It’s fascinating to observe how we’re learning how fake modern scientage is, how misleading modern scientistry is, and how at the same time we’re learning more about genuine human history than ever before thanks to the relentless application of curiosity and technology. Because the truth, most of which is still undiscovered, is far more strange and complicated than the nonsensical modern narrative would have it.
Scientists who revealed an underground ‘hidden city’ in Egypt have announced the discovery of a second city they say ‘proves’ the existence of a massive subterranean complex linking the Giza pyramids 2,000 feet beneath the surface.
The newly-discovered shafts and chambers could rewrite history if confirmed to be true.
The team of Italian researchers first claimed to have uncovered vast underground structures below the Khafre pyramid in March, igniting fierce backlash from mainstream archaeologists who called the findings ‘false’ and lacking scientific basis.
Famed archaeologist Dr Zahi Hawass is the team’s biggest critic, saying it is impossible for the ground-penetrating radar to see thousands of feet below the surface.
Undeterred by the scrutiny, the team has now reportedly detected similar shafts beneath the Pyramid of Menkaure, the smallest of the three main pyramids at Giza, months after their initial findings below Khafre.
The Giza complex, west of Cairo, includes the pyramids of Khufu, Khafre, and Menkaure, along with the Great Sphinx. All shrouded in mystery due to their unclear construction methods, precise astronomical alignment, and still-debated purpose.
Filippo Biondi, a radar expert from University of Strathclyde in Scotland and co-author of the research, told the Daily Mail that their data shows a 90 percent probability that the Menkaure shares the same pillars as Khafre.
The team arrived at the probability ‘through objective analysis of the tomography data, which, as experimental measurements, strongly indicate that the structures we identified beneath Khafre are also present under Menkaure.’
‘We firmly believe that the Giza structures are interconnected, reinforcing our view that the pyramids are merely the tip of the iceberg of a colossal underground infrastructural complex,’ Biondi said.
Note in particular the “fierce backlash” from archeologists as well as the appeal to their magic “Science”. This is downright comical because archeology doesn’t involve scientody at all; they don’t do experiments, there is no reproducing their nonexistent experiments, and their field doesn’t even properly merit being described as a science at all.
If archeology is “science” then so is cleaning your room.
Aside from defending their fictional narratives about the past and desperately trying to shore up the shattered remnants of the false theory about evolution, what is the point of crying Science about what is a straightforward claim about an observation of existing objects? There is no need for anyone to express an opinion when the Egyptian authorities can simply dig a hole and see if the perceived structures are actually there.
As Mr. Gioia observed, the entire structure of the modernist narrative is collapsing. It is so fragile now that one simple discovery of a past civilization will be sufficient to finish it off, which may explain the instinctively frantic denials on the part of the mainstream archeologists.
