No evidence of election fraud on YouTube

Because YouTube is actively deleting it:

Our Community Guidelines prohibit spam, scams, or other manipulated media, coordinated influence operations, and any content that seeks to incite violence. Since September, we’ve terminated over 8000 channels and thousands of harmful and misleading elections-related videos for violating our existing policies. Over 77{6534ce8d8d9c109105c5a2b8c5c8b9d708712d970696104baa8b52bda29579f8} of those removed videos were taken down before they had 100 views. 

We also work to make sure that the line between what is removed and what is allowed is drawn in the right place. Our policies prohibit misleading viewers about where and how to vote. We also disallow content alleging widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of a historical U.S. Presidential election. However in some cases, that has meant allowing controversial views on the outcome or process of counting votes of a current election as election officials have worked to finalize counts. 

Yesterday was the safe harbor deadline for the U.S. Presidential election and enough states have certified their election results to determine a President-elect. Given that, we will start removing any piece of content uploaded today (or anytime after) that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. Presidential election, in line with our approach towards historical U.S. Presidential elections. For example, we will remove videos claiming that a Presidential candidate won the election due to widespread software glitches or counting errors. We will begin enforcing this policy today, and will ramp up in the weeks to come. As always, news coverage and commentary on these issues can remain on our site if there’s sufficient education, documentary, scientific or artistic context.

Shameless, aren’t they. I hope the God-Emperor has a truly special place for them in mind. If you ever wanted to know what rule by fork-tongued, deceit-filled devils looks like, this should give you a pretty good idea. 

2+2=37, it always did, and if you ever thought you believed otherwise, then clearly you are an insane badthinker.

The sooner Section 230 is nuked, the better. And if you’re not subscribed to UATV and active on SG yet, you should be.