Malkin(s) Watch doesn’t seem to think the issue through:
Vox Day’s column this week laments the shift of the conservative movement to (and its subsequent dry-humping of) The Left, and he finally does what none of us have had the courage to do: Peg down Michelle’s politics with a single label based on a single controversial stance on a nonexistent issue.
Indeed, what with Michelle Malkin pushing FDR’s internment program, Ben Shapiro, Sean Hannity and numerous others pushing Woodrow Wilson’s foreign policy, Larry Kudlow pushing Richard Nixon’s monetary policies and the editors of National Review harboring a Harry Truman-style crush on the United Nations, one has to wonder if a liberal media is redundant these days.
There you have it. Michelle is a New Deal Democrat because she wants to lock up the undesirables. If this seems a bit farfetched to you (as it does to me), take solace in the fact that you are not a genius like VD. We’ll never get to hang at those hot MENSA orgies. American politics is, like, totally hard to understand.
So, did I miss it when Me So abandoned her pro-war stance and cheerleading for the Wilsonian World Demokratic Revolutia? Has she come out strongly for shutting down Social Security or returning to a gold standard? Does she promote pulling out of the United Nations or does she instead concern herself with who represents us there?
Correct me if I’m wrong, as I don’t read the woman these days, but I’m pretty sure that every single faux conservative stance I cited in this week’s column applies as well to Malkin as it does to Shapiro, Kudlow or NRO’s Lopez.