Tag: UK

WWII Wasn’t Worth It

A British WWII veteran issues a scathing verdict on the state of Britain today and his regrets about having defended what is now a collapsing, demoralized, half-occupied nation:

A 100-year-old veteran shocked the hosts of Good Morning Britain today by declaring that winning World War II ‘wasn’t worth it’ due to the state of the UK.

Alec Penstone told Adil Ray and Kate Garraway how he quit his factory job to sign up for the Royal Navy and fight for his country as soon as he came of age. The war hero recalled serving alongside close friends, many of whom lost their lives, and called himself ‘just a lucky one’ for having survived. Asked by Ms Garraway what Remembrance Sunday meant to him, the veteran said he felt that winning the war was ‘not worth’ how the country had turned out today.

‘My message is, I can see in my mind’s eye those rows and rows of white stones and all the hundreds of my friends who gave their lives, for what? The country of today? No, I’m sorry – but the sacrifice wasn’t worth the result of what it is now.’

When he was asked to clarify what he meant by Mr Ray, he continued: ‘What we fought for was our freedom, but now it’s a darn sight worse than when I fought for it.’

What was the point of defending Britain against the potential threat posed by 3 million Germans in order to turn around and meekly submit to the subsequent invasion of 3 million Indians, 2 million Pakistanis,
2.5 million Africans, and 500,000 Chinese?

What was the threat, that they might end up speaking the same language as their royal family, the Saxe-Coburg and Gothas, all spoke originally?

What a historical disaster. The sacrifice of all those young Englishmen absolutely wasn’t worth it. But perhaps the old English veteran can find some solace in the fact that even the Viking and Roman invaders were eventually sent home.

DISCUSS ON SG

Adios, Mr. Windsor

King Charles actually had the backbone to do what his mother couldn’t bring herself to do:

Andrew will no longer be known as a prince and is to leave Royal Lodge, Buckingham Palace has confirmed. In a bombshell statement released tonight, Buckingham Palace said he will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor – with immediate effect.

It comes as the palace said the ‘censures are deemed necessary’ amid the ongoing scandal over Jeffrey Epstein, whom Andrew lied about cutting ties with.

‘His Majesty has today initiated a formal process to remove the Style, Titles and Honours of Prince Andrew,’ the statement said.

Prince Andrew will now be known as Andrew Mountbatten Windsor. His lease on Royal Lodge has, to date, provided him with legal protection to continue in residence. Formal notice has now been served to surrender the lease and he will move to alternative private accommodation.

Impressive, very nice. Now do Harry Markle…

DISCUSS ON SG

Clown World Knows It’s Falling

A leaked report about the UK police shows they’re not even trying to uphold the law anymore because they know that the immigrant populations will respond with violence that will likely cause a reaction that will overturn the system.

SENIOR POLICE OFFICERS ADMIT THEIR BIGGEST FEAR IS “MUSLIMS KICKING OFF”

A leaked discussion among senior UK police officers has revealed that their greatest fear when handling sensitive cases is “Muslims kicking off.”

  • Officers admit they tread lightly to avoid “community backlash”
  • Fear of unrest now shaping law enforcement decisions
  • Britain’s policing priorities have shifted from justice to appeasement

“And then their other fear is that a lot of us now are refusing to go along with the ‘multiculturalism has worked out brilliantly’ and they are now afraid of people pointing that out.”

It’s interesting to see how Clown World has recreated the situation that plagues the USA in the European countries. A significant minority of the native populations now aggressively opposes all forms of multiculturalism and multiracism because the failures of immigration, diversity, and equality are so obvious and undeniable.

And that minority will become a majority within the next decade.

DISCUSS ON SG

Epstein Bankrolled British Royalty

Things like this are why the elite in the US and the UK have been fighting tooth and nail to prevent any information about Jeffrey Epstein’s operation from getting out.

Jeffrey Epstein secretly bankrolled Sarah Ferguson for 15 years, astonishing new emails claim. The convicted paedophile complained to friends about the disgraced duchess’s scrounging ways in messages that suggest his financial support went far beyond the £15,000 she admitted taking from him.

In the previously unseen emails, Epstein reveals Fergie was so desperate to cosy up to him that ‘she was the first to celebrate’ his release from jail ‘with her two daughters in tow’. Princess Beatrice would have been 20 at the time and Eugenie 19, the same age as many of his victims.

The shocking claims are contained in a huge tranche of documents under review by the US Congress. They are set to be released once they have been redacted to protect the identity of hundreds of young girls Epstein raped and sexually abused.

I very much doubt that the Duchess of York and the two princesses were the only members of the Royal family on his payroll. But it appears that the information dam is, if not breaking, at least cracking a little.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Left Discovers the Deep State

Dan Hodges is a son of a British Labour Member of Parliament and a former member of the British Labour Party. While he is a columnist for the Daily Mail, he’s one of their more reliably leftist writers. So, it’s interesting to observe that he has reached much the same conclusions that Q, Qanon, and pretty much everyone to the right of the conservative gatekeeper’s club have.

We must confront the outrageous truth. A shadowy cabal of men is running Britain – and the Prime Minister is not one of them.

You don’t say… Clown World has always preferred to operate by pulling the strings of its puppet politicians from behind the scenes.

DISCUSS ON SG

BIH Ian Watkins

There can be little doubt that the recently deceased Lostprophets singer is not resting in peace, but rather, burning in Hell.

Lostprophets singer Ian Watkins has died after being attacked in jail, prison sources have confirmed.

The disgraced rock star from Pontypridd was serving a 29-year sentence at HMP Wakefield for child sex offences. West Yorkshire Police said they were called to the prison on Saturday morning to an assault on a prisoner, who was pronounced dead at the scene. Watkins, 48, was jailed in December 2013 for a string of child sex offences, including the attempted rape of a baby.

He was attacked with a knife by another inmate, PA reported, citing sources.

I quite liked Lostprophets back in the day. They had several really good songs. And while I never consciously decided to stop listening to them after Watkins’s arrest for some incredibly awful child abuse, I simply never really wanted to hear the man’s voice again. Apparently his bandmates felt much the same, as they decided to shut down the band in the aftermath of his arrest and conviction.

The fall of Ian Watkins into utter depravity is a reminder that no matter how much worldly success one has, it will never be satisfying and it will never be enough, so chasing it is an obvious fool’s game from the start.

DISCUSS ON SG

A Political Conundrum

If you say or imply that foreign people can’t be British, then we will fight you with everything we have because you are the enemy. 
—Keir Starmer

Why come no one will vote for me?
—also Keir Starmer

Here is an epiphany for the conceptually-challenged Prime Minister. Foreign people can’t be British, for the obvious reason that if they were British, then they wouldn’t be foreign. A Pakistani who moves to Britain is still Pakistani. A monarch butterfly that migrates from Canada to Mexico does not cease to be a monarch butterfly on the basis of its southern residence.

A child of a Pakistani immigrant is still a Pakistani. So is a grandchild. Because what determines nationality is genetics, not geographic location. A child born in the Antarctic is not an Antarctican and a foreign child born in Britain is not British.

Neither paper nor governments dictate what a nation is. The nations existed before any of these governments or their papers existed. And they will last long after these governments and their papers are gone.

DISCUSS ON SG

British Girls vs Migrants: The Real Story

Remember, the Official Story is always, ALWAYS, wrong in at least one or more substantive details. So, it should come as no surprise that the British media is not only attempting to falsely spin the story of the young British girl who defended her sister from an alleged attack by a migrant sex pest, but appears to have gotten a number of basic details wrong as well.

Here is the Daily Mail’s attempt to whitewash the story in favor of the migrant and alleged attacker.

Now we can reveal the man being threatened is a family man who has been living in the UK for four years – and who was accompanied by his wife on the way to the shops when the incident occurred. Far from being fresh off a cross-channel small inflatable, as implied by Robinson and Musk, Fatos Ali Dumana, 21, says he came to Britain legally from Bulgaria and he and his wife have an eight-month-old baby.

The self-styled ‘digital creator’ took the chance to have his own say on the bust-up which launched a thousand memes – and which also led to the girl being charged by police. Speaking from his home in Dundee, Mr Dumana insisted he did nothing wrong and is in the country legitimately.

He said: ‘I have seen the social media and it’s blown up. In the video she’s saying, “Don’t touch my sister, she’s only 12. I never touched her. I didn’t hit her, I swear on my life, I have a baby now. I would never hurt someone. If she’s only 12 why was she messing with me and having weapons? I was going to the shop and she was stopping me going on my way. If I did hurt the girl, why didn’t the police arrest me? They have done nothing to me. ‘They saw from the CCTV cameras from Farmfoods that she was stopping me go on my way to the shop. There was one more person also who told them (the police) she was attacking me and calling me a f* migrant. ‘I am not an illegal migrant. I have not done anything. I did not hit them, I am a human not an animal.’

So, there are several obvious red flags in the Daily Mail’s version:

  • He is a migrant from Bulgaria. No one said, or cares, how recently he arrived or whether he is “legal” or not. He is quite literally “a fucking migrant”. The distinction between “illegal migrant” and “legal migrant” is arbitrary, irrelevant, and intended to obscure the issue.
  • Presumably the police didn’t arrest him for the same reason they didn’t arrest any of the Rotherham rapists or the dozens of other migrant sex pests attacking young British girls. The police are evil and an important element of the war on the British people; the order they are employed to maintain is a wicked, anti-British, and anti-Christian order.
  • She is carrying weapons at the age of 12 to defend herself and her sister from foreign sex assailants because she believes, correctly, that neither the police nor British men are going to defend her.
  • The over-the-top victim rhetoric. “I am a human not an animal” is the sort of thing that third-worlders say because they behave like animals. A civilized individual never has any need to point it out.
  • The “I could never” rhetoric. Never trust the word of anyone who attempts to substitute irrelevancies for actual impossibilities. “I was not there” is an alibi. “I have a baby” is not.
  • He mentions “one more person” without clarifying that it was a third girl who is a friend of the two girls, an eyewitness to the attack, and was the individual who contacted the police.
  • The article states that he was accompanied by his wife but not by their 8-month old baby. Was the woman with him actually his wife?
  • You know it’s a Clown World propaganda piece in defense of the Narrative when they’re not accepting comments on the article.

Now the real story from the mother of the THIRD girl who was there, who was an eyewitness to what she claimed was an attack by two migrants, and who called the police.

I spoke with the mom of one of the girls and got the entire story that the media is covering up and lying about. So first of all, the reporting got the names of the girls mixed up. There were 3 girls who were there who were accosted and attacked by the migrants. Lola – Lola is the hero from the video. She’s the one with the axe defending her sister from the migrant attackers Ruby – Lola’s older sister who was attacked and hospitalized, Mayah – Ruby’s best friend who was with them and went to call the police after Ruby was attacked by the migrants

Here’s the summary of what happened from Mayah’s mother:

“Yes. So what happened was the girls where out just walking and the man in the picture made comments to lola (the younger girl) calling her sexy and other sexual remarks then the girls started to tell this man to leave them alone and stop following them and making sexual remarks to them. After that the man’s sister (also in the picture) came around the corner and physically attacked ruby (the older sister) she grabbed her hair dragged her to the floor started to punch her then both the man and woman where kicking her in head while she was on the floor. At this point my daughter (mayah) called the police so my daughters account after that is all a bit blurry. But that is when lola had the weapons she pulled them out to protect ruby. After that the man came back at lola recording her making sure she showed the weapons to the camera and antagonising her. Ruby was hospitalised after the attack with a severe concussion a tennis ball sized lump to the back of her head as well as lots of bruises.”

Never, ever, take anything the mainstream media says at face value. It’s always a spin and it’s always in the same direction. The fact that the story has already gone viral and spawned a series of effective means is why they’re attempting to get out ahead of it and spin their usual false narrative about how foreign invaders never did nothing to nobody and if you think they did, well, you’re just a racist.

UPDATE: The BBC inadvertently demonstrates why British police reports cannot be trusted while trying to establish the Narrative.

BBC News understands that officers have found no evidence to substantiate claims being made online the youths were at risk of sexual assault. The force had initially said she was 14, before issuing a correction.

First, notice the focus on the claim of being “at risk of sexual assault” as opposed to the actual claim of “were physically assaulted by migrants”. Second, note that they didn’t get the age of the girl or the number of girls correct. And third, in the aftermath of Jimmy Savile and Rotherham, why would anyone take anything that the British police say seriously? They’re confirmed liars.

UPDATE: Curiouser and curiouser. If this is the couple that attacked and filmed the girls, then the Bulgarian migrant being portrayed as the innocent victim by the Daily Mail wasn’t even involved at all and is probably just a crisis actor. It’s obviously not the same man; among other things, there is no cross tattoo on the neck.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Virginian Began to Hate

The eminent John C. Wright feels a stir of righteous militance in his breast:

British police have ARRESTED a 14-year-old girl for fending off a migrant Paynim child molester?
… a 14-year-old girl ??!!
Enough is enough.
Invade England.
Free the people. Expel the invaders. Hang the ringleaders.

In fairness, the USA has invaded countries for less. I’m just kind of curious how the Clown Worlders think this is all supposed to work out for them. I mean, it’s obvious that war, and a particularly nasty form of war, is going to take place across the West. What I can’t quite figure out is how they think they’re somehow going to be immune from its consequences.

Unless they’re just suicidal agents of evil. In that case, it makes sense. Or, I suppose, stupid servants of evil without any sense of self-preservation. That would work too. In either case, Great Britain is now observably Gulag Britain.

“Every man always has handy a dozen glib little reasons why he is right not to sacrifice himself.”
― Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

DISCUSS ON SG

Nigel Farage is a Fraud

He was against mass deportation before he was for reduced mass deportations.

Your three and a half page ‘policy’ document is weak as piss, Farage. How on earth has it taken you so long to cobble this together? This isn’t mass deportations. Your ‘plan’ barely scratches the surface. 500k deportations? It’s not enough. It’s pathetic. That needs to be quadrupled, at least. You stood across from me in that Essex hotel room and instructed me to remove the term ‘mass deportation’. You told the Telegraph it was a ‘very grave, dark and dangerous use of language’. Were you lying then? Or now? Which is it? Radical problems require radical solutions. There easily will be two million plus illegals by 2029. Likely far more. They ALL need to go. Not some, as you are suggesting. But all. Britain needs real mass deportations.

And then get started on the incompatible so-called “legals”. Multiculturalism has failed. Multiracialism has failed. There are no “nations of immigrants”. And there is no such thing as an “idea nation”.

There are two choices left. Mass repatriations based on race and religion or war. That’s it. And we’re in this ugly situation thanks to all the evil people, the stupid people, and the nice people who bought into the ridiculous Clown World rhetoric.

And the more time that passes, the more it becomes likely

DISCUSS ON SG