It’s becoming obvious that a disproportionate percentage of the Clown World elite has tranny spouses. Including, it would seem, the French president:
Poussard presents several pieces of documentary and photographic evidence in support of his claim that Brigitte Macron is transgender (specifically, that she was born male as Jean-Michel Trogneux, her brother’s name, and later assumed a female identity). Poussard points to Brigitte Macron’s physical appearance, such as broad shoulders, slim hips, and certain mannerisms (e.g., how she sits or walks), as indicators that she was born male. But it is the photographic evidence and the lack of photographic evidence that seals the case. Poussard shows that there are no accessible photos of a young Brigitte, with former schools refusing to release images and town halls reluctant to share birth certificates. Poussard would be a fool to make this claim if “Brigitte” could produce the photos from all of her school yearbooks, photos of her pregnant, photos of her playing with her alleged children. The Macrons have steadfastly refused to release what would be a powerful refutation and a financial death sentence for Poussard.
But then there is this photo:
Poussard used facial-recognition software to evaluate a number of photos. This one above shows Jean-Michel Trogneux, allegedly Brigitte’s brother, when he was 18. Hell, you don’t even need software to see the resemblance.
Poussard also highlights a lack of documented accounts for Jean-Michel Trogneux in some family records, despite his appearance in family photos and references (e.g., at Brigitte’s 1974 wedding), implying identity theft or fabrication.
It would seem a simple matter to simply have this missing brother of “Brigitte” come forward and appear with his sister. And surely there would be photographs of them together at “her” wedding, would there not? Except, apparently, there aren’t. I find it particularly amusing that he’s stuck with the same style of eyeglasses over the years. Change your sex? Sure. But glasses… yeah, you’ve got to stick with what works for your facial features.
Let’s be clear. Not only are all of these crazy “conspiracy theories” about the Clown World elite more or less true, I’ll bet they don’t even cover the half of it. I am absolutely confident that if and when the truth comes out, it’s going to be a lot weirder than “a gay guy pretended to be a woman in order to marry a guy half his age at a time when gay marriage was illegal”. Forget conspiracy theory, that doesn’t sound any more outrageous than the plot of a Shakespeare comedy.
All countries should do this with all duel-citizens. Especially the USA
EU state could block Russian citizens from politics. Lithuanian conservatives have proposed banning Russian passport holders from serving as founders, members, or donors of political parties. The bill, drafted by the Homeland Union – Lithuanian Christian Democrats (TSLKD), the country’s largest opposition party, would also require political parties to disclose members with multiple citizenships.
A man cannot serve two masters. And the US demographics were destroyed by one such dual-citizen specifically for the benefit of his people at the expense of Americans. It doesn’t matter what the paper citizenry is, because blood and DNA always trump paper.
Liberals, including the variety that call themselves conservatives in the USA, like to denigrate “blood and soil” but DNA is destiny.
The United Kingdom could resort to military force against China in the event of an escalation over Taiwan, British Defense Secretary John Healey has said, though he emphasized that London continues to prefer a diplomatic resolution. Speaking to The Telegraph during a visit to Australia, Healey said Britain would “secure peace through strength” if necessary – marking one of the clearest signals yet from a senior UK official regarding the possibility of direct confrontation with Beijing.
Healey made the remarks as the HMS Prince of Wales, a British aircraft carrier equipped with F-35 fighter jets, docked in the northern Australian city of Darwin. It is the first time in nearly 30 years that a British strike group has arrived in the region. The carrier is on a nine-month Pacific deployment, participating in Australia’s Talisman Sabre exercise and visiting ports in Japan and South Korea.
”If we have to fight, as we have done in the past, Australia and the UK are nations that will fight together. We exercise together and by exercising together and being more ready to fight, we deter better together,” Healey said when asked what London would do in case of an escalation around Taiwan.
What strength? The UK hasn’t been a major military power for 70 years! Forget the seas, Britain doesn’t even rule its own borders anymore. I’m not sure the Chinese would even notice if the UK actually went to war against them.
Clown Worlders are observably delusional in the extreme.
I don’t see any way Spain doesn’t beat England, and beat England handily tonight. The Spanish team is like having six or seven Caitlyn Clarks on one team; if you watch this collection of all their goals in the tournament, the first thing that strikes you is how well the team plays together, passes, and moves without the ball. The second thing is the way that most of their goals aren’t the usual garbage-style goals that rely more upon the limitations of the defenders and the goalie than the skills of the attackers to go in the net.
Esther is an instinctive goalscorer who is a total predator in the box. Athenea is an aggressive attacking winger with crazy-good ball skills who doesn’t hesitate to take on multiple defenders. Vicky not only controls her side down the wing, but constantly sends in excellent crosses. Pina can score from outside the box. And despite being a team without much height, they’re really good in the air, Paredes in particular. I love the way the Spanish women repeatedly attack over the top of the defense as soon as they cross the midfield line; it’s a tactic that probably wouldn’t work in the men’s game, but when you’ve got midfielders and defenders who can reliably hit their targets 30 meters away, it’s a devastating one in the women’s game.
The other thing that is remarkable about the compilation is the way that they didn’t even need their best player, Aitana Bonmati, to score until the semifinal game against Germany. And her assist against the Swiss was a work of art.
England has proved incredibly resilient, coming back from behind to win at the end twice in the tournament, but I don’t think they’re going to come back against this much offensive firepower.
UPDATE: 1-0 Spain. Spain is much the better team, but England should have scored first on the keeper telegraphing a pass to a defender and getting intercepted. Greenwood vs Athenea on the Spanish right is quite the battle, but Greenwood is holding her own so far.
UPDATE: England wins on penalties. I definitely got that one wrong, but not as wrong as the Spanish coach did. Her substitutions were terrible, and why she had Salma Paralluelo taking a penalty after she’d whiffed on three good chances in front of goal are beyond me. Unsurprisingly, she didn’t even put it on target. Even though they retained possession, you could see Spain lose all of its attacking creativity after Esther, Athenea, and Alexia came out, and the Spanish defense was just lazy on the English goal.
Volodymyr Zelensky was once Ukraine’s saviour. In the first hours of the Russian invasion, as Putin’s paratroopers advanced on Central Kyiv with specific orders to kill him, Zelensky refused to evacuate. Instead, he rallied his people to a heroic resistance that surprised the world – and Ukrainians themselves. It was thanks to Zelensky’s relentless lobbying and inspiring showmanship that Western nations were cajoled into sending rockets, artillery and tanks where once they had offered helmets and bandages.
But those times are gone. Zelensky is no longer part of the solution to Ukraine – he is part of the problem. Over the last year Zelensky has used emergency wartime powers to exile, investigate and jail many leading political opponents and critics. Opposition media have been shut down, and thousands of businesses have been seized by Zelensky cronies under the pretext of alleged links to Russia.
Zelensky has played an epic role in saving his country from destruction. Now there is a danger of his imitating his corrupt predecessors, and he should step aside, for Ukraine’s sake.
If a headline article in The Daily Telegraph is not a very clear signal for Zelensky to resign and run for one of his mansions in Florida or Tuscany while he still can, I don’t know what is. Short of Boris Johnson showing up in Kiev and telling him “it’s over” to his face, this is about as direct an order as Clown World ever gives.
This doesn’t mean the neoclowns have gotten any more realistic about what it will take to convince Putin to call off the Russian Army. The problem is that since the proxy war has gone global, it’s not just about what former Ukrainian territory will be transferred to Russian sovereignty, it’s also about ending the West’s economic war on Russia and its partners.
These jokers need to stop promising and posturing and actually arresting people and putting these “shocking matters” out in public, or they can just shut up and go away.
Embattled FBI deputy director Dan Bongino revealed he has discovered matters that have ‘shocked me down to my core’ during his time in office.
Bongino shared a cryptic message to his social media in which he vowed to uncover ‘the truth’ amid mounting criticism of his handling of the Epstein files.
He added: ‘We cannot run a Republic like this. I’ll never be the same after learning what I’ve learned.
‘We are going to conduct these righteous and proper investigations by the book and in accordance with the law. We are going to get the answers WE ALL DESERVE.
‘As with any investigation, I cannot predict where it will land, but I can promise you an honest and dignified effort at truth. Not “my truth,” or “your truth,” but THE TRUTH.’
Bongino alluded in his statement to recent discoveries surrounding government corruption and weaponization.
He did not provide a timeline for when the general public might learn about what he is talking about, adding that ‘things are happening’.
No one falls for the “we can’t talk because we’re investigating” line anymore. The law doesn’t punish celebrities and politicians anyhow, so it’s not a credible excuse. And the truth is certain defense against defamation.
Clown World’s diplomatic wall is cracking. My guess is that the Israeli plans to ethnically cleanse the Palestinians and move them to Europe proved to be one final bridge too far.
The only way to resolve the Middle East conflict is through the creation of a Palestinian state alongside Israel, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said Friday. His statement followed French President Emmanuel Macron’s announcement that France will formally recognize Palestine at the UN General Assembly in September.
”Russia has always adhered to a two-state solution as the basis for resolving the Palestinian issue,” Peskov told reporters. Moscow’s recognition dates to 1988, when the Soviet Union endorsed the Palestinian declaration of independence.
According to Peskov, peace “can only be achieved by adhering to UN Security Council resolutions,” which have declared Israeli occupation in the West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal and called for a ceasefire and Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.
Macron’s decision, announced on social media, aims to advance a “just and lasting peace.” France would become the first major Western power to recognize Palestine, joining over 140 countries that already do.
Another point of observation: whenever you see rhetoric appealing to specific events, that’s a pretty good indication that the events were staged or otherwise exaggerated. The idea that Palestine, a nation that existed long before the first Zionists ever appeared in the region, doesn’t merit recognition “because of October 7th” isn’t just obviously ridiculous, it’s not even good rhetoric.
But it does tend to confirm the immediate suspicions at the time that it was a green flag, at the very least. Although why Hamas would keep trying to hold onto any hostages is completely beyond me, given that it’s the sole remaining Israeli excuse for its actions in Gaza. Unless, of course, Hamas actually thinks it’s winning, which I suppose is possible.
US President Donald Trump said Europe ‘better get your act together’ on immigration as he landed in Scotland.
Mr Trump landed in the country earlier today for a four-day visit to both of his golf clubs in Aberdeen and Ayrshire.
Jetting in at around 8.30pm, the president was greeted by Scottish Secretary Ian Murray before speaking to reporters.
Asked about illegal immigration – which successive UK governments have sought to curb – Mr Trump said: ‘On immigration, you better get your act together. You’re not going to have Europe anymore, you’ve got to get your act together.
‘As you know, last month we had nobody entering our country – nobody, (we) shut it down.’ He added: ‘You’ve got to stop this horrible invasion that’s happening to Europe’ add that immigration was ‘killing Europe’.
Both the USA and Europe are well past the point of stopping immigration, legal or illegal. Large-scale repatriations are necessary if the societies are going to survive. Nations are people, not laws or ideas.
It’s always fascinating to see how those inclined toward rhetoric will always find a way to declare something to be bad, even if it requires a complete inversion of common, every-day terminology. This exchange was in the comments in Sigma Game, after I made an observation that applies generally to a large class of people.
EM: Nothing like painting with a broad brush, lol. I’ve never met anyone so certain of every single thing they say.
VD: That’s because if I’m not certain, I don’t say anything. You should try it.
EM: Only a fool is so certain of every single thing they say. I hope you hear the pride in your own words. That is a dangerous stance, my friend. Humility would be a good medicine.
VD: You have it completely backwards. Only a fool blurts out his thoughts when he knows little and opines in ignorance. I have 22 years of daily experience with hundreds of people who dislike me intensely dissecting every single word I write in order to discredit me or expose any weakness in my arguments. There is no pride in knowing when to speak and when to remain silent. What you mistake for pride is just absolute confidence based on the experience of having been repeatedly challenged and tested over a period of decades.
Now, obviously even the local midwits know perfectly well what’s going on here. But the interesting thing is the way that the rhetorical attacker doesn’t hesitate to invert the idea that remaining reticent about sharing one’s opinion and refusing to opine in ignorance is somehow based in pride rather than intellectual humility and the recognition that one’s opinion might well be wrong.
For example, I was very hesitant to do more than ask questions when I happened to notice the first anomalies in evolutionary scientistry, such as the inability of biologists, professors, and teachers to understand the concept that there not only is an average rate of evolution by natural selection, but that there absolutely has to be. Even after that first glimpse of innumeracy and philosophical inepititude, ittook years of cautious inquiry and detailed reading of various papers and books before I was confident enough in my reasoning, certain enough in my conclusions, to publicly challenge the likes of JF Gariepy and point out the mathematical impossibility of mainstream evolutionary theory.
And now, of course, all of those evolutionists who were so eager to lecture me on a subject they presumed I did not understand not only don’t want to answer any of my questions anymore, they are in full retreat from the very strong point they have defended for decades.
I am referring here, of course, to their headlong retreat to randomness, which is vastly amusing to anyone who recalls Dawkins’s passionate, but inept, attempt to argue that natural selection “is the very opposite of random”.
Those who have been here since 2008 will also notice that I no longer attempt to calculate the impact of debt on the economy despite a respectable past record. That’s because I don’t have the relevant information anymore; the Federal Reserve’s changes to its reporting has deprived me of the data I require to even begin formulating an opinion. So, I don’t say anything because I don’t know anything.
But to the rhetorical, intellectual humility can be pride for the same reason that black can be white and war can be peace. Because there is no information content in rhetoric, it’s merely an attempt to emotionally manipulate other individuals.
The more deeply one looks into the facts related to the mainstream historian’s version of the official Shakespeare story, the more obviously implausible it becomes.
In my debate with classicist Philip Womack, he pushed the orthodox view detailed above that the apocryphal plays and bad quartos were all the result of some form of piracy. And I responded with something like the following:
Can you not tell how anti-Strafordian you sound here? You think the majority of plays attributed to William Shakespeare while he was alive and up till 1621 are fraudulent and the result of corruption (this is counting all apocryphal plays and bad quartos) despite the fact that:
Shakespeare never protested about his name falsely being used.
Shakespeare and company, who performed all these plays, never complained about their illicit procurement and unauthorized publication.
No one else ever mentioned it at the time or for decades afterward.
The real authors of the apocryphal plays never demanded proper credit.
None of the dozens of printers or publishers were ever punished for it.
These nefarious printers and publishers ended up pulling off a ruse that fooled the world for a century—as scholars, editors, etc. were still referring to “Yorkshire Tragedy” and “London Prodigal” as Shakespeare’s into the 18th century.
No other playwright of the Shakespeare era was similarly victimized. In fact, no other living writer in all of English history had a similar misattribution occur to him just once—let alone twelve times!
Expanding on the last point above, there is no known case in history in which an English printer or publisher has ever purposefully misattributed a single work (like a play, essay, or novel) to a single, living author whom they knew had nothing to do with the work. Why is that? Well, because the printer and publisher would know that the credited author would complain—and so too would the wronged author whose work had been stolen and assigned to someone else. In fact, as I have shown, there also may not even be an indisputable example of such a deliberate misattribution occurring to a dead author.
There’s just no rational reason to doubt Shakespeare’s authorship of the quartos attributed to him—and no one at the time, or for even a century afterward, ever doubted those title pages either.
As usual, the mainstream inverts the actual situation. It’s not those who are revising the official history on the basis of the available facts who are the conspiracy theorists, it’s the classicists who are defending their unsupportable dogma by concocting a whole series of conspiratorial explanations.
