication of the shift to nationalism and localism.


Cool, now do the Fed

And the Bank of England. Because does anyone really believe the central banks of the USA and the UK are any less corrupt than Lebanon’s central bank? There is presumably a reason the Fed has vehemently resisted being audited since Ron Paul first started calling for a public audit.

Switzerland’s attorney-general is investigating allegations that Lebanon’s central bank governor and his brother embezzled more than $300m from that institution through transactions to a mysterious offshore company. 

“Since April 2002 at least, it appears the central bank governor, Riad Salame, with help from his brother, Raja Salame, organised embezzlement operations, . . . exceeding $300m to the detriment of the Banque du Liban [BdL],” the Swiss attorney-general’s office wrote in a letter to the Lebanese authorities requesting mutual legal assistance. The letter, sent in November last year, was leaked and is publicly available online on a Lebanese news site. 

A Lebanese official confirmed the authenticity of the letter. The Swiss attorney-general’s office confirmed to the FT a “criminal investigation into suspicions of aggravated money laundering . . . in connection with possible embezzlement to the detriment of the Banque du Liban”, and that it had requested help from Lebanese “competent authorities”. 

Clown world is collapsing. The tide is receding and soon we’ll see who is naked. 


CHICAGO TYPEWRITER on Arktoons

CHICAGO TYPEWRITER, the 1920s-era comic by Brandon Fiadino that inspired the South Korean TV show of the same name, is a little darker than the usual Arkhaven series, but it fits beautifully with the Dark Legion lineup. It is also, with SWAN KNIGHTS SAGA, a Saturday regular on Arktoons.

To subscribe to Arktoons pre-launch, visit Arkhaven Comics. The good news is that we’re rapidly approaching 15 percent of goal, which was our pre-Impact Day objective.


The shilling of superstonk

 A GME autist explicates his suspicions of the sudden rise of an alternative stonks forum:

We know the GME saga is bigger than a subreddit drama surrounding an epic stock play. This situation only came about through decades of financial fraud: short interest more than 100{3549d4179a0cbfd35266a886b325f66920645bb4445f165578a9e086cbc22d08} and retail owning more than the whole float are supposed to be impossible. The resulting recursive loop glitch in the market technically has the potential to send the price to any number. We know this can go high enough that it obliterates the financial establishment, and I think higher powers (whether they be financial institutions, regulatory bodies, or governments themselves) have known this as well since at least January. They are self-serving, pro-active, intelligence-gathering organisations. These institutions are beholden to people with a lot of power and influence, and they really want to keep it, so they won’t have been sitting around on their hands waiting to lose it all. They can, and will, have amassed teams of analysts and experts to work around the clock developing and carrying out plans to prevent or limit the squeeze – to make people sell, or at the very least, sell early.

Don’t you think it’s weird how it seems the best they could manage is price drops, straight-forward FUD spam, and a few fake news articles? Weren’t we expecting some greater scheme to be executed, that they’ve been planning something bigger all along? Didn’t the structure of events over the last few days seem incredibly coordinated to you?

Think about it

We’re in the run up to the share recall deadline, everything is panning out as expected. It’s Sunday night, April 4th, on [r/]GME. It’s been a fairly quiet few days except: a couple new mods are announced, alongside some chatter saying they’re sus; rensole (supposedly accidentally) sends a server-wide discord message eluding to the sub being compromised; wardenelite gets banned for having self-promotion in his post (again). Then, suddenly all this information about fairly mild moderator drama is revealed. Rensole and redchessqueen99, the ‘celebrity mods’, claim they have been pushed out, and although other mods are insisting they weren’t, a bunch of accounts start hyping up that ‘[r/]GME has fallen’. The story gets muddied, and now people are panicking. Rensole posts a vague summary of events full of what look like subtle exaggerations and half-truths, portraying him and red as benevolent, moderate, and humble, says nothing to calm the fears the sub is compromised, then finishes by saying they’re both moving to [r/]superstonk – a subreddit that has existed for less than two weeks and isn’t even GME focused (allows discussion of distraction stocks like AMC).

In times of crisis people tend to cling onto what they feel is most familiar to them, and I think this was exploited here.

So next the spamming begins. I’d never seen this community act with such frantic haste, and I find it very hard to believe that every account endlessly pushing [r/]superstonk and bashing the mods was genuine – I looked at a lot of them, and although some looked real, many were only a few weeks old, or had long breaks before recently starting to post generic GME related content. During one of the quietest periods of the week, everything is kicking off, people are confused, and information is conflicting. The subreddit is bombarded with a broad message of ‘you should be fearful, uncertain, doubtful of this sub; act quickly, you don’t need to think about it, just trust in the celebrities; flee, come to [r/]superstonk, the safe utopia where you can finally let your guard down!’ So of course, everyone does.

And now, when people arrive on Monday morning, one of the busiest periods, it appears ‘the great migration’ has already taken place – you’re just late to the party. [r/]GME is a bomb site, full of spam and shitposts throwing out the wildest claims to make it look terrible, and urging people to move to [r/]superstonk. When people do, they find a heaven with friendly apes, excellent memes, and all the well-known users (because they are human and followed along like everyone else). It presents as what [r/]GME felt like weeks ago before the endless FUD, bots and shills started piling in and confusing everything.

Nobody questions why there are no FUD bots there – it’s sweet release in knowing the community is finally safe under the new benevolent order. Nobody questions why Thornton McEnery, a Marketwatch journalist with (in my opinion) a consistent track record of releasing carefully crafted FUD articles, references [r/]superstonk on the first day of its relevance, while [r/]GME never got a single mention in the media ever. If [r/]superstonk was legit, why wouldn’t the higher powers be doing everything they can to destroy it just as they did for [r/]GME?

We know from mod testaments released shortly after these events that rensole had been dominating leadership (thr0wthis4ccount4way’s post has now been removed, but it was literally the first line), and that recent attitudes in the mod team had become much more ban-happy, which rensole denounced during the heat of the drama. Since he had a role of leadership in the mod team, if rensole really thought FUD was as simplistic and manageable as he makes it out to be publicly, how did the moderation team develop a culture of excessive paranoia and over-banning? He gave a strong impression that unification was important, and that he was self-aware of his leadership role, so why did he decide to change subs so unexpectedly during a period of drama and misinformation? You’d think he would’ve known a large portion of the community would follow, and a division was highly likely? Something doesn’t add up here.

Undercover operations are standard practice in law enforcement in most countries in the West, including the United States. With how big GME has gotten, I think it would be foolish to seriously believe there isn’t the possibility of this being an operation; it has every hallmark of a honeypot trap. Since everyone is effectively unknown on Reddit, everyone is on the ‘sus list’ by default. Before the January gamma squeeze, neither rensole nor redchessqueen99 existed in the GME community at all, yet now they are basically running things. I think that warrants an investigation at the very least.

There are various forms of undercover ops directed at every online community, no matter how innocuous they are. These can range from amateur infiltrations, such as the Big Bear haters who subscribe to SocialGalactic in order to see what’s going on there, to the national intelligence agencies that patrol every comment system on the Internet and attempt to steer the trends on the major social media sites.

This autist’s analysis is worth reading because he describes a number of tells that even the most professional operators can’t help but betray. What I find interesting is how much overlap there is between natural gamma behavior and professional shill behavior. In either case, it provides more than sufficient justification for the zero tolerance policy here.

Anyhow, it’s always wise to be suspicious of newcomers who become self-appointed leaders. In both the cases of the Tea Party and Comicsgate, for example, individuals who had nothing to do with the original organic movement leaped to the front of the parade and managed to successsfully redirect it. And before anyone tries to make this about me somehow, I will remind everyone that I was not a part of either the Tea Party or Comicsgate.

For me, the second-biggest indicator of an unreliable figure is their tendency to dissemble and avoid answering direct questions. The biggest indicator, of course, is favorable media coverage.


SWAN KNIGHT SAGA on Arktoons

The lead Sunday comic on Arktoons is SWAN KNIGHT SAGA, which is based on the epic magical fantasy books written by science fiction grandmaster John C. Wright, including SWAN KNIGHT’S SON, the 2017 Dragon Award Finalist for Best YA Novel. 

The story tells the tale of a young man who awakens one night at the Thirteenth Hour, and for the first time sees for himself the cruel reality of the secret rule of Elf over Man. Only then does he begin to learn about his true heritage, the heritage of Twilight.

To subscribe to Arktoons pre-launch, visit Arkhaven Comics.


China attacks feminism

The reason that the smart money is on China is because, unlike the West, their leaders have been smart enough to see through the various ideologies that have been used to harm both them and the West. The Chinese frog has shaken off the scorpion, whereas the West angrily attacks anyone who suggests it take action in the interest of its own survival.

The Chinese Communist Party has been heavily censoring social media posts by feminists. While the CCP is synonymous with internet censorship, in this case, the stakes are even higher as the country’s ten-year census is nearing. What’s more, the census is suspected to show a decline in birth rates for the fourth consecutive year.

“In recent days, more than a dozen accounts used by feminists were deleted from the Weibo social-media platform as well as cultural-discussion site Douban.com,” wrote the WSJ.

Weibo and Douban.com are prominent social media platforms in the country. Weibo is more or less referred to as “Chinese Twitter” as it is also a microblogging platform built exclusively for the Chinese netizens. Both the social media platforms are subjected to heavy surveillance and censorship by the CCP.

A user wrote on Weibo about the declining birth rates and censorship, stating: “What are they afraid of? Are they afraid of more women waking up? Are they panicking when seeing the fertility rates and marriage rates?”

It sounds as if the Chinese are reacting swiftly to save their society and civilization by banning feminism, something that Americans should have done back in the 1970s once it became clear what the fruits of feminism, which is one of the few ideologies that is actually more evil than the German variant of national socialism and less functional than communism, were.

The first rule of societal survival is this: have children. Any ideology that stands in the way of the first rule is not going to last very long.


CLOCKWORK DANCER on Arktoons

It’s not all superheroes, science fiction, vampires, and violence at Arktoons, as evidenced by Saturday’s second series to be announced. CLOCKWORK DANCER is a intriguing old school comic that shows the broad spectrum of comics that are available on Arktoons.

To subscribe to Arktoons pre-launch, visit Arkhaven Comics. It’s T minus Four to Impact and we’re already at almost 13 percent of what we calculate is necessary to establish a perpetual production machine.

So, let’s revisit the announced schedule to date. Each day will feature at least two additional series that have not yet been announced.
  • WED: Hammer of Freedom, Midnight’s War
  • THU: Ascendant, A Throne of Bones
  • FRI: Shade, Hypergamouse
  • SAT: Quantum Mortis, Clockwork Dancer
To put that amount of content in perspective, that’s 36 episodes of those five series in the first month alone. The total number of pages that DC is publishing in April are the equivalent of 133 episodes.

Without fear or hesitation

Drew Pearson demonstrates the correct way to respond to those who hate you and everything for which you stand. This practically defines the term “open up your hate and let it flow into me.” What would otherwise have been a pedestrian announcement of a second-round draft pick is transformed into a celebration of community pride. 

Also and even so, Drew Pearson pushed off.