Proof is the new evidence

It’s interesting to see the mainstream media narrative keep changing over time. From the Daily Mail:

Trump claims that there is ‘big voter fraud information coming out concerning Georgia’ as he continues to claim he won the election

President Donald Trump continued to allege voter fraud on Saturday

He claimed there is ‘big voter fraud information’ coming from Georgia

Trump urged his supporters to ‘stay tuned!’ yet offered no further information on what his campaign claims to have found there

Biden was declared the winner in Georgia after a hand recount this week 

Trump’s previous claims of fraud have been widely dismissed as his legal team has failed to supply any proof 

First, the narrative was that there wasn’t any evidence, which we’re still seeing being ignorantly repeated by a few lagging retards who simply don’t know what “evidence” is. Then that shifted to “no strong evidence”, which is still the primary narrative despite the fact that no one in the media is even remotely equipped to understand, let alone explain, the significance of the strong statistical and technological evidence that has already been revealed.

Now, the media has begun retreating to the “failed to supply any proof” position, which we can reasonably expect to be abandoned within two weeks. Of course, once the proof is supplied, it’s game over for Sleepy Joe and a lot of corrupt election officials.


They’re starting to worry

The survey taken November 13-17, more than a week after Election Day, shows President Trump’s open defiance of Biden’s victory appears to be affecting the public’s confidence in American democracy – especially among Republicans.


Is she math-challenged?

 Or does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez know what is coming when all the votes are properly counted?

A constituent asked Ocasio-Cortez about her thoughts on Democrats shrinking their majority in the House and expressed her frustration.

“Why did we lose so many seats, and what needs to be done to get them back next term?” the moderator asked on behalf on the constituent.

“So, you know, of course, the loss of the House majority is just extraordinarily upsetting to all of us. It’s upsetting to all of us who are invested in having a Democratic majority so that we can expand health care, so that we can raise wages, so that we can protect working people,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

The charade being utilized to cover the fraud is cracking. 


Sounds like a movie

Then again, Q told us that we were watching one. One thing I had wondered about is where all those late-night Biden-only ballots were produced, and this might explain the mystery.

The Boss of the Philly mob — ‘Skinny Joey’ Merlino — is taking a victory strut, hobnobbing around the highest echelons of old-time mafia folk, mostly in Florida, describing what may have been the heist of the century: the 2020 presidential election.

The feat is drawing praise from far-flung corners of the Italian American business community, which sees the thanks of a grateful administration as key to the revival of the community’s political influence.

But an associate says that Merlino might just be willing to flip on Joe Biden and the Pennsylvania political operatives who ordered up some 300,000 election ballots marked for Biden.  The source alleges that Merlino and a lean team of associates manufactured those ballots at a rate of $10 per ballot — a whopping $3 million for three days of work.  They were then packaged into non-descript cardboard boxes and dropped off outside the Philadelphia Convention Center.

Sources who spoke to The Chronicle on the condition of anonymity say that Merlino picked up those ballots from two private households where a trusted handful of associates were busily marking ballots with Sharpie markers.  They were paid more than $1,000 per hour, often producing thousands of ballots every hour for more than 60 nearly-consecutive hours.

The ballots were purchased in cash. 

Nice work if you can get it. And, of course, avoid doing the time for it…. 


The election arrests begin

 This should be the first of many, one presumes:

The Democrat Director of Texas state political strategy for the Joe Biden Presidential campaign has been arrested for electoral fraud.

Democratic Party operative Dallas Jones was formally accused of helping to run an illegal ballot harvesting operation in the state of Texas on behalf of the Joe Biden campaign during this contested Presidential election.

According to the National File, two investigators, including a former FBI agent and former police officer, testified under oath that they have Democratic Party internal documentation, as well as video evidence and witnesses, for their investigation.

Now do the Secretaries of State in PA and GA…. 

UPDATE: There is confusion about whether this is an old arrest or a second arrest. Regardless, this isn’t going to be one that matters since whenever it happened, it happened in Texas. There need to be a LOT more to address the 2020 election fraud.


Proof of PA fraud

The Gateway Pundit provides proof of mail-in ballot fraud in Pennsylvania:

In almost every county throughout the state, the President was awarded a percent of votes 40{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} less than the percent the President won on election day.  If Trump won a county by 80{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the vote on Election Day, he won 40{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the mail-in vote for a county.  If the President won 60{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the vote on Election Day, he won 20{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the mail-in vote in another county.  This pattern occurred in almost every county with the only noticeable exception of Philadelphia, where the President only earned 30{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the vote on Election Day.


Too implausible for fiction

Bestselling novelist Larry Correia, who knows fiction when he sees it, asked a number of professional auditors about the plausibility of the statistical evidence for the media-projected results of the U.S. presidential election:

I noticed yesterday that I was having lots of strangers show up to scream at me whenever I posted any information about election fraud, but they were all low information types just barfing up “fact checks” which was basically whatever the news had just told them, but none of them had the basic knowledge of how fraud works to even sorta discuss any of the actual data. So I got curious and posted the following on facebook:

One quick question, only answer if you have worked in auditing/stats/fraud/investigations/or other data analysis type fields. In your entire career, have you ever seen a case that threw up this many flags that DID NOT turn out to be fraud?

Again, flags are not proof. They are merely anomalies which would cause an auditor to check. Nor am I claiming this is a scientific poll (though I’d bet I’m still more accurate than Nate Silver!). There is of course a sampling bias as I know many of these people in meat space (and their resumes on this topic are killer) but it was also open to the public so anyone could comment and it got shared a hundred times.

The consensus thus far is overwhelming. No. Not only no but hell no.

Certified Fraud Examiner since 1992 here. I have never seen such an oversupply of red flags. 3 or 4 might be explicable or coincidence, but dozens all pointing the same way? This would be too implausible for fiction, let alone a case study.

No. In fact I would say that in about 34 years of this work it is my professional opinion that at this level it is mathematically more likely that our sun blinks out of existence as a result of every particle in it spontaneously “blinking” into another state than it is that fraud did not take place on the order of millions of votes.

Epstein didn’t kill himself. Biden didn’t win. And Q says it had to be this way.

How do you ‘show’ the public the truth?

How do you ‘safeguard’ US elections post-POTUS?

How do you ‘remove’ foreign interference and corruption and install US-owned voter ID law(s) and other safeguards? 

It had to be this way.

Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light. 

Q

This tends to confirm my hypothesis that President Trump was so confident of his reelection that he was willing to appear to put his second term at risk in order to secure free and fair elections in 2024 and beyond. After all, what is the point of winning a second term if the Swamp is simply going to undo everything you have accomplished. This would also explain the need to wait for the second term to drain the Swamp; the only way to systematically excise the full extent of the fraud was to expose it to everyone.


The statistical storm

Although the statistical evidence is rapidly turning into hard physical evidence of ballot fraud, it’s still useful to continue noting the statistical anomalies and how strongly they indicate that there is no shortage of fraud to find by refining the statistical case against Biden:

  1. TURNOUT 
  2. OUTPERFORMANCE VS. OBAMA
  3. BIDEN-ONLY BALLOTS
  4. ABSENCE OF MAIL-IN VOTE VETTING

The statistical case, in isolation, does not prove fraud. But the confluence of highly unlikely results does, emphatically, paint of picture of utter improbability.

Any one of these four factors alone would cast intense doubt upon election results.

Put all four together, and the result is a seemingly impossible statistical perfect storm.

And it is wildly ironic that the self-styled “party of science” that relies so heavily upon statistics for “proof” of racism and income inequality to turn around and reject the idea that statistics are a reasonable basis to justify further investigations into ballot fraud.


Biden didn’t win

President Trump did, and now he can prove it.

Election Fraud: @RudyGiuliani says he has uncovered enough unlawful ballots in Pennsylvania and Michigan to turn the election in favor of @realDonaldTrump.

– Lou Dobbs

This is going to be so much fun…. Listen to the whole thing. It’s crazier than you think. The votes in Georgia were being digitally processed by a Venezuelan-owned Canadian company in Barcelona. Giuliani says there are now 623,000 confirmed unlawful ballots in PA and 320,000 confirmed unlawful ballots in MI.

They got into a panic because they thought they had made up the lead, but Trump was still ahead by 120,000 votes… Now I think that number will go up, when we began in PA, we only had about 130k, now we’re up to nearly 632k. The same pattern exists in NV, AZ, GA, WI.


No one believes Biden won

 And this is a subject of deep concern to the people that claimed Creepy Joe was a shoe-in:

Our latest YouGov/The Economist poll has a host of troubling findings about public confidence in the election.

Most shocking is that 86{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of Trump voters say that Biden “did not legitimately win the election.” 73{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} say that we’ll “never know the real outcome of this election.” 

We also see the usual patterns in attitudes about mail-in voting and fraud. 88{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of Trump voters say they believe that “illegal immigrants voted fraudulently in 2016 and tried again in 2020,” for ex, and 90{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} believed that “mail ballots are being manipulated to favor Joe Biden.” 

Republicans are also exhibiting some… concerning… attitudes about the franchise, with 46{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} saying that “some people are not smart enough to vote” (27{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} among Dems) and 43{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} saying that people should have to pass a test before voting (15{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} for Dems). 

89{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of Trump voters think he should contest the outcome of the election in court, and 62{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of his voters think it will change the outcome.

Fewer than half of Americans expect there will be a peaceful transition of power to a Biden presidency.

Forget “peaceful”. There won’t be ANY transition of power to a Biden presidency and most Americans already know it. 

Because Epstein didn’t kill himself and Biden didn’t win.