There is no concession

For crying out loud, people really need to stop falling for every single step of the demoralization campaign.

What does GSA being allowed to preliminarily work with the Dems have to do with continuing to pursue our various cases on what will go down as the most corrupt election in American political history? We are moving full speed ahead. Will never concede to fake ballots & “Dominion”. – President Trump

There are two possibilities here. Either Trump is managing the decline and is simply drawing out the process because he is an cruel bastard who wants to troll both his own followers and the Democrats or he understands the GSA release of funds is irrelevant and he wishes to take the pressure off a woman and her family because he sees no need for her to bear it.

Which possibility sounds more like the President Trump you have observed for the last four years?

Just. Be. Patient. There will either be victory or defeat in the end. Wringing your hands and crying about how worried you are probably won’t matter at all, but to the extent it matters, it favors the latter. Get a grip. And remember, once a signal is sent and received, there is no need to keep sending it.

UPDATE: AC has a theory about the GSA approval of the transition funds.

This might be because Democrats were going to call the head of GSA in to testify about this, and Trump may not want her able to be questioned about what she knows.

Meanwhile, Venezuelans have known about the connection between Smartmatic and the CIA for 12 years, because one of Smartmatic’s Venezuelan founders died in the crash of what is believed to have been a CIA plane.

Woven into one small story about a plane crash in Venezuela that killed seven people are visible threads from two perennial American cover-ups:  one surrounding vote fraud,  and one covering-up the CIA’s role in drug trafficking. For anyone interested in the news that gets left out of the newspaper, its’ a Perfect Storm. The Mother of All Scandals.

The downed plane’s relevance to the ongoing story of vote fraud in America involves the identity of it’s passenger, Jose Alfredo Anzola, a 34-year old founder of Smartmatic, a Venezuela-based election company whose American subsidiary counted one in every three votes in the 2004 Presidential election, while engaged the whole time in heated controversy over allegations the firm counting America’s votes had hidden ties to—of all people— Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez.

The connection between last week’s plane crash and the ongoing saga of CIA Drug trafficking begins with 43-year old Mario Donadi Gafaro, the veteran drug pilot at the controls of the twin engine plane.

This suggests that the computer aspect of U.S. vote fraud has been around longer than anyone except conspiracy theorists imagined. For a deeper dive into the history of Smartmatic, which was founded in Venezuela in 1997, read this article, links to which have been resulting in instabans on Twitter.


Lies and more lies

 When you deal enough with lawyers, you learn how they lie through omission and misdirection. See if you can spot the lies here:

Against false statements, the facts: Smartmatic does not own Dominion Voting Systems and has never provided Dominion with any technology. Smartmatic has never had ties with any government or political group anywhere in the world.

See, Smartmatic “has never provided Dominion with any technology” because Dominion provided the technology to Smartmatic.

Reporter: The question on people’s minds, why is Smartmatic even still here in the Philippines after reports it had violated provisions of the election automated law. Number one for example that it was never allowed to bid in the 2010 elections because it did not actually own the software. Dominion owned the software. Dominion Voting owned the software. Plus the difficulty that they had to put the COMELEC (Commission on Elections) in order to access the source code. Issues like that. Your thoughts? People say we should not be subjected to Smartmatic again this time around.

Mark Malloch Brown: Yes, well I think that’s competitors who say that. The fact is, yes a part of our technology IS licensed from Dominion. But you tell me a large technology company which isn’t using in part licenses from other companies. And we have a license for the international use of that particular piece of the technology.

Reporter: So Mark let me just cut in there and ask you, the license issued by Dominion for you to use for proprietary software, that is a live license for you to use?

Mark Malloch Brown: Yes.

But then, it turns out that the lying by omission and misdirection goes even deeper.

 Leading voting technology provider Sequoia Voting Systems is pleased to announce the sale of the company to a group of private U.S. investors led by Sequoia’s current executive management team.

“Sequoia is an innovative company with a century-long history; hard-working and talented employees; proven products; a solid balance sheet; essentially no debt, a corporate structure that provides flexibility; an extensive customer base and a very bright future,” said Jack Blaine, Sequoia President & CEO. “I am very excited and hopeful about the tremendous possibilities and numerous opportunities that lay ahead for Sequoia given the company’s new structure and the completion of this sale process.”

The investment group, led by Sequoia President & CEO Jack Blaine and company Chief Financial Officer Peter McManemy, purchased Sequoia from former parent company Smartmatic Corporation for an undisclosed sum.

That private investment group sold Sequoia, and its technology to Dominion.

Sequoia Voting Systems was a California-based company that is one of the largest providers of electronic voting systems in the U.S., having offices in Oakland, Denver and New York City. Some of its major competitors were Premier Election Solutions (formerly Diebold Election Systems) and Election Systems & Software. It was acquired by the Canadian company Dominion Voting Systems on June 4, 2010. 

In other words, there was a cutout, which doesn’t even truly qualify as a third party due to the fact that it was led by Sequoia’s management team, that allows Smartmatic to deceptively claim that it never provided the technology directly to Dominion even though Dominion now owns the technology that Smartmatic formerly owned.

And note that Dominion Voting Systems is a Canadian company, thereby confirming the fact of foreign interference in US elections.


Proof is the new evidence

It’s interesting to see the mainstream media narrative keep changing over time. From the Daily Mail:

Trump claims that there is ‘big voter fraud information coming out concerning Georgia’ as he continues to claim he won the election

President Donald Trump continued to allege voter fraud on Saturday

He claimed there is ‘big voter fraud information’ coming from Georgia

Trump urged his supporters to ‘stay tuned!’ yet offered no further information on what his campaign claims to have found there

Biden was declared the winner in Georgia after a hand recount this week 

Trump’s previous claims of fraud have been widely dismissed as his legal team has failed to supply any proof 

First, the narrative was that there wasn’t any evidence, which we’re still seeing being ignorantly repeated by a few lagging retards who simply don’t know what “evidence” is. Then that shifted to “no strong evidence”, which is still the primary narrative despite the fact that no one in the media is even remotely equipped to understand, let alone explain, the significance of the strong statistical and technological evidence that has already been revealed.

Now, the media has begun retreating to the “failed to supply any proof” position, which we can reasonably expect to be abandoned within two weeks. Of course, once the proof is supplied, it’s game over for Sleepy Joe and a lot of corrupt election officials.


They’re starting to worry

The survey taken November 13-17, more than a week after Election Day, shows President Trump’s open defiance of Biden’s victory appears to be affecting the public’s confidence in American democracy – especially among Republicans.


Is she math-challenged?

 Or does Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez know what is coming when all the votes are properly counted?

A constituent asked Ocasio-Cortez about her thoughts on Democrats shrinking their majority in the House and expressed her frustration.

“Why did we lose so many seats, and what needs to be done to get them back next term?” the moderator asked on behalf on the constituent.

“So, you know, of course, the loss of the House majority is just extraordinarily upsetting to all of us. It’s upsetting to all of us who are invested in having a Democratic majority so that we can expand health care, so that we can raise wages, so that we can protect working people,” Ocasio-Cortez said.

The charade being utilized to cover the fraud is cracking. 


Sounds like a movie

Then again, Q told us that we were watching one. One thing I had wondered about is where all those late-night Biden-only ballots were produced, and this might explain the mystery.

The Boss of the Philly mob — ‘Skinny Joey’ Merlino — is taking a victory strut, hobnobbing around the highest echelons of old-time mafia folk, mostly in Florida, describing what may have been the heist of the century: the 2020 presidential election.

The feat is drawing praise from far-flung corners of the Italian American business community, which sees the thanks of a grateful administration as key to the revival of the community’s political influence.

But an associate says that Merlino might just be willing to flip on Joe Biden and the Pennsylvania political operatives who ordered up some 300,000 election ballots marked for Biden.  The source alleges that Merlino and a lean team of associates manufactured those ballots at a rate of $10 per ballot — a whopping $3 million for three days of work.  They were then packaged into non-descript cardboard boxes and dropped off outside the Philadelphia Convention Center.

Sources who spoke to The Chronicle on the condition of anonymity say that Merlino picked up those ballots from two private households where a trusted handful of associates were busily marking ballots with Sharpie markers.  They were paid more than $1,000 per hour, often producing thousands of ballots every hour for more than 60 nearly-consecutive hours.

The ballots were purchased in cash. 

Nice work if you can get it. And, of course, avoid doing the time for it…. 


The election arrests begin

 This should be the first of many, one presumes:

The Democrat Director of Texas state political strategy for the Joe Biden Presidential campaign has been arrested for electoral fraud.

Democratic Party operative Dallas Jones was formally accused of helping to run an illegal ballot harvesting operation in the state of Texas on behalf of the Joe Biden campaign during this contested Presidential election.

According to the National File, two investigators, including a former FBI agent and former police officer, testified under oath that they have Democratic Party internal documentation, as well as video evidence and witnesses, for their investigation.

Now do the Secretaries of State in PA and GA…. 

UPDATE: There is confusion about whether this is an old arrest or a second arrest. Regardless, this isn’t going to be one that matters since whenever it happened, it happened in Texas. There need to be a LOT more to address the 2020 election fraud.


Proof of PA fraud

The Gateway Pundit provides proof of mail-in ballot fraud in Pennsylvania:

In almost every county throughout the state, the President was awarded a percent of votes 40{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} less than the percent the President won on election day.  If Trump won a county by 80{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the vote on Election Day, he won 40{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the mail-in vote for a county.  If the President won 60{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the vote on Election Day, he won 20{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the mail-in vote in another county.  This pattern occurred in almost every county with the only noticeable exception of Philadelphia, where the President only earned 30{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of the vote on Election Day.


Too implausible for fiction

Bestselling novelist Larry Correia, who knows fiction when he sees it, asked a number of professional auditors about the plausibility of the statistical evidence for the media-projected results of the U.S. presidential election:

I noticed yesterday that I was having lots of strangers show up to scream at me whenever I posted any information about election fraud, but they were all low information types just barfing up “fact checks” which was basically whatever the news had just told them, but none of them had the basic knowledge of how fraud works to even sorta discuss any of the actual data. So I got curious and posted the following on facebook:

One quick question, only answer if you have worked in auditing/stats/fraud/investigations/or other data analysis type fields. In your entire career, have you ever seen a case that threw up this many flags that DID NOT turn out to be fraud?

Again, flags are not proof. They are merely anomalies which would cause an auditor to check. Nor am I claiming this is a scientific poll (though I’d bet I’m still more accurate than Nate Silver!). There is of course a sampling bias as I know many of these people in meat space (and their resumes on this topic are killer) but it was also open to the public so anyone could comment and it got shared a hundred times.

The consensus thus far is overwhelming. No. Not only no but hell no.

Certified Fraud Examiner since 1992 here. I have never seen such an oversupply of red flags. 3 or 4 might be explicable or coincidence, but dozens all pointing the same way? This would be too implausible for fiction, let alone a case study.

No. In fact I would say that in about 34 years of this work it is my professional opinion that at this level it is mathematically more likely that our sun blinks out of existence as a result of every particle in it spontaneously “blinking” into another state than it is that fraud did not take place on the order of millions of votes.

Epstein didn’t kill himself. Biden didn’t win. And Q says it had to be this way.

How do you ‘show’ the public the truth?

How do you ‘safeguard’ US elections post-POTUS?

How do you ‘remove’ foreign interference and corruption and install US-owned voter ID law(s) and other safeguards? 

It had to be this way.

Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light. 

Q

This tends to confirm my hypothesis that President Trump was so confident of his reelection that he was willing to appear to put his second term at risk in order to secure free and fair elections in 2024 and beyond. After all, what is the point of winning a second term if the Swamp is simply going to undo everything you have accomplished. This would also explain the need to wait for the second term to drain the Swamp; the only way to systematically excise the full extent of the fraud was to expose it to everyone.


The statistical storm

Although the statistical evidence is rapidly turning into hard physical evidence of ballot fraud, it’s still useful to continue noting the statistical anomalies and how strongly they indicate that there is no shortage of fraud to find by refining the statistical case against Biden:

  1. TURNOUT 
  2. OUTPERFORMANCE VS. OBAMA
  3. BIDEN-ONLY BALLOTS
  4. ABSENCE OF MAIL-IN VOTE VETTING

The statistical case, in isolation, does not prove fraud. But the confluence of highly unlikely results does, emphatically, paint of picture of utter improbability.

Any one of these four factors alone would cast intense doubt upon election results.

Put all four together, and the result is a seemingly impossible statistical perfect storm.

And it is wildly ironic that the self-styled “party of science” that relies so heavily upon statistics for “proof” of racism and income inequality to turn around and reject the idea that statistics are a reasonable basis to justify further investigations into ballot fraud.