Patreon bravely runs away

Patreon changes its Terms of Use again:

Dispute resolution

To summarize: If you have a problem please talk to us. Any disputes with us must be resolved in San Francisco under California law.

We encourage you to contact us if you have an issue. If a dispute does arise out of these terms or in relation to your use of Patreon, then the dispute will be resolved in the federal or state courts located in San Francisco, California. Both parties consent to the exclusive jurisdiction and venue of the San Francisco courts for the purpose of resolving any such dispute.

California law, excluding its conflict of law provisions, governs these terms, all other Patreon policies, and any dispute that arises between you and Patreon.

Translation: they’re losing the consumer arbitrations so badly that they’re running away from arbitration altogether. Compare it to the old terms if you don’t understand what the new language signifies.

The lesson, as always, is this: don’t fuck with the Legal Legion.


The Junior Classics on Unauthorized

We’ve launched a new channel on UATV. It features dramatic readings of classic tales from the Junior Classics by the Junior Classic Podcast. Two episodes are already available on the Junior Classics channel and a new episode will be added every week.

And don’t forget the Pinkerton’s Ghosts channel, which presently features three episodes and also appears on a weekly basis. As Unauthorized grows, we will be adding original video documentaries beginning next year, and we hope to eventually begin producing video dramas once we have the necessary resources.

If you want to help build it, you know what to do. And if you already are, thank you very much.


Deceptive practices

The European nations are gunning hard for Big Tech:

US crowdfunding platform GoFundMe was handed down a hefty fine by the Italian competition regulator, which found its advertising and the way it takes a cut from donations to be deceptive and a violation of consumer rights.

The platform was ordered to pay €1.5 million ($1.8 million) for hiding the costs of donations from Italians using it to fund various causes. The California-based company was accused of deceiving people about how much they would actually pay when donating through the platform, by hiding transaction fees and the voluntary ‘tips’ that went to the company itself.

The platform had a default setting for how big its cut from each donation would be and saw its share of donations plummet as soon as it set it to zero for new campaigns after the Italian probe was launched.

The Italian Competition Authority (AGCM) started an investigation into GoFundMe Ireland Ltd, the international operator of the crowdfunding site, in March. It responded to hundreds of complaints from Italian citizens, who accused the company of falsely advertising its services as free.

The authority confirmed that there was a basis for the complaints. GoFundMe advertised itself as allowing fundraising “at no cost” on its front page and elsewhere. In practice, donors would pay extra on top of whatever amount they would type in on a campaign page. Part of this hidden cost is a transaction fee, which amounts to 2.9 percent of the donation amount plus €0.25 ($0.30) per donation, but for some campaigns, an extra may be billed as a “tip” to GoFundMe itself.

As you see, there are numerous angles of attack against the lawless Big Tech corporations. And even their home court turf of the California Superior Courts isn’t anywhere nearly as friendly as it used to be. 


Rounding up the pedos

 Another Epstein associate is arrested, in Paris:

A French fashion agent who is suspected of sharing a teenage lover with Prince Andrew was today facing multiple prison sentences after being charged with the ‘rape of minors’ and ‘sexual harassment’.

Prosecutors in Paris confirmed that Jean-Luc Brunel, 74, was indicted late on Friday night after two days of interviews by an examining magistrate and specialist police from an anti-paedophilia unit.

He was arrested at the city’s Charles de Gaulle airport on Wednesday while trying to board a plane to Dakar, Senegal, telling detectives ‘I’m going on holiday’.

Don’t think that this isn’t related to the election crisis. Nationalism vs globopedo is the underlying theme here, and there is a direct connection between the attempted election stealing and the globalist pedocracy. 


Will be wild!

President Trump calls upon the American people:

Peter Navarro releases 36-page report alleging election fraud ‘more than sufficient’ to swing victory to Trump. A great report by Peter. Statistically impossible to have lost the 2020 Election. Big protest in D.C. on January 6th. Be there, will be wild!

Interesting that President Trump should mention a specific date. He’s also specifically mentioned the need to fight.

Republican Senators have to get tougher, or you won’t have a Republican Party anymore. We won the Presidential Election, by a lot. FIGHT FOR IT. Don’t let them take it away! 

This does not sound like a man intending to concede anything, or humbly accede to the lies of his enemies. It’s in keeping with his character to allow people every possible opportunity to do the right thing, so I would not expect any direct action until after the House and Senate fail him too.

In not-unrelated news:

  • Patrick Byrne: On election night in the United States, bandwidth between the United States and Frankfurt Germany reached a new record:  DE-CIX Frankfurt hits 10 Tbps peak traffic – DE-CIX 
  • Dr. Keshavarz-Nia: Results were forwarded to servers located in Frankfurt, Germany.
  • Col. Phil Waldron: We observed packet traffic going to a server in Frankfurt, Germany.
You may recall what I said would be the smoking gun nearly one month ago.


Which important order is that?

Tweet from Secretary Pompeo, official US twitter account, Secretary of State:
“There is no clash between Secretary Steven Mnuchin and me. We are simply working to resolve interagency mechanics of an important executive order.”
Tweet from Secretary Mnuchin:
“There is no disagreement between Secretary Pompeo and me regarding the implementation of the President’s Executive Order. We are coordinating closely on an interagency basis.”

So, about that “transition”

There isn’t going to be any transition, for the obvious reason that a) Biden lost, and, b) Biden is one of dozens of politicians who have been corrupted by foreign funding.

Axios’ Jonathan Swan reports a bombshell potential major disruption in a key part of the presidential transition before President-Elect Joe Biden is sworn in on January 20: the Pentagon has without warning or explanation halted Biden’s intelligence transition briefings.

Reports Swan: “Acting Defense Secretary Chris Miller ordered a Pentagon-wide halt to cooperation with the transition of President-elect Biden, shocking officials across the Defense Department, senior administration officials tell Axios.”

Biden’s team has so far maintained that it’s unaware of the directive while Pentagon officials are said to be stunned and in the dark: “Administration officials left open the possibility cooperation would resume after a holiday pause,” the breaking Axios report notes. “The officials were unsure what prompted Miller’s action, or whether President Trump approved.”

This is just the first step that is obvious to the public. There will be more, until it finally becomes obvious to the media that Biden will not be allowed anywhere near the White House. 


Losing the advantage at sea

The three U.S. maritime services contemplate losing naval supremacy within the next decade in their co-authored strategic report entitled Advantage at Sea:

New and converging technologies will have profound impacts on the security environment. Artificial intelligence, autonomy, additive manufacturing, quantum computing, and new communications and energy technologies could each, individually, generate enormous disruptive change. In combination, the effects of these technologies, and others, will be multiplicative and unpredictable. Militaries that effectively integrate them will undoubtedly gain significant warfighting advantages. 

The United States and its allies will be challenged to build the necessary capability and capacity required to address these many threats. Increasingly sophisticated weapon systems and a shrinking defense industrial base will raise the price and extend the timelines for developing and procuring new weapons and platforms. Continuous budget pressures, including the economic impact of COVID-19, may constrain resources available for defense.

PROBLEM STATEMENT

China’s and Russia’s revisionist approaches in the maritime environment threaten U.S. interests, undermine alliances and partnerships, and degrade the free and open international order. Moreover, China’s and Russia’s aggressive naval growth and modernization are eroding U.S. military advantages. Unchecked, these trends will leave the Naval Service unprepared to ensure our advantage at sea and protect national interests within the next decade.

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE NAVAL SERVICE

Alliances and partnerships remain our key strategic advantage. Our allies, partners, and alliances such as NATO are an enduring asymmetric advantage over our rivals. They uphold international norms, generate naval power, and provide access to valuable strategic maritime positions. We must strengthen and expand our network of relationships to ensure our success in competition, crisis, and conflict.

Activities short of war can achieve strategic-level effects. The maritime domain is particularly vulnerable to malign behavior below the threshold of war and incremental gains from malign activities can accumulate into long-term advantages. Rivals are exploiting new avenues to advance their interests, including weaponizing social media, infiltrating global supply chains, and using space and cyber as warfighting domains. We must compete in these spaces.

Prevailing in competition is more than a conceptual challenge. Countering malign behaviors short of armed conflict requires sufficient naval capacity and integration to maintain forward presence, as well as targeted capabilities that expand our response options. To sustain deterrence and prevent competition from escalating into conflict, we must maintain our critical military advantages.

Operating forward deters coercive behavior and conventional aggression. We cannot build trust and interoperability with our maritime allies and partners from a distance. 

Nor can we contest malign activities without being present. Our force generation models must ensure we have sufficient combat-credible naval forces available to deter aggression, preempt a fait accompli, and win in conflict, all backed up by rapid surge capability and capacity.

Contested seas require a renewed emphasis on sea control. Denying our adversaries’ use of the seas thwarts their direct wartime objectives and disrupts their efforts to threaten our allies and the American homeland from the maritime domain. We must increase our emphasis on controlling the seas in conflict to provide joint and allied forces with the freedom of maneuver to attack adversary forces and impose costs globally.

Maintaining advantage at sea requires modernization. In persistently surveilled, contested environments, agile naval forces offer dynamic and flexible options from which to project combat power. We must maintain our advantage at sea with new platforms, new thinking, and new technologies that enhance distributed naval operations, and develop our people and culture to meet the challenges of a complex security environment.

Granted, the military services customarily exaggerate the dangers posed by potential threats in order to justify ever-increasing budgets. But it’s apparent that the threats being posed to U.S. naval supremacy by the new Russian and Chinese technologies are real, and it is particularly interesting to see the awareness of the unrestricted 5GW reflected in the document, and to see it highlighted so prominently in the Problem Statment: “Activities short of war can achieve strategic-level effects.”


It’s perfectly safe!

Only confirmed idiots will be getting this “vaccine”. It hasn’t been comprehensively tested for efficacy, it obviously hasn’t been tested for long-term health effects, it hasn’t gone through the normal scientific testing routines, and most damningly, the manufacturer is not liable for any adverse effects. And it’s being relentlessly pushed by a group of people who very publicly advocate lowering the global population, so it won’t be even a little surprising if scientists eventually “discover” that it inhibits fertility.
This YouTube comment pretty much sums up the current situation: 

Now guys look, I know this looks bad, yes. I know that the nurse who took this vaccine that was developed in under a year and has no long-term testing, has fallen completely unconscious five minutes after taking it. And sure we faked the first nurse getting the vaccine by just having him get poked with a needle while the guy administrating it pretended to inject him with an empty syringe. Sure we’re threatening the medical licenses of doctors who express even the slightest reservations about this vaccine and actively silencing and banning the accounts of people who are saying they don’t trust the vaccine and shitposters making memes about it. But I think you’re just being paranoid and engaging in misinformation and contributing to the formation of baseless conspiracy theories.

But let’s be fair. These covid vaccines may well have a positive eugenics effect over time, as only the less intelligent will be dumb enough to take it.

A little hagiography

As you know, I’m sufficiently arrogant to find praise from others mildly distasteful, which is why I post very positive mailvoxes. However, this hagiographic effort was both sincere enough and serious enough about the reader’s lessons learned here to justify a link.

How many times in your life do you get to interact with someone who’s truly infamous?

And we’re not talking about a little notoriety here. We’re talking about so unspeakably abominable that his enemies tremble at the sound of his name.

I’m not even kidding.

The adversaries for the man we’ll be talking about today often refuse to print his name. It’s as if they fear it might conjure him up like some monstrosity from the deepest bowels of the internet.

Behold, a colossal miscreation from the void, some sci-fi horror experiment gone completely wrong, the most hideous behemoth of the digital deep! And it demands to feast on the flesh of its enemies!

It’s a good start, right? And now we have official confirmation from no less than Google itself that I am dangerous as well as notorious. Anyhow, to the lessons:

After a decade of curiously watching Mr. Day chisel at the marble, I’ve learned a thing or two. Best of all and as always, what I’ve learned, in business, leadership, and life, has been tested out in the field, in real life.

Building a Business

The experts make a lot of mistakes to capitalize on

The Patreon fiasco mentioned above is a huge mistake. And a huge opportunity for those willing to take advantage of it. And as we saw this week, corporations are serving up an endless buffet of entrepreneurial opportunities at the moment. But whether it’s your mortal enemies or your business competition, you’ve got viable possibilities for hitting back or building an alternative.

There’s strategy, and then there’s logistics

If I had a dime for every strategy meeting I’ve been asked to attend, I’d be an international bank. What became of most of those strategic plans? Nothing, absolutely nothing. The corporations and consulting firms love cooking up useless strategy plans. But Vox Day taught me that deploying your plans, taking stock of the real means you’ll do it, is just as critical as your scheming. It’s the only way to rise above mere bullshitting.

Marketing, including SEO, isn’t all it’s cracked up to be

Once upon a time, slick, well-financed, and professional won the race. But those days are gone. What’s most interesting about Mr. Day’s website is that he admittedly knows nothing about SEO. Or advanced website metrics. In fact, he seems unaware of large swaths of the marketing industry. But with his kind of site traffic, you can see that the marketing industry is clearly jerking itself off.

Business is war by other means

Although I suspect Vox Day may disagree, business organizations are just as much political organizations as anything else. Corporate espionage, protection racketeering, dark intelligence services. What separates governments from private enterprise is more paper-thin than you might imagine.

And if you’re going into business today, you may want to study up on military history as much as business models. His career shows that it’s not always business as usual. And in this way, you can have a better real-world understanding of power and might.

It’s particularly interesting that he picked up the link between business, politics, and war before I read, much less posted, anything about Unrestricted Warfare. The part about strategy and logistics is even reminiscent of what the Chinese authors of the book believe to be one of the essential principles of that 5GW.

When setting objectives, give full consideration to the feasibility of accomplishing them. Do not pursue objectives which are unrestricted in time and space…. Every objective which is achievable is limited. No matter what the reason, setting objectives which exceed allowable limits of the measures available will only lead to disastrous consequences.