In which we are delighted to be done

Finally, at long last, I can announce that Summa Elvetica is complete. It will be available for order soon as one of the three launch titles from Marcher Lord Press. To tide over those who happen to be interested, here’s a bit from the author’s note that was requested by the publisher:

This novel did not proceed according to plan. It was originally conceived as an epic philosophical trilogy, in which the reader would be immersed in medieval scholastic thought and explore various facets of some of the great philosophical debates that took place both within and without the Catholic Church. Misunderstood by most modern intellectuals and ignored by the irreligious authors of modern fantasy fiction, the great scholars of the church were no close-minded ideologues, but rather brilliant men who conceived and refined many of the rational mechanisms that we today take for granted. It is not a coincidence that William of Ockham, author of the Summa Logicae and known for the logical principle that bears his name, was a Franciscan monk.

While the logic of churchmen such as William of Ockham, Aurelius Augustinus Hipponensis, and Thomas Aquinas most certainly has its flaws, the fair-minded reader must admit that their philosophical methods, however alien they may appear to modern eyes, are rather more reasonable and straighforward than the shamelessly manipulative Socratic method made famous by Plato. Unfortunately, my initial goal of assigning roles for the diverse schools of philosophical thought to each of the conventional fantasy races foundered on my inability to meaningfully connect it to the story of the prospective young priest travelling to the elflands.

I note in passing that two books in one year tends to somewhat belie the Original Cyberpunk’s contention that blogging is bad for your writing. In the OC’s defense, he only referred to fiction writing, and furthermore, my career as a novelist is about as close to nonexistent as a writer whose books are regularly published can be. I’m not complaining. I primarily write for my own entertainment and there is almost no way that a novel like Summa Elvetica would ever get published by any large publisher, be they mainstream, genre, or CBA, even if I was a much more talented writer.

I’ve renounced any thought of embarking on a new fiction project anytime soon, but that doesn’t mean I can’t revel in my favorite part of the process, namely, thinking about what I might write next. I’m interested to know what people here might favor, with the usual caveat that I won’t hesitate to ignore even a unanimous consensus. I have a few ideas. I could complete David the Hero, the first book in the Chronicles of King David. I have an idea for an Internet fiction project similar to the OC’s Weres Anonymous, sort of an outrageously violent, darkly humorous take on the Harry Potter thing. That, however, would require about five reliable co-writers able to contribute on a weekly basis, which my experience with open source projects informs me is improbable. It would also greatly benefit from the OC’s involvement, which is even less likely given his commitments. The thought of writing a parody of Lord of the Rings has occurred to me, not a silly and flatulent Bored of the Rings-style one, but rather a politically correct one which shows Sauron to be the equalitarian, trans-gendered champion of the racially oppressed and differently abled peoples of Middle Earth. But that’s probably been done to death already. One SF/F publisher was also interested in a serious military take on dragons, probably due to the success of the Novik novels, which I like but have very little in common with my particular concept. And then, there’s this great idea for a strong, independent woman torn between her love for a vampire prince and a werewolf chieftan….

Anyhow, there’s no need to decide anything now, so I shall merely take my time luxuriating in the writer’s favorite occupation of kicking around ideas, pretending to do research, and not doing any actual writing. In the meantime, we can also start thinking about the topic of the next Voxiversity. Whilst I have the Landmark Herodotus, it is right out for number two. Feel free to throw in your suggestions.


Obamanation loses it

The usually deliberate John Scalzi is beginning to show some signs of electoral stress himself:

It’s entirely possible that McCain campaign will benefit from a critical mass of people — and not just dyed-in-the-wool, will-vote-Satan-into-office-if-he-wears-a-flag-pin Republicans — who have been primed by years of intentional and structural undermining of the legitimacy of fact, to accept bald-faced lying as just another tactic; people, in other words, who know that they are being lied to, know the lies are being repeated in the face of factual evidence, and know the campaign knows it is lying and plans to continue to do so all the way to the White House… and see that sort of stance as admirable. Can you blame McCain for taking advantage of this dynamic? Well, quite obviously, you can, and should. It’s one thing to imagine one’s self a “maverick” for speaking truth to power; it’s quite another thing to be a “maverick” by deciding to lie one’s way into power. However, it’s also amply clear that many who should blame him, or would be outraged by Obama lying in such a transparent and recurrent fashion, won’t.

Setting aside the amusing notion that any Democrat other than Walter Mondale has ever told anything even remotely approaching the truth about their governing intentions, in my opinion Mr. Scalzi is too close to his favored candidate and it’s shredding his ability to analyze the election properly. McCain’s campaign is lying, as politicians do, but the lies are minor and they mostly involve exaggerations of the facts. If McCain were to tell whoppers – such as posing as a champion of ending illegal immigration or free speech – he’d suffer badly. He’s keeping it within the rules of the game.

Barack Obama, on the other hand, is lying about who he is and he has been lying about who he is from the very beginning, even in his own autobiography. The man is obnoxious, a near-complete fraud, and many people sense that and dislike him; he can tell the absolute truth for the rest of the campaign and it will make no difference at all. The fact that his campaign is run by strategists who think they’re still running in a Democratic primary hasn’t helped him.

Does this mean the electorate is stupid? Of course it does, most people are idiots. Most people at Whatever are idiots too, functionally if not literally. I mean, those who are still in denial about Liberal Media Bias may as well sign up for the Flat Earth Society and the Holocaust Deniers League while they’re at it.

I understand why Democrats are furious to the point of hysteria. They absolutely should win this election in a landslide and if they had nominated Hillary, they would have. But they didn’t. Instead they unwisely nominated a smooth self-promoter who is so hopelessly amateurish that he can’t even attack a Republican president presiding over the worst financial meltdown in the country’s history. Obama fans had better get used to the notion that he’s going to lose, since he’s probably going to lose worse than people thought McCain would a month ago. Remember, those who say he’s still a winner are the same folks who said Palin was a terrible choice by McCain that would blow up in Republican faces.

But Democrats should be consoled by the fact that it doesn’t matter who wins since Bernanke is going to be calling the shots anyhow. The economic meltdown will continue, Republicans will bear the blame, and Hillary can ascend the Cherry Blossom Throne four years later than scheduled, just in time to reap the rewards of a economic bounce-back.


Help a sister out

Brooke from Rachel’s blog requires assistance of the sort that the Ilk are generally well-qualified to give. Anyone live near her and willing? Cookies are promised!

RW Donn said: For those of you who DON’T own guns . . . WHY?!!?!?!?!!!?????

Brooke Says: Because I have never had anyone to take me out shooting, as I consider having a gun to be much like a car – you should have someone show you what to do. So if anyone in Phoenix who is a gun owner would like to take me to the range and show me some basics, dinner is most definitely on me, and I’ll assuredly throw in some cookies or something.

You know, I’ll be just a little disappointed if someone lives near her and Nate and Jac don’t have to ride out there and do it themselves.


AMF

If this wasn’t going to eventually cause so many decent people so much pain, I’d be tempted to uncork some champagne this morning. Wall Street’s wrinkled whores are finally dying of their financial STDs.

Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., the fourth-largest U.S. investment bank, succumbed to the subprime mortgage crisis it helped create in the biggest bankruptcy filing in history.

The 158-year-old firm, which survived railroad bankruptcies of the 1800s, the Great Depression in the 1930s and the collapse of Long-Term Capital Management a decade ago, filed a Chapter 11 petition with U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Manhattan today. The collapse of Lehman, which listed more than $613 billion of debt, dwarves WorldCom Inc.’s insolvency in 2002 and Drexel Burnham Lambert’s failure in 1990.

This isn’t a failure of free market capitalism. It’s precisely the opposite, it’s the failure of government-controlled faux market capitalism. The lesson, as always, is that debt is a lethal, fast-moving, corporate cancer. Leverage lets you make money fast, and it will finish you off even faster when – not if – you make a bad bet.


It means game over

Rod Dreher is attempting to understand the significance of the mortgage guarantees and the incipient Lehman bankruptcy:

Coming just a week after the government took control of mortgage lenders Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the magnitude of the industry’s reshaping is staggering: two of the most powerful firms on Wall Street, Merrill Lynch and Lehman, will disappear.

I have no idea what this means. Ye who do — Pyrrho, I’m looking at you — please explain what we have to look forward to.

This means that most, if not all, private equity in America will be destroyed, on average. If you own your house without a mortgage, you’ll be fine, you just won’t be as paper-wealthy as before. If you have a mortgage that is more than 50 percent of the current “value” of your house, you will probably find yourself underwater and will become a likely candidate for foreclosure. I was having drinks with Passport last night and the numbers he mentioned are truly incredible; even with the small decline in housing prices thus far, around 10 percent of mortgages are already underwater.

The logical conclusion is that all of the gains that came from an increase in housing “wealth” over the last 10-20 years will be eliminated. Those businesses that depended on leveraging that “wealth” will also fail. When the Fed finally gives up trying to literally paper over the gap by printing money – a bizarre idea of the disease somehow providing the cure – it will begin to raise interest rates which should eventually get to 20 percent or more. This will be good for those few who are productive and/or liquid, and very difficult for those who need to borrow. Basically, it will either be akin to the 70’s or the 30’s, and the latter is probably more likely now since the Fed and the Bush administration have significantly exacerbated what was already an obvious problem five years ago.

Games, books, and other stay-at-home products which have a low $/hr rate should do relatively well, travel, restaurant and luxury businesses will go under, as they are already doing in the UK. Crime and religion will see significant growth, skirts will get longer, and sadly, this likely means the end of the booty short. [A moment of silence, please….] There will be more war, more government restrictions on liberty, and eventually a Hispanic-led secessionist movement in the American southwest as immigration is first restricted and the expulsions finally begin. The crisis will simmer until it boils over in 10-15 years when the babyboomers can no longer work and they react in their customary political and totally self-obsessed manner. In the end, the proposed solution will be the North American Union and a transnational currency to replace the defunct dollar.

Basically, it’s now time to quit spending lots of money, to seek out secondary and tertiary streams of income and to pay close attention to the financial strength of your bank. Wealth preservation, not growth, is now the key. Here’s a vivid chart from Lombard Street Research which shows that the post-FNMA guarantee US public debt situation is so bad, it’s already approaching the famously dysfunctional Italian levels. And remember, it’s only going to get worse with each new guarantee, bailout, entitlement program, and interest rate increase.


Short answer: no

Whoopi Goldberg confirms everything everyone has ever imagined about the intelligence of liberal America by asking a fascinating question of John McCain:

“Should I be worried about being a slave, about being returned to slavery because certain things happened in the Constitution that you had to change?”

I would have voted for McCain had he only answered:

“No, Miss Whoopi, you needn’t be concerned because there’s not much inherent value in a comedienne who isn’t funny or an actress who can’t act. You don’t have to be worried about being enslaved because you’re simply too useless and ugly to be worth your keep. However, the Missus tells me that we are in need of a doorman for one of our seven houses, which fortuitously happens to be one of the few jobs for which my clean and articulate young opponent, Barack Obama, is well-qualified and I look forward to adding him to the house staff in time for Christmas. Whoo-pah!”

As one of Rachel Lucas’s commenters points out, one has to wonder precisely when Whoopi was last a slave. Is she confusing her real life with her movie roles or is this simply some sort of Shirley Maclaine moment?


I can only concur

The Other McCain sums up the new Sitemeter:

Just got my first look at the new format for SiteMeter statistics. It sucks, big-time.

Speaking as a professional game and software designer, all I can say is that the new Sitemeter sucks more badly than nearly any software “improvement” I have ever seen. You actually get less functionality and less information from the initial page than you got before. It’s so utterly horrible; I can’t even imagine bothering to check on my statistics there. The only reason I won’t migrate immediately is that it’s so bad, they’ll surely revert or provide a classic version as soon as their executives see how their traffic has dropped off a cliff.

It’s amazing how many companies blindly go ahead and break things that were previously functional. This is why I’m always an advocate of giving the user optional improvements. If it’s genuinely better, most people will migrate and you can let the transition take place naturally. If you feel the need to throw out the old and cram the new down your user’s throats, chances are that your basic design sucks.


Now THAT is funny

Novelist and journalist David Foster Wallace is dead of an apparent suicide at age 46. Personally, I was a big fan of Wallace — I’ve actually read his doorstop dystopian satire Infinite Jest twice.

I have to admit, I tend to find it more than a little amusing when authors primarily famous for writing “pessimistic” or “dystopian” works wind up killing themselves. Not because I wish them ill or anything, but mostly because everyone acts as if it’s some sort of shocking act that no one could ever have expected.

I’d never read Wallace, but I’ll definitely have to check out Infinite Jest. Not because of the suicide, but because he sounds like a fellow devotee of The Footnote.


VPFL Week 1

73 Judean Peoples Front
43 Black Mouth Curs

69 Burns Redbeards
51 Mounds View Meerkats

66 Valders Valkyries
29 Masonville Marauders

56 Alamo City Spartans
42 Winston Reverends

49 Silver Spooners
49 Greenfield Grizzlies

Off to my usual slow start, scoring more than the other losers, but not enough to win. Apparently, my autodraft is in sync with the Sports Guy: “Reason No. 783 why fantasy football drives me crazy: You only had to watch an hour of that Pack-Vikes game before you realized, “Dammit, I should have had Greg Jennings, Ryan Grant, Donald Driver and Aaron Rodgers three rounds higher.”

Yeah, Bill, well, I got them all. So, if the Packers go 13-3 and lead the league in scoring, I should be all right. Here’s the VP-AFL results for Week One:

Carpe Oro 78
Az Hammeroids 96

Supernauts Jihad 74
Masonville Marauders 112

The Thunder 80
Village Valkyries 72

Alamo City Spartans 108
Cranberry Bogs 99

COS McRays 70
Bukkakelypse Boyz 91


And now the states fall

The Obamanations were whistling in the dark about how the Electoral College means that the presidential election is tabulated state-by-state, which rendered all the national poll results meaningless.

So much for that argument:

Obama/Biden 217
—————-
157 Solid 60 Leaning

McCain/Palin 227
—————-
172 Solid 55 Leaning

Toss Up 94

Ed Whelan notes that this is an 85-vote swing in a single month. If Obama continues on his self-destructive path, this could be a complete reverse of the Clinton-landslide I was expecting. Good humor indeed!