Category: Uncategorized

Identity trumps ideology

Being anti-facist, anti-racist, and pro-diversity won’t save you if you’re white, as a French writer discovered last weekend.

Writer Ghislain Gilberti and his son were savagely attacked on Saturday by a group of men shouting “filthy white”, seemingly Islamists enraged by one of his novels, police in France have heard.

Mr Gilbert and his 12-year-old son were attacked in Belfort, France on Saturday following harassment and attempted break-ins. Though an active antifascist, the writer and his family have received death threats from Salafists displeased that the prologue title of the novelist’s bestseller is “jihad”.

Police are investigating after Mr Gilberti was taken to hospital with a broken arm by firemen, following a reported street attack by Salafist Muslims. Mr Gilberti said he received blows to his back before being called a “filthy white” by four men aged between 20 and 30 years, who held him down while attacking.

The author reported the men also kicked his 12-year-old son in the head and stomach, shouting “it’s the same price for you” and “we don’t forgive, we don’t forget” at his 11-year-old daughter who was also present.

The thriller novelist lost consciousness during the beating and, following the attack, will again request full police protection, Mr Gilberti’s publisher broadcast on Facebook.

It appears even their strategy of being eaten last by the crocodile is a failure. Remember, identity > culture > politics.

If the New French are willing to attack a 12-year-old boy, don’t think they won’t attack you.

Not-White, anti-Right, forever

Tom Teicholz rebukes Dennis Prager’s appeal to conservatism and explains why Jews will always be self-appointed enemies to the Alt-Right, to conservatives, and to and the interests of America and the European nations in the Jewish Journal:

Jews will always believe Black Lives matter because Jews do not think of themselves as “White People.” You have but to walk down a street in Tel Aviv to see the multiplicity of Jewish skin colors. You have but to live as a Jew in any time in history, in any country including the United States, to recognize we are not the White People – we were not the White People allowed into certain clubs, schools, neighborhoods for most of American history. We are not the people rallying for “white people’s rights.” As Ta-Nehisi Coates has written more eloquently that I ever will, “Our notion of what constitutes “white” and what constitutes “black” is a product of social context.”

Dennis Prager makes much of how the Left has often betrayed Jews. He is not wrong about that. But he is wrong in thinking that means Jews should stop supporting the causes of the Left. Consider the alternative: How have Jews fared under the right? Far worse. In Egypt, or under the Greeks and Romans, in Spain and Portugal under the Inquisition, in Europe during the Reformation, in France at the time of Dreyfus, or in Hitler’s Germany or his Reichlands. Consider the fate of Jewish lives under right wing governments in Hungary or Poland – are they better off than they were under Leftist regimes? One can even ask, as members of the Israeli Knesset have, whether more Israelis have died as a result of the policies of the current right-wing Likud government than in those years when Labor was in power (they have).

Leonard Bernstein was ridiculed for hosting a party for the Black Panthers. But Bernstein’s compassion and sense of Justice led him to lead the Palestine Symphony Orchestra in 1947 and as it became the Israel Philharmonic in Beersheba in November 1948 and almost every year of his life. His heart was large, his passion great and he was not wrong to support the cause of Black Pride and African American self-empowerment, even if its leaders had not so great a heart as his.

Jews will always agitate for and support causes of the Left, because we are commanded to be a beacon unto others and to see social activism and seeking Justice, Tikkun Olam and Tzedaka, as part of the Jewish DNA.

The next time someone claims that the Right, whether Alt-Right or some other variety, is antisemitic and Holocaust, it should prove useful to observe that, in their own words:

  • “All the non-Jews that you see all around the world, the billions, they exist just for the Jew’s benefit.”
  • “Jews will always agitate for and support causes of the Left.”

Now, which of those statements do you not oppose? Are you down with both of them?

Before anyone produces the expected NAJALT argument, I should first be very interested to learn why you are intent on playing defense attorney HERE on behalf of those with whom you supposedly disagree rather than actively opposing those making such statements THERE.

And furthermore, as I pointed out to one Jewish gentleman on Twitter, one can expect the Alt-Right to stop quoting living Jews concerning their beliefs and objectives at about the same time that the opponents of the Alt-Right stop calling us Nazis, racists, and anti-semites. We are not conservatives. We do not hesitate to use the other side’s tactics. See: Point 12.

Some say that makes us SJWs. Does it make us Jews as well?

As he responded, “I can’t fault the alt-right for lumping all Jews in with our worst crazies when so many Jews do the same to Whites.”

I can live with this

Sam Bradford is observably the best passer the Vikings have had since Bret Farve’s One Bright Season. I suspect he will prove better than Teddy Bridgewater, having seen every pass the latter has thrown in a game since he entered the league. Bradford doesn’t have the strongest arm, but he hits crossing receivers in stride and he can deliver an accurate ball even when he’s under pressure.

I would not be at all surprised if Bradford started the game against Tennessee next weekend, since Norv Turner has a history of preparing newly acquired quarterbacks quickly. Besides, how hard can it be for an NFL starter to learn the Shaun Hill gameplan?

  • First down: hand off to AD
  • Second down: hand off to AD
  • Third down: fake handoff to AD, play-action route to a) Stefon Diggs or b) Kyle Rudolph
  • Repeat if SUM(1D:3D) is greater than 10 yards. If SUM(1D:3D) is less than 10 yards, punt

The prophecy of Silverberg

The media-politico complex is deeply, deeply concerned about people being provided any reason to trust their own eyes regarding Hillary Clinton’s health, which is why Dr. Drew appears to have some concerns about his own:

Dr. Drew Pinsky is so afraid of Hillary Clinton and her supporters, he won’t blame them for the cancellation of his show on HLN, the sister channel of CNN.

“No, no, no. I just want them to go away!” he told one friend.

“Dr. Drew” was canceled eight days after Pinsky discussed Clinton’s health on a radio show, saying he was “gravely concerned not just about her health, but her health care.”

“CNN is so supportive of Clinton, network honchos acted like the Mafia when confronting Drew,” a source told me. “First, they demanded he retract his comments, but he wouldn’t.”

What followed was a series of nasty phone calls and e-mails. “It was downright scary and creepy,” a source close to Pinsky said.

The Clinton campaign increasingly reminds me of Robert Silverberg’s Majipoor Chronicles, in which it is revealed that the ruler of the massive planet, the Pontifex, is a comatose elderly man whose life is being artificially sustained by technology, while the Coronal, ostensibly his vice-executive, rules publicly in his place.

Seriously, though, what are they going to do for the next four years if Hillary somehow avoids the coming Trumpslide and actually wins the election? They can barely wheel her out in public once every few weeks as it is.

Amazon is hard

alexvdl of File 770 is having a hard time figuring out how Castalia House publishes Nick Cole’s excellent Dragon Award-winning novel Ctrl-Alt-Revolt!.

Also of note is that, Ctrl-Alt-Revolt is the prequel to a book published by Harper Voyager. Although it’s listed as “Castalia House” on the ballot, the book was written for Harper, and then they declined it, and the author then complained of censorship and self-published it. If it’s published by CH then someone should mention that to Amazon, as it certainly doesn’t have that imprimatur there.

Really? It doesn’t? Meanwhile, the Injustice Gamer chronicles the feelbadz of the SF-SJWs.

As we announced on the day the Dragon Award finalists were made public, we publish the hardcover and paperback editions of Mr. Cole’s excellent, award-winning novel. Because Mr. Cole was already self-publishing the Kindle and Audiobook editions, we saw no need to do so ourselves. We will be publishing the sequel, which will be called Ctrl-Alt-Replay!, in all four editions next year, as well as other books by Mr. Cole, who is rapidly becoming a favorite among the readers of Castalia House.

As for the idea that Castalia is a vanity press, I will merely note that it now publishes 58 books in as many as four editions each. It has not yet published a single book by me in 2016. The next five NEW releases it will publish in September and October are:


Alien Game by Rod Walker
Feast of the Elfs by John C. Wright
Nine Laws of Power by Ivan Throne
Six Expressions of Death by Mojo Mori
An Equation of Almost Infinite Complexity by J. Mulrooney

We will also soon be publishing the following five books in hardcover and paperback editions:

Iron Chamber of Memory by John C. Wright
The End of the World as We Knew It by Nick Cole
Back From the Dead by Rolf Nelson
Gorilla Mindset by Mike Cernovich
The Eden Plague by David VanDyke

Various audiobooks are also forthcoming, as well as print editions of SJWAL in Spanish and Portuguese.

The Russians aren’t coming

The Saker explains that Russia wouldn’t take Ukraine even if it could do so without firing a shot:

Russia is much weaker than what most people think. Her landmass is immense and her military arguably the best on the planet, but population is relatively small, and her economy a struggling one. Yes, the future does look bright for Russia, but presently she simply does not have the means to single handedly rescue (resurrect, really) the Ukraine. Not even close.

The reality is that even Crimea has presented Russia with major challenges. After 25 years of total neglect, Crimea basically needs to completely rebuilt most of its infrastructure. The Kremlin has poured billions of Rubles into numerous and large modernization programs, including an immensely expensive but vitally needed bridge over the Kerch strait, and she will continue to rebuilt Crimea in spite of the immense costs involved. Down the road, of course, Crimea will end up being very wealthy, courtesy of an immense tourist potential, the presence of a much expanded Black Sea fleet and because of its strategic location. But for the foreseeable future, Crimea will remain a major burden which Russia will struggle to deal with.

The situation in the Donbass is even bleaker. If Crimean was neglected, the Donbass has been almost totally destroyed. Right now the Russians are paying the pensions of the local population because the Ukronazis have stolen them, in direct violation of the Minsk Agreements. Russia is also alone in supporting the Novorussian republics with humanitarian, medical, technical, administrative and military programs. And while the Novorussians have done an amazing job rebuilding much of Donetsk and a few other cities, most of what lies within artillery range of the Ukronazi forces still lies in ruins and the economy is more or less at a standstill. This will not change until peace truly returns to the region.

What is already quite evident that regardless of who will be in the Kremlin and regardless of how much good will and self-sacrifice the Russians will have, Russia simply does not have the means to salvage the Ukraine. It just ain’t happening. Furthermore, polls show that most Russians are categorically opposed to a full reintegration of the entire Ukraine into Russia. Who could blame them? They are not only acutely aware that the Ukraine has turned into one bloody hell of a mess, but that an entire generation of Ukrainians has now been terminally brainwashed with russophobic hatred. And, frankly, Russia has no use for Nazis of any kind, even if they are fellow Slavs or even if they are basically the very same nation as the Russian one.

So even if tomorrow Petro Poroshenko and his gang decided to invite the Russians to come in an fix this bloody mess, the Russians would decline (so much for the warnings about a Russian invasion!). Oh sure, there are a lot of Ukrainians who kid themselves and think that “the Russians will come and fix this”, but this is a pipe-dream: the Russians ain’t coming. At most, Russia will let the DNR/LNR get back the territories which belonged to their regions and Mariupol might be liberated. But that’s about it. And even if by some miracle the Novorussian tanks end up in Kiev, I don’t see them staying there for very long because the Kremlin fully understands that if they grab it, they own it and they have to fix it. Eventually Russia will, of course, simply be forced absorb the Donbass and make it a part of Russia, mostly because there is no way the Donbass will ever go back to the Ukraine again, but even this process will take time.

So, why is the Obama administration beating the drum about a Russian invasion of a) Ukraine, b) the Baltic States, and c) Western Europe? Because the USA is doing what it has often done before, attempting to cover its own aggressive actions by portraying them as necessary defensive ones.

However, the fact that it is US troops that occupy dozens of other countries, and that it was the US that overthrew the elected Ukrainian government makes it very clear that while the Russians are not the good guys, the US, and to a lesser extent the EU, are the bad guys of the scenario.

And believe me, none of this has escaped the attention of the people of both Eastern and Western Europe. Putin and the Russians may not be on their side, but unlike the USA and the EU, they are not actively encouraging and enabling the one-million-strong invasion of Europe by warriors of Islam.

Congratulations, Dragon Award winners!

I’m very pleased to report that Somewhither, by John C. Wright, has been awarded the inaugural Best Science Fiction Novel at Dragoncon.

And I am equally happy to be able to say that Ctrl-Alt-Revolt! by Nick Cole, has been awarded Best Apocalyptic Novel.

Congratulations are also due to Larry Correia, whose Son of the Black Sword was a well-merited Best Fantasy Novel winner, and to Castalia author-to-be Brien Niemeier, who won Best Horror Novel  for Souldancer.

The 2016 Dragon Award winners:

Best Science Fiction Novel
Somewhither: A Tale of the Unwithering Realm, John C. Wright (Castalia House)

Best Fantasy Novel
Son of the Black Sword, Larry Correia (Baen)

Best Young Adult / Middle Grade Novel
The Shepherd’s Crown, Terry Pratchett (Harper)

Best Military Science Fiction or Fantasy Novel
Hell’s Foundations Quiver, David Weber (Tor)

Best Alternate History Novel
League of Dragons, Naomi Novik (Del Rey)

Best Apocalyptic Novel
Ctrl Alt Revolt!, Nick Cole (Castalia House)

Best Horror Novel
Souldancer, Brian Niemeier (Self-published)

Best Comic Book
Ms. Marvel

Best Graphic Novel
The Sandman: Overture, Neil Gaiman & J.H. Williams III (Vertigo)

Best Science Fiction or Fantasy TV Series
Game of Thrones

Best Science Fiction or Fantasy Movie
The Martian

Best Science Fiction or Fantasy PC / Console Game
Fallout 4 by Bethesda Softworks

Best Science Fiction or Fantasy Mobile Game
Fallout Shelter by Bethesda Softworks

Best Science Fiction or Fantasy Board Game
Pandemic: Legacy by ZMan Games

Best Science Fiction or Fantasy Miniatures / Collectible Card / Role-Playing Game
Call of Cthulhu Roleplaying Game (7th Edition) by Chaosium Inc.

Action (((Reaction)))

Action: It is our duty to preserve our nations for our children.


(((Reaction))): redefine “preserve”, “nation” and “children”.

What most Americans don’t realize is that (((globalist propagandists))) are now pushing the same deceitful game of redefinition in their attack on the nations of Europe that they successfully pushed in the United States in the 20th century.

But even the dumbest, most maleducated and historically ignorant American, who blithely accepts the idea that George Washington, Alexander Hamilton, and Benjamin Franklin believed their posterity to consist of Bantu tribesmen, cannibals from Papua New Guinea, and Chinamen in founding “a nation of immigrants”, will tend to raise his eyebrows in befuddlement at new and outlandish claims about “Britain is a nation of immigrants”, “the Judeo-Christian identity of the Swedish nation” and “all nations are nations of immigrants”.

I cannot stress this enough. All four of the following phrases are ahistorical lies, and moreover, they are lies that are now being recycled to attack Europe in the same way they were used to destroy the genuine historical concept of the American nation.

  • The melting pot
  • A proposition nation
  • A nation of immigrants
  • Judeo-Christian values
  • “all men are created equal” means “everyone is an American”
And the European nationalists all know it too.



“If we could just get our definitions straight I’m sure we’d find we actually AGREE on the important points”
– Saint Cuck the First

La Derecha Alternativa: 16 Puntos

  1. La Derecha Alternativa pertenece a la derecha política tanto en el sentido europeo como en el americano. Los socialistas no son Derecha Alternativa. Los progresistas no son Derecha Alternativa. Los liberales no son Derecha Alternativa. Los comunistas, los marxistas, los marxistas culturales y los neocons no son Derecha Alternativa.
  2. La Derecha Alternativa es una ALTERNATIVA  al conservadurismo tradicional norteamericano, cuyos principios fueron sintetizados por Russel Kirk en sus 10 principios conservadores, y que en realidad ha terminado por degenerar en progresismo. También es una alternativa al liberalismo. 
  3. La Derecha Alternativa no es una actitud defensiva y rechaza el concepto de la derrota noble y civilizada.  Es, antes bien, una filosofía ambiciosa y a la ofensiva, en todos los sentidos del término. La Derecha Alternativa cree en la victoria a través de la tenacidad y en la necesidad de estar en armonía con la ciencia, la realidad, la tradición cultural y las lecciones de la Historia. 
  4. La Derecha Alternativa cree en la Civilización Occidental como el culmen del logro humano y defiende sus tres pilares fundacionales: el Cristianismo, las naciones europeas y el legado grecorromano. 
  5. La Derecha Alternativa es abierta y reconocidamente nacionalista. Apoya todos los nacionalismos y el derecho de las naciones a existir, conservando su homogeneidad e inadulteradas por invasiones extranjeras y la inmigración. 
  6. La Derecha Alternativa es anti-globalista. Se opone a todos aquellos grupos inspirados por ideales y objetivos globalistas. 
  7. La Derecha Alternativa es anti-igualitaria. Rechaza la idea de la igualdad por la misma razón que rechaza los unicornios o los duendes, a la vista de que la igualdad humana no existe en ninguna forma observable, sea científica, legal, material, intelectual, sexual o espiritual. 
  8. La Derecha Alternativa cree en el método científico. Acepta en principio las conclusiones presentes del método científico, al mismo tiempo que entiende que a), estas conclusiones están sujetas a futuras revisiones, b) que la ciencia no es inmune a la corrupción, y c) que el así llamado consenso científico no está fundamentado en el método científico, sino en la democracia, y es en consecuencia intrínsecamente anti-científico. 
  9. La Derecha Alternativa cree que Identidad > Cultura > política.
  10. La Derecha Alternativa se opone al gobierno o dominación de cualquier grupo étnico sobre otro, particularmente en los territorios soberanos de los pueblos dominados. La Derecha Alternativa se opone a la posibilidad de que cualquier grupo étnico no nativo ejerza una influencia excesiva en una cierta sociedad a través del nepotismo, el tribalismo o cualquier otro medio.
  11. La Derecha Alternativa entiende que diversidad + proximidad = guerra.
  12. A la Derecha Alternativa no le importa lo que pienses de ella.
  13. La Derecha Alternativa rechaza el libre comercio internacional y el libre movimiento de personas que el libre comercio internacional exige. Los beneficios del libre comercio intranacional no constituyen una prueba válida de los beneficios del libre comercio internacional.
  14. La Derecha Alternativa defiende el deber de asegurar la existencia de los pueblos blancos y un futuro para los niños blancos. 
  15. La Derecha Alternativa no cree en la supremacía general de ninguna raza, nación, pueblo o subespecie. Toda raza, nación, pueblo o subespecie humana es única en sus fortalezas y sus debilidades y posee el derecho inalienable a habitar, libre de intromisiones, en aquella cultura nativa de su preferencia.
  16. La Derecha Alternativa es una filosofía que aprecia en gran medida la paz entre las naciones del mundo y rechaza la guerra como herramienta para imponer los valores de una nación a otra, así como cualquier esfuerzo para exterminar naciones individuales a través de la guerra, el genocidio, la inmigración o la asimilación genética.

La Derecha Alternativa es una ideología occidental que cree en la ciencia, la historia y el derecho de una nación genética a existir y gobernarse a sí misma en aras de sus propios intereses.

L’alt-droite: 16 points

  1. L’alt-droite se situe à la droite politique aux sens américain et européen de cette expression. Les socialistes ne sont pas de l’alt-droite. Les progressistes ne sont pas de l’alt-droite. Les libéraux ne sont pas de l’alt-droite. Les communistes, les marxistes, les marxiens, les marxistes culturels et les néo-conservateurs ne sont pas de l’alt-droite.
  2. L’alt-droite est une alternative au conservatisme traditionnel des Etats-Unis décrit en théorie par les dix principes conservateurs de Russel Kirk, mais qui s’est finalement transformé en progressisme. C’est aussi une alternative au libertarianisme.
  3. L’alt-droite n’est pas une attitude défensive et rejette le concept d’une défaite noble et de principe. C’est une philosophie anticipatrice d’attaque, dans tous les sens de ce terme. L’alt-droite croit en la victoire par la persévérance tout en demeurant en harmonie avec la science, la réalité, les traditions culturelles et les enseignements tirés de l’histoire.
  4. L’alt-droite croit que l’Occident est le plus grand accomplissement de l’humanité et supporte ses trois piliers fondateurs: le christianisme, les nations européennes et l’héritage gréco-romain.
  5. L’alt-droite est ouvertement, et de son propre aveu, nationaliste. Elle supporte toutes les formes de nationalisme, ainsi que le droit de toute nation à une existence homogène et sans altération par l’invasion étrangère et l’immigration.
  6. L’alt-droite est anti-mondialiste. Elle s’oppose aux groupes travaillant avec des idéaux et/ou des objectifs mondialistes.
  7. L’alt-droite est anti-égalitariste. Elle rejette le concept d’égalité pour la même raison qu’elle rejette l’existence des licornes et des farfadets, en pointant le fait qu’aucune forme observable scientifique, légale, matérielle, intellectuelle, sexuelle ou spirituelle ne démontre l’existence de l’égalité entres les humains.
  8. L’alt-droite est “scientodifique”. Elle accepte par inférence les présentes conclusions de la méthode scientifique (i.e. “scientodie”) tout en comprenant que: a) ces conclusions sont sujettes à une révision future; b) la “scientisterie” (i.e. la profession de la science) est sensible à la corruption; c) le soit-disant consensus scientifique n’est aucunement basé sur la scientodie, mais plutôt sur la démocratie, ce qui le rend non-scientifique de manière intrinsèque.
  9. L’alt-droite croit que l’identité > la culture > la politique.
  10. L’alt-droite s’oppose à la domination d’un groupe ethnique indigène par un autre groupe ethnique, en particulier sur les terres souveraines des peuples dominés. L’alt-droite s’oppose à l’idée qu’un groupe ethnique étranger puisse obtenir une influence excessive dans n’importe quelle société en employant le népotisme, le tribalisme ou tout autre moyen.
  11. L’alt-droite comprend que la diversité + la proximité = la guerre.
  12. L’alt-droite se fiche de ce que les autres pensent d’elle.
  13. L’alt-droite rejette le libre-échange international, ainsi que la liberté de circulation requise par le libre-échange. Les bénéfices d’un libre-échange intranational n’est pas une évidence qui puisse être utilisée afin de démontrer les bénéfices d’un libre-échange international.
  14. L’alt-droite croit que l’existence des individus blancs et le futur des enfants blancs doivent tout deux être protégés.
  15. L’alt-droite ne croit pas à la supériorité générale d’une race, d’une nation, d’un peuple ou d’une sous-espèce. Chaque race, nation, peuple et sous-espèce a ses forces et faiblesses uniques, et possède le droit souverain d’habiter la culture natale qu’elle préfère sans être maltraitée.
  16. L’alt-droite est une philosophie qui attache une importance à la paix entre les différentes nations du monde. Elle s’oppose aux guerre qui ont pour but d’imposer les valeurs d’une nation sur une autre, ainsi qu’aux mouvements qui cherchent à exterminer les nations individuelles par le génocide, l’immigration, ou l’assimilation génétique.

TL;PL L’alt-droite est une idéologie du monde occidental qui croit en la science, l’histoire, la réalité et au droit d’une nation génétique d’exister et de se gouverner afin de protéger ses propres intérêts.