If Shaquille O’Neal is to be trusted, and to be honest, I trust the Big Aristotle more than I trust science these days, the Blue Origin “space flight” should have been named Greenscreen Origin:
Spade said that they had been discussing why Shaq had not been aboard the space capsule. I would assume the answer is “real estate,” but Shaq explained that the reason was because he doesn’t think it ever went to space.
“Let’s discuss it: was it real?” Shaq began. “Let me go first. I know Jeff loves Laura…”
That’s “Lauren,” Shaq.
“…He wouldn’t want anything to happen to her, so I think there was some green screen involvement there.”
Alright, that’s some good conjecture, but any evidence supporting this, DJ Diesel?
“Number two: their hair was luxurious in space,” he said. “Katy Perry’s hair didn’t move Laura’s…”
Lauren, Shaq.
“…hair didn’t move. Nobody’s hair ever moved. Then I saw when they landed, Jeff had the special key, but it was already open.
“So, I’m going to go Universal Studios green screen on this one.”
I couldn’t agree more. Now do the so-called “Moon landing” by Apollo 11 in 1969. They’re going to need a new term for those of us who no longer believe anything related to the mainstream narrative, whether it relates to events of the modern era or ancient and medieval history. Conspiracy theorist doesn’t even begin to cut it when everything is more or less fake, and at the very least, dumbed-down and rewritten in a form that retards can begin to comprehend.
I think I’d prefer to go with Omni-Narrational Skeptic. If you’ve got a mainstream narrative to sell, then I am immediately and intrinsically skeptical of it. Look what happened to the very simple term and concept of “Sigma male” and then apply that filter to every single concept or event described since the year 1700.