Tag: conspiracy

10 Different Versions

That’s absurd, of course, There are, at most, four Donald Trumps:

As someone who first voted for him in 2016, I can say it has been an endless cycle of “We’re so back” and “It’s so over.” There have even been single days where we cycle between the two multiple times a day.

He will make a statement saying “No more fatties on visas” and follow it up with “600k potential Chinese spies and 50 year mortgages are what MAGA wants.” An absolute rollercoaster of emotions. Some days, it seems like we have 10 different versions of him.

This is where logical heuristics like Ockham’s Razor shine. If it seems as if there are multiple versions of the man, that is because there are multiple body doubles being utilized by different political factions.

Consider the possibilities explaining the various inconsistencies and anomalies observed:

  • Donald Trump is crazy
  • Donald Trump is pretending to be crazy
  • Donald Trump tells different audiences different things in public.
  • Donald Trump is being controlled by Benjamin Netanyahu/Xi Jinping/Vladimir Putin
  • The warring political factions in the USA are utilizing different political decoys.

Now, if one considers that the use of body doubles goes back to the time of The Iliad, when Patroclus rallied the Greeks by wearing the armor of Achilles, combined with the fact that Josef Stalin and British general Bernard Montgomery are both confirmed to have utilized body doubles in the 1940s, what is the most reasonable answer to the questions concerning President Trump’s incessant inconsistencies?

DISCUSS ON SG

Too Good to be True

The Moon Landing psyop is falling apart since the old technology utilized can’t stand up to analysis anymore and only the Boomers can “remember” it being staged live. We’re already entering the Revelation of the Method phase that reliably precedes the Old News Admission phase.

Jason Farago just published a New York Times interactive photo-video piece headlined “How Lunar Photography Brought the Heavens Down to Earth.” Farago celebrates the alleged artistic genius of the Apollo moon photos, viewing them as the climax of the overlapping artistic and scientific histories of moon explorations and representations.

Moon landing skeptic and professional photographer Massimo Mazzucco says that’s bullshit. Farago’s extravagant praise of the Apollo astronauts’ brilliant use of deep depth of field just means they knew how to crank the f-stop up to f16 or f32 (which I figured out about five seconds after buying the cheapest available Pentax when I was a journalism student back in 1976). His orgasmic effusions about the beautifully-rendered lunar surface texture sound like something an LSD tripper might say while staring hypnotically at the ground in some godforsaken stretch of barren desert. And his ranting about how many of the moon landing photos are so perfectly composed and executed that they look totally fake really takes the cake:

“The photographs were in fact so good—and the 70mm stock so detailed—that doubts set in on the blue sphere below. With their rich chiaroscuro and starless skies, Bean and Conrad’s photos looked uncannily like a Hollywood stage set.”

Because they were taken on a Hollywood stage set. This is obvious to any professional photographer who bothers to actually analyze the images.

I have been a photographer for the first part of my life, let’s say between age 20 and 40.. And I was a professional, at the top level. I was working for magazines all over the world. I was using actually the same cameras and film and lighting that supposedly were used in the Apollo missions.

I’ll give you one quick anecdote so you understand the point of view of a professional. I learned my trade from a famous photographer, now deceased. He just passed away a few months ago. His name was Oliviero Toscani. He’s actually the guy who made the Benton campaign all over the world. He was very, very famous. I would put him in the top 10 in the world history of fashion photography. I was his assistant for about three years. Then we parted ways. I went on to have my own career.

Back in 2000, when I saw the lunar pictures for the first time—all of them, not just the few that were published before, but all of them that were put out by NASA on the internet—I looked at them and I could see all the defects that I would find myself when I tried to replicate sunlight in the studio. So I got very suspicious. I called Toscani and I said, “Oliviero, what did you think the first time you saw the Apollo moon pictures?” And his answer was, and I quote him:

“I always thought that had they given me the job, I would have done a much better job.”

I’m not saying that Man never landed on the Moon, that there aren’t secret Nazi military bases there, or even that it’s impossible for Man’s alien progenitors to have left clues about their original landing on Earth there. (That’s a James Hogan reference, if you’re wondering about that last one. Very good and genuine science fiction, that trilogy.) I am saying that the Apollo missions staged by NASA from 1961–1972 never landed anyone on the Moon, probably never got anywhere near the Moon, and were definitely faked.

The amount of evidence proving that the Apollo missions were fake is simply overwhelming now, and the more technology improves, the more obvious it is. Which, of course, is why we’re rapidly approaching the point that the US government is going to admit it and the media will promptly claim that everyone always knew this all along and cite the very sources that we skeptics have been pointing to for decades.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Kataskocracy in Action

If surveillance and sexual blackmail are being used to control political operatives at the state level, what are the odds they are not being utilized in a similar fashion at the much more significant level of national politics?

US federal officials have charged a Maryland Democratic state senator with extortion for allegedly masterminding a blackmail scheme involving secretly filmed explicit videos, according to an indictment unsealed on Thursday. Dalya Attar, who was first elected to the Maryland House of Delegates in 2018 and was re-elected in 2022, became the first Orthodox Jewish woman to serve in the Maryland State Senate earlier this year.

Court documents allege that Attar devised a plan to stop a former employee from speaking out against her 2022 re-election bid. Prosecutors say she conspired with her brother, Joseph Attar, and Baltimore police officer Kalman Finkelstein, who had worked on her campaign.

Staring in 2020, they worked to threaten the ex-employee into silence, using covertly taken videos of her in bed with a married man, the court documents alleged. The group allegedly conspired to follow the ex-consultant’s movements using a tracker on her loaned car, and to secure intimate videos of her with her lover by installing cameras disguised as smoke detectors, the court documents said. The victim was staying at an apartment owned by Finklestein’s family at the time.

I tend to doubt the ethnic aspect of the case will escape anyone who understands what the motivation behind the Jeffrey Epstein operation appears to have been. Political ethno-nepotism, which is observable from the earliest Irish immigrants in New York City to the Somalis in Minneapolis today, is the reason civic nationalism is, and will always be, a complete non-starter.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Dancing Nurses of Covid-19

I never understood what purpose those stupid dancing nurse videos were supposed to serve, nor did I realize how prevalent they were since I wasn’t on Twitter, Tik-tok, or Facebook. But since I was personally acquainted with two nurses during that time, I was aware that they were nonsense and that real nurses working in real hospitals weren’t wasting their time learning choreographed dance routines and performing them for the purposes of their own morale.

Dancing nurses were never about the morale of healthcare workers or stress relief. They were a test, a sorting mechanism, revealing who would accept the contradictions and who would resist them. These videos on TikTok, which appeared simultaneously across all continents while governments declared medical emergencies, represented something unprecedented in the history of propaganda: the authorities showed that they could make populations accept two mutually exclusive realities at the same time.

What we witnessed was not traditional propaganda aimed at persuasion, but something more akin to what abuse experts recognize as gaslighting on a large scale. The psychological mechanism was elegant in its cruelty: it presented citizens with an apparent contradiction—hospitals that were both overcrowded and empty enough for choreographed routines—and then punished them socially for noticing it. Those who pointed out the inconsistency were labeled “conspiracy theorists,” while those who defended the videos unwittingly became pawns in the operation.

This essay explores how this technique fits into the broader context of psychological warfare described by researchers from Paul Linebarger to Michael Hoffman, from Peter Pomerantsev to Annalee Newitz. It examines how the “revelation of the method“ — which shows the audience the manipulation while remaining powerless to resist it — serves to discourage and fragment resistance.

The dancing-nurses were a test for the distortion of reality. Once populations accepted this initial contradiction, they were prepared for more: masks that worked, except when they didn’t, vaccines that prevented transmission until they stopped preventing it, two weeks to “flatten the curve” that ended up being two years. Each accepted absurdity weakened the public’s ability to trust their own observations.

Almost four years later, we can see how this enterprise created precedents that persist. The infrastructure of cognitive control—digital identity systems, social credit mechanisms, curation of reality through algorithmic manipulation—continues to expand…

This technique seems to draw inspiration from what Michael Hoffman calls “method disclosure“ — the practice of cryptocracy revealing its activities in plain sight, knowing that public inaction in the face of such a revelation produces a discouraging effect. The message becomes: “We can show you the contradiction between our words and our actions, and you will do nothing. You will accept both the lie and the evidence of it.” It is a form of ritual humiliation that works not through concealment, but through unabashed display.

The dancing nurses were not trying to convince anyone that the hospitals were functioning normally—they were trying to show that the authorities could make citizens accept two mutually exclusive realities at the same time. It was not simply a matter of controlling information; it was about breaking the public’s trust in their perception of reality.

The lesson of Clown World is this: if it doesn’t make sense, then it is definitely fake and probably gay.

DISCUSS ON SG

President Trump’s Third Term

Ockham’s Razor suffices to explain why Donald Trump can run for a “third term” as U.S. President in 2028 as well as why the short, fat fake Trump is permitted to continue acting as the president:

In a bold and unapologetic interview with The Economist, Steve Bannon, War Room host and former chief strategist to President Donald Trump, confirmed that a concrete plan is underway to secure the president a third term in 2028.

Dismissing the 22nd Amendment, which limits the presidency to two terms, Bannon emphasized that Trump’s third term is inevitable and essential to “finish the job” of restoring America. “He’s going to get a third term. So Trump ’28. Trump is going to be president in ’28, and people just ought to get accommodated with that,” Bannon stated during the interview with The Economist’s editor-in-chief Zanny Minton Beddoes and deputy editor Ed Carr.

Bannon did not lay out the plan, but said it will be revealed at the appropriate time.

“There’s many different alternatives. At the appropriate time, we’ll lay out what the plan is. But there’s a plan, and President Trump will be the president in ’28,” Bannon said.

Beddoes responded, “I’m trying to understand the coherence of the things you’ve just told me in the last few minutes. On the one hand, you’ve said the Constitution is fit for purpose. Secondly, you said that President Trump needs another term, even though the 22nd Amendment makes pretty clear that he cannot have another term.”

“Why does it make that clear?” Bannon asked.

“Because he’s in his second term already,” Beddoes said.

First of all, there is no reason for President Trump to “respect the Constitution” considering the myriad of ways that the US federal government fails to respect it in any way, shape, or form and everyone in the world of politics knows that.

Second, the most obvious and logical explanation for Trump being able to serve another term is that despite his three electoral victories, he hasn’t served a second term yet. Which might explain why the white hats are content to let the short fat Trump pretend to be the President until the end of 2026, given the specific wording of the relevant Amendment.

No person shall be elected to the office of the President more than twice, and no person who has held the office of President, or acted as President, for more than two years of a term to which some other person was elected President shall be elected to the office of the President more than once.

Trump can probably prove that he has been elected to the office of the President more than twice already, but on both occasions he was prevented from acting as President “for more than two years of a term” to which he was elected. If he can establish those facts before the Supreme Court, there would be no legal justification to prevent him from a) serving out the last two years of the current term and b) being elected to what would actually be his second term and fourth electoral victory.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Official Record

I think Candace Owens may have just won her defamation lawsuit against “Brigitte Macron”. The individual known as the wife of the French President is officially registered as a man in the tax registry, thereby providing a degree of credibility to Owens’s claims.

Brigitte Macron, the wife of the President of France Emmanuel Macron, is registered as a man in the tax registry. This was reported by the BFM TV channel, citing a representative of the First Lady of France, Tristan Bromet. According to BFM, Brigitte recently discovered that on the French tax website her gender is listed as male, and the name is recorded as Jean-Michel.

Candace notes that the explanation being provided is that the tax registry was hacked, which at first glance is about as convincing as a celebrity claiming their social media account was hacked whenever they drunk-post something that offends people.

The excuse the Elysees palace has concocted is they suspect her account may have been hacked—yet they confess it’s impossible to modify account names so they are unsure how such a hack might have occurred.

While it is, of course, possible that the tax registry account was modified recently, there will be records dating back decades that could not have been changed since the first rumor that “Brigitte” is actually Jean-Michel. That being said, the one thing that might point to it being a recent hack is if there are only references to “Jean-Michel Macron” and none to “Jean-Michel Trogneux”.

I’d be more confident that the tax registry reference was real and conclusive evidence of a real transpiracy if the report cited the full name rather than just the first name. I checked out a few French sites and saw no references to the full name.

« Comme beaucoup de Français, madame Macron a consulté son espace personnel sur le site des impôts, impots.gouv.fr. Elle se connecte et voit qu’il n’est pas écrit Brigitte Macron, mais Jean-Michel dit Brigitte Macron. À ce moment-là, vous êtes totalement surpris », explique-t-il.

“Like many French people, Mrs. Macron checked her personal account on the tax website, impots.gouv.fr. She logged in and saw that it didn’t say Brigitte Macron, but Jean-Michel called Brigitte Macron.

That does sound like a hack if there are no similar references in the system of earlier dates.

DISCUSS ON SG

Epstein Bankrolled British Royalty

Things like this are why the elite in the US and the UK have been fighting tooth and nail to prevent any information about Jeffrey Epstein’s operation from getting out.

Jeffrey Epstein secretly bankrolled Sarah Ferguson for 15 years, astonishing new emails claim. The convicted paedophile complained to friends about the disgraced duchess’s scrounging ways in messages that suggest his financial support went far beyond the £15,000 she admitted taking from him.

In the previously unseen emails, Epstein reveals Fergie was so desperate to cosy up to him that ‘she was the first to celebrate’ his release from jail ‘with her two daughters in tow’. Princess Beatrice would have been 20 at the time and Eugenie 19, the same age as many of his victims.

The shocking claims are contained in a huge tranche of documents under review by the US Congress. They are set to be released once they have been redacted to protect the identity of hundreds of young girls Epstein raped and sexually abused.

I very much doubt that the Duchess of York and the two princesses were the only members of the Royal family on his payroll. But it appears that the information dam is, if not breaking, at least cracking a little.

DISCUSS ON SG

Why the Gazacaust Ended

Charles Johnson has a very different theory about the sudden end of the Israeli invasion of Gaza that revolves around the funding of the Trump coterie by Qatar:

The second Netanyahu tried to kill Hamas members in Qatar and thereby threatened Witkoff and Kushner family money — which is really Trump money — he was done. So you’re aware about what really caused the Gaza War to end. Netanyahu tried murdering Hamas in Qatar. That’s what it was — an attempted murder.

Qatari officials said if this behavior is allowed in our country, we are going to withdraw investments in the United States, including the money we have put behind your allies and your family.

President Trump said, “Woah, is there anything we can do to make this cool?” The Qataris said, “Yeah, we have a security guarantee. Let’s invoke it against Netanyahu.”

Trump made Netanyahu apologize to the Qataris and the Qataris rewarded America by announcing new investments in America, including an air base in Idaho.

I have no idea if any of this is real or relevant, as it’s entirely outside of my knowledge base, but the whole thing was definitely abrupt and weird. I certainly didn’t expect the ceasefire to hold, much less for Hamas to return the hostages and for the IDF to withdraw from Gaza. But, let’s face it, it wouldn’t be terribly surprising if the whole thing was about corruption and money rather than anything of ideological, strategic, spiritual, or historic import.

DISCUSS ON SG

Inverse Analysis

Most people look at predictions before the relevant events happen, or don’t happen. I prefer to look at events, then look back to see who predicted them, regardless of whatever other nonsense or lunacy they might be spouting.

6 October 2025

  • All the branches of the U.S. military are holding an emergency meeting over the government shutdown. We are hearing from our intelligence agency sources that the Gaza and Ukraine wars are to be ended immediately.

9 October 2026

  • Hamas declares the war in Gaza OVER: Leader of terror group confirms ceasefire as Trump promises historic deal will deliver ‘lasting peace’
  • Peace at last for Gaza: Israeli security cabinet approves Trump-brokered agreement to end two years of brutal war with all 20 living hostages released by Monday

Jury is still out on whether Ukraine will be wound down or not, of course, but it’s an interesting observation.

DISCUSS ON SG

Selling Out is Not Success

This is why one should never, ever, trust any “influencer” or “opinion leader” or “activist” who rapidly goes from nothing to hundreds of thousands of “followers”. It’s also why I pay no attention to the likes of Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Charlie Kirk, Nick Fuentes, Candace Owens, and every other shill who sells opinions for donor cash.

CHARLIE KIRK

Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won’t cancel Tucker. I’m thinking of inviting Candace.

CHARLIE KIRK

Jewish donors play into all the stereotypes. I cannot and will not be bullied like this.

Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro Israel cause.

Now, there are a lot of things that can be gleaned from these three texts written by Charlie Kirk. But first and foremost, mark that he was being propped up to the tune of $2 million per year from just one of his “donors”. It doesn’t matter by whom, it doesn’t matter for what, the salient point is that all of these guys are fake.

All of these characters are quite literally manufactured. Their opinions aren’t real, they are purchased and directed by their donors and investors.

If someone isn’t actually selling an actual product or service, then what he is selling, unbeknownst to most of those who listen to him, is his voice and his words.

DISCUSS ON SG