Author: VD

Since I’m a writer, you’d think I’d be a great champion of intellectual property, but corporations such as Disney have bribed Congress into stretching the concept beyond all reasonable interpretation. I suppose we can expect to see more of this sort of thing as information continues to become simultaneously more valuable and easier to access.

No, the mailbox isn’t returning to WND, as I’m still not getting enough opposition mail to justify it. But this is as good a place as any to publicly spank those who wish to cross pens with me. En garde! Claire Sullivan won the right to appear here first, with her lengthy missive assaulting my old column on Gynomythology.

The fact that you are a member of Mensa and therefore supposedly an

intelligent man, I find your opinions as stated in this article utterly

offensive and quite ridiculous.

Mensa membership actually says very little about where one stands in the ranks of the cognitive elite, if the requisite one-in-fifty status is even enough to allow one to be classified there. But the reference provides a measure of warning to those surprised by opinons that unexpectedly contradict their cherished beliefs, a warning that should logically merit at least a cursory inspection of one’s previous assumptions before one dares to pop off in a derogatory manner. And yet to some, it seems red always means go….

Firstly you cannot use the words of one feminist to speak for all of the

feminist movement, let alone all of womankind. Ms de Beauvoir’s words were

not to imply that we shouldn’t allow women to look after their children at

all just that women should be further encouraged to join the workforce for

their own personal development.

If I can’t use the words of a feminist with iconic status to speak for the feminist movement, who would you recommend I use, Josef Stalin? This reminds me of the spoiled little brunette from That 70’s Show: “I can’t be held responsible for anything that comes out of my mouth.” Ms de Beauvoir’s words did not imply that women should not be allowed to look after their children, they stated it outright. “No woman should be authorized to stay at home to raise her children. Society should be totally different.” Ms Sullivan establishes herself here as a profoundly dishonest historical revisionist. By the way, I have never stated, nor believed for a second, that feminists speak for all women.

Secondly the reason that women have accomplished very little of note

throughout history is primarily due to males having written most of the

history books.

Women have been literate for more than 2,000 years, but with the exception of Ariel Durant, they have largely chosen not to bother recording much history. I imagine this was probably for the same reason that they did not accomplish much of historical note during that time – they had other, more immediate concerns of higher priority, such as caring for their families and trying not to get pillaged by Vikings or the equivalent local barbarians. The above is a prodigiously silly and unfounded assumption, without any evidence to support it.

Thirdly women do not strive to be better than men, just to have an equal

platform….We will see in 20 years time whether equality does bring women

to the fore of many academic and scientific fields. until that day one cannot

sensibly pass judgement.

I’m very skeptical of this, based on the perversion of academic discipline by feminist pseudo-intellectuals over the last 30 years. There are already more women graduating from American universities than men, unfortunately, the Sisterhood has taught far too many of them to reject concepts such as science and logic as being masculine and therefore inappropriate for women. Talk about building your foundation on sand! But I’m content to wait and allow that the verdict may not be completely decisive as yet. Not that anything will change in another 20 years, of course, except to make the failure of women to achieve equal regard in the sciences and other fields more obvious and more embarassing to the feminist movement. Rejecting the Western intellectual canon is a valid choice, it’s just a bad one

And the greatest evidence that a woman has the right to control her own body

surely must be the legions of women that reject you and your repellant

misogyny.

There are a panoply of laws that say a woman has no right to control her own body. Just try to shoot some heroin into it, or sell a kidney, or walk into a prohibited area, and you’ll see just how much control over it you are allowed. As for the argument itself, well, let’s just say that if that is indeed a reasonable basis, the historical evidence tends to support the opposite conclusion.

Four strikes and you’re out, Ms Sullivan. Stick a fork in her, she’s done! So, who’s next?

In honor of Governor Schwarzenegger’s election – I didn’t and don’t support his political career, but I still like him as an example of what determination can do for an individual – I hit the triceps hard today. After my normal workout, I added a symbolic six reps with the 100-pound dumbell. I figure Arnold would appreciate that sort of homage instead of the usual toast or whatever. So, *grunt* here’s to the new governor!

And now to sacrifice whatever man points the above feat may have gained me… I was listening to Robbie Williams in the car on the way to the gym, (note – not my CD, it was already in there), and I had to admire the way he forthrightly addressed the public accusations of his supposed homosexuality. In my humble opinion, singing “Press be asking do I care for sodomy, I don’t know, yeh, probably,” while a not-very-clad Kylie Minogue is draped all over you amounts to a rather decisively sarcastic rebuttal.

Given that I am charged with an unhealthy and unnatural interest in men on pretty much a weekly basis, I see only one logical solution. It’s time for me to write a song and film a video with Kylie.

This is an interesting trend. Those who most loudly and proudly proclaim their allegiance to the will of the people appear to actually hate it whenever it counters their interests. In the recent California recall, the California Democratic party was more than willing to use three corrupt judges to attempt to overturn what has now proven to be the overwhelming will of the people of California. I’m not saying that I support Governor Schwarzenegger – I don’t, and I suspect it is possible that he may one day come to represent the continental divide of the national Republican Party – but it’s clear that the people of California want him to govern them. Sometimes people get the government they deserve.

Sometimes people don’t, however. The eurofascists of Europe Uber alles are now forcing their so-called constitution down the unwilling throats of people who don’t support it, have never seen it debated in their national parliaments and will not be allowed to vote on it. Of course, in those countries where the Franco-German Fourth Reich will permit a vote, they will simply force a second vote if the result of the first one is not to their liking. And a third, if necessary, and a fourth… until the people finally vote as directed. For an example of how this works, one only has to look to Ireland, which was the only nation of the fifteen signatories involved that allowed its citizens to vote on the Treaty of Nice. The EU is rather like the Hotel California. You can enter any time you like, but you can never leave – for as Romano Prodi has declared, “the Euro is forever”.

How Hitler would have envied these men! Politicans succeed where panzers failed.

Speaking of the NFL, is anyone else beginning to smell a little 1998 in the air? Almost every year, one team that failed to make the playoffs the previous year ends up in the Super Bowl, and the mighty Vikes finally appear to have a defense to pair with their high-octane offense.

The ironic thing about this black quarterback controversy is that the only apparent race-based decision that I’ve ever seen at the position was when Denny Green signed Randall Cunningham to a long-term contract and let Brad Johnson go. I love Randall and I have nothing but the fondest memories of that magical 1998 season, but the small fact that his long and distinguished career was running on fumes at that point would have seemed to indicate that just maybe it might possibly make sense to keep the younger guy around. And sure enough, much to Denny’s surprise, Randall’s wheels fell off the very next year.

But it worked out well for everyone in the end. Randall got paid for an incredible year, Brad got his Super Bowl ring with Tampa, and now we’ve got Daunte.

I couldn’t help but notice some similarities today between Patrick Buchanan’s column on the Rush Limbaugh NFL controversy today and my own. On Monday, I wrote: “It is shocking, however, that he chose to resign so quickly, rather than force ESPN to show its timorous hand by firing him for daring to speak out on an issue around which the cowardly sports media has danced so delicately for decades.”

Meanwhile, Mr. Buchanan wrote: “But, as a friend said wisely, Rush should not have resigned. He should have forced the weenies at ESPN to fire him and to publish the reason why they were doing it, so the world could see how craven they are.”

Now, this is hardly an original point – it’s not exactly akin to the simultaneous development of calculus, to say the least – but I am mildly curious to know if perhaps I happen to be that friend of whom Mr. Buchanan spoke with such regard. Probably not, since I suppose he writes his column several days in advance, in which case he would not have seen my column. But it’s remotely possible, and if it is the case, this leaves me with two questions:

1) Why mention Slate and Barra, but not WorldNetDaily and my own bad self?

2) When are we going to hang out? I don’t know about you, but I have the definite impression that hanging out with Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan promises a good time. Not as good a time as, say, David Spade or The Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders, but a good time nonetheless.