Tag: immigration

He Wasn’t Wrong

Twenty-five years ago, the Atlanta Braves pitcher John Rocker wrote an impassioned observation about the decline of New York.

“Imagine having to take the 7 Train to the ballpark looking like you’re riding through Beirut next to some kid with purple hair, next to some queer with AIDS, right next to some dude who just got out of jail for the fourth time, right next to some 20-year-old mom with four kids. It’s depressing. The biggest thing I don’t like about New York are the foreigners. You can walk an entire block in Times Square and not hear anybody speaking English. Asians and Koreans and Vietnamese and Indians and Russians and Spanish people and everything up there. How the hell did they get in this country?”

He was roundly condemned for this by the national media, by Major League Baseball, and was even forced to undergo professional counseling for the thought crime of noticing the consequences of the foreign invasion the city was undergoing. And now, with what appears to be the imminent election of a socialist Muslim born in Uganda to the highest elective office in New York City, he’s taking a well-earned victory lap.

25 years ago I criticized New York for its rapid decline into a third world country. I was forced to undergo Psychological Counseling, as if I were the crazy one. 25 years later, the city is voting in a muslim socialist for mayor.

This is an object lesson for all of the puritanical goodthinkers and immigration fetishists who drank the equalitarian Kool-Aid. Those Cassandras you condemned for being “crazy” and “racist” and “bigoted” were right all along. All of history, recent and ancient, clearly testifies to the obvious fact that if you permit a sufficient number of foreigners to enter your country, they will change it to suit their preferences with absolutely no respect for what was there before them.

The equalitarian ideology has failed. The Enlightenment has failed. Multiculturalism and anti-racism have failed. Immigration is a clear, present, and existential danger to most of the nations of the West.

If you are still having trouble understanding the concept, ask an American Indian to explain it to you.

DISCUSS ON SG

Clown World Knows It’s Falling

A leaked report about the UK police shows they’re not even trying to uphold the law anymore because they know that the immigrant populations will respond with violence that will likely cause a reaction that will overturn the system.

SENIOR POLICE OFFICERS ADMIT THEIR BIGGEST FEAR IS “MUSLIMS KICKING OFF”

A leaked discussion among senior UK police officers has revealed that their greatest fear when handling sensitive cases is “Muslims kicking off.”

  • Officers admit they tread lightly to avoid “community backlash”
  • Fear of unrest now shaping law enforcement decisions
  • Britain’s policing priorities have shifted from justice to appeasement

“And then their other fear is that a lot of us now are refusing to go along with the ‘multiculturalism has worked out brilliantly’ and they are now afraid of people pointing that out.”

It’s interesting to see how Clown World has recreated the situation that plagues the USA in the European countries. A significant minority of the native populations now aggressively opposes all forms of multiculturalism and multiracism because the failures of immigration, diversity, and equality are so obvious and undeniable.

And that minority will become a majority within the next decade.

DISCUSS ON SG

Immigration is Importing Poverty

The big lie about immigration is that it is “good for the economy” and “necessary to maintain the social security structure”. Because in any advanced economy, immigrants reduce the productivity of labor and impose a tremendous financial burden on the economy that significantly outweigh any benefits they could ever collectively provide.

New data shows that foreigners account for a substantial share of people living in absolute poverty in Italy, even as the poverty rates of families with two Italian parents drops. One director of La Verita newspaper, Maurizio Belpietro, has run an opinion piece in his newspaper lamenting that Italy is “importing poverty.”

“We are importing poor people. Of the total immigrant population, 35.6 percent live in absolute poverty. This rate is five times higher than that of Italians,” writes Belpietro, who is an influential voice in Italian politics with 360,000 followers on X.

He further notes that although foreigners make up a small percentage of the population, they represent a huge share of the number of people living in poverty.

“Of the 2.2 million households living in poverty, i.e., do not have enough income to support a minimum standard of living, 1.5 million are Italian and 733,000 are foreigners. This means that, despite being less than a tenth of the population, poor non-EU citizens are one third of the total,” he wrote. The data, from the Italian government’s Istat, shows that for those families with one Italian and one foreign parent, the absolute poverty rate is only slightly lower, at 30.4 percent.

Claims that mass immigration would “save” European pension systems are increasingly running into reality.

Citing the article, Italian commentator Francesca Totolo wrote on X: “No, immigrants do not pay pensions to Italians. The absolute poverty rate among families of only foreigners is 35.2%, while among families of only Italians it is 6.2%. This means that it is and will be Italians who have to pay for assistance, subsidies, housing, and pensions to foreigners without resources.”

This finding has been replicated in many other countries, which shows that the left’s promise that foreigners would feed into the pension system falters when confronted with the data. Notably, there are substantial differences between EU and non-EU foreigners, with EU foreigners often boosting GDP and contributing to the tax base, in particular those from certain EU countries.

According to a landmark study from the Netherlands, the report found that migrants had cost the state €400 billion between 1995 and 2019. In Germany, the estimated cost of migrants is currently at €50 billion a year, including social benefits, housing, integration, education, and child allowances.

In 2021, French author and academic Jean-Paul Gourévitch said in an interview with Radio Sud that employment data show that it is a myth that immigration to France has economic benefits.

“I have studied this topic extensively and today everyone in France, from the left to the right agrees that immigration costs more than it brings in,” Gourévitch said. “There is a major difference between left and right (oriented) economists regarding the costs: the leftist economists say the deficit is six to ten billion [euros per year], while those on the right say it is 40 to 44 billion. My own scientific research shows that the deficit is 20 to 25 billion [euros],” he said.

There is absolutely no positive economic argument for permitting mass immigration except for the appeal to debt-funded GDP growth that could be much less expensively provided by simply having the government distribute more spending money directly to the native population to boost consumer spending.

Mass immigration is an economic disaster as well as a societal disaster. There are only three solutions: mass repatriations, mass violence and ethnic cleansings, and total societal collapse. And no amount of magic-wording, word-spelling, and name-calling is going to create a viable fourth option.

The mass importation of foreigners is almost unprecedented in history. And extreme policies such as we have suffered will inevitably result in extreme consequences.

Consider that Great Britain has been invaded by 10x more foreigners than have invaded Ukraine. How can anyone expect the consequences for Great Britain to be less significant over time than the consequences of defeat for Ukraine? A military invasion is often less significant over time, because in the case of a military invasion, most of the foreigners eventually return home.

DISCUSS ON SG

Rebuking the Fake Pope

Carlo Maria Vignano demolishes Fake Pope Bergoglio’s attempt to claim that immigration and the genetic destruction of the nations are somehow “Christian” values:

Jorge Bergoglio’s monomaniacal obsession with indiscriminate immigration and miscegenation finds a zealous proponent in Robert Prevost. The handover did not represent any radical change, either doctrinally or morally, or politically or socially. The conciliar-synodal Church is and remains the “Ancilla Novi Ordinis,” the courtesan of the globalist elite.

We know well that the migratory phenomenon is not spontaneous: it is not caused by famine, war, or religious persecution. Instead, it was desired and planned as a means of destabilizing Western nations, and illegal immigration is used as an instrument of social subversion. This is stated in a United Nations document of March 21, 2000, entitled “Replacement Migration.”

The Bergoglian and post-Bergoglian Church is at the forefront of promoting immigrationism, ethnic substitution, and the invasion of Western nations, aiming to erase their Christian identity, culture, and history. This is confirmed by the emphasis placed on the audience granted by Leo to Amy Pope, Director General of the United Nations International Organization for Migration (IOM), and on the Jubilee of Migrants.

The Holy See is complicit in the subversive plan hatched by the globalist elite: it presents illegal immigrants as victims and maintains relationships with those who organize their trafficking, while blaming the invaded population, victims of the heinous crimes and degradation these hordes commit in our cities. Finally, abusing the moral authority of the Papacy, the Synodal Church equates immigration, the death penalty, and abortion, to the delight of the woke Left and to the great scandal of pro-life movements.

The collusion of Leo and his bishops with the globalist elite is deliberate, intended, and a source of profit for Catholic institutions and organizations. This also occurs in civil governments, whose leaders are all emissaries of the Davos Forum, the Fabian Society, Soros’s Open Society, or other supranational entities conspiring against the people. And it is scandalous—to say the least—that progressive American bishops are fueling this artfully created controversy, exploiting it for political gain against President Trump, when they cowardly remained silent during the Biden presidency in the face of far more serious moral issues…

This subservience of the Catholic Church to the criminal plan of the Great Reset and Agenda 2030 will be judged by God and by history, and will remain as an indelible stain on the already severely compromised reputation of this renegade and apostate Hierarchy.

The fury of the young European men at organized Christianity in general and the Catholic Church in particular is well-founded, which is why it is important to make sure they are informed that the fake church led by a fake pope are neither Catholic in the proper sense nor Christian in even the broadest sense of the term.

Regardless of whether you are Catholic, Protestant, Orthodox, or atheist, you can certainly agree that the official institution presently headquartered in the Vatican that calls itself the Roman Catholic Church is an organization that was infiltrated, subverted, and is now led by those who worship the god of this world and are the self-professed enemies of Jesus Christ as well as those who seek to follow him.

But paganism is not, and will never be, the answer to satanry. A brief look at India, or any post-Christian culture in Europe and the Americas, should suffice to conclusively prove that. There is only one force that is capable of defeating global satanry and that is Jesus Christ.

DISCUSS ON SG

Immigration is a Luxury

Eva is correct. Immigration is neither necessary nor is it “good for the economy”:

Every non-Western immigrant that enters The Netherlands puts an average strain of €600.000 on the Dutch national treasury. Yet many people still believe the diabolical lie that immigration is necessary to solve the aging population issue. The opposite is true.

Immigration cannot solve the birth rate problem because the loss of a net-productive native cannot be replaced by one, two, or ten net-negative immigrant. In fact, the more immigrants, the worse the problem will inevitably be.

Karl Denninger calculates that less than 15 percent of all US immigrants contribute anything at all. The percentage that are net-positive could be under five percent, which obviously cannot even begin to compensate for the negative effects of their fellow immigrants, let alone the native shortfall.

DISCUSS ON SG

Nationalist or Feminist

Time will tell. Given the disastrous historical performances by female leaders like Margaret Thatcher and Angela Merkel, it’s hard to have any confidence in Japan’s next prime minister, Sanae Takaichi, despite her ideological superiority to her LDP rivals:

Japan’s ruling party picked hardline conservative Sanae Takaichi as its head on Saturday, putting her on course to become the country’s first female prime minister in a move set to jolt investors and neighbors.

The Liberal Democratic Party, which has ruled Japan for almost all of the postwar era, elected Takaichi, 64, to regain trust from a public angered by rising prices and drawn to opposition groups promising stimulus and clampdowns on migrants.

A vote in parliament to choose a replacement for outgoing Shigeru Ishiba is expected on October 15. Takaichi is favored as the ruling coalition has the largest number of seats.

Takaichi, the only woman among the five LDP candidates, beat a challenge from the more moderate Shinjiro Koizumi, 44, who was bidding to become the youngest modern leader.

Being more influenced by their social surroundings than men, women in positions of political leadership also tend to “grow” more in office because the influences on them once they become a broad spectrum leader, they are suddenly subject to pressure from a much broader range of interests and ideologies.

Margaret Thatcher violated her most precious principles when she sold out British sovereignty and permitted Great Britain to join the precursor to the European Union. Angela Merkel was the most conservative major party leader when she invited the invasion of Germany by the mass of third-world migrants in 2015.

So, I would not expect too much from either Takaichi or Alice Weidel of Germany’s AfD party. Because no matter hardline or conservative they are now, they are still women and they are still subject to the same social pressures that so easily manipulate their more liberal sisters.

DISCUSS ON SG

There Will Be No Integration

The migrants are being naturally selected for conquest and predation, not a better life through integration:

Imagine a fleet of large trucks arriving every week in villages all throughout subsaharan west Africa – countries like Gabon, Togo, Niger, Burkino Faso, and Guinea-Bissau Men aged 18-30 would be picked up, given phones, money, clothes, and some food and hauled up through the sahara desert with promises of reaching the El Dorado that is Europe for free handouts and the pick of any white women they want.

Let’s say on any particular day 10 men from 10 villages were picked up, filling a truck to 100 capacity. By the time the truck made it to Tripoli, half of them were dead, either through fighting, being left in the desert, hijacked by other traffickers.

So now you’ve got 50 of that original 100 in Tripoli, but they’ve got to make it to the port, avoid open slave markets, militia, drug gangs, and street bombings. Let’s halve that again, and now you’ve got 25 military aged African men at the Southern coast of the mediterranean. They get stuffed in a boat with the surviving 25 from other trucks, money exchanges hands from one trafficking group to the next to the next at each leg of the journey. The rubber dinghy goes across the sea and as its reaching the South of Spain or Italy it starts to sink. Some of the guys have already expired from dehydration, many of them find out they don’t know how to swim.

5 of the original 100 that were picked up in Niger have made it to Spain. Now imagine what those 5 guys are like: They would be hard, ruthless, brutal motherfuckers And what they want is what they’ve been promised. Your land, your culture, your women, your daughters, your money, your food, your drugs They don’t give a fuck about you or anything you represent, and they certainly aren’t asylum seekers They want to rape your women, piss on your idols, attack your young boys, and run your streets, and they feel like they’ve earned it.

These migrants have gone through their own personal hell to get to Europe so they feel completely entitled to the spoils of their journey.

No only are the USA, the UK, and Europe not going to vote their way out of the invasions, they’re not going to be able to escape the inevitable violence that will determine who rules whom.

DISCUSS ON SG

Oktoberfest Cancelled

It’s only a matter of time before either a) the New Germans shut down Oktoberfest or b) the Germans repatriate all the non-Germans back to their non-German homelands.

Police in the German city of Munich say the venue where Oktoberfest is taking place has been temporarily closed because of possible links to an explosion and fire at a house rigged with explosives.

A badly injured man was found at a nearby lake and he later died. Mayor Dieter Reiter said the festival site would remain closed until at least 17:00 (15:00 GMT) on Wednesday because of an unspecified bomb threat.

A large-scale emergency operation was under way in Lerchenau in northern Munich. Police said potential links to other locations were being investigated, including the site of the annual beer festival.

It should be eminently clear by now that maintaining one’s social and cultural traditions is not possible if statistically-significant immigration is permitted. It’s not a question of legality, illegality, or integration, because the dirt is not magic and a society is a consequence of its ingredients. A pinch of Islam and a dash of Africans is no more insignificant than adding curry and hot pepper to a recipe for baking bread.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Schools Aren’t Magic

Immigrants are proving literally uneducable(PDF) by the schools in the countries they have invaded:

In spite of the many criticisms to which PISA can and should be legitimately subjected, it is difficult to deny that this large and highly successful OECD project is a blessing for research in Comparative Education, as it provides strictly comparable data on inputs, processes and results for most educational systems in the world. The outcomes of analyzing these enormous data sets are rather disappointing for those who had expected from it quick and solid adjudications among rival theories. First the PISA reports, and then the many reanalyses carried out on the PISA data, have found only very weak relations between students’ outcomes and characteristics of educational systems which are usually thought of
paramount importance (Carabaña, 2008).

It is from these tenuous links that multilevel regressions extract cross-country coefficients that, when statistically significant, are quite hard to interpret even by the best willed officials and scholars. I will here address the question of the effects that schools in the destination countries have on the academic results of immigrant’s children. Immigration countries have generally better schools and better results than countries of emigration. It is therefore easy to imagine how the desire to improve the schooling conditions of their children might be one important pulling factor for emigrants. However, against all expectations of subjects and observers, immigrant students score in the PISA tests rather like students in their countries of origin than like native students in the countries of destination.

In spite of the allegedly better schools of the host countries, the learning of the newcomers remains at the level of their origin countries not only in the first generation, but also in the second and even later on.

This is because the differences across humanity are not merely “skin-deep”. The contents of one’s character do matter, but so too do the contents of one’s culture, and even more importantly, one’s genes. An 80-IQ Somali immigrant who attends a good public school in Minneapolis is still going to be an 80-IQ Somali after being given a piece of paper that declares he is educated. So too will his son, and his grandson, and his great-grandson.

This should be entirely obvious, as the British colonists did not gradually turn into American Indians after four generations in the New World. And the descendants of the African slaves imported into the Americas are still observably distinct in appearance, behavior, and educational outcome after many generations of education in the USA.

DISCUSS ON SG