The Logic Holds

If we can suspend the constitution in its entirety over a 99.999% survivable virus, we can suspend it to expel all the Somalis and the Democrats facilitating their welfare and election scams.

Without question. Furthermore, the Somalis, naturalized or not, have no Constitutional rights as Americans. The Constitution was written to protect the rights of the Posterity of the Founding Fathers of the American Revolution. Regardless of what immigrant judges may have declared over the years, no one else resident in the USA has any claim to any rights protected by the U.S. Constitution.

You can point horse and say cow all you like, but that doesn’t make the horse a cow.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Inevitable Arrives

I have always said that feminism is the dumbest, most incoherent, most violent, and most destabilizing ideology in the history of ideology. Now Great Britain is discovering one of the many reasons why:

Britain’s leading abortion charity has been criticised for encouraging ‘sex-selective’ terminations – amid fears these are on the rise among the country’s Indian women. The British Pregnancy Advisory Service (BPAS), which carries out 110,000 terminations a year, suggests that aborting a baby on the basis of sex is not illegal – despite Government advice explicitly stating it is against the law.

Furious campaigners called the advice ‘irresponsible’ and pointed out that many pregnant British-Indian women are under huge pressure to have boys, and may be coerced into having an abortion as soon as a scan reveals a female foetus.

Women of Indian origin are likely to have aborted 400 girls on the basis of their sex in the five years up to 2021, the latest figures reveal.

But Department of Health guidance issued to doctors in 2014 states: ‘Abortion on the grounds of gender alone is illegal. Gender is not itself a lawful ground under the Abortion Act.’

But the BPAS website says: ‘The law is silent on the matter. Reason of foetal sex is not a specified ground for abortion within the Abortion Act, but nor is it specifically prohibited.’ BPAS carries out almost half the abortions in the UK, through drugs it sends by post or surgical procedures at its 55 clinics nationwide.

If women have the right to choose abortion, then they have the right to choose abortion for any reason. The entire concept of the freedom of speech is literally founded upon the undeniable observation of the freedom of thought, which is not a right, but a definitional tautology: one man cannot know what another man thinks.

Human Action was written on the basis of acting man alone knowing the basis for his actions. Or, in this case, her actions.

A society cannot have both a) abortion rights and b) laws against women having abortions for the wrong reasons. Obviously, there is no such thing as a “right” to murder unborn children simply due to the physical location of the child and abortion should be illegal.

But in places where it isn’t, these issues will inevitably arise, as I pointed out nearly 20 years ago. Now, what was once a problem in India is now a problem in the UK thanks to the joys of mass immigration.

DISCUSS ON SG


Maybe They Just Need More Immigrants

The UK is collapsing and contracting economically:

High inflation and low growth will further the decline in UK living standards, pushing the country behind its economic peers, the UK-based Centre for Economics and Business Research (CEBR) has predicted.

The forecast, set out in the CEBR’s annual World Economic League Table released on Friday, projects that the UK will fall from 19th to 22nd in global GDP per capita rankings by 2030, being overtaken by Hong Kong, Finland, and the UAE. British living standards are expected to slip behind those of former colony Malta by 2035.

In dollar terms, UK GDP per capita is forecast at $58,775 for next year.

According to the report, Britain’s GDP per capita growth is set to be the second-weakest in the G7 over the next five years, trailing only Japan.

CEBR economist Pushpin Singh said the UK confronts a “triple challenge” of high inflation, high debt, and low growth. He warned that competitiveness is being eroded by rival nations with lower taxes and lighter regulation, while an “inability to shrink state spending” persists.

Remember when they used to say that immigration was “good for the economy”. Remember that?

They’re not going to be saying it 20 years from now. They’re not going to be saying it 200 years from now.

The lesson is being learned the hard way.

DISCUSS ON SG


H1B is Invasion

Immigrants always hire other immigrants. This is why you shouldn’t hire immigrants, and you definitely shouldn’t ever permit immigrant executives. Their first priority is always finding a way to hire more of their own, not the success of the company, much less the society they’re plundering:

FedEx received a significant federal delivery contract worth more than $2 billion in late 2022. The company’s hiring procedures started to drastically change thereafter. According to The Dallas Express, official documents show that FedEx significantly raised the number of foreign workers it hired under the H-1B visa program while concurrently decreasing the number of American positions held in different parts of the US.

In response to the report, FedEx stated that its hiring decisions are based on business requirements and the necessary skills. A spokesperson for the company told The Dallas Express that FedEx is committed to fostering employee development and constructing a workforce aligned with its operational needs.

“Across our business, we employ a wide range of roles, requiring a variety of skillsets and are committed to complying with all applicable federal immigration laws.”

Also Read: H-1B visa row drastically impacts California schools, ‘it’s a form of discrimination to…’

Indian-origin FedEx CEO Rajesh “Raj” Subramaniam is now facing flak on social media for firing American employees in order to bring in foreign workers. The move comes at a time when firms are hesitant to hire H-1B workers due to the hefty $100K charge under current Trump administration.

We’re about 20 years away from the advocacy of mass immigration, and the organizational support for it, being correctly identified and prosecuted as treason. Because that’s exactly what it is; mass cross-cultural immigration is more harmful for a nation than military invasion and occupation.

Japan and Eastern Europe were occupied for generations. They are still observably what they were. Canada, France, the UK, Australia, and the USA? Not so much, and in one-third the time.

Foreign soldiers go home voluntarily. Large-scale migrations don’t.

Just ask the American Indian…

DISCUSS ON SG


Immigrants and Their Idea Nation Lie

Vivek Ramaswamy is not, and will never be, an American:

Vivek Ramaswamy has taken to the pages of the New York Times to lecture heritage Americans about what their country really means. According to this son of Indian immigrants—born in 1985 to parents who arrived after the 1965 Immigration Act abolished the national origins system—America is not a nation in any traditional sense. It is an idea. A creed. A set of propositions to which anyone on earth can subscribe and thereby become “every bit as American as a Mayflower descendant.”

This is not history. This is mythology. And it is mythology that serves the interests of those who benefit from the displacement of the historic American nation while providing ideological cover for that displacement.

The idea that America was always a “proposition nation” open to the world is a post-World War II invention. It was manufactured by Jewish intellectuals hostile to the historic American nation and popularized by politicians eager to justify the 1965 Immigration Act that opened the floodgates to the third world. Reagan was not articulating timeless American principles. He was repeating propaganda that had been crafted within living memory.

Vivek’s vision is not merely historically illiterate. It is also incompatible with the Biblical understanding of nationhood.

The only people who believe that America is an idea, and that it can belong to everyone, are the enemies of America. Long before Vivek Ramaswamy was even born, Moammar Qaddafi was saying the same thing: America belongs to everyone, America belongs to the world. More recently the Iranian president, or former Iranian president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, said much the same thing. He said America is a concept that belongs to the world and no government has the right to tell people that they can’t go and live in the United States.

You’re just an idea and neither your land nor your government belongs to you is not the statement of a friend or ally, much less someone who is actually one of you.

If America is an idea, then how is it that people who observably don’t share or agree with whatever that idea is supposed to be are given passports? And what is that idea, precisely?

DISCUSS ON SG


Never More Blessed

There are two historical schools of thought regarding the presence of a certain tribe. The Christian Zionists assure us that blessing that tribe and treating it well assures divine blessings and prosperity. The antisemites, on the other hand, vociferously insist that there are extremely good reasons that tribe has been forcibly evicted from 112 nations and counting, and why so many people around the world have learned to fear and hate them. Indeed, we are repeatedly informed that there has never been more global antisemitism than today. But regardless of which side happens to have the more historically accurate narrative going for it, it appears the USA is going to find out one way or the other in the 21st century.

It looks as if prosperity has got to be right around the corner. Or else something very bad.

DISCUSS ON SG


Bankrupt Them All

Looks like we’re going to see some of those wicked Lutheran and Catholic charities aiding and abetting the invasion going out of business in 2026:

The Trump administration is making sponsors pay back the money that migrants received through tax-payer funded benefits like welfare and health care.

Deputy Secretary of HHS, Jim O’Neill, is sending out demands for repayment from sponsors of migrants who have accessed taxpayer-funded benefits. Its actually a pre-existing law that was not enforced during the Biden Administration.

O’Neill said that sponsors are on the hook for the money when sponsored migrants use public benefits.

This action lines up with federal immigration law, which has required this type of accountability since the 1996 welfare reform. Details:

Sponsors who sign Form I-864 (Affidavit of Support) enter a legally binding contract to reimburse the government for any benefits received by the sponsored migrant. Covered benefits typically include programs like Medicaid, SNAP, TANF, and SSI administered through HHS or related agencies. The obligation remains until the migrant becomes a U.S. citizen, accrues 40 quarters of qualifying work, departs the country permanently, or dies.

Agencies may demand repayment directly from sponsors, with options to pursue legal action for non-compliance, including recovery of costs and fees.

They should go after every illegal penny that was paid. Clown World is all about selective enforcement. Often the laws that are needed are already on the books, since only the most dangerous ones about usury and blasphemy are actually eliminated.

DISCUSS ON SG


America is for Everyone

Except Americans and the Europeans who look like them:

There is a peculiar pathology that afflicts white Americans and white Europeans alone among all the peoples of the earth. It is the belief that identity politics is beneath them; that engaging in explicit ethnic advocacy is somehow shameful, distasteful, or morally compromised. They have been taught to believe that the highest virtue is to transcend their own identity, to judge everyone as individuals, to refuse to see patterns or advocate for their own collective interests. Meanwhile, every other group on the planet organizes along ethnic lines, advances ethnic interests, and celebrates ethnic identity without a shred of guilt or hesitation.

This is not a sustainable arrangement. It is, in fact, a formula for extinction.

Let us be clear about what is actually happening in America and throughout the Western world. This is how politics works. It is how it has always worked. Every major demographic group except one practices explicit identity politics. They have advocacy organizations, legal defense funds, congressional caucuses, scholarships, hiring preferences, and media outlets dedicated to advancing their collective interests. They vote as blocs. They network and hire their own. They celebrate their heritage and teach their children to be proud of who they are. None of this is controversial. None of it is condemned. It is understood as natural, healthy, and good.

Black Americans have the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus, Black Entertainment Television, historically black colleges, and an entire cultural infrastructure devoted to black advancement. When they advocate for their collective interests, they are celebrated as civil rights heroes continuing a noble legacy. When black politicians openly say they will represent “their people,” no one blinks.

Jewish Americans have the ADL, AIPAC, the American Jewish Committee, and countless other organizations devoted to Jewish identity, Jewish continuity, and Jewish interests. Jewish in-group preference in academia, media, finance, and law is well-documented and openly discussed in Jewish publications. When Jewish groups advocate for Israel or against “antisemitism,” they are exercising ethnic solidarity and no one is permitted to criticize it.

Hispanic Americans have La Raza (now UnidosUS), the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, and an entire political movement built around ethnic identity and ethnic interests. When Hispanic activists openly advocate for more immigration from Latin America to increase Hispanic political power, this is considered legitimate political organizing.

Asian Americans have their own advocacy organizations, their own congressional caucus, their own identity-based scholarships and hiring networks. When Asian parents organize to oppose policies that disadvantage their children, they are exercising ethnic advocacy.

Only one group is forbidden from doing any of this.

I don’t disagree with anything that Torba points out here. But it’s important to remember, and to understand, that the reason this has taken place is because the immigrants – the Germans, the Irish, the Swedes, the Jews – all wanted to be able to feel like they were true blue original Americans no different than the Heritage Americans, the Sons and Daughters of the American Revolution, the Posterity of Plymouth Rock and the Founding Fathers.

And they weren’t. They were never part of the Posterity for whom the Constitution was written and whose rights it guarantees. The Constitution was never intended to protect the rights of every citizen, every resident, every tourist, or every human being on the planet. But since there was plenty of room in the New World, and since everyone didn’t see what harm it would do if everyone pretended to be the same in order to get along, civic nationalism was invented and gradually came to take the place of the real American nationalism.

So, keep in mind that if you’re a non-Posterity American, all that everyone else from Afghanistan to Somalia is doing is the same thing that you, your parents, and your grandparents have been doing for decades, which is pretending that they are Americans. The only real difference is that the cultures, religions, and ethnicities from which you came were similar enough to avoid open and immediate conflict. in the short term.

Even so, these cultural differences between the American nation and immigrants from the European nations were what led to the Civil War and the defeat of the South after the first great wave of immigration. The post-1965 wave is what will lead to what will either be civil war, mass remigration, collapse, or some combination of all three. But regardless of what happens, nothing will ever change the fact that America is a White Anglo-Saxon Protestant nation, and everyone else is just visiting it, or at most, playing tourist while some remnants of it still survive.

There will always be people called “Americans”. After all, Rome still survives as “Romania” to this day. But the modern Romanian is even less related to the Conscript Fathers of the Roman Senate than the average “American” today is related to the Founding Fathers of the American Revolution.

DISCUSS ON SG


SJW Travel Ban

Also, if you’re insufficiently enthusiastic about the response to the unprovoked and totally unexpected October 7th terrorist attacks, you might want to reconsider your travel plans to the USA:

The Trump administration is set to require foreign tourists to hand over the past five years of their social media history in order to enter the United States. The drastic move was the latest attempt by President Donald Trump to scrutinize those entering the country, after an immigration freeze from 19 countries was announced last week.

The ‘mandatory’ notice was published by Customs and Border Protection on Tuesday in the Federal Register.

Social media data would be required for any people entering the United States, including countries like the United Kingdom and Germany who don’t mandate visas for travel.

It follows a June announcement by the State Department that ordered travelers to make their social media profiles public.

People entering the US will also be asked to provide email addresses, phone numbers and information on their family members in order to achieve safe passage.

First, it will certainly tend to cut down on immigration, particularly immigration from the sort of people employed by NGOs. Second, what a boon for alternative social media platforms that are not accessible by the various government authorities.

As much as most of us enjoy it, the ease and affordability of global travel has turned out to be one of the greatest banes of the modern age. Imagine how awful it would have been if the Visigoths could have simply flown to Rome and that’s essentially the situation we’ve been living in since the 1970s.

The US Citizenship and Immigration Services said officers will now consider whether an applicant for benefits, such as residency, work and visa applications, ‘endorsed, promoted, supported, or otherwise espoused’ anti-American, terrorist or antisemitic views.

Two observations. First, I find it all-too-typical that people who don’t hesitate to identify “anti-semitism” somehow find it impossible to understand what “anti-American” is or identify anything as being “anti-American”. And second, the fact that “antisemitic views” are on that list is a clear indication that this is a Clown World measure and not the America First one it appears to be.

DISCUSS ON SG


The National Security Strategy

It’s far from ideal, but it is a massive improvement upon the destructive path of the entire post-WWII period. (PDF document)

First, a long-overdue condemnation of the foreign-infested elite’s strategy.

American strategies since the end of the Cold War have fallen short—they have been laundry lists of wishes or desired end states; have not clearly defined what we want but instead stated vague platitudes; and have often misjudged what we should want.

After the end of the Cold War, American foreign policy elites convinced themselves that permanent American domination of the entire world was in the best interests of our country. Yet the affairs of other countries are our concern only if their activities directly threaten our interests.

Our elites badly miscalculated America’s willingness to shoulder forever global burdens to which the American people saw no connection to the national interest.

They overestimated America’s ability to fund, simultaneously, a massive welfare-regulatory-administrative state alongside a massive military, diplomatic, intelligence, and foreign aid complex. They placed hugely misguided and destructive bets on globalism and so-called “free trade” that hollowed out the very middle class and industrial base on which American economic and military preeminence depend. They allowed allies and partners to offload the cost of their defense onto the American people, and sometimes to suck us into conflicts and controversies central to their interests but peripheral or irrelevant to our own. And they lashed American policy to a network of international institutions, some of which are driven by outright anti-Americanism and many by a transnationalism that explicitly seeks to dissolve individual state sovereignty. In sum, not only did our elites pursue a fundamentally undesirable and impossible goal, in doing so they undermined the very means necessary to achieve that goal: the character of our nation upon which its power, wealth, and decency were built.

Second, the very first priority listed is to shut down the societally destructive policy of permitting mass immigration. While it falls short of the much-needed policy of mass remigration, it’s clearly pointing in that direction.

The Era of Mass Migration Is Over – Who a country admits into its borders—in what numbers and from where—will inevitably define the future of that nation. Any country that considers itself sovereign has the right and duty to define its future. Throughout history, sovereign nations prohibited uncontrolled migration and granted citizenship only rarely to foreigners, who also had to meet demanding criteria. The West’s experience over the past decades vindicates this enduring wisdom. In countries throughout the world, mass migration has strained domestic resources, increased violence and other crime, weakened social cohesion, distorted labor markets, and undermined national security. The era of mass migration must end. Border security is the primary element of national security. We must protect our country from invasion, not just from unchecked migration but from cross-border threats such as terrorism, drugs, espionage, and human trafficking. A border controlled by the will of the American people as implemented by their government is fundamental to the survival of the United States as a sovereign republic.

And third, the administration still doesn’t comprehend the degree to which China’s military capabilities already dwarf those of the USA from the strategic perspective:

In the long term, maintaining American economic and technological preeminence is the surest way to deter and prevent a large-scale military conflict… We will build a military capable of denying aggression anywhere in the First Island Chain. But the American military cannot, and should not have to, do this alone.

Our allies must step up and spend—and more importantly do—much more for collective defense. America’s diplomatic efforts should focus on pressing our First Island Chain allies and partners to allow the U.S. military greater access to their ports and other facilities, to spend more on their own defense, and most importantly to invest in capabilities aimed at deterring aggression. This will interlink maritime security issues along the First Island Chain while reinforcing U.S. and allies’ capacity to deny any attempt to seize Taiwan or achieve a balance of forces so unfavorable to us as to make defending that island impossible.

There is nothing to maintain. China’s shipbuilding and dronebuilding advantage already exceeds the historical US industrial advantage over Japan. Taiwan and the South China Sea are already gone. So plan accordingly, don’t strategerize about military fantasies.

One hopes this strategic approach will be rather more successful than its predecessor, which in 1992 asserted:

The United States had become the world’s sole remaining superpower following the dissolution of the Soviet Union at the end of the Cold War, and declared that its principal objective was to preserve that status.

I think we can certainly assess the so-called “Wolfowitz doctrine” as having been complete and comprehensive failure by that metric. Which, of course, what always happens when you let opportunistic tacticians make the strategy.

DISCUSS ON SG