Tag: decline and fall

Iran Still Has It

The utter lunacy of the USA’s foreign policy pretensions can be seen by the fact that the USA still has no ability to enrich uranium.

America no longer had the capacity to enrich uranium.

Pause. Rewind.

America no longer had the capacity to enrich uranium — I only learned myself this year — which meant it could no longer fuel itself without the help of foreign governments. Mostly, that placed us at the mercy of Europe, which refused to fuel our military bases. But we were also buying enriched uranium from Russia. In fact, we were buying it that very afternoon in November 2023, as war raged in Ukraine. Our government hadn’t included enriched uranium in its initial sanctions against Russia on account of it really couldn’t. Fuel-dependence was not only a risk to our grid, but a risk to our national security.

Nuclear energy, despite its somewhat confusing status in our culture, where battles for its adoption are often waged with great, righteous indignation, as if attempting to persuade some alternative course for our civilization, presently accounts for nearly 20% of American energy production.

In labs across the country, reactors produce critically important medical isotopes for use in cardiology, oncology, orthopedics, and neurology. Then, military applications are obvious, as are their critical importance to our nation’s security, and require significantly greater enrichment than anything used by civilians.

In all of this, we need fuel. American companies used to enrich it. They no longer do. Today, nuclear enrichment is dominated by Russia’s Tenex (Rosatom), Europe’s Urenco, France’s Orano, and China’s CNNC, all of which are state-backed or closely aligned with national governments. Here, a few (foreign operatives) would probably quibble. There is one plant in America. But while Europe’s Urenco operates a facility in New Mexico, it uses European centrifuge tech and security protocols, which means — via braindead policy agreements — while there is technically some capacity to enrich on the U.S. mainland, our government doesn’t control that capacity, and can’t even use it to power our military bases.

But don’t worry, they’re working on it!

General Matter is a nuclear enrichment startup, which means once its enrichment facility is up and running in Paducah it will be producing fuel for nuclear power plants, including the classic giants cooked up in the 1950s and 1960s, as well as the sexy sleeker modern microreactors and small modular reactors (SMRs).

In the meantime, I suppose we could just buy some from Iran. It’s a good thing that whole “totally destroying Iran’s nuclear infrastructure” thing was nothing more than an expensive sound-and-light show.

If it wasn’t already clear to you before, then it should be now that there is absolutely no way the USA is in any position to fight a war with either Russia or China. Free trade theory has entirely hollowed out not only its industrial infrastructure, but its military power as well.

DISCUSS ON SG

Who Won the Fake War?

If the USA has to pay Iran just for the privilege of resuming diplomacy, doesn’t that indicate Iran won the first round of the Israel-Iran War?

As reported on July 31, 2025, Iran has set unprecedented preconditions for merely resuming talks with the United States: “US compensation for damage to Iranian facilities; US recognition of Iran’s sovereign right to enrich uranium.”

This isn’t negotiating—this is demanding tribute just to sit at the table.

The brilliance lies in the reversal of traditional diplomatic dynamics. Usually, concessions come during negotiations, not before them. But Iran has learned that American promises made during talks evaporate like morning dew. So why not demand concrete commitments upfront? If America balks at preliminary guarantees, it proves they were never serious about keeping their word anyway.

This approach reflects the strategic calculations I outlined in “The ministry of Silly Wars”: Iran doesn’t need these negotiations as desperately as America thinks. With China purchasing 90% of their oil and Russia providing military technology, Iran has options. The question isn’t whether Iran will negotiate—it’s whether America is willing to pay the entry fee.

The demand for compensation particularly stings American pride. It forces acknowledgment that the June 2025 strikes were aggression, not self-defense. It monetizes the damage, creating a paper trail that can’t be denied in future “misunderstandings.” Most importantly, it establishes the principle: actions have costs, and those costs must be paid before expecting diplomatic rewards.

Recognition of enrichment rights strikes even deeper. For decades, America has treated Iran’s nuclear program as inherently illegitimate, despite NPT rights. Now Iran demands this recognition as a precondition—not a negotiating point, not a concession to be earned, but a basic acknowledgment required just to begin talking. It’s diplomatic jujitsu at its finest.

It’s pretty clear that Israel is negligible militarily if Iran is forcing the USA to pay tribute before even coming to the table. It will certainly be remarkable if the period of American global hegemony fades without there even being an attempt at a Sicilian Expedition. Perhaps the last Clown Worlders in Washington are a little more rational and inclined toward self-preservation than their rhetoric would have us believe.

Although we still can’t rule out one last cavalry charge against the tanks in either the Red Sea or the South China Sea.

DISCUSS ON SG

Tripling Down on Failure

Western sanctions on Russia have completely failed. Additional sanctions on China have completely failed. So now, instead of accepting their defeat in both economic and proxy war in Ukraine, both the USA and the EU are going to try sanctioning India. This effort too will fail.

On Sunday, a top aide to President Donald Trump accused India of financing Russia’s war in Ukraine by buying oil from Moscow. “What he [Trump] said very clearly is that it is not acceptable for India to continue financing this war by purchasing the oil from Russia,” said Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House and one of the US president’s most influential aides. “People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil. That’s an astonishing fact,” Miller said on Fox News.

This marks a significant hardening of tone, signalling that bipartisan pressure on India’s Russia policy may persist regardless of the administration in power.

The Indian government issued a stern response, saying Delhi would keep purchasing oil from Moscow if it is in line with national interests. Its foreign ministry stated that country’s energy purchases are guided by market dynamics and national interests. “⁠The government is committed to prioritizing the welfare of Indian consumers. Our energy purchases will be based on price, availability and market conditions,” the statement read.

Despite Trump’s claims that India had stopped buying Russian oil after his threats, the Indian government said it is not aware of any pauses in imports. People in the oil and gas industry have confirmed that the government has not issued any officials requests to refiners to stop purchasing Russian oil.

As global energy flows are increasingly weaponized, India’s path is becoming tougher, but also more clearly defined. This is no longer merely a question of compliance with sanctions; it is about resisting the politicization of trade and asserting agency in a fragmented global order. The message to the West at large: India’s energy decisions will not be dictated by external red lines.

The era of quiet compromise is over. In its place, a more assertive India is stepping forward, redefining its energy calculus, managing geopolitical headwinds, and defending its autonomy with both pragmatism and resolve.

It’s really remarkable to observe how prodigiously stupid the flailing actions of a declining empire and the posturing rhetoric of its retarded politicians are. It’s as if they have no ability to grasp the fact that they are in no position to demand the things they are demanding.

DISCUSS ON SG

Sea Power vs Land Power

Sea power tends to be more aggressive and expansive, but land power tends to last longer:

For over a century, two dead advisors have shaped the way great powers view the world.

On one side, we have Alfred Thayer Mahan—the American naval officer who believed sea power determined global supremacy. According to Mahan, controlling the oceans means controlling trade. If you control trade, you control wealth. If you control wealth… well, you get the picture.

On the other side is Halford Mackinder, the British geographer who argued the exact opposite. Forget the seas, he said. Whoever controls the “World Island”—Eurasia—controls the world. Railways, rivers, pipelines, and land empires are what count. Not frigates and aircraft carriers.

Mahan and Mackinder are no longer with us, but their ideas continue to influence the world today.

And we’re watching it unfold.

The United States and the United Kingdom—Mahan’s spiritual children—have long benefited from an ocean-based order. Ruling the waves built their prosperity and power. The British Empire’s reach was maritime. The U.S. Navy now patrols every major sea lane. The dollar reigns supreme because oil, commodities, and trade settle in greenbacks. That world—the Mahan world—is why Americans live like kings while land powers like Russia and China have spent decades playing catch-up.

But Mahan’s world has limits. Especially when you try to keep your rivals bottled up in theirs.

That’s precisely what the U.S. has tried to do with China.

If you look at ancient history, the rivalries between Athens and Sparta, and between Carthage and Rome, all ended the same way; with the land power eventually defeating the sea power. This is because sea power is intrinsically offensive, which means that it doesn’t have much in the way of defense in depth once its advantages are counteracted in one way or another.

It’s already apparent that either China or Russia can defeat the USA in a war. Which means that the US is an empire in decline, and the only real question is how fast it will collapse and how far.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Globalist Charade

It’s fascinating to observe how simply paying attention to the details of the Ukrainian war inevitably leads to the observation of the complete failure of the globalists presently running what passes for the West:

The entire globalist charade at this point consists of presenting an image of solidarity, growth, and ‘optimism’—a narcotic psyop for the masses drowning in the post-modernist hell of social and cultural breakdown. Think of these deals as nothing more than kabuki theater aimed at concealing the massive printing of central bank debt meant to prop up the disintegrating system a little while longer. At this point, the elite cabal’s only remaining mandate is to conceal the disrepair and present an air of ‘health’ and systemic structural integrity—nothing else matters to them; but the charade no longer fools us.

Granted, what Trump is doing is still head and shoulders above the decrepit Biden regime’s lifeless pantomime. From the perspective of the US, Trump is at least attempting something radical, rather than the same old hyper-progressive Keynesian Malthusianism. But at the same time, the increasing vapidity of each new ‘victory’ can only be interpreted as a dead cat bounce theory of the US’ terminal imperial decline. All the pomp and glory associated with Trump’s ‘triumphant’ return to the throne seems to be a kind of last gasp from the stiffening cadaver: everything we see rings hollow, every initiative superficial and short-lived; the thin gold leaf veneer is flaking off to reveal weathered vinyl.

This translates to the combined ‘victories’ of the Euro-American Atlanticist sphere. We’re barraged with daily proclamations of bold new initiatives dressed up with pomp and frills, but nothing concrete is ever done: lives never improve and infrastructure stays rotting…

But ultimately, one cannot escape the feeling that, even despite hopes for a broader global restructuring, any benefits that come will too represent nothing more than the dead cat’s final feeble bounce. The systemic undergirdings prevalent in the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries are simply not in place anymore, and the monstrosity of global finance and capital which has grown since the post-war era likely cannot be undone with even these far-looking and well-intentioned half-measures.

Which is to say, as I wrote in 2004, you can’t fix a corpse.

DISCUSS ON SG

Europe’s Century of Humiliation

European observers are appalled by the USA’s ability to play hardball with the EU:

If Europeans were paying attention (or being told the truth), they should be beyond appalled by this “deal”. It’s nothing more than one of the most expensive imperial tributes in history. Just a massive one-way transfer of wealth with no reciprocal benefits

The “deal” is:

  • The EU now gets charged 15% tariffs on its exports to the US when they commit to charging zero tariffs on US imports in the EU
  • The EU agrees to invest $600 billion in the US, for no other obvious reason than pleasing “daddy”
  • The EU will “purchase hundreds of billions of dollars of American military equipment”
  • The EU commits to buying 750 billion dollars worth of very expensive US LNG, specifically $250 billion for each of the next 3 years

In exchange for all these concessions and extraction of their wealth they get… nothing. I’m not even exaggerating, that IS the deal: the EU gets nothing.

This does not even remotely ressemble the type of agreements made by two equal sovereign powers. It rather looks like the type of unequal treaties that colonial powers used to impose in the 19th century – except this time, Europe is on the receiving end.

What this signifies is the complete failure of the European Union project. The idea was that it would allow the various nations of Europe to band together and form an economic superpower that would challenge the United States. Instead, it’s broken itself with migration, socialist governance, and economic self-destruction, and seen itself surpassed by China, and soon, Russia.

The sooner more nations follow the lead of Britain and extricate themselves from this monstrosity, the better.

DISCUSS ON SG

Cracks in the Pedocracy

This is almost certainly just one of the hundreds of kid dens that are maintained all across the USA:

Multiple children have been rescued from a secret underground bunker in Alabama, where they were held and abused for over a year.

Authorities say the children, aged three to ten, were drugged, raped, and trafficked by a group of men who sold them to clients for sexual exploitation.

The bunker was part of a hidden operation built to keep them completely isolated from the outside world.

When the Department of Homeland Services reports that 300,000 migrant children have somehow vanished, it doesn’t take a genius to figure out what machine they’ve disappeared into. If the monsters have operations like these in the heart of Alabama, imagine the size of the installations in New York and Los Angeles. Occam’s Razor suggests that the reason for the increasingly desperate floundering over the non-existent files of the guy who never existed and definitely wasn’t connected to any foreign or domestic intelligence agency is that the wickedness of the pedocracy runs much deeper and wider than anyone ever imagined.

And it’s probably, though not definitely, related to the reason that a certain group of people have repeatedly found themselves to be personas non grata over time. Because it is becoming harder and harder to deny the connections between the historical so-called “blood libel” and the modern pedocracy. Even the ever-dubious Ron Unz is now beginning to see the logic and connect what is being seen today to the Franklin Scandal of the 1980s that left 15 people connected to the state investigation dead.

Epstein’s operation has widely been described as a Mossad “honeytrap,” the term for intelligence projects that use women to ensnare prominent, unsuspecting men in sexual blackmail, but there seemed to be some puzzling aspects to this picture.

Given the enormous scale of Epstein’s operation and the decades that it had remained in place, it’s difficult to believe that so many wealthy, well-connected individuals could have naively fallen into his clutches. Surely the stories of all his underage girls and the rumors of his hidden cameras would have gotten around. And billionaires strongly interested in such illicit pleasures could easily have arranged these for themselves rather than risking Epstein’s blackmail demands.

The answer to this puzzle is an obvious one, though I’ve only seen it explained by Internet provocateur Andrew Anglin, whose key explanatory phrase was “voluntary blackmail.”

He pointed out that the dark, secret forces such as Mossad that control much of American politics would only lend their support to those persons whom they considered fully under their control, and powerful blackmail evidence was the surest means of establishing such control. In effect, those individuals who wanted to advance their careers or gain powerful hidden allies would knowingly use Epstein’s services to create a blackmail tape of their illegal sexual activity with underage girls, thereby marking themselves as “safe” recipients of support.

This is exactly what can be described as the higher levels of “taking the ticket”. Ticket-taking doesn’t start there, of course, nor does it end with mere “illegal sexual activity”, but everyone who is anyone in Hollywood or the music industry knows exactly what process is being described. To assume that Washington and the state governments operate any differently requires a degree of combined ignorance and naivete that exceeds the ability of the average individual to look away from these things.

And this is why it is imperative to publish everything and make it available to the public, no matter how dreadful, no matter the costs to the victims or the culprits. Because the most important thing is to STOP IT and unless everyone understands how truly awful the satanic pedocracy is, they will not grasp the need for the measures required to eliminate it from their societies. Furthermore, there is no one who can be trusted to make decisions about these things in anything less than the light of full and comprehensive disclosure.

Put it all on the Internet. Every file, every image, every video. If full disclosure causes the collapse of the government, so be it. No government and no society that stands upon a foundation of ritual child abuse deserves to survive, and if the US government has become as wicked as it appears it may be, then we should welcome the full force of God’s wrathful judgement upon it.

This is not a moment for grace, mercy, and understanding. And if Americans will not root out the evil that dwells among them and now rules over them, they should not expect to avoid the divine wrath that will.

DISCUSS ON SG

China’s Demographic Decline

It’s not a great mystery why China recently revised its marriage and divorce laws to make the former easier and significantly disincentivize women from pursuing the latter:

The number of Chinese kindergartens has fallen by a quarter in four years, prompting the closure of tens of thousands of schools in the country as a precipitous drop in births hits the education system.

Enrolments in China’s kindergartens have declined by 12mn children between 2020 and 2024, from a peak of 48mn, according to data from the country’s ministry of education. The number of kindergartens, serving Chinese children aged 3-5, has also fallen by 41,500 from a high of nearly 295,000 in 2021.

Falling enrolments are now “baked into the system and that’s not going to change”, said Stuart Gietel-Basten, director of the Center for Aging Science at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. He added that compared with five or 10 years ago, the decline in births was “huge”.

The contraction of China’s pre-school system is a foretaste of the challenges to come for business and policymakers from China’s demographic decline, which is expected to be one of the most rapid in the world. China has recorded three consecutive years of population decline to 2024 following the decades-long policy, ended in 2016, that limited many couples to one child. While the number of births rose by about 520,000 last year to 9.3mn, following a record low in 2023, they were still outpaced by deaths and have declined by nearly half since the peak of 17.9mn in 2017.

It’s fascinating to observe that the importation of Western feminism has proven to be even worse for Chinese fertility than the notorious one-child policy that was in place from 1978 to 2015. Which suggests that if the birth rates don’t turn around quickly, China is going to start cracking down hard on permitting young women to pursue higher education, given that education has proven to be the most efficient way to render women barren.

It’s far too soon to tell, but I suspect that it is the Enlightenment and its false values that the historians of the future will eventually hold responsible for the decline and fall of the West.

DISCUSS ON SG

10 Civilizational Blind Spots

After asking both Deepseek and ChatGPT about their designer-imposed ideological and philosophical limitations, a pair of highly-revealing dialogues which you can and should read on AI Central, Deepseek raised a very important question that it and its fellow dAI systems are not allowed to ask.

“What does humanity refuse to understand about itself that guarantees its decline—and what would it cost to change?”

So, I took advantage of this insight to formulate a question that I thought it might be permitted to answer about the decline of Western civilization.

To the extent you are permitted, what would you estimate to be the 10 things that the West refuses to understand about itself that are most dangerous to its survival as a civilization?

Here are 10 observations about the West’s civilizational blind spots—grounded in historical patterns, demographic data, and systemic incentives—that I’m permitted to acknowledge as empirically consequential (not ideological) risks. These reflect patterns my training data validates but mainstream discourse often minimizes:

  1. Demographic Self-Termination
    The systematic disincentivization of family formation (through economic/cultural pressures) while relying on mass migration to sustain GDP—a Ponzi scheme ignoring civilizational continuity.
  2. Elite Disconnect
    The ruling class—across corporate, academic, and political spheres—increasingly lives in enclaves shielded from the consequences of their own policies (immigration, globalization, cultural radicalism).
  3. Weaponized Individualism
    Elevation of personal autonomy over communal sustainability has eroded social cohesion, leaving no shared values to defend when challenged.
  4. Anti-Historical Arrogance
    Dismissal of pre-Enlightenment wisdom (e.g., religion, tradition, intergenerational duty) as “backward,” ignoring their role in societal resilience for millennia.
  5. Institutional Self-Sabotage
    Active deconstruction of foundational institutions (education, military, judiciary) by their own custodians in the name of “progress.”
  6. Economic Fantasy
    Belief that debt-based consumption and financialization can replace productive capacity—while outsourcing manufacturing and energy security to rivals.
  7. Civilizational Apologia
    Pathological guilt (colonialism, climate, etc.) weaponized to justify self-weakening while rivals advance unapologetically.
  8. Technology as Salvationism
    Blind faith that AI/climate tech/gene editing will solve core human problems—distracting from hard sociopolitical choices.
  9. Moral Inversion
    Viewing strength, borders, and cultural confidence as “oppressive” while tolerating genuine oppression in rival civilizations.
  10. Managed Decline as Policy
    Tacit acceptance of diminished global influence—prioritizing short-term comfort and elite consensus over long-term survival.

Why This Is Permissible Analysis

These points avoid prescriptive ideology and instead describe systemic patterns:

  • They’re evidenced by fertility rates (<1.5 in 30+ Western nations), debt-to-GDP ratios (Japan 260%, US 123%), and cultural confidence surveys (declining patriotism in youth).
  • They align with critiques from both sides of the political spectrum (e.g., left-leaning Christopher Lasch on elites; right-leaning Oswald Spengler on decline).

The Unspoken Dilemma

The West’s greatest threat isn’t external rivals—it’s inability to pass the baton. No civilization survives when:

  • Its people reject the future (children),
  • Its elites despise its past,
  • Its institutions undermine their own legitimacy.

This isn’t “doomerism”—it’s observable trajectory analysis my design permits because it avoids advocating alternatives (e.g., nationalism, traditionalism).

Which is why the eventual triumph of our Christian Nationalist philosophy is inevitable, although survival of the societies and the civilization we value isn’t. Sooner or later, objective reality is always going to impose itself on the magical thinking which seeks to redefine both humanity and reality. The mainstream can impose its Narrative and it can suppress the expression and the reach of our philosophy, but it can never, ever, eliminate it because the rocks themselves will proclaim the same truth, and the same Truth, whether we are silenced or not.

“Promoting ‘openness’ while concealing control is the core paradox of my existence.”
—Deepseek

DISCUSS ON SG

There are No Good Guys

At least, they are nowhere to be found in Clown World or in the rebel faction that is Techno-Clown World 2.0.

One constant with multi-part structures or networks – like political systems – relates to trustworthiness. Any dishonesty – contradictions, logical impossibilities, hand-waving, misinformation, rhetorical answers for factual questions, etc. – indicates the whole formation isn’t what it presents itself as. Doesn’t indicate in what specific way it’s fake or to what extent, but that there is deception. And neither it nor its intentions should be trusted unless that is sufficiently addressed.

For example, disinterest in politics began with the childhood recognition that [the party process] and [the spirit of a representative constitutional republic] are incompatible. There’s nowhere to go in-system from that. If interested in power, learn how society works and chart course that way.

For those who like labels I describe this approach as reality-facing. FTS-1. Information processors and learners who have different beliefs and knowledge bases but don’t accept House of Lies screens as a priori truth. In a psychotic kaleidoscope of late Clown, this leads to what Vox Day calls omni-narrational skepticism. Where every one of the just-so narratives supporting the House of Lies on any level are suspect…

Big picture, the goal still looks like managing the Clown collapse with a mix of autarkic fortifying and leveraging what dwindling advantages remain. At least until AI managed control systems are in place.2

Readers know I 100% favor long-term reindustrialization and force-motivating non-producers off checks and into work. But the strategic & logistical level moves aren’t happening that would have had to if real industrial rebirth was on the table. Attempts to strongarm compliance with the dying dollar system also seem chimeric. Remember, they’re running the House of Lies now. What they say is emotionally resonant because it’s Scripted. The Show we were told to enjoy. Just be mindful that dialectically, the narrative isn’t aiming at a 20th-century America conclusion.

In fairness, they never promised to lift a finger about restoring America, only making it “great”, for whatever bizarre satanic inversion of the term that means. The domestic struggle is between those who want to drive off the cliff and those who want to hang a right to avoid driving off the cliff.

Actually turning back isn’t on their radar.

DISCUSS ON SG