Canada’s Bill C-9 has removed the “good faith religious expression defence” from convictions for criminal hate speech. It is now effectively, though not yet explicitly, illegal to quote the Bible or cite historical facts deemed contradictory to the Clown World narrative.
It is illegal under section 319(1) of the Criminal Code to publicly incite hatred by “communicating statements in any public place (that) incites hatred against any identifiable group where such incitement is likely to lead to a breach of the peace.”
It is also illegal under section 319(2) of the Criminal Code to communicate statements, “other than in private conversation” that “wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group,” and under 319(2.1) to wilfully promote antisemitism by “communicating statements, other than in private conversation… condoning, denying or downplaying the Holocaust.”
The penalties for these crimes are up to two years in prison.
The Supreme Court of Canada has defined hatred as the most extreme forms of the emotions described by vilification and detestation. The Court has said “detestation tend[s] to inspire enmity and extreme ill-will … which goes beyond mere disdain or dislike.” The Court has said vilification will “seek to abuse, denigrate or delegitimize (a group)… (or) render them lawless, dangerous, unworthy or unacceptable in the eyes of the audience.” The Court added that this type of speech “goes far beyond merely discrediting, humiliating or offending the victims.” The Court has not defined antisemitism.
The Court has also said that hatred can be identified by looking for “hallmarks of hatred” including speech that:
- “vilifies the targeted group by blaming its members for the current problems in society”
- “alleg(es) that members of a group are a “powerful menace”
- “accuses a group of carrying out secret conspiracies to gain global control or that they are plotting to destroy western civilization”
- “suggests members are illegal or unlawful,” such as by labelling them “liars, cheats, criminals and thugs”
- calls people “pure evil”
- “equates the targeted group with groups traditionally reviled in society, such as child abusers, pedophiles or deviant criminals who prey on children”
- describes members of a group as “animals or as subhuman”
- “calls into question whether group members qualify as human beings” or
- refers to them as “horrible creatures who ought not to be allowed to live,” “incognizant primates,” “genetically inferior,” “lesser beasts” or “sub-human filth.”
As I have repeatedly stated and proven by citing its original advocates, the so-called “freedom of speech” never existed and it was never a genuine objective or philosophical position. The freedom of thought was a tautology, not a God-given right. And now we’ve seen that the whole purpose, all along, was to undermine Christian civilization and Christian society, in order to allow the old religion to creep back in.
The Enlightenment always was a satanic fraud. Though it’s only recently that the fact of that fraud and its nature has become both a) philosophically irrefutable and b) observably undeniable.