Brave Sir William runs away… again

Lisa emails:


A Muslim-American, Dr. Imad-ad Dean Ahmad, was invited to appear on Bill O’Reilly’s TV show tonight to take “the anti-Bush stance” against a Muslim-American supporter of Bush. A few hours ago, Dr. Ahmad publicly stated, “I was actually in the car being driven to the show when his deputy called me and informed me that although they would identify me as a Muslim supporter of [Michael] Badnarik, that I was not allowed to mention Michael’s name on the show! I declined to accept those terms and they had the driver bring me back.”

This is the third time since June that Mr. O’Reilly’s “no spin zone” show has done something like this to either Badnarik or a supporter. Mr. O’Reilly seems to be free with mentioning Ralph Nader’s name quite often on his show, but he seems to be terrified to mention either Mr. Badnarik’s name or the Libertarian Party on his show.

A replacement for Dr. Ahmad was found, Khalid Turaani, the founder of Arab-American Republicans Against Bush, but it seems that despite the Factor’s best laid plans, things went agley.


They called him 30 minutes before taping and asked him if he would take the anti-Bush position on the show. He agreed and they rushed him down to the studio. They kept pressing him as to whom he would vote for and he kept dodging the question, saying he would say that on the show. Kerry? No, he said, I’m a conservative, I would never vote for Kerry. At the studio they pressed real hard and he admitted that he planned to vote for Badnarik. When he say the panic in their eyes he realized that despite their “fair and balanced” claims, they were Bush supporters. They tried to dissuade him from mentioning it on air, but by then it was too late to do to him what they did to me. He went on the air and said that a vote against Bush need not be a vote for Kerry and that he would vote for Badnarik, the Libertarian.

Mr Turaani’s actual words were: “I don’t want to cut off my nose to spite my face by not liking Bush and jumping in the lap of Kerry. No – I will vote Libertarian and I think Badnarik is going to be a good choice for people who don’t like Bush.”

Horror of horrors, both the L and the B word were mentioned! But what does Brave Sir William care? After all, he is an independent, right? Or perhaps he’s just another carrier of water for the Big Government Republicans. Keep this in mind when you complain about liberal media bias. It’s not really a liberal vs. conservative thing, it’s more truly a big government vs. freedom thing.


Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth

Cindy Adams makes use of the Number of the Beast:


I HATE that Maureen Dowd is maybe the sharpest and — here’s the part I hate most — best-looking columnist in the business. I also hate that her new Putnam book “BushWorld: Enter at Your Own Risk,” with smarmy writing like, how “the black sheep usurps the dutiful brother,” and how “the bag emperor calls me ‘Cobra’ ,” made the best-seller list. I also hate that she’s slim, red-haired and sports industrial-strength mascara.

I grew up in Minnesota, the home away from home of the Scandinavian ice princess. One thing I learned in going to school out East is that the East Coast is not exactly a haven for beautiful women… and I went to a school that had a plethora compared to the others I visited. Check out the picture, and realize that those are supposed to be unusually attractive women. What’s scary is that for their social circle, they probably are. For Pete’s sake, put me in a wig and a dress and I’d be prettier. Come to think of it, White Buffalo probably has the pictures… no, that was Big Chilly.

I’m not ragging on older women either. There are plenty of very attractive older women at the Galleria in Edina, or roaming through the bookstores down in Naples.

And Maureen Dowd isn’t even close to “sharp”. Superficial and consistently clueless would be a far more accurate description. Remember what I said about confusing verbal facility with other, more useful attributes….


43!

Brian Clough, on Arsenal’s breaking his Nottingham Forest team’s record of 42 games without defeat with a 3-0 victory over Blackburn Rovers:


“There is a tinge of sadness on my behalf because nobody likes to see themselves overtaken in the record books. But sadness will soon be replaced with sheer pleasure that it has taken such a brilliant and beautiful team to beat us. What more can I say about Arsenal? Well, even as an old codger, they take me back to my younger days. They caress a football the way I dreamed of caressing Marilyn Monroe. They treat a ball not only with respect but with reverence. They don’t try to knock the leather off it. Everything they do is as if they are trying to do the ball a favour.”

One thing the Premiership definitely has over the NFL is a unique sense of the game’s poetic significance. Then again, there is something endearing about Mike Tice’s guttural “huh huh huh”.


Mailvox: just wait, you’ll see

WB wonders:


Dow back to almost 10,200. What happened to the slide to 6,500?

I did say it would take until July 2006 to get there, didn’t I? This should put the recent movements in perspective.

NASDAQ-100 from June 30 (1516) to August 26 (1385)

1 215 1301 30 days

2 090 1391 10 days

This bounce is getting old and has another week left in it at most, from the looks of it. A 50 percent retracement would take us to 1410, before another decline that should run to around 1200 or so. The Elliott Wave experts would no doubt have more precise targets and better reasoning, but I’m no expert.


I told you they’re stupid

Jim Boyd of the Star & Sickle gets his head handed to him again:


In “Boydot’s epistemology,” we noted that the cowardly lion of Portland Avenue issued a challenge to our friends over at Fraters Libertas. Reader Richard Jahnke takes it from there.

You quote Jim Boyd of the Star Tribune issuing the following challenge:

“I served for a year with an Army outfit named U.S. Army Field Activities Command in Washington. I’ll give you a week to find ANY mention of it anywhere. I’ll give you two weeks to find out what it really was.” Well here’s a link. See page 52, second paragraph from the bottom.

The link above was the first return on the search “Army Field Activies Command” in Google. Took about 30 seconds, to get Google up, copy the phrase, get the return and click on the page. Most of the week is left. Here’s another link that suggests that the Army Field Activities Command ran Army Intelligence agents overseas.

As to the second part of Boyd’s challenge — what his old outfit really was — it appears, based on the material in the second link, to have been involved in internal security within the military, defense department and affiliated organizations.

Obviously, Boyd is lacking in Internet skills or he wouldn’t have issued this challenge without Googling it first.

You thought I was kidding when I told you how dumb the average paperboy is, didn’t you. And most – not all – of the television talking heads are worse. Never confuse verbal facility with intelligence, the two can coincide but they are not the same.

I assumed that Vicki Gowler of the Pioneer Press were dissembling when they couldn’t find Kerry’s 1971 testimony before Congress. But incredibly, despite my general scorn for their competence, I appear to have overestimated them nonetheless.


Even the blind can see it

Randi Rhodes is interviewed by Buzzflash:


Sometimes I wonder if there are two distinct parties anymore. I know that the Bush administration is about as Republican as I am. Seriously, they are not Republicans. They are globalists. I wish more Republicans realized that. The Bush Boys, The Cheneys, The Rumsfelds, well they are as comfortably at home in Riyadh as they are in Crawford or Cheyenne.

Keep in mind, this is coming from someone who hates Republicans and republican ideals. It never ceases to puzzle me that so many Republican commentators will go to the mat for a group of individuals who were betraying them and the nation from the start.


More tales of the White Buffalo

I was thinking about how the various talking heads all have their little media schtick and what mine would be. I was debating the various merits of narcolepsy vs Tourette’s Syndrome, which had the effect of reminding me of one of the most debilitating impressions I have ever seen in my life.

We were at the Digital Ghetto, playing NBA Live on the Playstation upstairs on the rattiest old yellow couch you can possibly imagine. The White Buffalo had the Denver Nuggets, for some reason that I can’t possibly explain, and I was up by six points or so when he passed the ball to his guard, Mahmoud Abdul-Rauf.

I made the mistake of saying “hey, isn’t he the guy with Tourette’s?” The WB simply nodded and knocked down a two-pointer. However, the next time Abdul-Rauf touched the ball, he barked this explosive obscenity combined with an spastic jerk of his head and an immediate launch of the basketball. I started cracking up, and every time I’d get it under control, he’d pass the ball to Abdul-Rauf again, who was knocking down threes even as his Tourette’s was getting increasingly out of hand.

By the end of the game, I was collapsed on the couch, laughing helplessly, as the White Buffalo was swearing up a storm and driving Mahmoud in for uncontested layups. Needless to say, I got crushed.

I wonder if the folks at Unity would find this story endearing? Okay, probably not. Maybe I’ll just make a practice of telling the host I’m not wearing any underwear. That went over pretty well at the party the Perfect Aryan Male’s law firm held to welcome him to the firm… but that’s a story for another time.


Mailvox: he’s not supporting himself

An officer in Iraq writes:


I hadn’t heard of OpenOffice until you recently mentioned it in your blog. Thanks for bringing it up. I installed it and it works great. I also read in your blog the entry entitled The Darkness Spawns More Evil regarding Windows XP and Linux. How user friendly is Linux for a home system belonging to someone that is not a computer expert (such as myself)? For the average home computer user, is it worth the switch?

On a different subject, I wanted to let you know that I tune in daily to the blogspot. Out here in the desert I’ve got a lot of time on my hands to read, and your site is one of my favorites. Count me, as well as a few fellow officers that will listen to me, in as converts to libertarian principles. I can’t believe I was blinded for so long. By the way, that Marine Major’s statement about supporting the troops equals supporting the mission is totally absurd. Obviously, some of us know better. We are the ones who get out of the service as soon as our commitment ends (if they let us re: stop loss orders) I and several other officers in our battalion, are headed for the door.

Linux, as in Fedora Core 2, works very well as a home system except for its home networking capabilities. I haven’t been able to get it working at all; it’s even less functional than Fedora Core 1, with which I could at least access my Windows machines via SMBCLIENT. Big Chilly reports that Mandrake does a very nice job with setting up all the networking stuff, though, and I’m planning to check it out once I wrap up a few more pressing projects.

I’m not in the least bit surprised to hear this officer ridicule the major’s statement, as I’ve heard from plenty of Marines, soldiers and sailors who have their doubts about the mission. Their professionalism allows them to get the job done and get it done right, but they do not make the mistake of confusing themselves with the mission. After all, their oath is to the Constitution, not to the whims of the Commander-in-Chief.

The fact that high-ranking career officers would rather retire than continue serving at the beck and call of the present administration is one of the more damning cases that one can make against the manner in which George Bush has handled his responsibilities as their commmander. No doubt they were expecting much better after being forced to suffer through Bill Clinton’s stewardship.

On a tangential note, does it amaze anyone else that our soldiers are able to remain in such close contact with the home front? I mean, one of my friends in my fantasy football league is back in Iraq again! Not that that will stop us from questioning his manhood and mocking him mercilessly whenever he loses, of course, although we have reluctantly agreed to cut him some slack on roster deadlines and so forth if his commanding officer will provide him with a signed note that he was too busy shooting at people to get his lineups straight.


Kerry to quit

I don’t have any evidence for this, it’s just a feeling I have as the Vietnam evidence against him snowballs. Krazy John wasn’t able to respond effectively to the first Swiftvet charges, and that’s turned out to be just an opening jab that prepared the public for what will likely be a knockout punch, his baseless testimony on war atrocities that was used against US POWS by the North Vietnamese. As more and more people discover the particulars of his meeting with the North Vietnamese and Viet Cong in 1970 as part of his protest effort, even die-hard Democrats will abandon him.

Democrats, more than most, love front-runners. Once Kerry starts to visibly slip, they will turn on him with all the ferocity of the unthinking rodents that they are at heart. They don’t actually like Kerry, and remember, another Massachusetts liberal was leading another Bush by 17 points prior to the Republican coronation. By November, he was absolutely destroyed in a historic rout. And Willie Horton and the infamous tank-driving episode don’t pack one-tenth the punch that Kerry’s cumulative Vietnam debacle will.

Remember, too, that Whackjob is an exceptionally and unusually proud man. He doesn’t fall, he assures us even as we see him getting up from the snow. He doesn’t fail. He is too proud to be willing to get crushed – crushed – by a mediocrity such as George W. Bush, and too self-centered to give a damn about what his late pull-out will do to his party. The only way that Kerry can salvage his bizarre view of himself is to declare himself too noble for the dirtiness of modern politics and end his campaign. He won’t have failed, it was the system, the vets, the Republican attack dogs, etc, anyone but him.

Edwards would cheerfully leap in and play sacrificial lamb, in order to give himself a leg up for the nomination in 2008. But as one veteran trader, who was the first to suggest this possibility to me, has pointed out, Kerry will have to quit in mid-September for Edwards to participate in the first debate. Interestingly enough, the POW documentary starts in two weeks….

It’s just speculation at this point, but there is a certain compelling logic to the concept.


Mailvox: Vox for President

Linda sees some eerie parallels:


It’s clear that you’re not concerned with anybody’s opinion but yours. All too typical of an arrogant, self-absorbed, immature person who thinks he/she knows more than he/she actually knows.

Just be careful of the words you write and say. Watch carefully what’s happening to Kerry. He was an arrogant, self-absorbed, immature, opportunist thirty years ago, just like yourself, and now his words and actions are coming back to haunt him.

Erm… what’s that you were saying? I was just filming the recreation of my epic smackdown of Me So Michelle.