A Response to an Irrelevance

Someone who calls himself something like Faggotus Maximus took offense at my contemptuous dismissal of a deceased political whore and purported to attempt what he erroneously calls a “fisking”:

Dear Vox, Once upon a time you were important, very important. You were the first to provide real resistance to the Social Justice Warriors with Gamer Gate. Being first is important. Very important. Your books on Social Justice Warriors have stood the test of time.

You are among the first to achieve real traction getting important ideas into the minds of right wing intellectuals and activists: that conservatism is not enough, that Social Justice Warriors are a cancer that must be eradicated, that free trade isn’t working according to accepted theory, that conservatives need to play hardball and not play strictly by the rules when the the other side is cheating gratuitously.

As in a multi level marketing scheme, you deserve partial credit for those who have run with your ideas — maybe even a few orts of Charlie Kirk’s work when he has strayed into Christian Nationalist territory.

And you have deserved a well deserved rest from activism. You can retreat across the Atlantic to relative safety to focus on your family and on fun hobby projects with my complete blessing, with a bit of pontificating to the next wave of activists when you feel like it.

But that is not all your are doing. You have been repeatedly dismissing those who are are still fighting the good fight. And your repeated claim that those who have done greater things than you are disposable ticket takers is gammafied envy whining on the order of a twink Marxist sociology professor. It is more cringeworthy than your Mary Sue self insert at the end of Alt Hero.

There is more, of course there is more, but it’s always projection with these nobodies and neverweres. First, he clearly doesn’t even know what a “fisking” is, since he doesn’t go methodically through whatever I actually wrote that set him off. This is a false assertion of a faux-fisking. Second, he’s the only one who took any offense. I’m certainly not offended by anything he wrote, neither are any of my readers, fans, supporters, and casual followers. On the level of rhetorical heat to which we have become accustomed since 2001, this barely rises to the 2/10 level.

These are his words, not mine:

“Offense has been taken. Great offense. For some strange reason I find the disparagements of a Benedict Arnold to be more offensive than the gloatings of an open enemy. Offense shall be served.”

There will likely be some who ask why I respond to an irrelevance. The reason is that I never use an critic’s irrelevance as an excuse to avoid addressing him. I have debated PhDs and authors of the textbook on the subject concerned and I have debated complete nobodies. Unlike Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, and Nick Fuentes, I do not generate excuses to run from either criticism or debate.

Let’s set another thing straight. I am not a “self described dark lord”. The title of “Supreme Dark Lord” was granted to me by SF grandmaster John C. Wright himself after the editor-in-chief of Tor Books described me as rising “all the way to downright evil” and after my VFM and Dread Ilk forced the tech giants to completely revise their legally questionable terms of service. To this day, I am banned from YouTube and officially barred from setting foot in Google’s Mountain View headquarters. And I am reliably informed by my eyes and ears there that my name can only be spoken in hushed whispers at the headquarters of the Daily Wire.

Now, the truth of my disparagements notwithstanding, I can’t be a Benedict Arnold because I’m simply not on the same side as Charlie Kirk or FM or Brilyn Hollyhand or Nick Fuentes or Ben Shapiro or any other conservative creature who a) is funded by foreign political interests, or b) believes “Judeo-Christianity” is real or c) subscribes to the idea that Western Civilization was ever dependent upon Judaism in any way, or d) asserts that America is an “idea nation” or a “melting pot,” or e) believes in Enlightenment ideals such as “free trade” or “free speech” or “progress” or “equality,” or f) supports the societal normalization of sexual deviancy, no-fault divorce, abortion, and euthanasia.

All of these things are antithetical to civilization in general and Western Civilization in particular. I actively oppose and reject every single conservative who espouses any of those ideas. There is no us.

I am not, and I have never, ever been, a conservative. I explained why in CUCKSERVATIVE; it is merely a posture, it is neither a philosophy nor an ideology. I have never belonged to the Republican Party, or indeed, to any political party or faction. I do not care if the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, or the Democrat-Farmer-Labor Party are currently in power; I publicly dismissed all of them as the bi-factional ruling party back in 2004 and pointed out that the historical USA no longer even existed except in name and geography.

All of which is to say that I cannot retire from activism since I have never been an activist. I am neither a political activist nor a political extremist. I am an intellectual, which is something that is increasingly rare in an age of frauds, political whores, paid propagandists, and charlatans. I do not advocate, I observe and I assess. I do not think in binary terms, but from a probabilistic perspective. I certainly do not expect any political elites to pay attention to, endorse, or accept my observations, much less any of my recommendations, however correct they might be.

As a student of Aristotle, Martin van Creveld, Karl Marx, Friedrich von Hayek, Robert Prechter, Steve Keen, and Peter Turchin, among many others, I don’t view politics as being anything more than a superficial layer of distraction that obscures the real tectonics of human society, which are ultimately material and spiritual in nature. Modern politics across the West is a collection of delusional children playing make-a-wish; one has only to witness the incessant European conferences on how the member-states of the European Union, led by the European Commission, are going to institute regime change in Russia to grasp the fundamentally irrelevant nature of politics today.

This is not to say politics has no influence on society at all. But that influence is limited, indirect, controlled, and inevitably bows before material force and spiritual power. Moreover, there is virtually no link between the will of the people as theoretically represented by their democratically-elected “representatives” and what the people of the nation actually want. Very few, if any, of the institutions and policies of the current US federal government were ever desired by the American people, and yet they were forced upon them anyhow. The same is true of most European nations.

I very much doubt that most of my readers, much less any of my critics, can fathom how low my expectations are. We swim in a sea of willfully delusional retardery and none of the things that obsess most political activists matter in the least; forget who will win the electoral race in the 4th California congressional district or whatever as most people across the West will consider themselves fortunate if they preserve electricity, clean water, and indoor plumbing in their neighborhoods and avoid being roasted over open fires. All polities collapse in time, and the USA is observably approaching the end of its viability as a unitary governing entity. I’m not the first to see this; Wang Hunin observed the same thing years before I predicted a collapse in the 2033 timeframe in 2004.

Politics is not going to fix this.

The irony is that my opinion of FM is not entirely dissimilar to his opinion of me. He thinks I am wasting my time developing new concepts, disproving various historical falsehoods, and publishing a range of books that will last for centuries. I think he is wasting his time trying to build a political coalition on behalf of people under the financial control of global satanists in order to preserve a decrepit polity that cannot survive intact. His interest is in the success of the Republican Party. My interest is in the Good, the Beautiful, and the True.

Only time can conclusively determine who is correct, but regardless, I can’t pretend to care about something that never mattered to me in the first place. And as for those matters that gave offense, I can summarize my views in a succinct manner:

Disagree if you like. Take offense if you wish. The facts are what they are. The Truth is what it is. And nothing you, me, FM, or anyone else says is going to change that.

Veritas incontestabilis stat

UPDATE: Dennis Prager’s fate is more than a little ironic in light of the Black Rider analogy often used for the ticket-takers who have ceased to be useful to their masters. Of course, the fact that I was unaware of this only underlines how little attention I pay to these manufactured entities. Only a short-sighted fool could ever envy what passes for their so-called “success”.

UPDATE: FM is also blatantly lying in his comments.

It matters because he has building a cult of personality, teaching insane shit, and injecting mental poison into the Right. His disgusting Charlie Kirk post was but a trigger to write this fisk. He needs to either mend his ways or have his reputation destroyed. Benedict Arnold was once the Continental Army’s most effective general. He’s not remembered as a hero today for some reason. And yes he did hate Charlie. He hates everyone who is more successful than he is, that envious little $#*(@). He denegrates everyone who makes an impact as a “ticket taker.” Vox is not just a mere Black Piller. He is pushing Black Pills, a cult mindset, and assorted insanity using cred built from past real accomplishments.

Again, pure projection. I neither envied nor wanted the “success” that a corpse, a paraplegic, and a suicidal nutjob previously enjoyed. I wouldn’t trade places with Ben Shapiro, Nick Fuentes, or any other well-funded current gatekeeper if I were offered 10x their revenue and the daily services of the entire Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders squad. Nor would I trade places with successful non-gatekeepers like George RR Martin, Brandon Sanderson, Larry Correia, and John Scalzi. I also don’t hate any of them, but low-status men like FM often confuse contempt and disdain for hate and envy.

The amusing thing is that what FM calls “insane shit” today, a few years from now he will likely pretend to have believed all along. I still remember when most of the readers here thought I was crazy for refusing to celebrate Jordan Peterson as the great intellectual hero of the Right, and when evolutionists thought I was crazy for asking about the average rate of evolution by natural selection. It wasn’t even that long ago when people thought I was crazy for pointing out that the USA could not win a war with either Russia or China, much less a Sino-Russian alliance. I don’t always correctly anticipate the future, but I do have a better track record than most.

Anyhow, the fact that FM believes me to be a Black Piller should suffice to demonstrate that he has no idea what he’s talking about.

DISCUSS ON SG


Denninger on Heresy

Even the Boomers are rejecting the religious subversion of the American right now:

I’ve talked about dispensationalism a few times in various formats over the years on this blog and how it is utterly unsupportable when it comes to calling someone “privileged” from the standpoint of Christianity particularly as applies to Jewish people and/or Israel.

But Tucker Carlson went there in his recent show and in fact echoed what I’ve said for a long time: As a Christian if you espouse this you have committed Heresy and worse, you’ve stated a belief that those who disagree will be literally killed by God.

Tucker is right, by the way.

Israel, like every other nation, can deal with us as a peer and with respect but at no time will I or should anyone else consider them to have any means of “control” over the United States

Ever.
Period.
Full stop.

Tucker further points out something even more important, which is that while heresy is an offense before God (assuming you believe in it, of course) when committed by people in political power, such as Lindsey Graham, it becomes something much more-serious in the secular world.

I think it’s a very easy and straightforward question for any honest individual. When do you consider America to have been more blessed?

  1. Prior to 31 January 1949
  2. After 31 January 1949

If your answer is (1), then there obviously is no reason to accept the Dispensationalist heresy or the subordination of Americans to any foreign people. And the point is further underlined by a historical question. When would you consider Spain to have been more blessed?

  1. Prior to March 31, 1492
  2. After March 31, 1492

The Golden Age of Spain is generally considered to begin in 1492, marked by the end of the Reconquista, Christopher Columbus’s voyages, and the publication of Antonio de Nebrija’s Grammar of the Castilian Language. It ended around 1659 with the Treaty of the Pyrenees, though some extend it to 1681, after the death of Pedro Calderón de la Barca.

Now, keep in mind that I don’t accept the Dispensationalist metric in the first place. I certainly don’t regard heretical theology as a sound basis for making decisions about financial budgets or foreign policy. But it’s always most effective to answer one’s opponent in the terms he is capable of understanding.

DISCUSS ON SG


Rebuking the Fake Pope

Carlo Maria Vignano demolishes Fake Pope Bergoglio’s attempt to claim that immigration and the genetic destruction of the nations are somehow “Christian” values:

Jorge Bergoglio’s monomaniacal obsession with indiscriminate immigration and miscegenation finds a zealous proponent in Robert Prevost. The handover did not represent any radical change, either doctrinally or morally, or politically or socially. The conciliar-synodal Church is and remains the “Ancilla Novi Ordinis,” the courtesan of the globalist elite.

We know well that the migratory phenomenon is not spontaneous: it is not caused by famine, war, or religious persecution. Instead, it was desired and planned as a means of destabilizing Western nations, and illegal immigration is used as an instrument of social subversion. This is stated in a United Nations document of March 21, 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration.”

The Bergoglian and post-Bergoglian Church is at the forefront of promoting immigrationism, ethnic substitution, and the invasion of Western nations, aiming to erase their Christian identity, culture, and history. This is confirmed by the emphasis placed on the audience granted by Leo to Amy Pope, Director General of the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM), and on the Jubilee of Migrants.

The Holy See is complicit in the subversive plan hatched by the globalist elite: it presents illegal immigrants as victims and maintains relationships with those who organize their trafficking, while blaming the invaded population, victims of the heinous crimes and degradation these hordes commit in our cities. Finally, abusing the moral authority of the Papacy, the Synodal Church equates immigration, the death penalty, and abortion, to the delight of the woke Left and to the great scandal of pro-life movements.

The collusion of Leo and his bishops with the globalist elite is deliberate, intended, and a source of profit for Catholic institutions and organizations. This also occurs in civil governments, whose leaders are all emissaries of the Davos Forum, the Fabian Society, Soros’s Open Society, or other supranational entities conspiring against the people. And it is scandalous—to say the least—that progressive American bishops are fueling this artfully created controversy, exploiting it for political gain against President Trump, when they cowardly remained silent during the Biden presidency in the face of far more serious moral issues…

This subservience of the Catholic Church to the criminal plan of the Great Reset and Agenda 2030 will be judged by God and by history, and will remain as an indelible stain on the already severely compromised reputation of this renegade and apostate Hierarchy.

The fury of the young European men at organized Christianity in general and the Catholic Church in particular is well-founded, which is why it is important to make sure they are informed that the fake church led by a fake pope are neither Catholic in the proper sense nor Christian in even the broadest sense of the term.

Regardless of whether you are Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, or atheist, you can certainly agree that the official institution presently headquartered in the Vatican that calls itself the Roman Catholic Church is an organization that was infiltrated, subverted, and is now led by those who worship the god of this world and are the self-professed enemies of Jesus Christ as well as those who seek to follow him.

But paganism is not, and will never be, the answer to satanry. A brief look at India, or any post-Christian culture in Europe and the Americas, should suffice to conclusively prove that. There is only one force that is capable of defeating global satanry and that is Jesus Christ.

DISCUSS ON SG


The End of Jordan Peterson

The Black Rider appears to no longer have any use for the Canadian charlatan:

This summer has been exceedingly difficult. Dad was in an ICU suffering from pneumonia and sepsis after dealing with a host of neurological issues this summer that we believe stem from SERS which is chronic inflammatory response syndrome due to decades of mold exposure. We don’t have a better explanation for his neurological symptoms at the moment other than spiritual attacks. He’s been suffering for the last number of years with unexplainable neuropathy and weakness amongst other symptoms, but they worsened this summer after he cleaned out his parents’ basement after his dad, my grandpa, passed away.

The summary from /pol/ is apt enough:

His rise and decline is very interesting. You can see he starts off as a nobody retard professor, then gets attention talking about free speech, has some good points early on. Sold a book. It was all uphill, but the success wasn’t enough. He was approached and he was hungry for more, the money wasn’t enough, he wanted recognition, but then recognition wasn’t enough, he wanted to be part of “the club”. He is a story of a man who went to defeat a dragon but succumbed to the riches the dragon has collected. When his time in the spotlight was over, he couldn’t let go. He became a parody of himself, willing to say and do anything to keep even a crumb of the rise he previously experienced. A man destroyed by his own success, his own greed for relevancy and fame. A good start followed by a pathetic end.

If you’ve read Jordanetics, then you know that Jordan Peterson was directly involved with the occult and there are even hints that his family is one drenched in generational evil.

Observe that even on what would appear to be his last legs, he still refuses to humble himself and turn to Jesus Christ. And remember, this is a man whose so-called “success” I, and others like Milo, have been frequently accused of envying, which has never, ever, been the case.

We recently watched Ghostbusters: Afterlife, and one of the things that struck me was how the revived Gozer didn’t hesitate to destroy the one servant who had made her revival possible. I’ve just never understood how evil men like Jordan Peterson never seem to grasp that the even more wicked men and spirits they serve not only don’t love or respect them, but won’t hesitate to destroy them as soon as they cease to be useful.

To be honest, I didn’t really expect Peterson to fade away into irrelevance as he has over the past few years. I always thought his demise would be more spectacular and more obviously self-inflicted.

DISCUSS ON SG


Never Take the Ticket

It would appear that Charlie Kirk’s conscience was belatedly catching up to him. But developing a conscience has consequences for any ticket taker.

A Trump insider and longtime friend of Charlie Kirk tells The Grayzone how the assassinated conservative leader’s turning point on Israeli influence provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid.

Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization, America’s largest conservative youth association, according to a longtime friend of the slain commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity. The source told The Grayzone that the late pro-Trump influencer believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel’s overwhelming influence in Washington and demanded more space to criticize it.

In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.

By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”

“He was afraid of them,” the source emphasized.

Kirk was 18 years old when he launched TPUSA in 2012. From its inception, his career was propelled by Zionist donors, who showered his young organization with money through neoconservative outfits like the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He repaid his wealthy backers over the years by unleashing a relentless firehose of anti-Palestinian and Islamophobic diatribes, accepting propaganda trips to Israel, and sternly shutting down nationalist forces challenging his support for Israel during TPUSA event…

Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu’s wealthy allies in the US, including many who had funded TPUSA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line. 

Once you sell your soul, you can’t really expect the Devil to simply give it back to you upon request. The one expectation of the purchased man is that he will stay bought. That’s why it’s better to simply live in the knowledge that you’ll never have the material success that the Prince of This World offers the untalented and the insufficiently self-confident. Not all “successful” people are ticket takers, but others much more informed on the subject than I am estimate that 90 percent of them are.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Churchians Strike Back

Everything about the Churchians is a lie. So it should come as no surprise that they “review” books without first bothering to actually read the book. Consider the “review” of CHURCHIANITY recently posted on Amazon.

Misses the mark completely

A friend sent me information about this book, so I did some research on Jon and Vox. Based on what I learned, I wouldn’t touch this book with a 10′ pole. If you really want to know God and join him in his work on the earth, do what Jesus said to do with his church. People won’t be impressed with your version of the gospel spewed out in your bold words. People want a real God who is present with them where they are, not another guilt ridden Christian who is ashamed of themselves.

The behavior of the Churchians underlines why it’s important to delve into Churchianity. They are quite literally Satan’s pipeline into the Christian churches and are the primary means by which Christian organizations are being destroyed.

Meanwhile, a review from a Christian who has actually read the book reaches a very different conclusion.

This should be required reading for all Christians, regardless of denomination. It will help renew, solidify, and grow your faith. Possibly the most important book of our time.

DISCUSS ON SG


Hiding the Bodies: A Dialogue

Clown World can’t hide the bodies, but they have been able to hide the cause of death and the growing number of post-vaccine deaths using a variety of statistical “corrections”.

ETHICAL SKEPTIC: On left is the raw unprocessed infant death data fm the CDC – a 25-year legacy trend. On right is the disciplined inflection analytic. It removes 1) seasonality, 2) noise, 3) false trend/inflection. Those who can’t/won’t see this are obtuse, malicious pharma sycophants.

In your opinion, what is the specific incentive behind this murderous system?

ETHICAL SKEPTIC: My opinion—speculative yet consistent with observed patterns in ponerology—is that a kind of tacit contract is struck between these flesh-and-blood servants and the darker intelligences they host. The transaction is simple: if they deliver suffering, particularly of the innocent, they generate a form of energy or “currency” that sustains their demonic patrons. In return, they are rewarded handsomely in this life with wealth, power, or influence. Research into destructive ideologies and totalitarian personalities (cf. Andrzej Łobaczewski, Political Ponerology) hints at such dynamics: suffering becomes not a byproduct but a cultivated resource, systematized and exchanged in what amounts to a pathological economy.

Whether one interprets this literally as spiritual commerce or metaphorically as the sociopathic reward system of oppressive hierarchies, the observed outcomes remain strikingly similar. Yet this bargain is no ordinary addiction. It cleaves the soul into an immortal entourage that extends beyond one’s lifetime. In the end, each person chooses the allegiance of their energy—whether to align with the destructive current that feeds on innocence, or with its opposite, which fosters life, dignity, and spiritual renewal.

DISCUSS ON SG


A “Patriot” Fake and Gay

It’s always important to pay close attention to self-applied appellations. It turns out what is “misfit” about the Misfit Patriot is that he’s not a pro-American patriot at all.

I’ve come to the realization that I’m actually not America First, and heres why:

Im not a fan of people who think Jews/Israel can do no wrong, and it’s very clear I absolutely fuckin detest people who think the Jews/Israel are responsible for everything wrong with the world.

However, the people I hate more than both groups are fucking liars who tell you they don’t hate Jews/Israel, they’re “just asking questions” or “they don’t like what the government is doing”

Bullshit! It’s the Jews.

I couldn’t give a fuck about the Israeli government, and I’ve said that about 1000 times, yet whenever I support taking out terrorists, or standing up for Jews (not the Israeli government), I get accused of being a shill for a country that I know very little about. The Nation state of Israel is no different to me than Canada. It’s a country, and it’s not my country.

The only thing I put before my country is God, period!

I know Jesus, and I know the Father. Jesus was a Jew, and the Father told me to Bless the people of Israel, and I can guarantee you he wasn’t talking about the ones who chant Allahu Akbar. If you think I’m gonna turn my back on my creator because you don’t like our current foreign policy, you clearly don’t understand my conviction on this matter.

So to all the people who claim because I stand with the Jews I’m not “America first”, you’re right. I’m God first, and America second. The nation state of Israel doesn’t even make the top 10, but the people who live there (Gods chosen people) are more important to me than any of your partisan geopolitical bullshit.

I know this won’t make any difference to replacement theology retards or chatGPT Christians, but to anyone who actually understands what’s written in the Bible, it will light a fire under their ass and remind them we are not, fucking, backing, down.

So come at me, fucker. I got the protection of the almighty on my side. Genesis 12:1-3

Let’s see. This self-styled “patriot” is allegedly a) America-second, b) an ethnic Jew, and c) gay, if the information in the comments is correct. He’s definitely part of the problem, not part of the solution.

As for his talk about “God”, it’s pretty clear that this guy’s god is the god of this world and he’s a philosatanic judeo-churchian. As for Genesis 12:1-3, I will counter with Revelation 2:8–9.

God never said one single word about “blessing the Jews”. And He certainly didn’t say anything about “blessing the Synagogue of Satan”.

Why do conservatives pay these charlatans any attention whatsoever?

DISCUSS ON SG


Anti-Racism is Inversive

Just in case you were still clinging to the faint hope that Christianity is not inherently racist, and that all of the anti-bigotry and anti-racism and manufacture of new sins so ostentatiously displayed by the Churchians is anything but inversive, subversive, and satanic, I invite you to consider the so-called Church of England’s portrayal of St. Augustine as a Negro:

St Augustine has been depicted as a black man in a children’s book written by Church of England officials as part of its diversity drive. The saint, one of the most influential figures in Christian history, has been illustrated as black in a new book called Heroes of Hope.

This book says it seeks to inspire children with examples of ‘Black and brown saints, often erased and whitewashed from history, who formed the church and therefore modern society as we know it today’.

Aurelius Augustinus was born in 345 AD in a Mediterranean coastal town now in modern-day Algeria, going on to become a bishop of the North African settlement of Hippo.

Over the years, most depictions of St Augustine have been of a white man. At that time in history, the area was a Roman province, although Augustine and his mother Saint Monica may have originated from the North African Berber ethnic group.

Although this would not make him black, there have been efforts to apply this identity to him by some groups, including at the Catholic University of Villanova in Pennsylvania. An official at the university wrote in 2023 that it was important to depict the saint as black because ‘depicting St. Augustine as a Black man actively decentres whiteness’.

Unlike most people, I have actually read St. Augustine’s work. And while his attention to theological questions centered around rape are indeed a little eyebrow raising, there is absolutely zero chance that the author of his works is a Negro.

This is just another example of the historical and geographical illiteracy of the modern faux literati, who assume that anything related to Africa thereby necessarily means “negro”. Which obviously isn’t true, but when have the inversives every concerned themselves with truth, except, of course to subvert and invert it.

Heroes of Hope was co-authored by The Rev Dr Sharon Prentis, who was appointed the deputy director of the Church of England’s Racial Justice Unit in January 2023. The unit was set up in 2022, in the wake of Black Lives Matter protests, to help meet the Church’s commitments to achieving racial justice. Dr Prentis’s co-writer was Alysia-Lara Ayonrinde, the Church’s national education lead for racial justice.

As F.A. von Hayek demonstrated, social justice is not justice. The adjective modifies the noun. Therefore, racial justice is not justice. And it is not Christian either.

I have come to feel strongly that the greatest service I can still render to my fellow men would be that I could make the speakers and writers among them thoroughly ashamed ever again to employ the term “social justice”.
—F.A. von Hayek

DISCUSS ON SG


Mediocrity Rules

People are noticing that the best and brightest don’t tend to be meaningfully employed these days:

Every smart person I know is failing

My brother who was the valedictorian of our high school is unemployed. My best friend who skipped grades and went to MIT for math is a beach bum now in Florida working at a bar. I’ve personally made enough money to quit society if I moved to a cheap college town and I am seriously considering it, I do not see the point in working and I am totally burned out.

Meanwhile the most mid people I have met throughout my life are rising to director positions at companies, going on crazy vacations, becoming influencers, having families. Truly every really bright person I know who studied something serious at a good school is now unemployed and working on ar; esoteric passion project no one will ever care about.

Has it always been this way or is society especially cooked right now?

It’s not just the communications gap, which was always a problem for those with 130+ IQs. The so-called “meritocracy” was very short-lived, and lasted about as long as it took Clown World to take control of the Ivy League and then bar the doors against the more objectively meritorious whites and Asians who dutifully, but naively, swallowed the rhetoric about an educational meritocracy.

That was more than 30 years ago. Now, the need to protect the favored mediocrities from their intellectual superiors has pervaded every aspect of society, aided by the diversity, equality, and inclusivity directives that ensure no one who is capable of seeing through the nonsensical corporate narratives is in a position to challenge them.

I became aware that I was being banned from things as early as 1994, when I was directly informed that I would never be permitted to have my work appear on the editorial page of a newspaper. That ban proved to be prophetic, as despite being nationally syndicated, precisely three of my articles ever appeared on an editorial page, and one of them was only because I was deemed to be the writer at the newspaper most capable of understanding the Unabomber’s manifesto.

So, subsequent bannings by the SF genre publishers (2005), SFWA and the Hugo Awards (20013-2015), Twitter, Indiegogo, YouTube, and BackerKit have hardly been surprising. It is the fate that will eventually be met by all superior intellects who refuse to take Clown World’s ticket. If they haven’t gotten around to you yet, it’s simply because you are insufficiently threatening to their morass of mediocrities.

But climb a little higher, show a little more potential, enjoy a little more success, and you, too, will suddenly find the doors closing in your face, and watch as those who are obviously less accomplished are turned into manufactured “successes”.

This is not a complaint. The world is the way it is now because the wicked openly rule it. But, as has happened many times before, they have overplayed their hand and their world is collapsing under the weight of their own incompetence. The subversive never seem to understand that they are nothing more than parasites, and that they cannot create, they cannot improve, and worst of all, they cannot even maintain a functional society capable of surviving over time.

The evil has not yet dared to show its true face. The USA has not yet erected its pyramids to their evil gods, and, God willing, it never will. And our promise of victory lies not only in the Word of God, but in the ancient ruins stretching from Africa to South America that show the way in which their doom is certain and absolute even at the moments of their greatest self-proclaimed triumphs.

DISCUSS ON SG