Author: VD

Accusing top Pentagon officials of “dereliction of duty,” retired Marine Gen. Anthony Zinni says staying the course in Iraq isn’t a reasonable option. “The course is headed over Niagara Falls. I think it’s time to change course a little bit or at least hold somebody responsible for putting you on this course…. There has been poor strategic thinking in this…poor operational planning and execution on the ground,” says Zinni, who served as commander-in-chief of the U.S. Central Command from 1997 to 2000.

You may recall that I have criticized the poor strategic thinking for some time now. I don’t expect anyone to pay a great deal of attention to what I have to say on military matters, but one would think that a commanding general’s opinion might at least be taken into account. Staying the course is not a reasonable option, and only someone almost wholly ignorant of the situation would recommend it. Significant expansion into global warfare and retreat into constitutional isolationism are the two primary alternatives. I tend to favor the latter, not out of any pacificist inclination, but because I do not trust the motivations and long-term goals of those who would be leading the former.

I wonder how Mowbray will go about defending his poor neoconservative friends this time? It’s an admirable instinct – to defend your friends – but here’s hoping he won’t have to start impugning false racist motivations to the general this time.

It’s a simple matter of mathematics. This was written about the time I left the industry, and according to my friends still in games, it’s only gotten much, much worse now that PC game sales are declining.

Their existence, and virtually every problem they address-–divorce, custody, child abuse, child-support enforcement, even juvenile crime—revolve around one overriding principle: removing the father from the family. If fathers remained with their families, family courts would have little reason to exist, since the problems that they handle seldom appear in intact families. While mothers also fall afoul of family court judges, it is fathers against whom their enmity is largely directed, because fathers are their principal rivals.

The judges’ contempt for both fathers and constitutional rights was openly expressed by New Jersey municipal court judge Richard Russell. Speaking to his colleagues during a training seminar in 1994, he said: “Your job is not to become concerned about the constitutional rights of the man that you’re violating. Throw him out on the street, give him the clothes on his back and tell him, “See ya around.” . . .We don’t have to worry about their rights.”

Why are men so restrained about this obscenity? With all the unemployed Russian and Colombian gangsters willing to knock off judges for less than $500, I’m surprised there’s a family court judge in the country willing to rule against a father whose wife has unilaterally decided to split the family.

“Gee, honey, I sure am sorry to hear they have to reschedule and find a new judge again….”

Space Bunny and I took the BBC’s Test the Nation quiz yesterday. Didn’t do too badly, beating everyone in the actual TV audience – the highest score there was 143 – although not as well as Emma Patterson of Wokengham. It was probably the most difficult test of this sort that I’ve ever taken thanks to the time limitations, but it was fun.

Michael Ledeen, one of the war-on-method’s foremost neocon proponents, writes: Second, our defeat in Fallujah. I had hoped that the tactic of enlisting Sunni leaders to assist in the defeat of the jihadis would accelerate the terrorists’ defeat and enable us to round them up and clean out the city. But it turns out that it wasn’t a tactic at all; it was a strategic retreat. Today, throughout the region, everybody knows that the bad guys outlasted us. We were forced out. The Sunni generals (the first of which, unforgivably, was one of Saddam’s henchmen) just told everyone to cool it for a while, and the bad guys are now reorganizing for the next assault. Instead of smashing the terrorists, we set ourselves up for more casualties.

Worse yet, some of the crackpot realists in our military and their exhausted civilian commanders in State and Defense, have convinced themselves that this is the way to go, and they are now whispering to one another that we should adopt “the Fallujah model” in future engagements. If that holds, then we have lost. Because it means that we have surrendered the initiative to the terrorists and will not destroy them in future engagements. That adds up to actively encouraging the enemy to attack us.

Defeat in Fallujah. How veddy interesting. And here the administration sycophants had been talking about how the retreat from Fallujah was really just a demonstration of a clever new strategy. Furthermore, it’s becoming increasingly apparent that the Abu Ghraib hijinks were not any part of a systematic intelligence-gathering program, but a short period of undisciplined craziness.

Keep this in mind as I continue to write about the impossibility of nation-building, and the sycophants continue to vociferously support it, right up until the time that President Bush declares Mission Accomplished II. Hopefully, this time he’ll have the wisdom to bring the troops home. I note that even hard core nuke-them-all ass-kickers like Bane have come around to my way of thinking vis-a-vis the administration’s martial prowess.

Ledeen continues: All of this is the inevitable result of the fundamental misunderstanding of the war against the terror masters. It is a regional war, not a war limited to a single country. Since we refuse to admit this, we are unable to design an effective strategy to win.

Ledeen’s only error here is that he, like the adminstration, refuses to admit to the global scale of the clash of civilizations. But otherwise, he might well be echoing my article of Clauswitzian criticism of the war effort.

Michael Rubin adds: The situation in Iraq today is dire. Bremer has embarked on a policy which is as damaging in the region as the Abu Ghraib scandal. Across the region, Arabs and Iranians point to the raid on Chalabi’s house to show that friendship with America is futile; the United States cannot be an ally and should never be trusted. Democracy is not about crushing peaceful dissent. Across the region, Iraqis and Arabs juxtapose Bush rhetoric and implementation.

Want one more reason that the Iraqi Occupation will fail miserably? Bremer is not only no MacArthur, he is yet another State Department disaster. He’s not really a disaster, though. It only looks that way if you make the mistaking of assuming that State is on America’s side, and not the UN’s, as is more accurately the case. As for a juxtaposition of Bushian rhetoric and implementation, those disappointed Iraqis and Arabs might have done well to consult with conservative Republicans as to the wisdom of putting faith in the president’s words.

I’m looking to buy a decent mike for my PC and was wondering if anyone had any recommendations. I don’t want a DSP-USB one, unless the sound is significantly better as I’ve heard there are some volume issues. It should have a two-ear headset too. Thanks.

From Drudge: President fell off bike today… Kerry told reporters in front of cameras, ‘Did the training wheels fall off?’… Reporters are debating whether to treat it is as on or off the record.

The only thing they’re debating is how much damage it’s going to do to Kerry. If Clinton had said it, they would have reported it because it was funny. Since Kerry comes off as an unlikable jerk, there’s a strong possibility that it will harm him. Therefore, a statement made openly in front of the cameras has to be treated as off the record.

The mainstream press is a joke. And remember, if you’re subscribing to them, you’re supporting them.

Marine Capt. Brian R. Chontosh received the Navy Cross Medal from the Commandant of the United States Marine Corps, Gen. Michael W. Hagee, during an awards ceremony Thursday at Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Training Center, Twentynine Palms, Calif. Three other Marines received medals for valor at the same ceremony.

Chontosh, 29, from Rochester, N.Y. , received the naval service’s second highest award for extraordinary heroism while serving as Combined Anti-Armor Platoon Commander, Weapons Company, 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Division, 1st Marine Expeditionary Force, in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom March 25, 2003. The Medal of Honor is the highest military award.

While leading his platoon north on Highway 1 toward Ad Diwaniyah, Chontosh’s platoon moved into a coordinated ambush of mortars, rocket propelled grenades and automatic weapons fire. With coalitions tanks blocking the road ahead, he realized his platoon was caught in a kill zone. He had his driver move the vehicle through a breach along his flank, where he was immediately taken under fire from an entrenched machine gun. Without hesitation, Chontosh ordered the driver to advanced directly at the enemy position enabling his .50 caliber machine gunner to silence the enemy.

He then directed his driver into the enemy trench, where he exited his vehicle and began to clear the trench with an M16A2 service rifle and 9 millimeter pistol. His ammunition depleted, Chontosh, with complete disregard for his safety, twice picked up discarded enemy rifles and continued his ferocious attack. When a Marine following him found an enemy rocket propelled grenade launcher, Chontosh used it to destroy yet another group of enemy soldiers. When his audacious attack ended, he had cleared over 200 meters of the enemy trench, killing more than 20 enemy soldiers and wounding several others.

“They are the reflection of the Marine Corps type who’s service to the Marine Corps and country is held above their own safety and lives,” said Gen. Hagee, commenting on the four Marines who received medals during the ceremony. “I’m proud to be here awarding the second highest and third highest awards for bravery to these great Marines.”

“These four Marines are a reflection of every Marine and sailor in this great battalion,” said Sergeant Major of the Marine Corps, Sgt. Maj. John L. Estrada. “I was just doing my job, I did the same thing every other Marine would have done, it was just a passion and love for my Marines, the experience put a lot into perspective,” said Chontosh.

That’s why they called them Devil Dogs. It sure sounds as if he might have played Doom at one point or another.

SW writes: Bill Buckler, from his newsletter the Privateer… says that the Asians have to make a choice about whether to buy the continuing avalanches of US debt that will be issued from the US Treasury. If they buy the debt, they have to expand their own money supplies. If they don’t, then the dollar will fall. “They know that they can either crash their own economies, or crash the US Treasury.” Why will the dollar fall if the Asians don’t?

If the Asians don’t continue to buy US Treasuries, which are loans taken out from the Federal Reserve by the US government, then the government has two options: raise taxes dramatically or print more money. (Actually, there is a third option of providing worthwhile services for which people are willing to pay, but don’t hold your breath waiting for that to happen.) Since increasing the tax burden would drive the greedy, overburdened American consumer into default, the only serious option is inflation.

We have been seeing plenty of signs of this over the last few years, as asset prices have increased, now accompanied by rising producer prices and, despite the best efforts of the statisticians to hide it, consumer prices. Now, the USA is in serious trouble if the Japanese and Chinese stop printing yen and renminbi in order to buy dollars since the Asians account for about two-thirds of our debt purchasing. Inflation would have to increase dramatically for government to keep spending at its current rate, much less increase its rate of spending as is currently planned.

More dollars equals lower value. So, the dollar falls.

From the Gargler’s blog: Jeanne says: I am so excited to be part of a harem! I can’t wait to tell my husband!

I don’t laugh out loud often but I did when I read that. But hey… I’m not really suprised that Jeanne and Tonya are happy to be here. Deep down, almost all of them wanna play “Egyptian Slave Girls”.

It always amused me when feminists were outraged by John Norman’s GOR novels, which are Conanesque soft-core adventure porn. With titles like SLAVE GIRLS OF GOR, you can understand why they were irritated, especially since the fiesty captured princess who is sexually awoken by the sensuous appeal of her slave collar was a regular theme. The punch line, however, is that the GOR books are far more widely read by women than by men.