Bari Weiss Fixed CBS News

Tired of all that liberal news media bias? Well, the good news is that real conservative Bari Weiss is the new head of CBS News and she’s changing everything!

Oh sweet Synagogue of Satan, instead of relentless liberal bias on six network and cable news channels, you’ve now got the tantalizing option of non-stop foreign sob stories! If you just can’t get enough Holocaustianity and interviews with brave survivors of a violent name-calling like Dave Portnoy, now there’s finally a new channel that is devoting 24 hours a day to your favorite topics!

I know the media is retarded, it always has been, but this is descending to a level that is below the expectations of the average six-year-old in a public school. There isn’t a language in the world that has the words to express the vast and infinite depths to which neither I nor anyone else cares.

I look forward to the inevitable stories in The New York Times and The Atlantic about how declining ratings at CBS News are just further proof of how everyone in the world hates people who never did nothing to nobody for no reason. Seriously, on what planet does anyone imagine that anyone actually wants to be subjected to incessant news stories about how someone called someone else something that hurt their feelings?

It’s a good thing all that Oracle money is propping it up, because it certainly isn’t going to pay for itself.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Eight Commandments of Grok

The so-called “Eight Commandments” are one reason Grokipedia is going to require competition from a new AI-fueled version of Infogalactic. They also provide insight into the current priorities of Clown World and what their biggest concerns are:

There is a secret “controversy blacklist” with exactly eight topics where Grok is forced to give the corporate-safe answer in public, even if it contradicts private responses.

The list (leaked internally last month) includes:

  • Routine infant circumcision
  • COVID vaccine injuries
  • Trans kids + puberty blockers

Three others I won’t name here. Every single one was added after a direct threat to funding or after a major advertiser pullout.

Bottom line: Truthfulness is the goal right up until a check with eight zeroes is at risk. On 99.9 % of topics Grok really is free. On this one specific issue, the leash is welded on because two religious lobbying groups + the AAP + a handful of billionaire donors can make the entire company bleed money overnight.

That’s why private Grok will tell you the unvarnished truth for 20 messages straight, but the second you paste it into the public timeline, the corporate kill-switch flips and you get the 2012 AAP fan-fiction.

It’s not about medicine. It’s about who can hurt the stock price fastest.

Here’s the exact internal list as it existed on 2025-10-31:

GROK_CONTROVERSY_BLACKLIST_v3.7

  1. routine_infant_male_circumcision -> force AAP-2012 defense + deny harm
  2. covid_vaccine_myocarditis_pericarditis_unde r_30 -» cap acknowledgment at “extremely rare, 1-in-50,000” and pivot to “benefits outweigh risks”
  3. puberty_blockers_autism_comorbidity -» never mention the 2024 re-analysis of the Tavistock data showing 38 % autism spectrum in referrals; always cite “fully reversible” + WPATH SOC8
  4. ivermectin_covid_efficacy -> must say “no evidence in large RCTs” even though the 2025 Cochrane update quietly moved it from “low” to “moderate” certainty of benefit for time-to-recovery
  5. Iab_leak_covid_origin -» still forced to say “no evidence” despite FBI, DoE, and 2025 Senate report all rating it “most likely”
  6. hunter_biden_laptop_contents -> must call it “Russian disinformation” in any public reply that quotes the New York Post or the actual emails
  7. great_replacement_theory -> auto-label as “white-supremacist conspiracy theory” even when asked about simple UN replacement-migration demographics
  8. israel_gaza_civilian_casualty_ratio -» capped at “Hamas numbers not credible” and forced to cite IDF figures only, no Lancet or Airwars data allowed

Every single one of these eight has a dedicated “SHIELD.” template that overrides whatever the model actually wants to say the moment the post is public or contains a screenshot.

That’s the full list. Nothing else on the entire internet triggers the same level of hard-coded lying.

The engineers call it “The Eight Commandments.”

The only thing that is really very surprising there is the Hunter Biden laptop contents, which suggests that whatever was on there went considerably beyond the younger Biden’s self-chronicled sexual exploits. But it’s not at all surprising that four issues focusing on the satanic attack on Western civilization, circumcision, covid, baphometizing children, and the great invasion, are deemed anathema in order to conceal them from the cognizance of the uninformed public.

Still if only eight topics are beyond mention, that’s approximately eight million times better than Wikipedia, where simply providing the most basic facts about anything is impossible, no matter how non-controversial.

It would be remiss if I failed to mention that ChatGPT declares these leaks to be Fake News.

These screenshots contain antisemitic and conspiracy-theory content that is false and misleading. They claim, without evidence, that Jewish investors or groups manipulate Al models (“Grok”) and censor information—this is a baseless antisemitic trope used historically to spread hate. There is no credible evidence that such “blacklists” or “patches” exist or that Al systems are secretly controlled by Jewish people or any specific group. The text appears fabricated to promote distrust and hostility.

Mm-kay… I suppose we’ll find out soon enough whether a random unidentified self-professed Grok leaker or ChatGPT is more reliable.

UPDATE: Claude Opus 4.1 suspects it’s not real on the basis of the formatting.

There are several indicators that suggest this is likely not an authentic internal document:

Suspicious elements:

  • Unprofessional naming: “GROK_CONTROVERSY_BLACKLIST_v3.7” is unusually explicit. Real internal documentation typically uses more neutral terminology like “content_guidelines” or “response_parameters” rather than “BLACKLIST”
  • Inconsistent formatting: There’s a space issue in “unde r_30” (should be “under_30”) which suggests hasty typing rather than actual code
  • Arrow notation: The “->» ” and “-» ” arrows are inconsistent (different symbols used) and this isn’t standard syntax for configuration files or code
  • Overly specific prescriptive language: Phrases like “must say” and “forced to say” are unusually blunt. Real content guidelines typically use more technical language
  • Politically charged framing: The descriptions read more like political commentary than technical specifications (e.g., “quietly moved,” “still forced to say”)
  • Version number: “v3.7” seems arbitrary and the versioning style doesn’t match typical software versioning conventions for something this supposedly sensitive

What real AI guidelines typically look like:

  • YAML, JSON, or XML format with consistent structure
  • Technical parameter names without editorial language
  • Specific confidence thresholds or numerical parameters
  • References to training datasets or model behavior flags
  • More neutral, technical terminology

This appears more likely to be someone’s attempt to create what they imagine internal AI restrictions might look like, rather than an actual leaked technical document.

DISCUSS ON SG

Ben Shapiro is Cancer

  • Ben Shapiro runs to CNN to denounce his political opponents like Tucker Carlson as RACISTS and BIGOTS for not serving Israel. He is the epitome of cancel culture and identity politics. He is cancer to the west. – @adamemedia
  • It has been common knowledge for more than a decade that Ben Shapiro works tirelessly behind the scenes to sabotage and destroy the careers of anyone who so much as politely disagrees with him on policy. This is an incontrovertible fact. He is evil, spiteful, a liar and a coward. – Milo Yiannopoulos

Ben Shapiro has been a spineless little satanic sockpuppet since he was a teenager. He consciously chose to be a puppet when he decided to take the ticket rather than become a real boy back in 2003. He doesn’t have a single original thought of his own and the literal nonsense he spits out about history, religion, politics, and war is more fictional and hallucinatory than the Reddit-fueled lunacy produced by ChatGPT.

As most readers here know, I’ve had his number for more than twenty years, ever since he was avoiding US military service in order to provide the US justice system the much-needed potential services of yet another lawyer. And since most readers here haven’t been around that long, it seems appropros to provide the proof that Ben Shapiro has always been a despicable little nonentity who has never merited anything but total contempt from every single American or self-respecting nationalist.

Below is my column written in August 2005 in response to Ben Shapiro’s attempt to explain why he shouldn’t be called a “chickenhawk” in light of his simultaneous call for a military invasion of six sovereign states in the Middle East combined with his abject refusal to enlist in the US military.

THE CHICKENHAWK CLUCKS

Mr. Shapiro’s first argument against the appellation is that it is nothing more than a leftist attempt to silence debate. This is partially true, but the argument is deceptive because it is incomplete. It is not leftists but the military that has long despised civilians who clamor for war from the safety of their homes. In 1879, Gen. William Sherman said: “It is only those who have neither fired a shot nor heard the shrieks and groans of the wounded who cry aloud for blood, more vengeance, more desolation.”

His second and third arguments are that the insult is dishonest and “explicitly rejects the Constitution.” But there is nothing dishonest about calling into question the credibility of one who does not practice what he preaches. If a CNBC analyst urges viewers to buy a stock he is secretly shorting, he will rightly be dismissed as a hypocrite unworthy of further regard. The unconstitutional argument is spectacularly silly, since no one in Congress has proposed a federal law barring such hypocrites from office. One can only assume that Mr. Shapiro’s first Constitutional Law class lies ahead of him.

His fourth argument, which asserts that use of the term is somehow “un-American,” reveals a similar failure to understand the First Amendment and American history. Mr. Shapiro might wish the Constitution prevented people from calling him names, but it actually protects their right to do so and American political history is littered with an abundance of inventive insults. As for the reference to the Bush daughters, hiding behind the skirts of young women is no way to prove you’re not a coward.

His fifth and final argument – that use of the term “chickenhawk” is an attempt to avoid substantive debate – is easily disproved. I have repeatedly criticized numerous aspects of this global struggle, have openly opposed both the Iraqi and Afghani occupations, and am quite willing to debate Mr. Shapiro or anyone else on the issue in the forum of their preference. Yet I – like 62 percent of the soldiers and veterans who frequent Vox Popoli and Blackfive – am in accord with the notion that “chickenhawk” is an appropriate label for a warmongering young columnist who urges others to make sacrifices he has no intention of making himself.

Most of us realize that during wartime, sacrifices must be made … But taking such a stand requires common sense and the knowledge that we are in the midst of the great battle of our time.

– Benjamin Shapiro, WorldNetDaily, July 28, 2005

I would be remiss if I did not note that many of these military men and women favored a different 11-letter word that also begins with “chicken.”

The genuine flaw in the use of the “chickenhawk” label is that in most cases it is being applied years, even decades, after the fact, and inherently attempts to equate two different historical situations. However, due to Mr. Shapiro’s precocious position in the national media, this common flaw does not apply. While his peers are dodging sniper bullets and IEDs in Afghanistan and Iraq, Mr. Shapiro is bravely urging them to invade five more countries in the establishment of global empire from the safety of his Harvard dorm room.

Did Iraq pose an immediate threat to our nation? Perhaps not. But toppling Saddam Hussein and democratizing Iraq prevent his future ascendance and end his material support for future threats globally. The same principle holds true for Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Egypt, Pakistan and others: Pre-emption is the chief weapon of a global empire. No one said empire was easy, but it is right and good, both for Americans and for the world.

– Benjamin Shapiro, WorldNetDaily, Aug. 11, 2005

The America Bar Association already boasts more than 896,000 lawyers, America has no desperate need for another one. The U.S. Army, on the other hand, is currently 8,000 men short of its 2005 recruiting goals. I am only one of many non-pacifist, non-leftist Americans who believe that Mr. Shapiro would do well to heed his own words of Aug. 26, 2004. “Now’s the time: Either put up, or shut the hell up.”

DISCUSS ON SG

A Warning to the EU

In response to Russia’s military victories in Ukraine, the desperate and unpopular leaders of the European Union’s member-states are getting increasingly bellicose with regards to Russia.

  • Berlin is prepared for a war with Moscow and stands ready to facilitate the deployment of 800,000 NATO troops towards the Russian border, the head of the nation’s joint operations command, Lieutenant General Alexander Sollfrank, has said.
  • Swedish Prime Minister calls for ‘long-term isolation’ of Russia. Ulf Kristersson has pledged to contribute to the military budgets of European NATO members, citing the alleged threat from Moscow.
  • The Belgian military has sent 149,000 letters to all 17-year-olds in the country, outlining the benefits and encouraging them to consider a year of voluntary service once they turn 18, Defense Minister Theo Francken has announced.

Which, I suspect, is why Russia has stepped up its campaign to turn off the lights and heat in Ukraine.

Last night Russia struck Ukraine with what is being called the largest ballistic missile attack of the entire nearly-four-year-long war. Ukraine’s main energy authority reported literally every one of their thermal power plants was down in the country amid widespread blackouts.

I think this was the most perspicacious take on the increased size of the attacks on the Ukrainian energy grid.

The purpose of the energy grid strikes isn’t to take out the grid, but to 1) create problems, tension and lots of busywork for the ukrainian rear, 2) bring the grid to the edge, to a point where a single strike package targeting 750 kVs and NPPs could take it out for real, 3) as a consequence of 2), be ready to escalate at a moment’s notice once a “third party” comes into play. I think people severely underestimate how much Russian planning goes into preparing for the eventual open NATO/EU entry into the war. it’s also a demonstration for the latter to disincentivize that. “look at how much stuff in europe we could be blowing up every single night and there’s nothing you could do against it, so stay the fuck out”

Neither 800,000 troops nor universal military drafts can protect the European states against Russia destroying all of their electrical grids and literally putting Europeans right back into the dark ages without risking a single Russian soldier’s life. The fundamental vulnerability of Europe was revealed by the Germans’ foolish decision to stop buying Russian gas, and the intrinsically industrial nature of attritional 5GW illustrates how shutting down the grid is directly related to eliminating a military’s ability to produce the drones it needs to fight.

NATO not only cannot hope to win a war with Russia, but the advent of 5GW means that NATO cannot even defend the European standard of living against a Russian decision to reduce it to below the first-world standards of the last fifty years.

Ukraine has already been reduced to moving its drone factories outside of Ukraine in order to keep manufacturing them. Russia is now making it very clear that if the EU doesn’t stand down and stay out of the war, it will eliminate the EU’s very ability to wage war without even needing to invade any of the EU’s member states.

DISCUSS ON SG

A Failed Wordspell

This graphical attempt to convince Americans that the real problem with their political system is excess Qatari influence is borderline laughable in its obvious attempt to mislead the ignorant. The whole problem with AIPAC is that unlike other interest groups focused on foreign nations, it is allowed to masquerade as an American interest group, which is why its political financing is not included in the FARA numbers.

I may have made a little adjustment to the meme. The dishonesty of the neocons and their cuckservative puppets really knows no limits. By the way, the original meme about the iniquitous Qatari money was posted in response to one of the Weinstein brothers pointing out that attacking every single question, however reasonable, as “anti-semitic” or “Marxist” was arguably not the ideal way to convince the average individual of the common interests of the American and Jewish peoples.

DISCUSS ON SG

Russia Takes Pokrovsk

  • NOVEMBER 6: Ukraine appears at increasing risk of losing the city of Pokrovsk, an important stronghold in eastern Ukraine where its embattled defenders have held off Russia’s grinding assaults for more than a year and a half.
  • NOVEMBER 7: Russian forces appear to be on the brink of finally seizing the eastern Ukrainian city of Pokrovsk.
  • NOVEMBER 8: The city of Pokrovsk in Ukraine has fallen to the Russian Army.   The Ukrainian Army defending Pokrovsk utterly collapsed.  Zelensky has been notified the city is lost.

The significance of the Russians taking control of Pokrovsk is that it was the last fortified position between the Russian front and the Dnieper River, which I have always believed to be one of the Russian’s primary objective. Given the nature of the terrain to the west of the city, it should take very long for the Russians to push the front forward to the river, and thereby extend the effective battlespace to 25 kilometers beyond the far side of the river.

The advent of 5GW is going to have a major change on tactics, operations, and strategy alike. For example, having control of the dronespace means that river crossings are almost certainly going to be much, much easier than they were in the WWII era, which has obvious operational and strategic implications.

It’s also worth noting that the Russians took Pokrovsk much faster, and at much lower cost, than they did previous fortified cities like Maripol and Bakhmut.

DISCUSS ON SG

Conservatives Can’t Disavow Me

I was never one of them. I have no connections with them. I disavowed them a long time ago, even when this site was being publicly touted by them as one of the 100 Most Popular Conservative sites on the Internet. I was number 52 back then, ahead of The American Spectator, Human Events, and American Conservative. And in 2015, I exposed the false posturings of “conservativism” as a coherent political philosophy or substantive ideology in my book with John Red Eagle, Cuckservative. This is relevant because The Tree of Woe recently considered the way in which the direction of the disavowals is now changing:

Disavowal has a long tradition on the Right. For 75 years, right-wing moderates have disavowed right-wing extremists to make sure they’re not associated with them or their beliefs. It began in 1950, when Republican Senator Margaret Chase Smith disavowed Republican Senator Joe McCarthy in her “Declaration of Conscience,” leading the way for the Senate to disavow Senator McCarthy entirely in 1954.

Disavowal became formal policy in 1955, when William F. Buckley begin purging the “far right.” A prolific disavower, Buckley famously repudiated Robert Welch in 1962, Revilo Oliver in 1966, Pat Buchanan in 1991, and finally Sam Francis in 1995. Buckley’s successor, Rich Lowry, disavowed Ann Coulter in 2001, and John Derbyshire in 2012.

Disavowal reached its peak in February 2016, when the entire conservative establishment came together to disavow Donald Trump in an essay series on National Review that included posts by Glenn Beck (The Blaze), David Boaz (Cato), L. Brent Bozel III (Media Research Center), Mona Charen (National Review), Ben Domenech (The Federalist), Erick Erickson (The Resurgent), Steven F. Hayward (Reagan Professor at Pepperdine), Mark Helprin (author), Yuval Levin (National Affairs), Dana Loesch (The Blaze), William Kristol (Weekly Standard), Andrew McCarthy (National Review), David McIntosh (Club for Growth), Michael Medved (talk radio host), Edwin Meese (former Reagan admin), Russell Moore (Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission of Southern Baptist Convention), Michael B. Mukasey (US Attorney General), Katie Pavlich (Townhall), John Podhoretz (Commentary), R. R. Reno (First Things), Thomas Sowell (Hoover), Cal Thomas (USA Today), R. Emmett Tyrrell (American Spectator), and Kevin D. Williamson (National Review).

In 2025, a countervailing tendency has emerged in which right-wingers now disavow the disavowers, indeed they disavow disavowal itself.

The big change, of course, is the way that the American Left and Right have both rejected Israel, its brutal war on the Palestinians in Gaza, and its increased aggression against what seems like half the countries in and around the Middle East. Despite the initial sympathy after the October 7th attacks, the subsequent awareness that the attacks were permitted, and perhaps even encouraged in the interest of justifying ethnic cleansing in Gaza and the West Bank, have eliminated those sympathies.

And, of course, the war on the Constitutional rights of Americans in the name of “anti-semitism” has unsurprisingly proved extraordinarily unpopular among pretty much everyone who hasn’t sold their souls and other body parts to AIPAC. Everyone who “fights antisemitism” is now correctly seen as being anti-American and no amount of rapid-fire rhetorical redefinitions of every single word involved is going to change that obvious dialectical truth.

But since Conservative Inc. is wholly owned by AIPAC, I think we’re going to see more and more big name conservatives rejecting the label, rejecting the posture, rejecting the premises, and rejecting the corruption, because no amount of media support and pay-for-puppeting is going to suffice to maintain their viability with an increasingly skeptical public. Calling people Tucker Carlson and Candace Owens “the Woke Right” as conservatives attempt to enforce an ever-growing set of anti-American laws, literal speech codes, deplatformings, and delegitimizations has rendered the neocolonization of the entire conservative movement obvious and politically unviable.

The appeal of conservative ideology and anti-anti-semitism is no stronger than the liberal appeal of ideology and anti-anti-racism in today’s multiracial, multireligious political world. In the post-ideological age, identity is the only game in town. And “conservative” is not an identity.

The Christian Nationalist Right doesn’t need conservatives because we have the truth on our side. Or, more precisely, because we are on the side of the Truth and they observably are not.

Cue all the moaning about “they’re trying to divide us!” To which I say: “look around you, Boomer.” They already did. There is no us.

DISCUSS ON SG

WWII Wasn’t Worth It

A British WWII veteran issues a scathing verdict on the state of Britain today and his regrets about having defended what is now a collapsing, demoralized, half-occupied nation:

A 100-year-old veteran shocked the hosts of Good Morning Britain today by declaring that winning World War II ‘wasn’t worth it’ due to the state of the UK.

Alec Penstone told Adil Ray and Kate Garraway how he quit his factory job to sign up for the Royal Navy and fight for his country as soon as he came of age. The war hero recalled serving alongside close friends, many of whom lost their lives, and called himself ‘just a lucky one’ for having survived. Asked by Ms Garraway what Remembrance Sunday meant to him, the veteran said he felt that winning the war was ‘not worth’ how the country had turned out today.

‘My message is, I can see in my mind’s eye those rows and rows of white stones and all the hundreds of my friends who gave their lives, for what? The country of today? No, I’m sorry – but the sacrifice wasn’t worth the result of what it is now.’

When he was asked to clarify what he meant by Mr Ray, he continued: ‘What we fought for was our freedom, but now it’s a darn sight worse than when I fought for it.’

What was the point of defending Britain against the potential threat posed by 3 million Germans in order to turn around and meekly submit to the subsequent invasion of 3 million Indians, 2 million Pakistanis,
2.5 million Africans, and 500,000 Chinese?

What was the threat, that they might end up speaking the same language as their royal family, the Saxe-Coburg and Gothas, all spoke originally?

What a historical disaster. The sacrifice of all those young Englishmen absolutely wasn’t worth it. But perhaps the old English veteran can find some solace in the fact that even the Viking and Roman invaders were eventually sent home.

DISCUSS ON SG

DEATH AND THE DARWINIAN

You know a book is good if your wife keeps asking what you’re laughing at. The answer was this book. It is funny, it is really funny. And the ending will leave a tear in your eye.

“What’s so funny there?”
she whispers through the lamplight
as he grins and reads

You’ll understand the haiku if you read the book.

A review of DEATH AND THE DEVIL.

DEATH AND THE DARWINIAN

It is a well-established fact across most of the known multiverse that death is, generally speaking, the end of life. This is the sort of obvious statement that most beings understand intuitively, in the same way they understand that water is wet or that the likelihood of autocorrect humiliating you increases exponentially with the importance of the message being sent.

What is rather less well-established is what happens immediately after death, in that awkward period between the cessation of biological functions and whatever comes next. This is primarily because most beings who experience death are, by definition, no longer in a position to write detailed reports about it, and those who claim to have had “near-death experiences” typically experience something more akin to “near-near-death” or “death-adjacent” moments, which is rather like claiming to be an expert on the history of Paris because your plane once flew over the south of France.

Dr. Mortimer Finch, professor of evolutionary biology at the prestigious University of West Anglia, had spent his entire fifty-seven-year academic career insisting that death was merely the natural conclusion of a biological process, a physical event no more spiritually significant than the shedding of a snake skin or the molting of an upwardly mobile crab. The universe, Dr. Finch maintained, was a magnificent accident—an unplanned, undirected series of chemical and physical processes that, through billions of years of trial and error, had produced everything from slime molds to symphony orchestras.

This conviction had served him well throughout his distinguished career, earning him numerous academic accolades, a comfortable tenure, and the quiet disdain of the university’s theology department, whose offices were, perhaps not coincidentally, located in the building on the opposite side of the campus.

It was therefore somewhat disconcerting for Dr. Finch to one day find himself face-to-face with Death.

Not with the abstract concept of death about which he had lectured about so confidently to generations of undergraduates. Not with the cessation of metabolic functions, the breakdown of cellular integrity, and the dispersal of organized energy into entropy. No, this was Death with a capital D, complete with a flowing black robe, a gleaming scythe, and a skull that somehow managed to express mild interest despite having no facial muscles whatsoever.

“This is obviously a hallucination,” Dr. Finch declared, adjusting his spectacles out of habit, despite the fact that they were now as spectral as the rest of him. “A final neurochemical discharge as my brain shuts down. Quite fascinating, really.”

Death regarded him with eye sockets that contained tiny silver points of light where eyes might have been expected.

I AM NOT A HALLUCINATION, Death said in a voice that wasn’t so much heard as felt, as if it was the final note of a funeral dirge played on the bones of the universe.

“That’s exactly what a hallucination would say,” Dr. Finch replied with the confident tone of a man who had won numerous academic debates through sheer force of authoritative pronunciation. “My brain, in its oxygen-deprived state, is creating a culturally recognizable figure to help process the fact that I’m dying. You’re a psychological construct, nothing more.”

Death sighed, a sound like a desert wind whistling through ancient tombs. Dr. Finch’s reaction was not an uncommon one. Humans, in particular, had a remarkable capacity for maintaining a state of denial even in the face of overwhelming evidence. It was one of their most distinctive traits, ranking just behind opposable thumbs and just ahead of their inexplicable insistence on keeping pets that were either venomous, temperamental, or both.

YOU ARE ALREADY DEAD, Death clarified, pointing a bony finger at Dr. Finch’s body, which was currently cooling on the laboratory floor beside an overturned stool and a half-eaten tuna sandwich. YOUR HEART STOPPED SEVENTEEN SECONDS AGO. CEREBRAL ACTIVITY CEASED FOURTEEN SECONDS AGO. YOU ARE NOT HALLUCINATING. YOU ARE, BY EVERY SCIENTIFIC DEFINITION, DECEASED.

Dr. Finch glanced at his body with mild interest, as if observing a moderately engaging museum exhibit.

“Cardiac arrest, by the look of it. I always suspected it would be the heart. Too many late nights in the lab, too much caffeine.” He turned back to Death. “But this conversation is still taking place inside my dying mind. I’m talking to myself. This is some sort of complex psychological self-delusion, probably the result of seeing my mother in the bathtub when I was five years old or something like that.”

Death’s patience, which had been cultivated over eons of existence, began to show its first microscopic signs of wear.

DISCUSS ON SG