MI tries to bury the election data

It’s almost certainly a futile attempt to bolt the stable door after the horses get out, but the Michigan Secretary of State’s order to delete the election data amounts to a confession of fraud:

It what can only be seen as an effort to keep the facts from coming to light in the face of problematic issues with Michigan’s 2020 General Election process, a memo has been issued from Michigan’s Secretary of State to destroy data.
The Michigan State Republican Party Friday sounded an alarm about an ethically questionable memo authorized by Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson that “is pushing for the mass deletion of election data.”
Michigan Republican Party Chairman Laura Cox in a statement Friday, said that Benson’s office issued orders to clerks in Michigan counties to “delete Electronic Poll Book software and associated files” even as calls to audit the election persist.
Cox was referring to a December 1, 2020, memo from the Michigan Bureau of Elections, an agency overseen by Benson’s office, that read, “[Electronic Poll Book] software and associated files must be deleted from all devices by the seventh calendar day following the final canvass and certification of the election (November 30, 2020) unless a petition for recount has been filed and the recount has not been completed, a post-election audit is planned but has not yet been completed, or the deletion of the data has been stayed by an order of the court or the Secretary of State.”
The order targeted data contained in Electronic Poll Book software and in files contained on laptops and USB drives using during the election.

In my opinion, the President should make it very clear to all state legislators of both parties that they will be held personally responsible for their dereliction of duty in the face of the evidence of obvious election fraud that has been presented to them. They all know about the fraud now, but some people only respond to rhetoric, and the rhetoric to which cowards are most responsive is the fear of consequences.

He should also make it very clear to them that he is going to cross the Rubicon if they fail to do their duty to the U.S. Constitution, and that they will no more be able to hide behind their state oaths of office or their state constitutions than Axis officers were permitted to hide behind their orders at Nuremberg.

Too late:

A security group that’s questioned Michigan’s presidential results and is listed in at least one of the lawsuits challenging Michigan’s election results is reviewing tabulators and other election materials in Antrim County. 

Allied Securities Operation Group and Village of Central Lake resident William Bailey will take forensic images of the county’s 22 tabulators and review other election related material Sunday following a Friday court order allowing for the review. 

Antrim County Administrator Pete Garwood and county Clerk Sheryl Guy will be in attendance, according to a statement from the county. 

“The imaging is expected to take hours, no timeline has been given for the forensic team’s investigation and results,” the statement said. 

Biden delta = +26 percent

Now that the Dominion servers are in the possession of the Trump team and the algorithm has been broken and is being analyzed, it’s beginning to appear that Biden didn’t just lose, he was absolutely destroyed by the Trumpslide.

Ware County, Ga has broken the Dominion algorithm: Using sequestered Dominion Equipment, Ware County ran a equal number of Trump votes and Biden votes through the Tabulator and the Tabulator reported a 26{6534ce8d8d9c109105c5a2b8c5c8b9d708712d970696104baa8b52bda29579f8} lead for Biden.

37 Trump votes used in the equal sample run had been “Switched” from Trump to Biden.  In actual algorithmic terms this means that a vote for Trump was counted as 87{6534ce8d8d9c109105c5a2b8c5c8b9d708712d970696104baa8b52bda29579f8} of a vote and a vote for Biden was counted as 113{6534ce8d8d9c109105c5a2b8c5c8b9d708712d970696104baa8b52bda29579f8} of a vote.

Those conducting the test were so shocked that they ran the same ballots again.  The same results appeared. ONE PIECE OF THE PUZZLE SOLVED. (It is worth noting that this was one County, and on one Tabulator alone. Dominion Tabulators could have been configured with different algorithms in different Counties or States.) The point is there is now hard evidence of electronic manipulation of the Election.

The use of illegal and/or fabricated ballots is an additional issue altogether, but this is sufficient evidence to question the validity of the ENTIRE Election in the 28 states that used Dominion software.

If this ratio holds up on a nationwide basis, that would mean that Trump won the popular vote 54-46, with a margin of more than 13 million votes.  

  • Trump: 74,221,816 x 1.149425287356322 = 85,312,432
  • Biden: 81,284,158 x 0.8849557522123894 = 71,932,883

That put the results almost precisely where I predicted they would be before the election, the second-largest landslide since Reagan-Mondale, which was 59-41. Of course, it’s not only possible, it is likely that the Ware County algorithm was less extreme than the algorithms used in the more populous Democratic strongholds like Philadelphia, Wayne, and Fulton Counties.

Also, the fact that Dominion was only used in 28 states is relevant, but I’m not inclined to bother working all of that out at this point because there could be different algorithms utilized in every county in those states. Once we get some idea what the algorithmic range is, we can see about doing a more accurate estimate.

Dominion and the virtual precincts

Neon Revolt explains MathAnon’s reverse-engineering of the Dominion vote-flipping algorithm:

MathAnon reverse-engineered the algo Dominion uses to flip the votes, via the use of #VirtualPrecincts!! (And he does it in Starcraft LMAO).

REMEMBER THAT TERM. VIRTUAL PRECINCTS!! I suspect it’s going to be HUGE, very, very soon.

Basically – the Dominion software shoots to have a set ratio split (in this case, in favor of Biden). It can be anything, but it is manually set in order to achieve flipping wherever they deem necessary.

They start by having the organic ballots cordoned off in one set. These remain untouched. The system is then designed to create another set, in order to flip what came in organically.

In other words, it looks at what came in already, and then goes “Hmmm, we need X amount of votes to flip this result, and X amount to make it look organic.”

To make it look more organic, these votes are divvied up between Virtual Precincts, at set ratios.

These new tallies are then added to the real precincts, in order to flip them wherever they’re needed.

Election workers on the ground can be in on the scheme and be used to pad the “official numbers” to meet what’s needed by the programmers, to make the result appear more organic and legitimate (think suitcases in the middle of the night).

This should be quite easy to prove, especially given the fact that Team Trump appears to have access to the original ballot data. It also explains why small numbers of flipped votes are being found in even the smallest counties where there were Dominion machines. The objective was to spread them out so that it looked organic, but the size of Trump’s unexpected lead precluded the planned restraint in the largest Democratic strongholds.

UPDATE: Virtual precincts is why this witness statement is not in error. Far from being a debunking, it supports what actually happened.

An election lawsuit by Sidney Powell, President Donald Trump’s former lawyer, cites a witness who claims to have seen something strange with the votes counted in Michigan’s Edison County. 

Here’s the thing: You can’t point to Edison County on your Michigan hand. And not because it’s in the Upper Peninsula.

Because, well, there is no Edison County in Michigan.

That’s not an accident

It’s not even a hacked car, given the description.

#HarrisonDeal car exploded (witnesses heard the explosion over a mile away).  Vehicle left as molten metal, engine block ejected 50-60 yards away.  That’s not an accident. That’s a car bomb disguised as an accident.

– Land of the Free

Unlike most people, I have actually crashed a car, set it on fire, and seen the fuel tank explode. 

It wasn’t even a crash per se, it just an unfortunate accident when I went off the road in a road rally in a 1977 MGB during the midst of a serious summer drought. Once the car came to a halt, unharmed, we heard something crackling underneath us and very soon after, smelled smoke. The catalytic converter had set the very dry field alight. A soon as I realized the car was stuck, we promptly bailed and ran toward the nearest farmhouse. 

The fireman arrived too late to do anything about the car, but they did manage to prevent the fire from engulfing the whole field or endangering any homes. When the gas tank exploded, it wasn’t like a bomb blast and it didn’t do anything more than blow the trunk cover up, with a dull crump that sent a brief stream of very black smoke up amidst the regular grey smoke from the fire. It didn’t even blow the cover off entirely, and MGB’s are essentially made out of tin.

Neither gasoline nor diesel explode in a manner resembling movie effects. They ignite and they burn, to be sure, but they don’t explode. So whatever made the Deal car explode so violently, it wasn’t anything that one would normally find in a civilian automobile or truck.

However, I doubt the engine block could have been ejected that far and I haven’t seen that in any of the eyewitness accounts. The amount of explosive required to do that would have been unlikely to leave any survivors in the other vehicles, which suggests someone is confusing that detail with details from Michael Hasting’s “accident”.

Anyhow, this suggests that the President should make his move sooner rather than later, lest the innocent suffer. And from the strategic perspective, a demonstrated inability to protect those around the elected officials who are already afraid to do their duty is not going to convince them to do it.

The legislatures have the power

Literally, the plenary power required to decide, absolutely and unilaterally, which presidential electors are appointed. The Supreme Court doesn’t have it. The voters, legitimate and fraudulent, don’t have it. Only the state legislatures do, no matter what the Fake News and the fraud-defending lawyers try to tell you. From The Tree of Woe, Alexander Macris explains the legal and historical truth of the matter:

What does “plenary power” mean? Plenary power is the most powerful authority that the Constitution grants to any branch of government.

According to Wikipedia, plenary power is “a complete and absolute power to take action on a particular issue, with no limitations. In U.S. Constitutional law, a plenary power is a power that has been granted to a body or person in absolute terms, with no review of or limitations upon the exercise of that power. The assignment of a plenary power to one body divests all other bodies from the right to exercise that power, where not otherwise entitled. Plenary powers are not subject to judicial review in a particular instance or in general.”

According to Justipedia, “Plenary power is an absolute power that is complete and allows for the holder to make unilateral decisions regarding a certain subject.”

By using the word “plenary,” the McPherson Court is stating that the state legislatures have complete, absolute power over the appointment of electors. Full stop.

McPherson is an old case, but it has been repeatedly upheld. In Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, No. 00-836, Op. at 4 (Dec. 4, 2000), the Court wrote:

In the selection of Presidential electors, the legislature is not acting solely under the authority given it by the people of the State, but by virtue of a direct grant of authority made under Art. II, §1, cl. 2, of the United States Constitution. Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Board, No. 00-836, Op. at 4 (Dec. 4, 2000)

This direct grant of authority “operates as a limitation upon the State in respect of any attempt to circumscribe the legislative power.” Bush, supra, at 5 (quoting McPherson, 146 U.S. at 25).

State courts may not invoke even the state constitution to circumscribe this state legislative power. Bush, supra, at 5, 7.

Bush v. Gore (2000) cited McPherson and Chief Justice Rehnquist, in his concurring opinion, expanded further:

There are a few exceptional cases in which the Constitution imposes a duty or confers a power on a particular branch of a State’s government. This is one of them. Article II, § 1, cl. 2, provides that “[e]ach State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct,” electors for President and Vice President…

In McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U.S. 1 (1892), we explained that Art. II, § 1, cl. 2, “convey[s] the broadest power of determination” and “leaves it to the legislature exclusively to define the method” of appointment. 146 U.S., at 27…

[I]n a Presidential election the clearly expressed intent of the legislature must prevail…

More recently, in DNC vs. Wisconsin State Legislature, 592 US __ (2020), Justice Kavanaugh wrote a concurring opinion that stated:

Article II expressly provides that the rules for Presidential elections are established by the States “in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct.” §1, cl. 2 (emphasis added). The text of Article II means that “the clearly expressed intent of the legislature must prevail” and that a state court may not depart from the state election code enacted by the legislature. Bush v. Gore, 531 U. S. 98, 120 (2000) (Rehnquist, C. J., concurring); see Bush v. Palm Beach County Canvassing Bd., 531 U. S. 70, 76–78 (2000) (per curiam); McPherson v. Blacker, 146 U. S. 1, 25 (1892). In a Presidential election, in other words, a state court’s “significant departure from the legislative scheme for appointing Presidential electors presents a federal constitutional question.” Bush v. Gore, 531 U. S., at 113 (Rehnquist, C. J., concurring). As Chief Justice Rehnquist explained in Bush v. Gore, the important federal judicial role in reviewing state-court decisions about state law in a federal Presidential election “does not imply a disrespect for state courts but rather a respect for the constitutionally prescribed role of state legislatures.”

So, to summarize:

  • The US Constitution grants the power to direct the manner by which presidential electors are appointed to the state legislature.
  • This grant of power is plenary, e.g. complete and absolute. The state legislature’s clearly expressed intent must always prevail.
  • The grant of power is exclusive to the state legislature. The state courts cannot overturn the state legislature on these matters.

Based on the above, there is no question whatsoever that the state legislature can appoint the presidential electors if it wants to. And, historically, state legislatures have done so dozens of times – in fact, 7{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of all presidential electors in US history have been directly appointed!

Read the whole thing. It is not merely a compelling case, it is a conclusive one. And it makes legal roadkill of the ludicrous Lawrence Tribe in the process, which is nice.

The state legislatures have the duty and responsibility to take matters into their own hands and address this unprecedented assault on the electoral system and the U.S. Constitution. And they should recall that if they don’t, the President has the moral duty and the Constitutional responsibility to hold them accountable for their failure.

Banning the banners

 Mailchimp is banned by Slickstack

Starting immediately, SlickStack has begun warning WordPress sites that have MailChimp software installed that we will begin banning it by default at some point in the near future.

(Note: users are always free to install their own plugin blacklist.txt file, instead of using the default one.)

This is in accordance with our official goals of maximizing free speech and website portability, and helping users to avoid implementing services or extensions that will likely present conflicts later on in their website’s life cycle, esp. regarding stability, security, or portability.

Over the past few years, MailChimp’s “leftist” activism and Orwellian censorship has gotten more and more bold. Among many others who have been arbitrarily banned for political reasons include Stefan Molyneux, March for Trump, VICE founder Gavin McInnes, and Alex Jones, and even a random women’s issues blogger named Emma.

Ironically after Alex Jones was banned, his InfoWars emails are now being powered by the Amazon AWS cloud, meaning that the smaller independent MailChimp is literally just pushing users into Big Tech services instead, or creating totally new IaaS services from the ground up, like Parler, Gab, and many others.

At long last we have the answer to the question of who will watch the watchers. Apparently, smaller independent watchers upon whom the watchers have begun to rely. 

Mailvox: stick and carrot

 A reader has a theory:

I’ve had this theory for a while and I figure I should put it out there on record in case it turns out to be right. My theory is that you two are attempting to take over the script. I don’t know if you are doing it consciously or subconsciously.  Either way you get equal credit because you are following your true inner beliefs/instincts in terms of what you believe needs to be said/heard. 

Vox is the good cop providing hope, morale, and a path to victory for Trump. Owen is the bad cop who is mocking and shaming Trump relentlessly into action. Vox is using the carrot. Owen is using the stick. It doesn’t matter if the masses hear either of you, it only matters if Trump does. If he believes in your collective ability to predict the future then he will put a lot of stock into the two roads that you are showing him are in front of him.

You aren’t writing the script, you are guiding the script. If this has openly been your plan from the  beginning then that is pretty incredible. If you don’t realize this is what you are doing then perhaps it is worth considering.

For my part, I don’t think the God-Emperor pays any attention whatsoever to anything that Owen or I do, say, write, or think. Sure, there are people on Team Trump who are aware of my thoughts and incorporate them into their analyses, but if there is one thing we know about Donald Trump, it is that he is his own man and he answers to no one but Jesus Christ.

I don’t play a role. What you see here is not the totality of me, but for better or for worse, it is an accurate representation. As for Big Bear, I think he is even less prone to playing a part than I am; personalities aside, I have considerably more control over my public output than he does by virtue of our preferred media. 

Pentagon purges

The God-Emperor puts more loyalists in place. For, you know, the transition….

Purge continues at the Pentagon with Trump team abruptly firing Defense Business Board members, installing Corey Lewandowski and David Bossie, as multiple retired military Trump supporters like Mike Flynn and Scott O’Grady call for martial law and overthrowing election.

Oh noes! Lawsy, whatevah shall we do about this blatant disrespect for fake democracy? Meanwhile, according to the Washington Post, the newly purged Pentagon is blocking visits to U.S. military intelligence agencies by the Biden transition team.

But no worries. I’m sure they will arrange to accommodate them at Gitmo.

SG and IG down

Don’t know why yet. The techs are on it.

UPDATE: Arkhaven and Infogalactic are back up. SocialGalactic should be back up soon.

UPDATE: SocialGalactic is back up too.

Converging the stock markets

There will be no avoiding the corporate cancer for those who seek public financing:

US stock exchange Nasdaq has warned listed companies they must appoint at least two “diverse” directors to their board – a ‘self-identified’ female and an “underrepresented minority” or LGBTQ person – or possibly face delisting.
Nasdaq revealed its plan to turbocharge diversity on its exchange in a proposal filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on Tuesday. 
Under the proposed new rules, not only will all listed US companies be required to “publicly disclose consistent, transparent diversity statistics regarding their board of directors,” but “most” companies would have to either appoint “diverse” board members or explain why they hadn’t done so in a letter. 
The mandatory addition of “one [director] who self-identifies as female and one who self-identifies as either an underrepresented minority or LGBTQ+” appears to leave room for Rachel Dolezal-style “self-identification” as something other than white, male, or straight – a potential loophole for companies that prefer to keep their current boards. Non-US companies and small firms would be permitted to appoint two female directors instead.
Listed companies would be required to publish their diversity stats within a year of the SEC adopting Nasdaq’s proposal, and be required to have “one diverse director” within two years of implementation. Depending on company size, they would have four or five years to comply with the two-director requirement. Those who fall short can escape delisting only “if they provide a public explanation of their reasons for not meeting the objectives.”

The reason this is NASDAQ and not the NYSE is because the companies in the DOW and the S&P 500 are, for the most part, established companies that have already been converged. Companies that list on NASDAQ are much younger and haven’t necessarily been saddled down with the diversity anchor, which would give them a competitive advantage.

Diversity in the board necessarily implies future diversity in the workforce, as the top priority for women and minorities in any organization is almost always to bring in more of their own kind.