Too Stupid to Survive

If your grandchildren ask you what England was and why it doesn’t exist anymore, remember this picture. Even the Dodo and the American Indian had stronger survival instincts. If these morons genuinely prefer living in third world squalor amongst refugees without racist Europeans around, then why didn’t they simply move to Rwanda or Pakistan? What is the point of this preference or is it just mindless virtue-signaling devoid of any concept of the obvious consequences?

The thing is, most racists would be perfectly happy if they could leave and live among their own kind, the problem is that both the refugees and the retards will inevitably follow them because as has been demonstrated over and over again throughout history, neither are capable of maintaining a functional society.

Anyhow, the immigration protests are over, which is just as well, because no nation has ever protested its way to freedom from occupation.

DISCUSS ON SG


The UK Government Hates the British

In fairness, Elon Musk did exaggerate a little in describing the situation in the UK as “a civil war”. Because the war between the native English and the foreigners resident there is really just a fairly conventional war of invasion. It’s not as if Keir Starmer is English, after all, or even British. He’s Irish, and yet instead of defending his native Ireland from invasion, he’s aiding and abetting the foreign conquest of England.

DISCUSS ON SG


“The Full Force of the Law”

The British police don’t have time to defend the borders against invading illegals, stop Pakistani rape gangs, or deport foreign criminals. But they are certainly determined to go to war with the native English people at a moment’s notice, and are threatening them with “the full force of the law”.

Ministers will consider banning the English Defence League following riots on the streets of Southport, Angela Rayner suggested today.

The deputy PM said the government ‘will look at various different groups’ amid widespread condemnation of violence that broke out after the horrific knife attack on children at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class.

Angry politicians have blamed ‘lies and propaganda’ on social media for igniting the chaos, while heartbroken Southport families have accused hoodlums of showing ‘no respect to a town that is grieving’.

Tributes have poured in for the three girls killed who police yesterday named as six-year-old Bebe King, seven-year-old Elsie Dot Stancombe and nine-year-old Alice Dasilva Aguiar.

Eight other children suffered stab wounds at the summer holiday dance workshop. Five are in a critical condition, alongside two women who were also critically injured as they bravely tried to save the children.

The Home Secretary has declared war on the English people. Now Englishmen appear to be on the verge of facing the same choice as the French. Either they fight the police or they end up being drafted to fight the Russians. I suspect the odds of surviving the former are considerably better than the latter.

DISCUSS ON SG


Farage is Not the Answer

James Delingpole eloquently explains why Nigel Farage serves the same master as Boris Johnson and Keith Starmer:

How do we know that Farage is compromised? Well, as with everyone else in that broad and bitterly divisive category ‘Controlled Opposition’, there are always one or two tells that give the game away.

In Farage’s case, I’d say one big clue was during Covid when he had himself pictured banging pots and pans for our NHS. Another was the extraordinary and never-to-be memory-holed moment when he called for Tony Blair to be appointed Britain’s Vaccine Czar.

Now you could argue, as many Farage defenders no doubt would, that this was uncharacteristic behaviour, the product of misplaced panic and a genuine belief that ‘Covid’ really was the terrible danger ‘the experts’ said it was.

I’m quite sympathetic to this line of argument: many of us have changed our views quite radically over years and it would be a bit unfair, not to say misleading, to hold us accountable for nonsense we have since rejected. But this excuse only works if there’s a degree of contrition and repentance, especially if your behaviour and public statements have been as egregiously wrong-headed as Farage’s were during ‘Covid.’

Sure Farage has been hinting recently that he now thinks the vaccines weren’t quite as safe and effective as we were told at the time. But this is just tactical trimming, not the complete change of course that would be needed were we to take Farage seriously as a credible opponent of the New World Order.

Covid was a test which Farage – and many others – failed and failed utterly. You do not redeem yourself from such disgrace by shrugging your shoulders, muttering that mistakes were made and sighing ‘Ah. Next time, eh?’

Either you acknowledge that Covid was the largest scale assault on human freedoms in the history of the world – or you are part of the problem. You can’t redeem yourself by being quite sound on other stuff like immigration and the environment. It’s like being pro human sacrifice but expecting some leeway because you once gave some money to a lovely rehabilitation centre for injured capybaras.

“Ah but he can’t speak out on all the issues because…” I can hear Reform voters protesting.

“Oh, yeah, right, because what?” I’m afraid I’m going to have to rudely interrupt. “Because mass injecting the populace with deadly toxins that kill and maim them is one of those moot issues where there are pros and cons on both sides? Because there are times when it’s really important that governments should use massive amounts of taxpayers’ money to bribe the media to lie relentlessly to the public so that they’re easier to manipulate and poison? No, sorry. Being right about Ukraine doesn’t cut it. Not if as late as 2024 you’re a politician and you’re STILL not calling out the Covid scam for what it was and is: a shameless wealth transfer to the superrich; a controlling mechanism; a mass population cull.”

So no, I don’t think that Farage – or Richard Tice or Reform – are on our side. I think, whether wittingly or no, they’re just another part of the operation steering us towards the implementation of the New World Order on behalf of the people who hate us and want to kill us or enslave us.

Delingpole is right. It’s not enough if some media celebrity or politician says one, or two, or three things that you happen to agree with. Either you are down with Clown World or you are not.

And these days, that’s the only thing that matters. This isn’t about expecting perfection, this is about a base expectation that one stands against the evil in this world rather than embrace and endorse it.

DISCUSS ON SG


Vote for Peace

They give you war and call it democracy.

London’s support for Kiev during the conflict with Moscow will remain at the same level under his leadership, the new Prime Minister of Britain Keir Starmer has told Vladimir Zelensky. Starmer replaced Rishi Sunak as the head of the UK government on Friday after the Labour Party he leads claimed a landslide victory in a general election, securing at least 412 of the 650 seats in parliament. One of his first phone calls in the new role was with Zelensky.

DISCUSS ON SG


DOA in Wales

The Conservative Party no longer exists in Wales:

The UK Labour Party has won all but five of Wales’ 32 seats in the House of Commons after the Conservatives suffered a crushing defeat in Thursday’s general election. Labour secured 27 of the Welsh seats, while the pro-independence Plaid Cymru party won four and the Lib Dems took one. The Conservative Party faced a total wipeout, losing all 14 of the seats they had won in the 2019 election.

It appears that the English people will also require a different party to represent them, as apparently getting wiped out with a Hindu at its head wasn’t enough for the Conservatives, who are now apparently debating which African they should get behind as a leader.

It’s remarkable that the Tories still think they’re playing a game of ideology and inclusivity. That game is over, because Britain is no longer racially homogenous.


The End of the Conservative Party

The Tories may be going the way of the Whig Party soon, and they absolutely deserve suffering the worst electoral defeat in British history by having thrown away 14 years of political power and accomplishing nothing more than to slavishly serve their masters in Clown World:

The UK Labour party is predicted to win a landslide victory in the British general election, according to a preliminary exit poll released as voting closed on Thursday evening.

According to the poll, Labour will win 410 out of the 650 seats, up from 205, in the House of Commons, while the previously governing Tories will secure 131 seats, down from 344.

The Liberal Democrats are predicted to win 61 seats, Nigel Farage’s Reform UK 13, and the Scottish National Party (SNP) ten. The Greens are slated to win two seats and the Welsh party Plaid Cymru four.

Sky News has described the Tories’ result as “the biggest electoral collapse in British electoral history.”

All the Tories had to do to stay in power was three things: Brexit, Deportation, and Neutrality in Ukraine. Well, four things, as a genuinely English Prime Minister would have also gone a long way.

Instead, they went one-for-four and quite rightly paid the price. The pendulum is moving toward sovereign nationalism, and the sovereign nations are going to win their war against Clown World. And there is no need for a Conservative Party that couldn’t even conserve the nation.

Labour, of course, won’t be any better. But at least they are open enemies rather than false friends.

UPDATE: It’s interesting to note that the Scottish National Party has been totally destroyed in Scotland. They had their chance, but they blew the independence referendum and thereby demonstrated that there was no need for the party to even exist. And all they had to do to win it was limit the vote to Scottish citizens actually resident in Scotland.

DISCUSS ON SG


Atheists Discover Consequences

It’s always mildly amusing to recall that they used to call themselves “brights” because they genuinely believed that they were smarter than Christians. Never mind that the island nation that developed a world-spanning empire under Christendom now can’t even offer token resistance to the imperial dar al-Islam:

I am getting scared of the rise of Islam in the UK and Europe. I study philosophy at university in England…. Oh boy my homeland is being overrun by Islam.

One guy legit told me the other day on a Friday that “I should be at the mosque” and shouted at me for not being so. I know plenty of Christians, and whilst I myself am atheist, none have ever tried to convert me or call me a heretic- whilst the only homophobes I know have been Muslim. Someone also said my degree, philosophy was “devil worship because asking questions about the universe and truth is evil-this is especially true because I focus in logic and game theory. They said it was not “real” and satanic…

What scares me most is that the left (of which I am a part of) seems to protect Islam by way of calling all who support it islamaphobic….when I said I supported Israel as it’s the only safe space for LGBT guys in the entire Middle East, and a democracy, someone spat at me and called me a “devil”.

It is psychotic. Do you think the west will fall to Islam? Sorry for the vent: I’ve come to the conclusion that I am very inclusive, but I cannot be inclusive to those who hate inclusion because fictional sky dad said no.

The fascinating thing is that even when they are in terror for their lives and their lifestyles, they still do not have the intellectual flexibility to admit that they were wrong, that inclusivity is evil and destructive, and that a nation that ceases to be a Christian nation will soon cease to be a nation at all.

If you accept diversity, equality, and inclusivity as ideals, then you have already lost the war. It’s just a matter of time before those who correctly reject those concepts as being intrinsically false overrun you.

DISCUSS ON SG


Farage is Deep State 4

James Delingpole explains why Nigel Farage and his Reform Party are no more a genuine alternative to the Conservative Party than Labour or the Liberal Democrats:

I don’t trust Nigel Farage. But that doesn’t mean he is wrong on everything. He is not wrong, for example, when he says that the Russian incursion into Eastern Ukraine was provoked by the West. Nor is he wrong that the only acceptable solution is a negotiated peace settlement.

But that still doesn’t mean we should trust him. This is the same man who, during the fake Covid pandemic helped promote the psyop by allowing himself to be filmed banging his pots and pans for ‘Our NHS’. And the same man who urged that Tony Blair should be put in charge of the operation to roll out those safe and effective vaccines now bowling over his constituency like ninepins.

So what are we to make of it when so blatant and slippery an Establishment change agent suddenly spouts something that makes such obvious sense? Are we to go – as so many Reform voters are saying – “Well he may not be perfect. But at least he’s preferable to the Sunak/Starmer uniparty.”

No, he is not. For Farage, too, is a card-carrying member of the Sunak/Starmer uniparty. His role is merely to offer the gullible the illusion that the rigged voting system offers any alternative other than the uniparty.

Delingpole’s point is not that one should vote Tory instead of Reform. His point is that it doesn’t matter for whom an Englishman votes, because all of the Establishment parties are under the control and guidance of precisely the same global satanists.

Democracy, particularly in its limited representative form, is nothing more than a sham meant to prevent the volatile public from knowing who truly rules over them. The whole point of the political systems of the modern “democracies” is not to express the will of the people, but rather, prevent it from being realized. Yes, this is an inversion of what you were taught in school, but if you haven’t figured out by now that what you are taught in school is an inversion of the truth, you really haven’t been paying attention.

If the self-styled defenders of democracy actually believed in democracy, they would be actively seeking to remove its legal limitations such as the courts, the parliaments, the senates, and the executive agencies. We have the technology for direct democracy and we have the legal framework for referendums, which means we have the ability to directly apply the clearly-expressed will of the people to every single political issue of the day.

And yet, the will of the people is relentlessly resisted and denied.

This is why the “authoritarian” models of Russia and China is not only more effective and more popular than those of the so-called “democracies”, but they are more legitimate as well. The very high popularity ratings for both Xi Jinping and Vladimir Putin are not only real, but they extend well beyond their domestic audiences. In fact, the least popular leaders in the world are all Clown Worlders, Yoon Suk-Yeol of South Korea, Emmanuel Macron of France, Rishi Sunak of the United Kingdom, Olaf Scholz of Germany, and the least popular of all, Fumio Kishida of Japan.

When the Clown World strategists plan their color revolutions aimed at regime change, they are very often engaging in the baseless projection of the unpopularity of their own “democratic” leaders onto other nations. But the nations of the world finally understand that the “freedom and democracy” banner under which the Empire of Lies has spread is now no more legitimate than the Communist promise of a Worker’s Paradise.

DISCUSS ON SG


How the Hapsburgs Took Over England

Or, was Henry VIIIth actually the good guy and was the dissolution of the monasteries motivated by something more than simple royal greed?

The story of Henry VIII is the story of a conflict. The conflict that is occurring is the conflict between Habsburg and Tudor houses. The house of Habsburg is, as they had previously done in many other European countries, attempting to gain political control of England through marriage and through its influence over the Catholic Church.

Which is to say: The Habsburgs are trying to take over England during the reign of Henry VIII.
Henry’s actions – exiting a marriage to a Habsburg connected figure, and exiting the Catholic Church – are direct responses to Habsburg attacks on England’s sovereignty through those same two avenues. The Habsburg attack comes through marriage and the Catholic Church.

However I have never seen that story recounted. Instead, I have only seen bizarre retellings where half the plot is left out, the Habsburg part. Obviously, if you omit the geopolitical motivation for Henry VIII’s actions from the story then his actions seem insane. The situation reminds me a little bit of the experience of accidentally walking into a spiderweb. Have you ever done this? It is totally jarring. You flail your hands and look like an idiot trying to get the bits of spiderweb off of your face. To an outside observer who can’t see the spiderweb you just walked into, you look spastic, manic. But there is a reason you’re acting that way. The conflict with the Habsburgs is that spiderweb for Henry VIII. You need to know it is there to understand his actions.

Is there any evidence of a Habsburg coup attempt? The evidence I have that the Habsburgs are trying to take over England during this period is that the Habsburgs do take over England in this period.

What? Yes. ‘Bloody Mary’ Tudor weds Phillip II Habsburg – the son of the Habsburg Emperor – just 5 years after the death of Henry VIII.

Phillip Habsburg becomes King of England Jure Uxoris – joint sovereign with Queen Mary. England comes under Habsburg control, along with Spain, Holland, Belgium, Luxembourg, Austria, Flanders, Bohemia, Germany, Italy, Hungary and… Did I forget any? At this point the Habsburgs are basically kings of the Universe, totally drunk with power. In England they are literally burning their enemies at the stake.

The Habsburg method for expanding their territory was fairly simple:

  1. Find a failing kingdom in need of aid or protection.
  2. Offer to use your influence in the Catholic Church to aid the Kingdom in exchange for an advantageous marriage, protection money, or both.
  3. Betray the Kingdom and use your influence instead to install your newly wed Habsburg as the sole sovereign.

Are you starting to understand why the story of a medieval Republican who miraculously defeats something that looks suspiciously like today’s democratic institutional oligarchy has never been properly told?

The Habsburg Coup in Henry VIII’s England

I’ve literally never, ever, heard this theory before, but at first glance, it sounds extremely persuasive. It also tends to raise an obvious question about the ethnicity of the Hapsburgs, who were both highly consanguineous and physically deformed. They certainly appear to have worked out their own method of “color revolutions” centuries before the neocons, although it may simply be that they were inspirations for the Rothschilds rather than predecessors of some kind.

And, of course, it would be yet another example of a “religious war” actually being about something other than the purported religious conflict, which tends to track with what we’ve learned about everything from the Crusades to the 30 Years War.

To think some people actually believe that history is boring… Definitely read the whole thing!

DISCUSS ON SG