Tag: judeo-christianity

Ahistorical Heresy

This should present a good test of the Triveritas and its ability to assess truth claims and how warranted they are. Let’s see how it fairs:

The Claim: Judaism is the foundation of the free world, and the correct foundational structure of Western Civilization is: Judaism -> Christ -> Christianity -> USA.

L: Logical Validity

The claim fails L in at least three distinct ways.

First, it commits an equivocation between Judaism-as-ethnic-religion and Judaism-as-philosophical-system. The religious tradition that produced Christ was the Hebrew religion of the Second Temple, a diverse, internally fractured tradition that included Pharisees, Sadducees, Essenes, Zealots, and Hellenized diaspora Jews, among others. Modern rabbinical Judaism descends primarily from the Pharisaic tradition and was formalized after the destruction of the Second Temple in 70 AD, partly in explicit reaction against Christianity. Claiming that “Judaism” is the foundation of the free world conflates these into a single continuous entity, which is historically and theologically incoherent. The Judaism that exists today explicitly rejected the very element (Christ) that the chain claims it produced. You cannot simultaneously claim credit for the product and reject the product.

Second, the chain omits essential intermediate links. Even if the false theological genealogy were to be granted, the sequence Judaism -> Christ -> Christianity -> USA skips Greece, Rome, the Germanic tribal traditions, English common law, the Magna Carta, the Protestant Reformation, the Enlightenment, and the entire tradition of Anglo-Saxon political philosophy from which the American founding actually derived. The Founders cited Cicero, Locke, Montesquieu, and the English constitutional tradition far more than they cited Moses or the Torah. The logical structure of the chain presents a linear causal sequence while suppressing the majority of the actual causal inputs. This is not a simplification. It is a falsification. A chain that omits the most important links is not a chain. It is a narrative.

Third, it confuses necessary conditions with sufficient conditions and with foundational primacy. Even if Judaism was one of many inputs into the civilizational stream that eventually produced the American republic, being an upstream input does not make you “the foundation.” Water is upstream of hydroelectric power, but we do not call water “the foundation of electricity.” The Tigris and Euphrates are upstream of Western agriculture, but we do not call Mesopotamian irrigation “the foundation of the free world.” The claim takes one thread in a complex tapestry and declares it the entire loom.

L: 9/99 = Fail. Equivocation on “Judaism,” suppression of the majority of actual causal inputs (Greece, Rome, Germanic law, English constitutionalism, the Reformation, the Enlightenment), and confusion of upstream necessary conditions with foundational primacy. Three independent logical defects, any one of which is fatal.

M: Mathematical Coherence

The claim has no quantitative structure to evaluate in a strict sense, but we can apply the Plausibility Check Principle. If Judaism is the foundation of the free world, we should expect some observable correlation between Jewish civilizational influence and the emergence of free societies. The actual pattern runs the other way. The societies where Judaism was the dominant cultural force (ancient Judea, the medieval Jewish communities of Europe) did not produce political freedom in the modern sense. The societies that did produce political freedom (England, the Netherlands, the American colonies) were overwhelmingly Christian and drew primarily on Greco-Roman and Germanic political traditions. The one modern state founded on explicitly Jewish principles, Israel, is a parliamentary democracy, but its political structure derives from British Mandate-era institutions and European political theory, not from the Torah or the Talmud. The empirical distribution of free societies does not cluster around Jewish cultural influence. It clusters around Protestant Christianity and English legal traditions. The claim predicts a pattern that the data does not show.

M: 8/99 = Fail. The predicted correlation between Jewish cultural influence and free societies not only fails to appear but runs in the opposite direction. The plausibility check is near-total failure, with a few points granted because the Old Testament is genuinely one of many upstream inputs into the broader civilizational stream.

E: Empirical Anchoring

The historical record refutes the claim directly. The American Founders did not understand themselves as building on a Jewish foundation. They understood themselves as building on English constitutional traditions, Greco-Roman republican theory, and Protestant Christian moral philosophy. Jefferson, Adams, Madison, and Hamilton left extensive writings on their intellectual influences. Judaism barely appears. The Declaration of Independence invokes “Nature’s God” and “the Laws of Nature,” language drawn from Deist and Enlightenment philosophy, not from Mosaic law. The Constitution contains no reference to Judaism, the Torah, or Mosaic law. The First Amendment explicitly prohibits the establishment of any religion, a principle that would be incoherent if the nation understood itself as founded on a specific religious tradition.

The claim also fails the Applied Triveritas test. Drop to the lowest level of concrete fact. Name the specific Jewish text, institution, or legal principle that the American Founders adopted as foundational. The Ten Commandments? Three of the ten are specifically religious commandments that the First Amendment forbids the government from enforcing. The Mosaic legal code? The Founders explicitly rejected theocratic governance. The prophetic tradition of social justice? This was mediated entirely through Christianity, not through direct engagement with Jewish sources. At every concrete point of contact, the actual mechanism of transmission runs through Christianity, Greece, Rome, or England, not through Judaism directly.

E: 5/99 = Fail. The Founders’ own writings constitute direct, unambiguous evidence against the claim. You cannot score well on empirical anchoring when the primary sources explicitly contradict you. The handful of points reflect the bare fact that the Bible, which includes the Old Testament, was culturally present in the Founding era, but cultural presence is not foundational primacy.

Triveritas Assessment: 7/99 = Propaganda

The claim fails all three dimensions. It is logically incoherent (equivocation, suppressed premises, confusion of necessary and sufficient conditions). It is mathematically incoherent in the plausibility-check sense (the predicted pattern does not match the observed distribution). It is empirically unanchored (the historical record directly contradicts it). Under the Triveritas, the claim does not merit warranted assent.

It has the structure of a claim but none of the substance. It exists to flatter a particular audience by placing them at the root of a civilizational genealogy they did not build. Every element is selected or distorted to serve the narrative rather than to describe what actually happened. The suppression of Greece, Rome, the Germanic traditions, and English constitutionalism is not an oversight. It is the point. The equivocation between the Hebrew religion and rabbinical Judaism is not a minor terminological slip. It is the mechanism by which the claim smuggles its conclusion into its first premise.

A score of 7/99 means the claim has almost no contact with reality on any dimension. It is not a good-faith attempt to describe civilizational history that gets some details wrong. It is a narrative constructed to reach a predetermined conclusion, with the evidence selected and distorted to fit. The Anti-Self-Sealing Principle identifies exactly this structure: a purely narrative system that substitutes storytelling for prediction, interprets all evidence as support, and never exposes itself to falsification by concrete data.

At 7/99, you are not in the territory of “debatable” or “oversimplified but defensible.” You are in the territory of a claim that fails every independent check available.

DISCUSS ON SG

The End of the Church of England

It’s officially over for the Anglican Church:

As Britain national identity has been eroded under leftist Labour party rule, other institutions like the ultra-woke Church of England are helping speed up the collapse process. Today, Sarah Mullally was confirmed as the new archbishop of Canterbury, becoming the first woman to spiritually lead the CoE.

It’s really remarkable how the dying throes of other churches that have gone down this route don’t even slow them down. Which tells you how much the people who managed to take control of the organization care about the church, the church membership, or the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

DISCUSS ON SG

Ted Cruz and the Stink of Sulfur

Ted Cruz says it wasn’t Jews who killed Jesus, saying the responsibility belongs to all of us. “Jews didn’t kill Jesus — I did. You did.” He says that blaming Jews for Christ’s death is antisemitic, saying only stupid people still believe that claim.

Stupid people like Matthew:

When Pilate saw that he was getting nowhere, but that instead an uproar was starting, he took water and washed his hands in front of the crowd. “I am innocent of this man’s blood,” he said. “It is your responsibility!” All the people answered, “His blood is on us and on our children!”

And the Apostle Paul:

For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God in Judea which are in Christ Jesus; for ye also have suffered like things from your own countrymen, even as they have from the Jews, who both killed the Lord Jesus and their own prophets, and have persecuted us. They please not God and are contrary to all men.

If, at this point, you don’t understand that the people who are waging war on “anti-semitism” and actively attacking the God-given rights of the American Posterity are at best Churchians, and on average, outright satanists, you simply aren’t paying any attention at all.

Their objectives have been obvious since the Enlightenment and the Reign of Terror, and their primary objective is waging war on Jesus Christ and those who follow Him. The fact that they pervert the words of the Bible and subvert the Christian institutions is simply further proof, as if any more were needed, that they serve the Father of Lies.

Any time you see that sort of inversive rhetoric, you should be able to smell the sulfur.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Return of Christian Nationalism

Andrew Torba has a new site up, and I have to say, he appears to have refined his thinking on the subject in a correct and positive manner as opposed to the civic nationalism that had crept into his book on the subject.

THE CHRISTIAN IDENTITY OF AMERICA

Christian Nationalism is not a new invention; it is a return to our true heritage. For centuries, America was explicitly Christian in law, custom, and identity.

WHY WE REJECT THE TERM “JUDEO-CHRISTIAN”

The term “Judeo-Christian” is a modern political invention, not a biblical one. It functions as a vague civil-religious umbrella that papers over real theological differences.

Christianity is not an extension of modern Judaism; it is the fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets through Jesus Christ.

The New Testament repeatedly teaches that the Church—not unbelieving Israel—is the continuation of God’s covenant people. Christian Nationalism is therefore Christian, not interfaith. We affirm the Lordship of Jesus Christ, the authority of the New Testament, and the mission of discipling the nations.

He’s absolutely correct. The differences are not just real and theological, they are fundamental and represent polar opposites. The term itself is not merely a contradiction, it is an oxymoron. While the values of the European Union are, without question, “talmudic” as stated by the EU’s High Priestess, Ursula van der Leyen, the values of Western civilization, the European nations, and America are 100 percent opposed to that satanic globalist babelism, the evil fruits of which are conclusively in evidence today.

The great Swiss Christian nationalist Gonzague de Reynold addressed this very contradiction between the Satanic elevation of the State over Man and nation on the one hand and the Christian elevation of Man’s soul over the State in 1938:

The notion of the common good has its source in the Christian conception of Man, and here is how it can be defined: the ensemble of natural and human conditions that permit man to live according to the needs of the individual, but according to the demands of the person, in order to accomplish his destiny which is to cross earthly life to assimilate himself to God. Thus, the common good must have ceaselessly before its eyes this last end of our human associations, this final and total perfection of our human being.

All earthly things are below the human soul. But it is certain that the human soul, as long as it remains incarnate, needs these things, and that the vital impulse takes in these things its point of departure. They must therefore be ordered to the human soul, to the person.

And this order is called civilization.

DISCUSS ON SG

Jump to India Confirmed

In 2004, the Learned Elders of Wye announced their plan to jump to China once the USA collapsed in the 2030s. However, those plans were cancelled by Xi Jinping in 2015, thereby prioritizing the jump to Ukraine for which the groundwork was laid in the Orange Revolution of 2014. Those plans for Ukraine would appear to have been cancelled by the Russian Special Military Operation launched in 2022, although it’s also possible that the repopulation of a neo-Ukranian rump state could involve a recolonization there; it’s too soon to tell.

But regardless, it’s apparent that the recent jeetification of Canada and the USA is a consequence of what would appear to be the new plan of a jump to India, as evidenced by the recent comments of Rosanne Barr. The point is not that Ms Barr is a particularly well-informed elite, but rather, that she is not; apparently this is such common knowledge that even she knows what’s in progress.

“America deserves what’s going to happen to them for it. Israel will just move on to India and America will fall.”

Such are “the blessings of Israel” that so concern the Zionist Boomers who didn’t hesitate to sacrifice the future of their children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren in order to secure the dubious and short-term blessings of the god of this world. The lessons of history are brutal, but they are certainly consistent.

Unless and until you comprehend that the “judeo-christianity” sold by the likes of Ben Shapiro and Dennis Prager and adopted by Churchians is not even remotely synonymous with “Christianity” in absolutely any sense of the term, be it historical, theological, spiritual, or moral, you cannot even begin to understand anything about the geopolitics of the last 80 years, let alone the history of the last two millennia. Remember, America is “the New Rome” and Israel has been at war with Rome since before Jesus Christ was born. In fact, if historian Barry Strauss and the Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu are to be taken at face value, Israel is still at war with Rome.

For those inclined to see this predicted fall of America as some sort of apocalyptic black pill, it’s probably worth keeping in mind that the post-1492 collapse of Spain was also described as Spain’s “Golden Age”. And even the Western Roman empire survived nearly another four centuries post-Vespasian, while the Eastern Roman Empire prospered for a thousand years.

DISCUSS ON SG

A Response to an Irrelevance

Someone who calls himself something like Faggotus Maximus took offense at my contemptuous dismissal of a deceased political whore and purported to attempt what he erroneously calls a “fisking”:

Dear Vox, Once upon a time you were important, very important. You were the first to provide real resistance to the Social Justice Warriors with Gamer Gate. Being first is important. Very important. Your books on Social Justice Warriors have stood the test of time.

You are among the first to achieve real traction getting important ideas into the minds of right wing intellectuals and activists: that conservatism is not enough, that Social Justice Warriors are a cancer that must be eradicated, that free trade isn’t working according to accepted theory, that conservatives need to play hardball and not play strictly by the rules when the the other side is cheating gratuitously.

As in a multi level marketing scheme, you deserve partial credit for those who have run with your ideas — maybe even a few orts of Charlie Kirk’s work when he has strayed into Christian Nationalist territory.

And you have deserved a well deserved rest from activism. You can retreat across the Atlantic to relative safety to focus on your family and on fun hobby projects with my complete blessing, with a bit of pontificating to the next wave of activists when you feel like it.

But that is not all your are doing. You have been repeatedly dismissing those who are are still fighting the good fight. And your repeated claim that those who have done greater things than you are disposable ticket takers is gammafied envy whining on the order of a twink Marxist sociology professor. It is more cringeworthy than your Mary Sue self insert at the end of Alt Hero.

There is more, of course there is more, but it’s always projection with these nobodies and neverweres. First, he clearly doesn’t even know what a “fisking” is, since he doesn’t go methodically through whatever I actually wrote that set him off. This is a false assertion of a faux-fisking. Second, he’s the only one who took any offense. I’m certainly not offended by anything he wrote, neither are any of my readers, fans, supporters, and casual followers. On the level of rhetorical heat to which we have become accustomed since 2001, this barely rises to the 2/10 level.

These are his words, not mine:

“Offense has been taken. Great offense. For some strange reason I find the disparagements of a Benedict Arnold to be more offensive than the gloatings of an open enemy. Offense shall be served.”

There will likely be some who ask why I respond to an irrelevance. The reason is that I never use an critic’s irrelevance as an excuse to avoid addressing him. I have debated PhDs and authors of the textbook on the subject concerned and I have debated complete nobodies. Unlike Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, and Nick Fuentes, I do not generate excuses to run from either criticism or debate.

Let’s set another thing straight. I am not a “self described dark lord”. The title of “Supreme Dark Lord” was granted to me by SF grandmaster John C. Wright himself after the editor-in-chief of Tor Books described me as rising “all the way to downright evil” and after my VFM and Dread Ilk forced the tech giants to completely revise their legally questionable terms of service. To this day, I am banned from YouTube and officially barred from setting foot in Google’s Mountain View headquarters. And I am reliably informed by my eyes and ears there that my name can only be spoken in hushed whispers at the headquarters of the Daily Wire.

Now, the truth of my disparagements notwithstanding, I can’t be a Benedict Arnold because I’m simply not on the same side as Charlie Kirk or FM or Brilyn Hollyhand or Nick Fuentes or Ben Shapiro or any other conservative creature who a) is funded by foreign political interests, or b) believes “Judeo-Christianity” is real or c) subscribes to the idea that Western Civilization was ever dependent upon Judaism in any way, or d) asserts that America is an “idea nation” or a “melting pot,” or e) believes in Enlightenment ideals such as “free trade” or “free speech” or “progress” or “equality,” or f) supports the societal normalization of sexual deviancy, no-fault divorce, abortion, and euthanasia.

All of these things are antithetical to civilization in general and Western Civilization in particular. I actively oppose and reject every single conservative who espouses any of those ideas. There is no us.

I am not, and I have never, ever been, a conservative. I explained why in CUCKSERVATIVE; it is merely a posture, it is neither a philosophy nor an ideology. I have never belonged to the Republican Party, or indeed, to any political party or faction. I do not care if the Republican Party, the Democratic Party, or the Democrat-Farmer-Labor Party are currently in power; I publicly dismissed all of them as the bi-factional ruling party back in 2004 and pointed out that the historical USA no longer even existed except in name and geography.

All of which is to say that I cannot retire from activism since I have never been an activist. I am neither a political activist nor a political extremist. I am an intellectual, which is something that is increasingly rare in an age of frauds, political whores, paid propagandists, and charlatans. I do not advocate, I observe and I assess. I do not think in binary terms, but from a probabilistic perspective. I certainly do not expect any political elites to pay attention to, endorse, or accept my observations, much less any of my recommendations, however correct they might be.

As a student of Aristotle, Martin van Creveld, Karl Marx, Friedrich von Hayek, Robert Prechter, Steve Keen, and Peter Turchin, among many others, I don’t view politics as being anything more than a superficial layer of distraction that obscures the real tectonics of human society, which are ultimately material and spiritual in nature. Modern politics across the West is a collection of delusional children playing make-a-wish; one has only to witness the incessant European conferences on how the member-states of the European Union, led by the European Commission, are going to institute regime change in Russia to grasp the fundamentally irrelevant nature of politics today.

This is not to say politics has no influence on society at all. But that influence is limited, indirect, controlled, and inevitably bows before material force and spiritual power. Moreover, there is virtually no link between the will of the people as theoretically represented by their democratically-elected “representatives” and what the people of the nation actually want. Very few, if any, of the institutions and policies of the current US federal government were ever desired by the American people, and yet they were forced upon them anyhow. The same is true of most European nations.

I very much doubt that most of my readers, much less any of my critics, can fathom how low my expectations are. We swim in a sea of willfully delusional retardery and none of the things that obsess most political activists matter in the least; forget who will win the electoral race in the 4th California congressional district or whatever as most people across the West will consider themselves fortunate if they preserve electricity, clean water, and indoor plumbing in their neighborhoods and avoid being roasted over open fires. All polities collapse in time, and the USA is observably approaching the end of its viability as a unitary governing entity. I’m not the first to see this; Wang Hunin observed the same thing years before I predicted a collapse in the 2033 timeframe in 2004.

Politics is not going to fix this.

The irony is that my opinion of FM is not entirely dissimilar to his opinion of me. He thinks I am wasting my time developing new concepts, disproving various historical falsehoods, and publishing a range of books that will last for centuries. I think he is wasting his time trying to build a political coalition on behalf of people under the financial control of global satanists in order to preserve a decrepit polity that cannot survive intact. His interest is in the success of the Republican Party. My interest is in the Good, the Beautiful, and the True.

Only time can conclusively determine who is correct, but regardless, I can’t pretend to care about something that never mattered to me in the first place. And as for those matters that gave offense, I can summarize my views in a succinct manner:

Disagree if you like. Take offense if you wish. The facts are what they are. The Truth is what it is. And nothing you, me, FM, or anyone else says is going to change that.

Veritas incontestabilis stat

UPDATE: Dennis Prager’s fate is more than a little ironic in light of the Black Rider analogy often used for the ticket-takers who have ceased to be useful to their masters. Of course, the fact that I was unaware of this only underlines how little attention I pay to these manufactured entities. Only a short-sighted fool could ever envy what passes for their so-called “success”.

UPDATE: FM is also blatantly lying in his comments.

It matters because he has building a cult of personality, teaching insane shit, and injecting mental poison into the Right. His disgusting Charlie Kirk post was but a trigger to write this fisk. He needs to either mend his ways or have his reputation destroyed. Benedict Arnold was once the Continental Army’s most effective general. He’s not remembered as a hero today for some reason. And yes he did hate Charlie. He hates everyone who is more successful than he is, that envious little $#*(@). He denegrates everyone who makes an impact as a “ticket taker.” Vox is not just a mere Black Piller. He is pushing Black Pills, a cult mindset, and assorted insanity using cred built from past real accomplishments.

Again, pure projection. I neither envied nor wanted the “success” that a corpse, a paraplegic, and a suicidal nutjob previously enjoyed. I wouldn’t trade places with Ben Shapiro, Nick Fuentes, or any other well-funded current gatekeeper if I were offered 10x their revenue and the daily services of the entire Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders squad. Nor would I trade places with successful non-gatekeepers like George RR Martin, Brandon Sanderson, Larry Correia, and John Scalzi. I also don’t hate any of them, but low-status men like FM often confuse contempt and disdain for hate and envy.

The amusing thing is that what FM calls “insane shit” today, a few years from now he will likely pretend to have believed all along. I still remember when most of the readers here thought I was crazy for refusing to celebrate Jordan Peterson as the great intellectual hero of the Right, and when evolutionists thought I was crazy for asking about the average rate of evolution by natural selection. It wasn’t even that long ago when people thought I was crazy for pointing out that the USA could not win a war with either Russia or China, much less a Sino-Russian alliance. I don’t always correctly anticipate the future, but I do have a better track record than most.

Anyhow, the fact that FM believes me to be a Black Piller should suffice to demonstrate that he has no idea what he’s talking about.

DISCUSS ON SG

Denninger on Heresy

Even the Boomers are rejecting the religious subversion of the American right now:

I’ve talked about dispensationalism a few times in various formats over the years on this blog and how it is utterly unsupportable when it comes to calling someone “privileged” from the standpoint of Christianity particularly as applies to Jewish people and/or Israel.

But Tucker Carlson went there in his recent show and in fact echoed what I’ve said for a long time: As a Christian if you espouse this you have committed Heresy and worse, you’ve stated a belief that those who disagree will be literally killed by God.

Tucker is right, by the way.

Israel, like every other nation, can deal with us as a peer and with respect but at no time will I or should anyone else consider them to have any means of “control” over the United States

Ever.
Period.
Full stop.

Tucker further points out something even more important, which is that while heresy is an offense before God (assuming you believe in it, of course) when committed by people in political power, such as Lindsey Graham, it becomes something much more-serious in the secular world.

I think it’s a very easy and straightforward question for any honest individual. When do you consider America to have been more blessed?

  1. Prior to 31 January 1949
  2. After 31 January 1949

If your answer is (1), then there obviously is no reason to accept the Dispensationalist heresy or the subordination of Americans to any foreign people. And the point is further underlined by a historical question. When would you consider Spain to have been more blessed?

  1. Prior to March 31, 1492
  2. After March 31, 1492

The Golden Age of Spain is generally considered to begin in 1492, marked by the end of the Reconquista, Christopher Columbus’s voyages, and the publication of Antonio de Nebrija’s Grammar of the Castilian Language. It ended around 1659 with the Treaty of the Pyrenees, though some extend it to 1681, after the death of Pedro Calderón de la Barca.

Now, keep in mind that I don’t accept the Dispensationalist metric in the first place. I certainly don’t regard heretical theology as a sound basis for making decisions about financial budgets or foreign policy. But it’s always most effective to answer one’s opponent in the terms he is capable of understanding.

DISCUSS ON SG

Rebuking the Fake Pope

Carlo Maria Vignano demolishes Fake Pope Bergoglio’s attempt to claim that immigration and the genetic destruction of the nations are somehow “Christian” values:

Jorge Bergoglio’s monomaniacal obsession with indiscriminate immigration and miscegenation finds a zealous proponent in Robert Prevost. The handover did not represent any radical change, either doctrinally or morally, or politically or socially. The conciliar-synodal Church is and remains the “Ancilla Novi Ordinis,” the courtesan of the globalist elite.

We know well that the migratory phenomenon is not spontaneous: it is not caused by famine, war, or religious persecution. Instead, it was desired and planned as a means of destabilizing Western nations, and illegal immigration is used as an instrument of social subversion. This is stated in a United Nations document of March 21, 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration.”

The Bergoglian and post-Bergoglian Church is at the forefront of promoting immigrationism, ethnic substitution, and the invasion of Western nations, aiming to erase their Christian identity, culture, and history. This is confirmed by the emphasis placed on the audience granted by Leo to Amy Pope, Director General of the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM), and on the Jubilee of Migrants.

The Holy See is complicit in the subversive plan hatched by the globalist elite: it presents illegal immigrants as victims and maintains relationships with those who organize their trafficking, while blaming the invaded population, victims of the heinous crimes and degradation these hordes commit in our cities. Finally, abusing the moral authority of the Papacy, the Synodal Church equates immigration, the death penalty, and abortion, to the delight of the woke Left and to the great scandal of pro-life movements.

The collusion of Leo and his bishops with the globalist elite is deliberate, intended, and a source of profit for Catholic institutions and organizations. This also occurs in civil governments, whose leaders are all emissaries of the Davos Forum, the Fabian Society, Soros’s Open Society, or other supranational entities conspiring against the people. And it is scandalous—to say the least—that progressive American bishops are fueling this artfully created controversy, exploiting it for political gain against President Trump, when they cowardly remained silent during the Biden presidency in the face of far more serious moral issues…

This subservience of the Catholic Church to the criminal plan of the Great Reset and Agenda 2030 will be judged by God and by history, and will remain as an indelible stain on the already severely compromised reputation of this renegade and apostate Hierarchy.

The fury of the young European men at organized Christianity in general and the Catholic Church in particular is well-founded, which is why it is important to make sure they are informed that the fake church led by a fake pope are neither Catholic in the proper sense nor Christian in even the broadest sense of the term.

Regardless of whether you are Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, or atheist, you can certainly agree that the official institution presently headquartered in the Vatican that calls itself the Roman Catholic Church is an organization that was infiltrated, subverted, and is now led by those who worship the god of this world and are the self-professed enemies of Jesus Christ as well as those who seek to follow him.

But paganism is not, and will never be, the answer to satanry. A brief look at India, or any post-Christian culture in Europe and the Americas, should suffice to conclusively prove that. There is only one force that is capable of defeating global satanry and that is Jesus Christ.

DISCUSS ON SG

The End of Jordan Peterson

The Black Rider appears to no longer have any use for the Canadian charlatan:

This summer has been exceedingly difficult. Dad was in an ICU suffering from pneumonia and sepsis after dealing with a host of neurological issues this summer that we believe stem from SERS which is chronic inflammatory response syndrome due to decades of mold exposure. We don’t have a better explanation for his neurological symptoms at the moment other than spiritual attacks. He’s been suffering for the last number of years with unexplainable neuropathy and weakness amongst other symptoms, but they worsened this summer after he cleaned out his parents’ basement after his dad, my grandpa, passed away.

The summary from /pol/ is apt enough:

His rise and decline is very interesting. You can see he starts off as a nobody retard professor, then gets attention talking about free speech, has some good points early on. Sold a book. It was all uphill, but the success wasn’t enough. He was approached and he was hungry for more, the money wasn’t enough, he wanted recognition, but then recognition wasn’t enough, he wanted to be part of “the club”. He is a story of a man who went to defeat a dragon but succumbed to the riches the dragon has collected. When his time in the spotlight was over, he couldn’t let go. He became a parody of himself, willing to say and do anything to keep even a crumb of the rise he previously experienced. A man destroyed by his own success, his own greed for relevancy and fame. A good start followed by a pathetic end.

If you’ve read Jordanetics, then you know that Jordan Peterson was directly involved with the occult and there are even hints that his family is one drenched in generational evil.

Observe that even on what would appear to be his last legs, he still refuses to humble himself and turn to Jesus Christ. And remember, this is a man whose so-called “success” I, and others like Milo, have been frequently accused of envying, which has never, ever, been the case.

We recently watched Ghostbusters: Afterlife, and one of the things that struck me was how the revived Gozer didn’t hesitate to destroy the one servant who had made her revival possible. I’ve just never understood how evil men like Jordan Peterson never seem to grasp that the even more wicked men and spirits they serve not only don’t love or respect them, but won’t hesitate to destroy them as soon as they cease to be useful.

To be honest, I didn’t really expect Peterson to fade away into irrelevance as he has over the past few years. I always thought his demise would be more spectacular and more obviously self-inflicted.

DISCUSS ON SG

Never Take the Ticket

It would appear that Charlie Kirk’s conscience was belatedly catching up to him. But developing a conscience has consequences for any ticket taker.

A Trump insider and longtime friend of Charlie Kirk tells The Grayzone how the assassinated conservative leader’s turning point on Israeli influence provoked a private backlash from Netanyahu’s allies that left him angry and afraid.

Charlie Kirk rejected an offer earlier this year from Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to arrange a massive new infusion of Zionist money into his Turning Point USA (TPUSA) organization, America’s largest conservative youth association, according to a longtime friend of the slain commentator speaking on the condition of anonymity. The source told The Grayzone that the late pro-Trump influencer believed Netanyahu was trying to cow him into silence as he began to publicly question Israel’s overwhelming influence in Washington and demanded more space to criticize it.

In the weeks leading up to his September 10 assassination, Kirk had come to loathe the Israeli leader, regarding him as a “bully,” the source said. Kirk was disgusted by what he witnessed inside the Trump administration, where Netanyahu sought to personally dictate the president’s personnel decisions, and weaponized Israeli assets like billionaire donor Miriam Adelson to keep the White House firmly under its thumb.

According to Kirk’s friend, who also enjoyed access to President Donald Trump and his inner circle, Kirk strongly warned Trump last June against bombing Iran on Israel’s behalf. “Charlie was the only person who did that,” they said, recalling how Trump “barked at him” in response and angrily shut down the conversation. The source believes the incident confirmed in Kirk’s mind that the president of the United States had fallen under the control of a malign foreign power, and was leading his own country into a series of disastrous conflicts.

By the following month, Kirk had become the target of a sustained private campaign of intimidation and free-floating fury by wealthy and powerful allies of Netanyahu – figures he described in an interview as Jewish “leaders” and “stakeholders.”

“He was afraid of them,” the source emphasized.

Kirk was 18 years old when he launched TPUSA in 2012. From its inception, his career was propelled by Zionist donors, who showered his young organization with money through neoconservative outfits like the David Horowitz Freedom Center. He repaid his wealthy backers over the years by unleashing a relentless firehose of anti-Palestinian and Islamophobic diatribes, accepting propaganda trips to Israel, and sternly shutting down nationalist forces challenging his support for Israel during TPUSA event…

Kirk was bombarded with infuriated text messages and phone calls from Netanyahu’s wealthy allies in the US, including many who had funded TPUSA. According to his longtime friend, the Zionist donors treated Kirk with outright contempt, essentially ordering him to fall back into line. 

Once you sell your soul, you can’t really expect the Devil to simply give it back to you upon request. The one expectation of the purchased man is that he will stay bought. That’s why it’s better to simply live in the knowledge that you’ll never have the material success that the Prince of This World offers the untalented and the insufficiently self-confident. Not all “successful” people are ticket takers, but others much more informed on the subject than I am estimate that 90 percent of them are.

DISCUSS ON SG