Author: VD

Viaje al pensamiento de Alt-right

It’s interesting to see that the Argentine media is considerably more professional than the US media. Instead of running to the likes of (((Ben Shapiro))) and other self-professed enemies of the Alt-Right to explain what it is and what it believes, Gabriela Esquivada took the unusual approach of simply asking Jared Taylor and me for her piece entitled “A Visit to the Thinking of the Alt-Right“:

Viaje al pensamiento de Alt-right: qué es y cómo funciona la nueva derecha de Estados Unidos. 

Estan cansados de la corrección política y el conservadurismo tradicional. Son nacionalistas, antiglobalización y defensores de una América blanca. Su influencia en la victoria de Donald Trump

En los Estados Unidos se ha presentado como un conjunto laxo de personas y organizaciones que van de la derecha a la ultraderecha, y que han ganado espacio en los medios que tratan de encontrar explicaciones a la elección de Donald Trump. Se llama Alternative Right, Alt-Right: derecha alternativa (DA).

“Es una ideología occidental que cree en la ciencia, la historia, la realidad y el derecho de una nación genética a existir y gobernarse en su propio interés”, definió Vox Day, seudónimo de uno de los bloggers más influyentes de este movimiento variopinto que se ha cocido en los Estados Unidos al fuego de la crisis económica y la decepción política de los últimos años.

El autor de Vox Popoli recomendó la lectura de los 16 puntos que él sintetizó como base de una filosofía de la DA, entre los que se destacan la superación del conservadurismo tradicional, la defensa de “los tres pilares de la civilización occidental” (el cristianismo, las naciones europeas y el legado grecorromano), el nacionalismo, la oposición a la globalización y el igualitarismo, la defensa de la política de la identidad y el proteccionismo, entre otros puntos….

El racismo y el sexismo son ideas y ninguna idea es mala, según Vox: “El hecho de que alguien pueda legítimamente tener una creencia no significa que alguien más no pueda creer que está equivocada o despreciarla. Dicho eso, algunas ideas encontradas pueden coexistir. Otras no”.

—Hay creencias que pueden conducir a acciones destructivas.

—¿Y qué? La ciencia lleva a acciones mucho más mortíferas que cualquier creencia —siguió Vox—. ¿Deberíamos matar a todos los científicos para asegurarnos que ninguno podrá construir armas peligrosas? La gente sólo puede ser responsabilizada por sus acciones, no se puede ejercer el poder de policía sobre las creencias sin recurrir a la tiranía total y el control del pensamiento.

“La DA está cansada de la corrección política”, marcó Sabo uno de los ejes de ese ideario. “Porque no es posible prever hasta dónde la llevará la izquierda”. Vox cree que la corrección política “es un cáncer y un intento de controlar el modo en que se le permite pensar y hablar a las personas”. Agregó, enfático: “Es una abominación neo-marxiana”.

It’s a very good article that, wonder of wonders, actually reports rather than editorializes. This should make it clear, as if there was still any doubt remaining, that the Alt-Right is a global phenomenon, of interest to nationalists and their opponents all over the world.

San Antonio shooting

Another policeman is murdered:

A detective was shot and killed while writing a traffic ticket outside of police headquarters late Sunday morning. San Antonio Police Chief William McManus identified the slain officer as 20-year veteran Detective Benjamin Marconi, 50. He said the suspect has not yet been apprehended, and a motive is not known.

McManus said Marconi had pulled over a car for a traffic violation outside Public Safety Headquarters in downtown. While Marconi was inside his squad car writing a ticket, a black vehicle pulled up behind him and the driver got out, walked up to the detective’s window and shot him in the head, McManus said. Then the suspect reached into the window and shot Marconi a second time, he said.

It’s tragic. It’s horrifying. But the grim reality is that this will not be the last such murder. Until the following steps are taken, expect more of the same:

  • Restore the pre-1965 American population demographics
  • Demilitarize the police
  • End the Drug War.

If you’re not going to work towards, or support, any of those things, then Blue Lives really don’t Matter to you. Sure, you can talk tough if you like, but no one has ever won a 4GW conflict that way.

Aleppo

Putin and Assad are such monsters that it really defies all imagination. They have both ISIS and the various rebel groups on the verge of defeat through their ruthless strategy of carpet-bombing children’s hospitals, kitten sanctuaries, nunneries, and humanitarian food distribution centers.

Still not about you

A discussion on Gab:

Vox Day
Even we American Indians have our sovereign reservations. Why shouldn’t white Americans have their own sovereign country?

HorrorQueen
Where on earth would I go? I’m English, Gypsy, Native American and black… are we going to slice me up?

Vox Day
Do you also argue that interest rates should be set according to your personal financial situation? What will happen will happen. It’s not about you.

Sciurus
Being multiracial myself, I don’t understand how people have such a hard time getting this. Immigration policies that were instrumental to my existence have been disastrous for America. That’s nothing personal; it’s just a fact.

A strong, wealthy, free, and predominantly white America is in the interest of everyone in the world. Everyone in the world, even its enemies, are more likely to benefit from a predominantly white America that does not attempt to play global policeman or to enforce American cultural values around the world than one in which America is adulterated and diversitied and vibrantized into a muddy parody passed off under the same name.

The fact that there are hundreds of millions of non-white non-Americans who would prefer to live among white Americans than among their own kind does not alter the truth of the preceding statements in the slightest. Even illiterate savages who defecate in the street often prefer to live among civilized people who don’t, particularly if those who don’t are willing to feed, shelter, clothe, and clean up after them.

But it is not possible for many non-white non-Americans to live among white America without transforming it into non-white not-America. And that is why it is very much in the interest of non-whites and non-Americans to support the return of the USA’s population to the pre-1965 ethnic demographics that were promised to Americans by the advocates of the 1965 Immigration Act. After all, do they really believe all that technology, investment, and foreign aid that is provided by white people is going to continue to flow once white countries are no longer white?

It is readily apparent that the immigration cargo cultists who subscribe to Magic Dirt Theory have never once thought through the obvious consequences of their policies.

Also, if your first response to the discussion of a macro-societal level issue is “well, what about me?”, you are not fit to participate in the discussion. If you don’t care about anyone else’s interests, there is absolutely no reason for anyone else to take yours into account.

Debt + Diversity = Community Death

A tale of white flight:

I’m devastated. My husband and I saved for 10 years to buy our dream home and since then a bunch of loud, gangster Latinos have moved into our neighborhood. They’ve started having late-night parties every week, drugs, scary-looking guys, etc.

We are going to lose our home’s value if we don’t sell asap. When we saw another gang banger party starting tonight two houses down I cried and cried. I love my my home. I wanted to grow old here. I wanted to retire here and die here. It’s completely unfair.

As soon as I’m well enough,after the baby is born we have to put our beautiful home on the market. Why, why do these people have the “right” to do this to our communities?

This is the response to every cuckservative, Churchian, SJW sob story about how “unfair” it is to send home invaders who “only want a better life for themselves and their children”. They don’t have any right to that “better life” because it is coming at the expense of the native peoples.

It’s not just the immigration. It’s the low-interest loans that permit the shifting of the demand curve upward. This is why discrimination, racial or otherwise, is not only moral, it is necessary, and why anti-discrimination laws are themselves immoral, destructive, and ultimately dyscivilizational.

Every community should have the right to pass laws banning anyone they don’t want in their community from being permitted to buy homes there. If people want to live in a mixed community, then let the community permit that. And if people don’t, they should not be forced to do so, or have the wishes of an entire community overturned by one indifferent party who is leaving anyhow.

Milo on Sky

Spacebunny and I were just watching Milo doing the tomorrow’s press deal in the UK. He was great, as you’d expect, but one thing he did mention was that he would NOT be taking a position in the Trump administration, or at least, not a full-time position.

So, sad to say, I expect this officially rules him out as the God-Emperor Ascendant’s Press Secretary. It was, alas, nothing more than a dream, a bittersweet dream.

Čo je Alt Pravica?

V záujme
vypracovania základov Alt Pravicovej filozofie, na ktorej môžu
stavať aj ostatní.

  1. Alt
    Pravica je politickou pravicou v americkom ako aj v európskom
    zmysle slova. Socialisti nie sú Alt Pravica, Pokrokoví
    (Progresívci)
    nie
    sú Alt Pravica, Liberáli nie sú Alt Pravica. Komunisti, Marxisti,
    Kultúrni Marxisti a neokonzervatívci nie sú Alt Pravica.
  2. Alt
    Pravica je alternatívou k tradičnému pravicovému hnutiu v
    Spojených Štátoch, ktoré je definované 10
    konzervatívnymi princípami
    Russela Kirka, ktoré v skutočnosti zdegenerovalo smerom k
    progresivizmu. Je tiež
    alternatívou k libertarianizmu.
  3. Alt
    Pravica
    nie je obranným postojom a odmieta koncepciu vznešenej a
    principiálnej porážky. Je to do budúcnosti hľadiaca filozofia
    útoku v každom zmysle tohto slova. Alt
    Pravica
    verí vo
    víťazstvo cestou vytrvalosti
    a harmónie
    s vedou, realitou, kultúrnou tradíciou a historickou skúsenosťou.
  4. Alt
    Pravica
    verí, že západná
    civilizácia je vrcholom ľudského úsilia a podporuje tri
    základné piliere: kresťanstvo, európske národy a gréko-románske
    dedičstvo.
  5. Alt
    Pravica
    otvorene deklaruje svoju národnú orientáciu. Podporutje všetky
    národy a ich právo na existenciu, homogénnu a neriedenú
    cudzineckou inváziou a prisťahovalectvom.
  6. Alt
    Pravica
    je antiglobalistická. Je v opozícíi proti skupinám, ktoré
    pracujú v záujme globalistických ideálov a cieľov.
  7. Alt
    Pravica je proti rovnostárstvu. Odmieta myšlienku rovnostárstva z
    rovnakých dôvodov ako odmieta jednorožcov a škriatkov. Ľudské
    rovnostárstvo neexistuje v žiadnej pozorovateľnej vedeckej,
    právnej, materiálnej, intelektuálnej, sexuálnej a duchovnej
    forme.
  8. Alt
    Pravica je vedecká a a priori akceptuje súčasné závery vedeckej
    metódy, avšak je si zároveň vedomá, že a) tieto závery
    podliehajú potenciálnemu budúcemu prehodnoteniu b) veda podlieha
    korupcii a c) takzvaný vedecký konsenzus nie je založený na
    vede, ale na demokracii a je tým pádom nevedecký
  9. Alt
    Pravica verí, že identita ­­> kultúra > politika
  10. Alt
    Pravica je proti podradenosti ktorejkoľvek pôvodnej etnickej
    skupiny inej skupine, najmä v suverénnej krajine dominovaného
    ľudu. Alt Pravica je proti získavaniu nadmerného vplyvu
    nepôvodnej populácie v ktorejkoľvek spoločnosti cestou známostí,
    kmeňových vzťahov alebo akýmkoľvek iným spôsobom.
  11. Alt
    Pravica si je vedomá, že diverzita + blízkosť = vojna
  12. Alt
    Pravici je jedno, čo si o nej myslíte.
  13. Alt
    Pravica odmieta medzinárodný obchod a voľný pohyb pracovníkov s
    ním súvisiaci. Výhody obchodu v rámci národa nie sú potvrdením
    výhod medzinárodného obchodu.
  14. Alt
    Pravica verí, že je nevyhnutné zabezpečiť existenciu bielych
    ľudí a budúcnosť bielych detí.
  15. Alt
    Pravica neverí vo všeobecnú nadradenosť žiadnej rasy, národa,
    ľudu alebo ľudského poddruhu. Každá rasa, národ, ľud alebo
    ľudský poddruh má svoje vlastné silné a slabé stránky a má
    suverénne právo nažívať bez cudzích vplyvov a uchovávať
    vlastnú kultúru, ktorú uprednostňuje.
  16. Alt
    Pravica je filozofia, ktorá si cení mier medzi národmi sveta a
    odmieta násliné šírenie hodnôt jedného národa na druhý
    národ, ako aj úsilie o extermináciu individuálnych národov
    cestou vojny, genocídy, prisťahovalectva alebo genetickej
    asimilácie. 

An enemy of Christendom

None other than the Littlest Chickenhawk, (((Ben Shapiro))), reveals himself to be an enemy of the West, the Alt-Right, and America, as he tells lies about the Alt-Right:

Sean Illing: Are there any concrete political goals on the alt-right, apart from restoring a kind of cultural hegemony?

Ben Shapiro: They want to destroy the Republican Party from within and take it over. They want the constitutional right destroyed. They actually hate the constitutional right more than they hate the left. They don’t actually hate the left. They think the left is wrong about racism but they don’t object to big government that takes care of people; rather, they think you should have special privileges if you’re of European descent. They want what they call “Christendom” protected from foreign bodies.

VP Reader: And with that last line, I knew that Shapiro was not an ally of the West, even though he claims to be one. He is an ally of the “West” that is most beneficial to him and his tribe while keeping Christianity down to a sufficient degree that it does not, once again, become the culturally dominant worldview of the West. But that kind of an ally is no ally at all.

He’s also lying. Four times in six sentences.

  1. We don’t want the constitutional right destroyed. We want them to come to their senses, stop relying on the magic words “muh Constitution”, and start defending the posterity that the Constitution was written to defend.
  2. We don’t actually hate the constitutional right. We think they are misguided, outdated, and naive, but we don’t hate them. We expect them to join us one day.
  3. We hate the Left. We know they will never join us and we look forward to relegating them to the ash heap of history. Therefore, we hate them more than the constitutional right, whom we don’t hate.
  4. We do actually hate the Left.
And while many of us would prefer small government, we recognize that if we do not stop and reverse the invasion, the small government vs large government debate will be rendered moot, because all of the invading foreign bodies prefer large government.
It is all too typical that dishonest “journalists” like Illing prefer to interview enemies of Christendom and the Alt-Right about the Alt-Right rather than speak directly to anyone from me to Richard Spencer to Greg Johnson to Andrew Anglin.


I don’t care if someone immigrates here so long as they’re willing to imbibe the principles of Western civilization. I don’t care what someone’s race happens to be. This is consistent with the founding vision of the country. But the alt-right doesn’t accept that.
– (((Ben Shapiro)))

(((Shapiro)))’s position is not at all consistent with the founding vision of the country. The Alt-Right doesn’t accept that because it is obviously untrue. It is conclusively disproven by the Preamble to the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Naturalization Law of 1790. From Infogalactic:

The original United States Naturalization Law of March 26, 1790 (1 Stat. 103) provided the first rules to be followed by the United States in the granting of national citizenship. This law limited naturalization to immigrants who were free white persons of good character. It thus excluded American Indians, indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, and Asians. It also provided for citizenship for the children of U.S. citizens born abroad, but specified that the right of citizenship did “not descend to persons whose fathers have never been resident in the United States.”


And if you’re dumb enough to cite a five-word sentence fragment of the Declaration of Independence in a futile attempt to prove that (((Shapiro))) is correct, I have six words for you: READ THE REST OF IT, MORON.

Immigration was ALWAYS the key

I’ve been pointing this out to politicians for over a decade. And yet many of the highly-paid political experts are STILL denying it, even though the first time a neophyte politician played that card, it took him straight to the White House. Steve Sailer points out an RCP piece observing that Trump won on the issues:

Although the Republican establishment would rather not think about it, immigration was Trump’s central issue as he came out of nowhere to beat 16 challengers and win the Republican nomination. Those same establishment Republicans, like most Democrats, predicted that immigration would hurt Trump in the general election. It didn’t.

Believers in the “Blue Wall”—the mythical fortification that would allegedly protect Democratic candidates in the electoral vote—claimed that embracing open-borders immigration policies is the only way to win as demographics change (largely because of 40-plus years of open-borders immigration policies). This “Blue Wall” turned out to be about as formidable as the Maginot Line, and Trump breached it in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Iowa, and apparently Michigan.

Immigration is actually a big reason why. When exit polling asked voters what the biggest issue was in the election, national security was about a wash—as voters who emphasized “foreign policy” preferred Clinton, while those who emphasized “terrorism” favored Trump, and by similar margins. Likewise, the economy as a whole was about a wash. Among the 52 percent of voters who said the economy was the biggest issue, Clinton won by 10 points (52 to 42 percent), but when voters were asked who would better handle the economy, Trump won by 3 points (49 to 46 percent). Among the one-eighth of voters who said immigration was the most important issue, however, Trump won by a 2-to-1 margin (64 to 32 percent)—the equivalent of about 5 million votes. In the states where Trump breached the “Blue Wall,” his margins on immigration were even bigger.

Immigration and other identity issues will continue to be the key going forward. However distasteful it may be to them, Republicans need to continue to make their transformation into a White Party, or if it makes them feel better, the American Party.

What they don’t understand is that the same small percentage of minorities that supported them before will continue to support them. These are the minorities who are smart enough to realize that a strong white majority in the USA is in their own interest, and in the interest of the world at large. But only a small percentage of any indentity group are capable of grasping enlightened self-interest, or self-interest once removed.