In case you’re wondering why Nate Winchester is now banned from commenting here.
Is there any benefit of the doubt or charitable interpretation I can extend to your words, which you have extended to Peterson’s? This isn’t even rhetorical. I haven’t had the time to go over everything you have written in detail so I would not be surprised if there is a passage where you extend him charity. Only on my initial impression does it strike me that by the exacting standard you condemn Peterson, do you also stand condemned. Note also that this is my principle issue with Vox Day as by the standards he applies to Peterson, Vox then is every bit the liar, narcissist, and cultist that Peterson is – more so even.
What an utterly ridiculous statement. There is absolutely no charitable reading of Jordan Peterson that allows one to consider him anything but what he is, a liar, a globalist, and a practicing occultist. Nor does one require an “exacting standard” to condemn his vast panoply of lies, bait-and-switches, redefinitions, false postures, and deceptions. As for the idea that I am even more of a liar than Jordan Peterson, Fake Nate might as reasonably have claimed that I have been prescribed even more SSRI’s than Peterson or dreamed more regularly about cannibalizing my extended family.
I neither need nor want shameless snakes like this around here. And I neither request or require any charity in reading what I have written. If any of you genuinely believe that I am a habitual liar, then by all means, just go away and stay away. Why would you ever want to read someone who lies to you on a regular basis in the first place?