The “science” of evolution


Science: The observation, identification, description, experimental investigation, and theoretical explanation of phenomena.

Well, at least the evolutionist True Believers have the latter down. One and four are totally absent, while two and three mutate more rapidly than anything proposed by the grand faith itself.

I barely consider economics to be an actual science, but at least there are some replicable experiments that can be performed which reliably support its basic laws. Perhaps you can’t test C+I+G+(x-m) very effectively, but you can test the Law of Supply and Demand and you’ll always receive the same result if you control for variables.

In fact, I suspect that Biblical principles are more reliable than evolutionary principles, albeit in a distinctly different arena. Spare the rod with 100 children, apply it firmly to another 100 and the firm foundation revealed by the experiment will have more genuine scientific support than Darwin’s landmark defense of racial eugenics.

As with democracy, no one actually believes in evolution. This is clear by the way that its supposed champions always shy away from the straightforward applications of its logic. Ironically, if recent demographics are any guide, the survival of the fittest points very strongly to a world without college-educated feminists, Europeans or atheists, all evolutionary dead-ends who cannot be troubled to reproduce themselves.