Tag: conspiracy

The Russians Know

It’s a lot harder for the satanic rulers of the West to convincingly dismiss so-called “conspiracy theories” when their strongest and best-armed opponents are openly calling out their wicked depopulationist objectives:

A Russian scientist close to Vladimir Putin claims the West is plotting to eliminate most of the human race with a virus, sparing only a small elite who will be served by robots.

Mikhail Kovalchuk, head of Russia’s Kurchatov nuclear research institute, made the extraordinary remarks while addressing a forum of school teachers in Moscow.

His comments underline the kind of extreme conspiracy theories that critics warn are increasingly shaping Kremlin ideology, according to The Times.

Kovalchuk, 77, alleged that western countries were planning to unleash a deadly disease to reduce the number of people on earth.

He also claimed the West was using LGBT and child-free ideologies to curb populations because robots would soon be able to work better and more effectively.

‘The West … understands that a huge number of people are becoming unnecessary. They have begun to prepare for a population reduction,’ the Kremlin boffin told the Forum of Class Teachers, a Russian-backed organisation. 

‘They introduced the LGBT agenda and for those who didn’t go along with it, they offered a second option – the child-free family. 

‘It’s working brilliantly. In a generation or two, there’ll be no continuation of their bloodlines. Only a small elite, the ones they actually need, will remain.’

I don’t see how anyone can possibly deny the depopulationist agenda of the various political elites across Europe, the USA, and the UK. Everything they prioritize, from female education to mass immigration, the aggressive promotion of sexual deviation, and the mRNA therapies is designed to reduce birth rates and populations; there is not one single country in the West that is even at replacement rates.

Even the Ukraine war is being fought with surprisingly little regard for preserving the lives of Ukrainian soldiers, so much so that there are various theories about what the plans are for the depopulated lands that remain to the Kiev regime if it should survive the inevitable surrender to Russia.

And is it really a “conspiracy theory” to observe that people have been pushing the “too many people” line for nearly as long as Generation X has been alive?

UPDATE: Elon Musk’s girlfriend knows too

“Luckily there’s a massive population drop coming.”

DISCUSS ON SG

More False Flag Warnings

I first warned about the false flags that would inevitably be attributed to Russia back in January 2022, before the Special Military Operation even began. In the aftermath of the pathetic attempt at pretending six duct-taped drones had attacked rural Polish farmhouses, a number of observers are increasingly concerned that NATO is finally going to stage a more serious false flag with a pre-prepared “response” intended to trigger a US defense of the soon-to-be overwhelmed European forces.

World War III will start very soon if the information about Kyiv’s plans to carry out a false-flag operation in Romania and Poland is confirmed.

According to the available information, the plan is to repair several downed Russian UAVs, send them — disguised as ‘Russian drones’ — to NATO hubs in Poland and Romania, conduct a disinformation campaign in Europe with the intent to blame everything on Moscow and thereby trigger an armed conflict between Russia and NATO.” (c) Russian MFA

On Kyiv’s plans to carry out a false-flag operation in Romania and Poland

Today several Hungarian media outlets reported on Zelensky’s plans to carry out sabotage in Romania and Poland in order to blame Russia. Thus, on Bankova they are preparing their own “Gleiwitz incident” — to create a casus belli for a war between Russia and NATO.

According to the available information, the Kyiv regime’s plan is as follows:

  • Repair several downed or intercepted Russian UAVs.
  • Equip them with a combat warhead.
  • Send UAVs controlled by Ukrainian specialists — disguised as “Russian drones” — to major NATO transport hubs in Poland and Romania.
  • Simultaneously conduct a disinformation campaign in Europe to blame everything on Moscow.
  • Ignite an armed conflict between the Russian Federation and NATO.

I very much doubt it’s going to work, despite what will be an absolute media blitzkrieg by the European, UK, and US medias, because it’s going to be absolutely obvious that Russia had nothing to do whatever the false flag turns out to be. And there are three reasons why it will be absolutely obvious.

  1. When Russia attacks, it does so in an open and unmistakable manner. Nor does it bother to hide its intentions or conceal its actions.
  2. False flags invariably involve minimal loss compared to real strikes. Russia attacks with an average of 187.5 drones and 8.4 missiles per day. An attack on NATO would be an escalation, so any real attack on NATO would presumably consist of at least 800 drones and 15 missiles. Anything short of this level should be assumed to be a false flag.
  3. If and when Russia attacks NATO, it will attack command centers, weapons depots, troop concentrations, and airfields. Attacks on trivial and tertiary targets, especially if they involve a minimal loss of life or primarily civilian casualties, should be assumed to be false flags.

More false flags are definitely coming. But there is no reason to assume that WWIII will be triggered as a result, since the Russians know perfectly well what the desperate Kiev regime and its European paymasters are trying to do. As does the Trump administration.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Theranos Fraud

A former hedge fund venture capitalist observes some of the more peculiar aspects of the Theranos story.

Over the last 20 years, part of my own work has been raising money from wealthy investors. Based on that experience, I find the Elizabeth Holmes story completely impossible to believe. Now, my experience was different in that I wasn’t raising money for a tech startup and I never worked in Silicon Valley. Rather, I sought funding for hedge fund ventures. But in essence, the process is the same: you go to wealthy investors, pitch your project and hope to raise funds. Your counterparts are shopping for investments that can give them a high return on capital.

The experience gave me a good sense of the way wealthy individuals make their investment decisions. For starters, they are not stupid; they are usually quite rigorous and don’t easily fall for cosmetics or charm. It’s true that some investors spray money on startup ventures less discriminately with the rationale that some projects will succeed. Typically they’ll look at your team, business plan, demand some proof of concept, and if they’re half-convinced that you have a shot at succeeding, they might give you some money. But in such cases we’re normally talking about relatively smaller sums – say, a few hundred thousand bucks or something in that ballpark.

But when it comes to large sums of money, investors tend to be very demanding. Venture capital funds tend to specialize in a limited number of industries and they use domain experts to vet prospective investments. Their job is to conduct thorough due diligence on potential investments and distill the most likely future success stories out of many, many applicants. This process is itself costly and time-consuming, and I would expect that in Silicon Valley, which attracts top notch creative talent from all over the world, the process is quick to eliminate candidates that fail to convince that they have a sound concept, competent management team and a compelling business strategy.

The cosmetics alone – the stories, visions, displays of confidence or personal charm – they won’t even get you past the gatekeepers if the stuff behind the façade doesn’t convince. In Elizabeth Holmes’s case, even minimal due diligence should have eliminated her: she set out to revolutionize health care but had no qualifications or experience in medicine and only rudimentary training in biochemistry. In almost all cases, her patents specified design of future solutions but not the functionality. She published no white papers or technical specifications, and could not demonstrate that her supposed inventions even worked. Any specialist in the field of medicine or biochemistry would have easily disqualified her claims and determined that there was no substance to her story.

Holmes’ fakery was obvious from the start

For example, Holmes was twice introduced to Stanford clinical pharmacologist and professor of medicine Dr. Phyllis Gardner with the recommendation that she was brilliant and had a revolutionary investment idea. But professor Gardner saw right through her: “she had no knowledge of medicine and rudimentary knowledge of engineering… And she really didn’t want any expertise, she thought she knew it all!” Another qualified longtime observer of the Theranos saga was also skeptical. Dr. Darren Saunders worked as an associate professor of medicine at the University of New South Wales where he ran the Ubiquitin Signaling Lab. He knew that Holmes could never do what she claimed. In an interview for the 60 minutes Australia program, he said that “it takes years and years to develop any one of those tests and make sure that it’s accurate.”

Indeed, what was glaringly obvious to Dr. Gardner and Dr. Saunders should have been just as obvious to any specialist in the field. In fact, Holmes also failed to convince the US military to adopt Theranos technology. In spite of wholehearted help from General Mattis, she was unable to pass the vetting process at the Pentagon. A few years later, in May 2015, University of Toronto professor Eleftherios Diamandis analyzed Theranos technology and also politely concluded that “most of the company’s claims are exaggerated.” Diamandis expressed that opinion at the time when the hype about Theranos and Holmes were at their peak.

For some reason however, Elizabeth Holmes’ ascent was not obstructed by any scrutiny of her fantastic claims. Early on, not only was she able to get a face-to-face meeting with Don Lucas Sr., one of the most prominent venture capitalists in Silicon Valley, she also managed to persuade him to make a large investment in Theranos. Lucas explained his rationale for that decision in a 2009 interview: “Her great-grandfather was an entrepreneur, very successful. And it turned out later that the hospital [near] where [her family] lives is named after her great-uncle.”

Apparently, her great uncle’s and great-grandfather’s success was enough for Lucas to invest in her project. I wonder if that same qualification was equally convincing to all other investors? Or was it her passion and charm? Whatever the case, big fish investors gave her more than $750 million, unconcerned about her qualifications or the functioning of her technology.

This is all very strange, to put it politely. The media narrative has meanwhile contrived plausible-sounding explanation for this: you see, the big investors gave Holmes a ton of cash because they were just so afraid of missing the next facebook or google. But this explanation is just as unlikely as the rest of the story. Neither do such silly rationalizations explain the massive allocations from a group of top-notch power players, nor the terms of investment that prohibited verification of Theranos technology, nor share prices that valued the fraudulent venture at $9 billion.

Read the whole thing, because it wasn’t just about making money. It appears to have been some sort of dry run for Covid.

DISCUSS ON SG

Undeniable Proof

No doubt this confession, obtained by the FBI, will put all doubts to rest.

There it is, as clear as day. Means, motive, and confession. I know I’m convinced. Anyone who suspects that a certain individual might still be alive, or alternatively, became not-alive as a result of actions by anyone aside from the confessed killer Tyler James Robinson, Antifa terrorist and homosexual romance artist(1), is obviously wrong to have doubted any aspect of the Official Story of the reported assassination in all of its various permutations and should be ashamed.

(1) Not to be confused with the other confessed killer, James Zinn.

DISCUSS ON SG

It’s Just a Joke

And a coincidence, right? You know Feynman proved everything is just coincidence and confirmation bias, right, anon?

A now-deleted X account appears to have had prior knowledge of the brutal assassination of Turning Point USA founder Charlie Kirk and subsequently posted a threatening date for President Donald Trump.
Trump was shot during an outdoor speech in Pennsylvania on July 13, 2024.

The account, @TallyHallAlbum, posted an eerily specific “joke” on September 3, declaring it would be “funny if someone like Charlie Kirk got shot on September 10th LMAO.”

Just days after the tragedy, the user followed up with a cryptic reply: “did i” – and then escalated the threat by posting “Donald Trump. December 14th.” before scrubbing the entire profile from existence.

The question this raises is pretty obvious. Which Donald Trump would that be?

DISCUSS ON SG

Remember, Everything is Fake

The “Russian drone attack” on Poland was a comical attempt at a false flag.

The incident was obviously very strange because, while a few errant Russian drones had maybe fallen over other countries here and there—after likely being jammed off their course—this has never happened in such a large scale. This heavily suggests something very fishy, in the way of either a false flag or a coordinated campaign; that is to say, something like an Israeli Stux-net or “pager” operation where a large amount of Russian drones are “tampered with” before hand, whether that’s by digital infection of firmware via virus, or something else.

There were several signs pointing to the ‘false flag’ explanation, for instance a photo of a Russian drone that landed on a Polish “chicken coop” that shows the drone taped together with literal duct tape. This is important because Ukraine was known to have been collecting previously-downed Russian drones in order to “creatively” reuse them for such a purpose. So a previously-destroyed or damaged drone could perhaps need some “work” to make it look whole for the ‘presentation’.

Additionally, Polish homes presented as “destroyed” by Russian drones were outed by citizens as houses that were damaged long ago by natural disasters.

The USA is much better at staging false events because it’s been doing so for much longer than most of other countries; since at least 1898 and the “Remember the Maine” false flag that was used to justify the Spanish-American War.

After reading a newspaper story in 1974 about the sinking of the Maine, Admiral Hyman G. Rickover decided to reexamine the issue. He recruited historians, archivists, and two Navy experts on ship design: Robert S. Price, a research physicist at the Naval Surface Weapons Center at White Oak, Maryland, and Ib S. Hansen, assistant for design applications in the Structures Department at the David W. Taylor Naval Ship Research and Development Center at Cabin John, Maryland. Among Price’s Navy projects had been an analysis of the wreckage of the nuclear-propelled submarine Scorpion (SSN-589), which was lost in May 1968.

The Hansen-Price analysis, as Rickover called it, was the heart of a short book published in 1976. The 23-page analysis reached this conclusion: “We found no technical evidence . . . that an external explosion initiated the destruction of the Maine. The available evidence is consistent with an internal explosion alone. We therefore conclude that an internal source was the cause of the explosion. The most likely source was heat from a fire in a coal bunker adjacent to the 6-inch reserve magazine. However, since there is no way of proving this, other internal causes cannot be eliminated as possibilities.”

As far as the “confession” concerning what has been reported as Charlie Kirk’s murder goes, remember that Tyler Robinson isn’t even the first person to confess to shooting the Turning Point USA founder. Whatever the truth eventually turns out to be, remember, the one and only thing we know cannot be true right now is the Official Story as reported by the mainstream media.

DISCUSS ON SG

They Got the Patsy

Color me dubious. Color me very, very dubious indeed that the assassination of Charlie Kirk was committed by another lone gunman.

The suspect is Tyler Robinson, a 22-year-old man from Washington, Utah. The shooter confessed to his father that he was the perpetrator, CNN reported.

The man’s father then tipped off law enforcement and secured his son until officers arrived. Sources told CNN the individual was still being questioned as of Friday morning.

Trump said that ‘somebody who was very close’ to the suspect turned him in to police – referring to the tipster as the assassin’s ‘minister’ and ‘father’.

‘It was a minister who was involved with law enforcement… his good friend is a top U.S. Marshal – and they took it from there,’ Trump said, suggesting the suspect’s father told him it was time to turn themselves in.

Law enforcement will share more details about the suspect’s arrest later on Friday, the president said.

It’s always possible that the Official Story is true… but history suggests that just isn’t very likely.

UPDATE: Retired Green Beret Nate Cornacchia claims that whoever the FBI arrests as the shooter will likely be just a patsy in a much larger cover-up. He adds that the chances of the arrested individual actually being the real shooter are “slim to none.”

You don’t say…

UPDATE: In case you didn’t believe the “shooter” is just the patsy, now they’re reporting that he was a follower of Nick Fuentes. Now, I may not think much of Fuentes, but he’s the kind of guy who runs away from debates with the likes of Candace Owens and Charlie Kirk, he’s not the kind of guy who plots their destruction and neither are his followers.

DISCUSS ON SG

We Never Went to the Moon

As the Boomers die out, so too does the belief that the Apollo Moon landings were real.

The moon hoax theory was almost unheard of before the spread of Internet, and gained momentum with the development of YouTube, which allowed close inspection of the Apollo footage by anyone interested. Before that, individuals who had serious doubts had little means to share them and make their case convincing. One pioneer was Bill Kaysing, who broke the subject in 1976 with his self-published book We Never Went to the Moon: America’s Thirty Billion Dollar Swindle. He may be called a whistleblower, since he had been working for Rocketdyne, the company that designed and built the Apollo rockets. Then came Ralph René with his NASA Mooned America!, also self published.

Research gained depth and scope, and disbelief became epidemic around the 30th anniversary of Apollo 11, thanks in great part to British cinematographer David Percy, who co-authored the book Dark Moon with Mary Bennett, and directed the 3-hour documentary What Happened on the Moon? An Investigation into Apollo (2000), presented by Ronnie Stronge. It remains to this day greatly valuable for anyone willing to make an informed opinion.

Then there was the much shorter A Funny Thing Happened on the way to the Moon (2001), directed by Bart Sibrel, which brings in valuable insight into the historical context. Sibrel also went around challenging NASA astronauts to swear on the Bible, in front of the camera, that they did walk on the moon, and he compiled these sequences in Astronauts Gone Wild, together with more useful footages of embarrassingly awkward statements made by NASA astronauts who are supposed to have walked on the moon but sound hardly competent and consistent; Alan Bean from Apollo 12 learning from Sibrel that he went through the Van Allen radiation belt is a must-see.

Then, using materials from those films and other sources, came the groundbreaking TV documentary Did we land on the moon? (2001), directed by John Moffet for Fox TV. To my knowledge and judgment, this is still the best introduction to the arguments of the “moon hoax theorists”.

I don’t believe for one second that the Apollo missions went to the Moon and landed on it. It has all of the characteristics of a government-funded fraud, right down to the equivalent of the “training exercise” of the films made by Stanley Kubrick. There are obviously a whole host of flaws in the Official Story, but the one that finally converted me to a Moon Landing Denier was the “oh, we recorded over the telemetry tapes and then we lost them” excuse that was belatedly produced when skeptics wanted to analyze them.

It’s worth noting the background of NASA’s first administrator, T. Keith Glennan.

Born in Enderlin, North Dakota, the son of Richard and Margaret Glennan, he attended the University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire and then earned a degree in electrical engineering from the Sheffield Scientific School of Yale University in 1927, where he was a member of Chi Phi fraternity. Following graduation, he became associated with the newly developed sound motion picture industry, and later became assistant general service superintendent for Electrical Research Products Company, a subsidiary of Western Electric Company. During his career he was studio manager of Paramount Pictures, and Samuel Goldwyn Studios.

NASA was a Hollywood operation all along, from the very beginning. And while Ockham’s Razor is not perfectly reliable, it is a reasonable metric that tends to point toward the truth.

The reason Man has not been back to the Moon is because he never went in the first place.

DISCUSS ON SG

Wind-Up Toy Attack

A school shooter attacked Annunciation Catholic in Minneapolis this morning.

Two children are dead, ages 8 and 10, after a gunman opened fire at the Annunciation Catholic School during a morning Mass on the south side of Minneapolis, authorities said. Seventeen others, including 14 children, were injured in the mass shooting, police said.

That’s awful, obviously. Now let’s see if there are any signs it was a wind-up toy at work.

Agents with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives were some of the very first responders to the scene because they just happened to be in the area of the shooting, according to an ATF source in Minneapolis.

They “just happened to be in the area”.

Right.

Now let me guess, the shooter killed himself.

The suspect in the Minneapolis shooting died of a self-inflicted gunshot wound, according to three law enforcement officials familiar with the investigation… Police believe the suspect was a lone shooter in his 20s who died of a self-inflicted gunshot in the parking lot.

Right.

I suspect it won’t be long before we’re going to be informed that he was seeing a psychiatrist or was in some kind of therapy and was prescribed SSRIs.

How can these tragedies possibly be prevented? It’s just such a mystery.

Also… homeschool or die.

UPDATE: The suspect has been identified as Robin Westman, a transsexual Jew. Quelle surprise.

DISCUSS ON SG

Fake Trump Exit Incoming

I don’t know if you’ve noticed this lately, but a lot of shills are suddenly pushing the idea that Trump’s short, puffy hands are an indication that he’s in poor health and will die soon, even though the diagnosis of chronic venous insufficiency and its treatment was announced more than a month ago, on July 17th.

President Donald Trump underwent medical testing after he had been seen with deep bruises on his hand and swollen legs in recent days, and was diagnosed with chronic venous insufficiency, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Thursday.

My opinion is that Clown World’s play of the double card is now deemed to have failed, and now they’re going to dispose of their puppet with the announcement that President Trump has died and JD Vance is succeeding him. This, I think, would be a belated attempt to force the white hats out in the open, presumably before they are prepared to make their case to the global public. It’s a move that smacks of desperation, but given how the balance of power has been gradually, but decisively, shifting toward Clown World’s enemies and away from their servants, it might be one of their last chances to escape the inevitable by overturning the table and trying to find some leverage in the chaos.

Now, for those of you who are binary thinkers, please just ignore all of this. I’m not interested in hearing your retarded attempts to declare “Vox believes this” or “Vox believes that” or “Vox is Q-tarded”. I’m a game designer, remember? I write 900-page fantasy novels with 9 different storylines running simultaneously. Unlike most people, I’m capable of following a logical line of thought all the way through to completion without getting attached to it or emotionally committing to a conclusion. I’m just looking at the observable facts, paying attention to reported events, and contemplating various possible explanations, always with the caveat that nothing reported by the media is ever what it seems.

But it is interesting to see that shills all over social media are suddenly hinting at Trump’s death by natural causes. They’re doing this for a reason. If you’ve got a better explanation, feel free to share it.

DISCUSS ON SG