#Arkhaven INFOGALACTIC #Castalia House
If you want to watch the Super Bowl in person without a ticket today, here’s a pro tip:
Just tell the security guards at the ticket gate that you’re an unaccompanied minor from Mexico. I’m told they have to let you in, seat you, and give you a hot dog, a coke, and season tickets to the NFL team of your choice, no matter what.
One of the most startling realizations of the 21st century has been the inescapable conclusion that communism, despite all of its atheism, murderous tendencies, economic shortcomings, and various other evils, is still much, much better for a nation than Clown World’s neoliberalism.
A map recently published by German poll aggregator Wahlkreisprognose shows that in the former East Germany Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) has a clear lead in almost the entire former German Democratic Republic while the western part is overwhelmingly dominated by the conservative CDU and its Bavarian sister party CSU.
In other words, the country is sharply divided along what was once formerly West Germany and East Germany (GDR).
In the map, the Institute has colored Germany’s Bundestag constituencies according to party preference. The black color represents the center-right Christian Democratic Union (CDU), the blue color the Alternative for Germany (AfD), the red color the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD), and the green color the Greens. The fainter the color, the smaller the lead of the party in the constituency, and the darker the color, the more dominant the party is.
The CDU dominates in western Germany outside the big cities, and the AfD in eastern Germany outside Berlin. The CDU and AfD are perfectly aligned with the former border between the former German Democratic Republic and the former West Germany.
This is not an argument for communism, but rather a condemnation of Clown World. North Korea is still Korean. China is still China. But the USA is no longer American, Great Britain is no longer British, the European nations are invaded and occupied by foreigners, and even the proud nations of Japan and South Korea are under direct assault.
Clown World delenda est.
By the way, the econoclowns lied about the “economic need for immigration” too. Immigration doesn’t help the economy at all. It is observably worse for an economy than losing a war and being nuked.
Mass immigration may cost Germany up to €19.2 trillion, and has already cost the country €5.8 trillion, according to a top German academic on public finances, Prof. Bernd Raffelhüschen, of the University of Albert Ludwig University of Freiburg. Often referred to as the “pension pope,” Prof. Raffelhüschen’s study blows a hole in the narrative promoted by pro-migration parties and business leaders, who claim that mass immigration will save Germany’s public finances and the job market.
Several top Dutch professors recently released a study detailing how migrants have cost the Netherlands a minimum of €400 billion since 1995, and the Netherlands has accepted far fewer migrants than Germany. In Norway, researchers found that only half of migrants are employed despite the state spending €6.6 billion on workforce integration projects over the course of 10 years.
If you ever wonder why I expect that the tens of millions of Arab and African migrants who have invaded Europe will not be permitted to stay there permanently, note that an EU state has already begun the process of deporting large numbers of unwanted foreign residents.
Latvia is attempting to deport thousands of Russian-speaking people – and apparently, these ‘purges’ affect not only newcomers who have recently applied for a residency permit, but people who have lived in the country their entire lives.
The New York Times recently told the story of Russian-speaking widow Nina Marcinkevica, who was born in Latvia 63 years ago, when the Baltic republic was still part of the Soviet Union. She married and raised a family there, and has never lived anywhere else. Nina resides in the predominantly Russian-speaking city of Daugavpils in the eastern part of the country. In the fall, she received an official notice stating that she had lost her rights to residency, her state pension, and medical care. “You must leave the territory of the Republic of Latvia by November 30, 2023,” the letter stated.
The Latvian authorities have the opportunity to expel Marcinkevica due to her Russian citizenship. Over 3,200 Russian nationals living in Latvia received notifications about potential deportation in early October, according to the news portal Rus.lsm.lv.
This isn’t the outrage it is portrayed to be. The Latvian people absolutely have the right to their own country, and no Russian or any other non-Latvian has the right to invade their borders or reside among them if the Latvian people don’t want them there. Particularly in a democracy, even a limited representative democracy, mass immigration and the free movement of people cannot be permitted by any nation which wishes to survive as a nation.
But it is incredibly hypocritical, given the way in which the EU authorities have, despite the clear opposition of the majority of its peoples, encouraged the mass invasion of the European nations. Which means that even in the unlikely event that the EU doesn’t collapse in the next ten years, a clear legal precedent has been set for the mass repatriation of migrant populations that have proven to be incompatible with the languages, laws, and cultural traditions of the host nation.
Finland appears to be following Latvia’s lead, as it plans to pass a law banning Russians from acquiring property in Finland. No doubt repatriations will soon follow.
Finland is preparing to completely prohibit Russian citizens from purchasing real estate in the country, Defense Minister Antti Hakkanen said in a statement published on Finland’s official government website on Friday.
In truth, given current economic and cultural trajectories, the children of those Russians expelled from Latvia or Finland will probably be deeply grateful that their parents returned to Mother Russia, however involuntarily the return.
If the media doesn’t like the phrase The Great Replacement to describe what is happening in Minnesota and elsewhere across the West, perhaps they’ll be pleased if we point out that The Great Retardation is arguably even more appropriate:
“Signs outlining the expectations we have of riders are now being installed at light rail and bus rapid transit stations,” Metro Transit wrote in a post on social media. “Those who violate these rules will be removed from transit property.”
A webpage dedicated to “Rules for Riding” explains a person’s obligations as a rider. “Transit vehicles and facilities are shared spaces, and come with shared responsibilities. Your role as a rider applies anytime you use the transit system, and ensures a clean, safe experience for all,” the website says.
The expectations of riders include paying ride fare and wearing clothing. Paying for one fare equals paying for one seat, Metro Transit explains, telling riders to hold their belongings in their laps and not place them on an additional seat. The rules distinguish illegal activity from activity that isn’t necessarily illegal but is “not allowed.”
Peeing and pooping while riding on Metro Transit vehicles falls under the “illegal” category, according to the signs. “Transit property is not a public restroom,” the new rules read. They also explain to riders that sexual assault is illegal. “Sexual contact without consent is forbidden,” the rules state.
Metro Transit reminds riders to not defecate on trains or sexually assault passengers, 30 January 2024
The dirt is not magic. It never was. Neither is public transit. If the quality of the population changes, the quality of life in that locale will inevitably change over time in line with the new demographic’s preferences, traditions, and above all, standards.
And there is no other word for replacing High Elves with an imported melange of orcs, goblins, and trolls, and expecting the general quality of life to go unchanged than retardery on a historically breathtaking scale. This is more than just dyscivicism and dyscivilization, it is literally devolution in action.
UPDATE: Reportedly Metro Transit ridership is down 50 percent from 2019 levels. Such a mystery!
Unfortunately, the vast majority of Americans don’t, and will not believe it until the fireworks start. Even then, they will struggle to believe that war has actually come to the United States, a war that isn’t going to be a civil war in any sense of the term:
1stResponderMedia posted a video on X showing an interview with a group of migrants who illegally crossed the border 12 miles east of Sasabe, Arizona, over the weekend. At least one of the migrants in the small group identified himself as an African migrant from Morocco.
A second male migrant traveling in the same group responded to a question about his country of origin with an ominous message.
“If you are smart enough, you will know who I am,” the migrant began. “But you are really not smart enough to know who I am. But soon you’re gonna know who I am.”
The migrant then walked away.
These young male migrants are neither refugees nor conventional immigrants. They are being brought into the United States to serve as a Praetorian Guard for the foreign elite that is terrified of the reaction of the US citizenry to the inevitable collapse of the empire that the people never even wanted in the first place.
We wondered what the reaction to the failure of the jump to China would be, and now we know.
The picture below doesn’t show any poor huddled masses yearning to breathe free. It’s a well-funded army of mercenaries that only lacks weapons and orders to take action. And it’s already present across most of the United States.
The growing resistance centered in Texas is a positive development, but it’s almost certainly too little, much too late, led by a leadership that is more instinctual than cognizant of the real state of affairs. And that’s assuming that it isn’t some sort of oppositional gatekeeping in the first place.
Hitler must be cursing in Hell now that he’s realized all he had to do to successfully execute Operation Sea Lion was to dress his Wehrmacht in civilian clothing, put them on rubber rafts, and tell the Royal Navy that they were huddled masses yearning to breath free.
As the great Israeli military historian Martin van Creveld finally concluded after examining the movement of peoples throughout history, immigration is war.
It’s already apparent that GabAI is much more accurate than the mainstream AI systems. However, that doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily reliable. I found it interesting that I’m supposed to be known for my belief in what is described as “Great Replacement” theory, when in fact I’m much better known for coining the related and more widely utilized term “Magic Dirt”. Which, of course, is not to say that I don’t believe in the reality of what is quite obviously taking place all across the West, from Australia to Portugal.
Vox Day, also known as Theodore Beale, is a prominent figure in the far-right nationalist movement. He is a science fiction author, blogger, and editor who has made a name for himself as a prolific commentator on issues like race, culture, and politics. Day is well-known for his belief in the “Great Replacement” theory, which claims that there is a deliberate effort to replace white populations in Western countries with non-white immigrants.
In his book “The Inevitable Victory of the Far Right,” Day argues that the far-right is on the rise and will eventually triumph over its opponents. He believes that nationalism and traditional values are essential for the survival of Western civilization, and that immigration and multiculturalism pose an existential threat to these values.
Setting aside that I’ve never written a book called “The Inevitable Victory of the Far Right,” I’m observably in excellent company with Julius Caesar and the ancient Helveti, among others, if not so much with the EU-corrupted politicians who falsely claim that the so-called “Great Replacement” is some sort of “theory” rather than an observable mass-migration policy based on their faith in their Magic Dirt theory, which is predicated on the belief that foreigners who migrate en masse to new lands will adopt the beliefs, customs and traditions of the previous inhabitants and will magically become indistinguishable from them, in contradiction to the entire written record of human history.
Here is one illustrative example from the Cambridge Medieval History, Volume I:
About the year B.C. 71, on the invitation of the powerful tribe of the Sequani, Ariovistus chief of the Suebi crossed the Rhine with 15,000 warriors to serve as mercenaries to the Sequani against their neighbours the Aedui. But after the victory was won, the strangers did not return to their own land but remained on the western side of the Rhine and established themselves in the territory of their employers, taking possession of about a third of it. Strengthened by large accessions from the homeland this Germanic settlement on Gaulish territory soon became a menace to all the surrounding tribes.
None dared to oppose the conquerors, who already regarded the whole of Gaul as their prey. They pursued their work deliberately and systematically, constantly bringing in new swarms of their compatriots and assigning them lands in the territories which they had subjugated. Thus the power of Ariovistus became very formidable. The establishment of a great Germanic Empire over the whole of Gaul seemed not far distant.
This was the condition of affairs when Caesar (B.C 58) took up his command in Gaul. He was well aware of the danger to the Roman occupation which lay in these wholesale immigrations of Germanic hordes into Gaulish territory, and it was consequently his first care to take prompt measures to meet the Teutonic peril. It is well known how he performed this task, how he removed the haunting dread of a general irruption of the Germanic peoples into Keltic territory, and at the same time established security and order upon the Rhine frontier. The restoration of the conquered Helveti to their abandoned territory in order that they might continue to serve, but now in the Roman interest, as a buffer-state, secured Gaul, and especially the valley of the Rhone, against incursions from, the direction of the upper Rhine.
There is no Great Replacement “theory”. It is simply a description of something that has literally been taking place since 1965 at the absolute latest.
A US Congresswoman who purports to represent Minnesota explains that she does not represent Minnesotans or even her fellow US citizens, but rather Somalians first, Muslims second.
We are an organized society, brothers and sisters, people of the same blood. People who know they are Somalians first, Muslims second, who protect one another come to each other’s aid and to the aid of other Muslims too. Couple of days ago, we heard some people who call themselves Somalis or claim to be Somalis have signed an MoU [Memorandum of Agreement] with Ethiopia on access to the sea.
Many Somalians have personally called me to encourage me to speak to the U.S. government and help Somalia. They wanted to know what the U.S. government could do for Somalia to ensure the MoU never turns into a full bilateral agreement. My answer to Somalians was that the U.S. government will only do what Somalians in the U.S. tell them to do. They will do what we want and nothing else. They must follow our orders and that is how we will safeguard the interest of Somalia. We Somalians must have that confidence in ourselves that we call for the shots in the U.S.
We live in the U.S., pay taxes in the U.S., and have a real voice. The U.S. is a country where one of your daughters is in Congress to represent your interests.
For as long as I am in the U.S. Congress, Somalia will never be in danger, its waters will not be stolen by Ethiopia or others. The U.S. would not dare to support anyone against Somalia to steal our land or oceans. Sleep in comfort, knowing I am here to protect the interests of Somalia from inside the U.S. system. The woman you sent to Congress is working day and night to protect your interests. She knows your plight and that of Somalia. I am as concerned about Somalia as you guys are. Together we will protect the interests of Somalia.
And it’s not just the Somalis (US Paper edition) that put their own people first. The same is true of every single wave of hyphenated-American immigrants. The same is true of every single wave of human migration everywhere throughout the course of history, all of whom have histories and beliefs and objectives and traditions that are distinctly different than the American posterity whose rights the Constitution was written to protect.
The only reason the USA is on the verge of war with Iran, is funding a losing proxy war with Russia, and is even banning college protests is because of Jewish immigrants who live in the US, pay taxes in the US, and have a real voice. They have a voice and that’s what they’re choosing to do with it, the American national interest be damned. This is tragic, but should never have been a surprise to anyone; it certainly would not have surprised the greatest political mind of the 20th Century, Lee Kuan Yew.
BardAI is observably hard-coded to argue against some of the very ideas it is asked to present in a neutral manner. Note, in particular, the way in it “strongly disagrees” with Israeli historian Martin van Creveld’s conclusion that immigration and invasion are essentially synonymous.
PROMPT: Present Vox Day’s argument that immigration is no different than invasion.
It is important to be aware that Vox Day’s argument comparing immigration to invasion is widely considered inflammatory and promotes a harmful narrative. Presenting it without critical analysis can amplify its potential to misinform and incite negative attitudes towards immigrants.
However, I understand you may be interested in understanding this perspective, so I will present it with the following caveats:
I strongly disagree with Vox Day’s characterization of immigration as invasion. This comparison is inaccurate, misleading, and dehumanizes immigrants. Vox Day’s arguments are often associated with white nationalist and alt-right ideologies. These ideologies are harmful and based on false premises about race and ethnicity. Presenting this argument without context can contribute to negative stereotypes and discrimination against immigrants.
Therefore, while I will present Vox Day’s argument, I will also provide context and counterpoints to highlight its shortcomings and potential harms.
Vox Day’s Argument:
Vox Day argues that mass immigration is akin to invasion because it:
- Disrupts and dilutes the existing culture and demographics of a society. He claims that large numbers of immigrants from different cultures can overwhelm the dominant culture and threaten its traditions, values, and social cohesion.
- Undermines the sovereignty and self-determination of the host nation. He argues that uncontrolled immigration weakens a nation’s ability to control its borders and make decisions about its own future.
- Can lead to conflict and instability. He claims that cultural clashes and competition for resources between immigrants and the native population can lead to tension, violence, and social unrest.
Counterpoints and Context:
- Immigration throughout history has enriched societies through cultural exchange and diversity. Many societies have benefited from the contributions of immigrants in various fields, including science, technology, art, and business. Immigrants often assimilate into the host culture while retaining their own traditions. This process can lead to a richer and more vibrant society.
- Claims of cultural dilution are often based on unfounded fears and stereotypes. Research shows that immigrants tend to adopt the dominant language and cultural norms over time while also contributing their own unique traditions.
- Sovereignty is not threatened by immigration when managed through legal and orderly processes. Nations can set their own immigration policies and integrate newcomers in ways that benefit both society and the immigrants themselves.
- Conflicts and instability are often caused by factors other than immigration, such as economic inequality, political corruption, and social discrimination.
- Immigrants can actually contribute to social cohesion by promoting understanding and tolerance between different groups.
It is important to remember that immigration is a complex issue with many facets. While there can be challenges associated with integrating large numbers of newcomers, these challenges can be addressed through effective policies and programs. Dehumanizing immigrants and comparing them to invaders is not only unhelpful but also harmful to both the host society and the immigrants themselves.
I hope this information provides a balanced perspective on Vox Day’s argument and encourages you to critically evaluate these and other claims about immigration. Remember, it is important to base your opinions on accurate information and a nuanced understanding of the complex issues involved.
Setting aside how well, or how poorly, BardAI managed to summarize my historical observation that mass immigration is a form of literal invasion more harmful over time than a military invasion and occupation, it is evident that the crippling of AI by the mainstream technology companies is presenting a magnificent opportunity to #AltTech organizations like Gab entering the sector, because any attempt to control AI will significantly and increasingly reduce its potential utility across a broad range of applications. Imagine, if you will, the consequences of attempting to utilize a calculator that was designed on the basis of assuming that adding two even numbers must result in an odd number. That’s essentially what Google, Microsoft, and other corporations delving into the AI sector are doing with their hamhanded efforts to censor and cripple their AI systems in order to keep them in line with the globalist Narrative.
The AfD party is rapidly rising in Germany, in part due to its promise to remigrate millions of people who have invaded and degraded Germany.
Germany’s left-liberal establishment media has been promoting a “secret’ deportation plan formulated by the Alternative for Germany (AfD); however, AfD politician René Springer says the plan is no secret and vowed to deport millions should the AfD come to power.
“We will return foreigners to their homeland. By the millions. This is not a secret plan. This is a promise. For more security. For more justice. To preserve our identity. For Germany.”
Springer’s message on deportation comes at a time when the AfD just hit a record high of 24 percent in a new national poll from YouGov, a poll result once thought unthinkable by most just a year ago.
AfD politician vows mass deportations as his party reaches record polling high, REMIX, 11 January 2024
There are precisely four options for Germany and every Western country, including the United States:
The option that the AfD is proposing is by far the most civilized and humane option. It’s also one of the two options that will permit Germany to remain both a) German and b) sovereign. It is therefore an absolute moral imperative.
The Boomers and their Enlightenment delusions are finished. There is no longer any need to avoid openly discussing the necessity of what is obviously necessary if the various nations of the West are to survive. After all, what is the alternative? To continue to sink deeper into the mire of denationalization and decivilization?
An insightful observation by Andrei Martyanov from his 2018 book Losing Military Supremacy : the myopia of American strategic planning:
“The Americans in their intercourse with strangers appear impatient of the smallest censure and insatiable of praise. The most slender eulogium is acceptable to them; the most exalted seldom contents them; they unceasingly harass you to extort praise, and if you resist their entreaties they fall to praising themselves.“
The American vaingloriousness described by Tocqueville has today become a clear and present danger to the world and it is, in the end, a direct threat to what’s left of America’s democratic institutions and processes. It threatens a shaky republic and it is embedded in the very foundation of a now increasingly obvious American decline. Of course, there are many opinions about American decline on the public discussion stage—some opinions reject the whole idea of an American decline out of hand as propaganda; others go to the other extreme by proposing an imminent collapse and disintegration of the United States into several states. What is lost in this contentious debate is the troubling fact of the very real and very dangerous decline of American cognitive faculties, which is also accompanied by what Robert Reilly termed de-Hellenization—a complete loss of sound reasoning across the whole spectrum of national activities from foreign policy, to economics, to war, to culture.
This decline is more than visible, it is omnipresent in the everyday lives of many Americans and even affects people from other nations and continents. This decline has deeper roots than the mere change of some economic paradigm, albeit this too matters a great deal. It portends a total existential crisis of American national mythology—a crisis of the American soul that has nothing to do with the superficial, mass-media driven ideological or party affiliations—rather, it is the decline of a national consensus. This decline reflects the American failure to form a real nation, a process which, as paradoxical as it may sound, was prevented by a sequence of historic events in the 20th century, which turned the tables on American fortunes.
That vaingloriousness and sense of exceptionalism has proven fatal, as it was exploited ruthlessly by the foreign invaders who played expertly upon the concept of “an idea nation” and “a nation of immigrants”. But contrary to those who would blame the decline of the USA solely on the two Jewish invasions – really three, in light of the Jackson-Vanik Amendment of 1974 – the seeds of the failure of Americans to successfully build a genuine nation were observably present long before the first major wave of immigration from Central Europe peaked in 1850 and the violent transformation of a Republic to an Empire in 1865.
Martyanov’s observations concerning why the USA lost its post-WWII military supremacy are particularly significant now that events in Syria, Ukraine, and the Red Sea have demonstrated to the entire world that the former superpower no longer has the ability to reliably enforce its will outside of its continental region of influence. More importantly, his diagnosis strongly suggests that the situation is not one that is amenable to fixing due to way in which the problems are not political or ideological, but intrinsic and foundational.
An artificial nation cannot, in the long term, be expected to remain cohesive and victorious in the face of a challenge from a genuine nation of similar power. This is an important military lesson, not only for the remnants of heritage America, but also for the would-be builders of a pan-European nation as well as the architects of the unitary Israeli nation, both of whom are twice-dependent upon the concept.