Remember, these are the same people who insist that immigration won’t change America for the worse:
Violence erupted at a Michigan law school Thursday when protestors tried to block a speech by Colorado Congressman Tom Tancredo. Police were called after protestors pulled a fire alarm prior to the speech on immigration policies. There were at least three violent incidents with protestors targeting student backers of the event, Tancredo, R-Littleton, said today.
“One was spit on, one was kicked, and one was punched,” Tancredo said in an e-mail. “Tires were also slashed.”
Michigan State University College Republicans and Young Americans for Freedom sponsored the event. Tancredo went to Michigan State University College of Law as part of a visit to the state to talk about immigration. He leads the group that opposes legal status for illegal immigrants.
Pro-immigrationists believe it is racist to oppose the continued importation of Mexicans, Central Americans, Arabs and other non-Europeans. Maybe so, but even if that is the case, it’s obvious that racism can only be a small part of the equation because it is wildly nonsensical to imagine that allowing tens of millions of people from authoritarian, illiberal cultures will not change their new residence in ways that cause it to resemble the place from which they came.
This is why Washingtonians, Oregonians and Arizonians protest the Californication of their states. Are they being racist in resenting this predominantly white immigration? Of course not! It is the same reason that Southern conservatives despise liberal white Northerners who move South to escape the high taxes, high costs and intrusive government of the “blue states”, then in their inability to understand cause-and-effect, perversely seek to recreate the very conditions they previously fled.
It is obvious that immigration can only be a limited good. If it was an unqualified good, then who would complain if 300 million Chinese communists decided to emigrate and settle in California next year. The true question is this: how much is too much? Based on the evidence, the USA and Britain are far past the too-much point already.
The fact that those who prefer to argue through violence support Brown America is further evidence that the immigration invasion is a deadly threat to both the abstract idea of America and the continuance of its once-soliid social structure.
The logical equation is simple. Brown America will either be the same as White America, or it will be different. History and the existing evidence strongly suggest it will be different. If it is different, then this prompts the question if it will be stronger, wealthier and more free or weaker, poorer and less free.
I shall leave that to the reader to decide.