Immigration is rape culture

The silence of feminists on the explosive issue of immigration and rape is one more indication of their total incoherence and one more reason why their opinions should be resolutely rejected. Everywhere, from Australia to Norway, Muslim immigrants are gang-raping white girls en masse… so naturally the feminists are yammering on about the problem of college girls getting drunk and having consensual sex with young white men.

It is difficult to overstate how awful these crimes were, nor how completely victims were failed by the authorities. One girl was doused in petrol and told she would be set on fire if she didn’t comply. Others were forced to watch rapes and told they would be next if they spoke out. The police regarded these girls with as much contempt as the rapists.

And in perhaps the most horrific paragraph in a report published yesterday, we learned that in two cases fathers had tracked down their daughters and tried to rescue them from houses in which they were being held, only to find themselves arrested by police, while the rapists walked free.

How many council staff do you suppose are under investigation, or have been sacked? Yup, you guessed it: none. Rotherham council’s chief executive, Martin Kimber, has not only stayed in his post but he has said he doesn’t have evidence enough to prosecute or discipline a single member of the council’s staff….

The political Left shrieks blue murder over the slightest indication of
overbearing male behaviour when it’s a white man. The tone-deaf
“Everyday Sexism” project is a weapon wielded almost exclusively at
white middle-class men by white middle-class women. But it makes excuses
for rapists and even child abusers when the criminals are black, or,
especially, from a Muslim community.

It is now abundantly clear that whether you are in the USA or the UK, the law won’t defend you. You will have to defend yourself and your own, and, quite possibly, against the best efforts of the law. Which isn’t actually the problem it appears to be. The law is outnumbered. And they bloody well know it.

Immigration is rape culture. That’s a devastating meme. Use it. Hammer it home every time you hear a feminist bring up “rape culture”. If they support mass immigration, they are advocating gang rape. Immigration is rape culture.

Related: a prediction from Glenn Reynolds:

Prediction: There’ll be more citizenship-stripping in the future, as European countries come to regret their openness to immigrants who have no interest in assimilating.

Preferably sooner rather than later. Mass immigration isn’t only rape culture, it is also culture rape.


Enoch Powell: still right

Slowly, but surely, the evils of mass immigration are causing people to stop being afraid of being called racist, as they gradually come to realize that if they do not fight back and repatriate the invaders, their culture and their civilization will die.

A veteran Tory MP has claimed controversial ‘rivers of blood’ MP Enoch Powell was right to warn against immigration. Gerald Howarth said the notorious Conservative MP had been correct to warn that mass movement of ‘non Christian’ migrants to Britain would cause problems.

His comments were made in an email to a constituent about the Islamist ‘Trojan Horse’ plot in Birmingham to radicalise school children by taking over governing boards.

In the leaked letter the former defence minister wrote: ‘Clearly, the arrival of so many people of non-Christian faith has presented a challenge, as so many of us, including the late Enoch Powell, warned decades ago.

‘Recent events have illustrated that some of these new arrivals have a very different ethos from traditional Christian schools and we are right to intervene to prevent them from teaching divisive ideology to children born here.’

Mr Howarth tonight confirmed that the leaked letter was ‘entirely accurate’ and reflected his views about the dangers of immigration….

Enoch Powell’s notorious ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech was delivered in Birmingham in April 1968, sparking widespread condemnation. In the speech Mr Powell called for the ‘repatriation’ of non-white immigrants, claiming the racial mix in Britain would lead to city riots. Sir Gerald did not advocate repatriation in the leaked email to his constituent.

It’s been interesting to see how most of the accusations of racism made by SWPLs and SJWs have abruptly trickled to a minimum ever since I revealed that I am a Native American eligible for enrollment in my ancestral tribe. All those accusations of my being a white supremacist, which were utterly stupid from the start given my known Hispanic background, have almost entirely vanished, thus proving that they are far more intrinsically racist than they ever accused me of being. Because my ideas haven’t changed in the interim, only their awareness of what I am. In fact, the more I have learned about my tribe, the more I am convinced that there is absolutely no room for compromise on the issue of mass immigration by Europeans and European-Americans who wish to preserve Western civilization.

What has happened to my tribe since the Spanish first encountered them is horrific. Decimated doesn’t even begin to describe it. Their language is nearly extinct, their numbers are very small, and only recently has the Internet made it possible for people like my family to learn about its connections to them. And lest you think I didn’t always know perfectly well that my family wasn’t exactly like all of my Scandinavian friends and neighbors in Minnesota, that is a picture of me with my grandparents. My grandmother is the daughter of a Mexican revolutionary and the Indian woman he married after he fled Pancho Villa’s assassins. And of all my family, they were the two people to whom I was always the closest.

So, perhaps you’ll understand the unmitigated extent of my contempt when I see lily-white liberals and black race-baiters attempting to disqualify my perfectly rational views from discussion by falsely claiming that I am a racist white supremacist, and why I don’t hesitate to play the Red card in order to shut down their lying rhetoric. Because I am both Native American and Native European, and I don’t wish to see what happened to the former people happen to the latter. It has happened before, it can happen again, and it will happen if the natives do not heed the wisdom of Enoch Powell and repatriate their would-be conquerors.

And it is telling, is it not, that The Daily Mail will not accept comments on the Howarth article? I suspect that even the nominally conservative UK media does not wish for people to grasp the true depth of the widespread public support for Powell’s position.

UPDATE: Speaking of UK politics, this is big news out of Britain:

Mr Carswell cannot be dismissed as a naive or out of touch intellectual. Let us remember that it was five years ago that it was Carswell who set in motion the movement which swept Speaker Martin from office in the wake of the expenses scandal.

This is why I believe that Mr Carswell’s decision to quit the Tory party and join Nigel Farage’s Ukip is a seismic political event. He cannot be compared to the ordinary self-interested political defections, for instance Shaun Woodward or Quentin Davies’ departure from the Conservatives to New Labour, in 2001 and 2007 respectively. Mr Carswell, and this is completely terrifying for David Cameron, is acting out of conviction rather than self-interest.

Men of principle acting out of conviction rather than self-interest changes the world. No wonder it terrifies so many people.

UPDATE 2: Keep this in mind:

The woman who presided over the last five years of failure as the boss of
children’s services at Rotherham Council is the same executive who removed
three children from their foster parents because they were Ukip voters…. Mrs Thacker lives with her husband in a four-bedroomed house in Shipley, West
Yorkshire.


The terrible cost of equality

It is becoming abundantly clear that immigration from outside Europe is not only dyscivic, but dysgenic as well. The Men of the West are becoming literally stupider as a result of opening their nations to various orcs, trolls, and goblins combined with the widespread adoption of a feminist philosophy that significantly increases the probabilities that the West’s most intelligent women – and many of its most intelligent men – will never have children:

An IQ test used to determine whether Danish men are fit to serve in the military has revealed scores have fallen by 1.5 points since 1998. And standard tests issued in the UK and Australia echo the results, according to journalist Bob Holmes, writing in New Scientist.

Tests carried out in 1980 and in 2008 showed that the average 14-year-old was two IQ points cleverer in 1980, according to a study published in 2009. Scientists found that performance dropped the most dramatically in teenagers in the upper half of the intelligence scale, The Telegraph reported. Brighter teens who took part in the study in 2008 were on average six IQ points less intelligent than their counterparts tested 28 years earlier.

The most pessimistic explanation as to why humans seem to be becoming less intelligent is that we have effectively reached our intellectual peak….

Some have even contentiously said this could be because educated people are deciding to have fewer children, so that subsequent generations are largely made up of less intelligent people. Richard Lynn, a psychologist at the University of Ulster, calculated the decline in humans’ genetic potential. He used data on average IQs around the world in 1950 and 2000 to discover that our collective intelligence has dropped by one IQ point.

Westerns have lost 14 IQ points on average since the Victorian age, according to a study published by the University of Amsterdam last year. Jan te Nijenhuis thinks this could be because intelligent women tend to have less children than women who are not as clever, The Huffington Post reported. The perceived link between IQ and fertility is a very contentious one. Dr Nijenhuis studied the results of 14 intelligence studies conducted between 1884 and 2004 to come to his conclusion.


Each study measured peoples’ reaction times – how long they took to press a button after being prompted. It is claimed that reaction time mirrors mental processing speed – so it reflects intelligence.They found that visual reaction times averaged 194 milliseconds in the late 19th Century, but in 2004, they had increased to 275 milliseconds….

It’s amazing what equality-indoctrinated scientists are willing to throw out as hypotheses rather than even consider the totally obvious. It hardly seems likely that the intellectual peak of Man would roughly coincide with the release of “Please Hammer, Don’t Hurt ‘Em”, among other things.  Not convinced because you’re one of those geniuses who “doesn’t see race” (or more properly, doesn’t understand the consequences of genetic science) or “doesn’t believe in IQ” (or, more properly, didn’t score very high on intelligence tests)? Then it should be interesting to hear your explanation for the simultaneous rise in deformed penises in Sweden, which also began happening recently “for reasons unknown”:

A condition which causes baby boys to be born with deformed penises
is becoming more common in Sweden, for reasons unknown to scientists. Researchers in Sweden assessed data collected on Hypospadias between
1973 and 2009. They found that before 1990, only 4.5 boys out of every
thousand had the condition known as hypospadias. But after 1990, the
figure had risen to 8 per 1000 boys. In an attempt to explain the
rise, the experts from Stockholm’s Karolinksa Institute considered
factors known to cause the defect, including low-birth weight, being
born a twin, and parents who used IVF treatment to conceive. However,
scientists could not link the rise to any previously known causes, and
instead concluded that an unknown factor was behind the trend, The Local reported.

Whatever might have happened after 1990 in Sweden that could possibly explain the increasing appearance of this birth defect at the same time average intelligences are decreasing and crime rates are rising? This “unknown factor” is a great mystery indeed. So congratulate yourself that you manage to avoid seeing race in the same way that Swedish scientists manage to avoid seeing basic cause and effect. Because, in a few dysgenic generations, your descendants won’t have any need to willfully ignore the readily apparent the way you do, they’ll be too stupid and deformed to see much of anything at all.

The costs of the fictitious progressive dogma of equality are real and material. Equality does not exist, it is not a positive ideal, and it must be rejected if Man is not going to continue his degradation into Orc. I don’t know Hebrew, but it strikes me that equalitarian dogma is the exact opposite of tikkun olem, the uplift of the world. Anti-nationalism is the degradation of Man. Equality is a lie. Even the historical icons of equality are lies. Consider the words and actual sentiments of The Great Emancipator, Abraham Lincoln:

“I will say then that I am not, nor ever have been in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the white and black races, that I am not nor ever have been in favor of making voters or jurors of Negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with white people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the white and black races which I believe will for ever forbid the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I as much as any other man am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the white race.”

Was Lincoln correct about the prospects for social and political equality? 156 years later, consider the recent events in Ferguson, Missouri, and think about the gerrymandered political districts carved out on racial lines. Then tell us how many more years will be required to reach that nominal ideal.


When do we bomb Britain?

After all, we’re told that geographic translocation makes people 100 percent real members of the nation into which they immigrate.

Islamic State executioner who beheaded US journalist IS British, government believes as Cameron returns from holiday early and Foreign Secretary says UK troops could be sent to Baghdad.

Now why would UK troops be sent to Baghdad? Shouldn’t the US be launching airstrikes on London to warn the British people not to behead Americans? Actually, that’s not the worst idea. Perhaps the Brits would be a little bit more cautious about handing out passports to people. Call it the Pearl-Foley Doctrine: if one of your citizens murders an American, your government and people will be held responsible.


This may cause a problem

Ukraine is attacking Russian vehicles, which may or may not be invading Ukraine

Ukraine said its troops attacked and partially destroyed a column of armed vehicles that had crossed the border from Russian territory, while Russia said it was concerned about an attack on another convoy carrying aid.

Putin clearly needs to study at the feet of the brilliant strategists in Honduras and Guatemala. The correct way to safely cross a border is to send in children, or at least twenty-something armed men you claim to be children. Isn’t it interesting that Glen Beck is not in tears, insisting that every Ukrainians Christian duty is to go to the border and and meet those poor Russian trucks seeking a better life and offer them food and clothing.


What West?

With Easterners murdering Easterners again, the cry rises once more: the West must act!

  • The West must face the evil that has revealed itself in the Iraq genocide – Michael Nazir-Ali
  • The West must intervene in Iraq – Lord Dannatt
  • The decision to intervene is almost certainly the right call – Ross Douthat

Why? What possible interest does the West have in keeping Easterners from killing each other? France imported tens of thousands of pro-French Algerians to keep them from being murdered by other Algerians, now their police don’t dare to enter the slums inhabited by the grandchildren of those Algerians. The USA has been importing people from every single one of its post-WWI foreign engagements of the previous century, what benefit has that been to Americans beyond nearly exposing the people of Coon Rapids, Minnesota, to Ebola?

Did Rome concern itself when one Chinese king was slaughtering other Chinese? Did Imperial Japan intervene in the Dutch-Spanish war?

The West is in no position to help anyone now that it has been invaded by more than 30 million Muslims and Africans and 50 million Hispanics. With the center of gravity under assault, nothing at all will be accomplished elsewhere. Considering that the present debacle is the direct result of the last two failed Western interventions, why does anyone believe that a third one will improve anything, rather than make it worse?

Besides, the “West” is already involved. There are presently more than 500 “Britons” fighting with ISIS in Syria and Iraq. Which means the West shouldn’t concern itself with the wars over there, it should be preparing to fight the inevitable one over here.


Will she write the story?

A female journalist gets a bigger story than she bargained for:

The woman was reporting on illegal immigration from France to Britain and police believe the attack was carried by some of the men she intended to write about in the northern France port.

Detectives described the attack as being of a “particularly brutal nature”….

The victim, who cannot be named for legal reasons, was described as “a London student who had travelled to France to highlight problems surrounding clandestine immigration.”

I have little sympathy for this woman, and none at all if she fails to honestly tell her fellow Brits about what happened to her at the hands of these poor immigrants who are just seeking a better life in Britain.  This is why: “this is believed to be the first time that a journalist trying
to highlight their plight has been attacked.” 

If the damned pro-immigration press would be more honest about the terrible cost of immigration to the native population, I tend to doubt she would have traveled there to “highlight their plight” in the first place.


Migrate them to Honduras

It’s a bit ironic that the technocrats are talking about migrating Californians out of California due to the extreme drought conditions, even as tens of thousands of Central American immigrants continue to migrate into California:

It’s going from worse to worst each week in California.

Suffering in its third year of drought, more than 58 percent of the state is currently in “exceptional drought” stage, according to the latest U.S. Drought Monitor map. That marks a huge jump from just seven days ago, when about 36 percent of the state was categorized that way.

Exceptional drought, the most extreme category, indicates widespread crop and pasture losses and shortages of water in reservoirs, streams and wells.

If the state continues on this path, there may have to be thoughts about moving people out, said Lynn Wilson, academic chair at Kaplan University and who serves on the climate change delegation in the United Nations.

“Civilizations in the past have had to migrate out of areas of drought,” Wilson said. “We may have to migrate people out of California.”

Now, I’m no expert on water usage, but it seems to me that before California starts forcibly migrating its residents out, it might want to consider not permitting any more people to migrate in.

That being said, no sane governor would permit the Californication of his state. Californians have trashed what used to be the Golden State; imagine what they will do wherever they descend next. It seems to me the only just thing to do is migrate them to Honduras. Then migrate all the pro-immigration people on the East Coast to the dessicated remnants of California so they can experience the benefits of the policies they’ve been advocating.

They’re dumb enough that one can simply tell them: “Drought? Oh, don’t worry about that. You’ve got plenty of water. Look, you’re right on the ocean!”


Immigration and overpopulation

Finally a group concerned with overpopulation is turning its attention to the actual problem:

A group dedicated to saving the planet by cutting runaway population increases is raising a new and shocking issue in Washington’s bitter fight over immigration reform: Most of the nation’s population growth is from immigrants, and they are consuming resources dangerously fast.

According to Negative Population Growth Inc., 80 percent of the growth in U.S. population comes from immigration, legal, illegal and among American-born children of immigrants.

“With increased population, we see a direct increase in the problems our nation faces on a daily basis: pollution, over-consumption, traffic gridlock, crowded schools and hospitals, overburdened social services, unemployment, crumbling infrastructure, urban sprawl, over-development, threatened or extinct animal and plant species, and dwindling natural resources,” said said Tracy Canada, the group’s deputy director.

It is madness that groups opposed to housing spread, pollution, and overpopulation have remained silent on immigration for so long when 80 percent of the population growth comes from immigrants. The environmentalists, in particular, are guilty of selling out the environment, with groups such as the Sierra Club having had their silence on the subject literally purchased by the son of a pair of Jewish immigrants, David Geffen. 

Overpopulation is a third world problem caused by first world do-gooders. And more do-goodery isn’t going to solve it, but will merely make it worse. One of the best arguments for shutting down immigration and repatriating low-productivity immigrants is that otherwise, the first world will be in no position to help the third world once its infrastructure begins to collapse.


A close call

Unless you lived in Minnesota 30 years ago, I can’t possibly explain how insane it sounds to hear that there are Africans living in Coon Rapids. I wonder how long it will be before they decide that the name of the town is racist:

Ebola victim who sparked fears of a worldwide outbreak was American: Father who died of incurable virus in Nigeria after taking international flight was going to visit his children in Minnesota…The couple, who both hold US citizenship are originally from Liberia and Decontee arrived in the country with her family in 1991 and Patrick came in the early 2000s. The couple are part of the large Liberian community in Minnesota, who moved there in the aftermath of the nation’s two civil wars in the 1980s and late 1990s.

The imported Somalis are bad enough, what with their suicide bombers and the occasional “gas leak” explosions that mysteriously blow up their residences. But Ebola-carrying Liberians too? This is Night of the Comet-level lunacy.

I’m as familiar with the melting pot mythology and Ellis Island rhetoric as anyone else. I get the idea that time plus geographic location is supposed to magically transform people from anywhere into something they previously were not. But seriously, even if you are one of those people whose grandparents were immigrants and are emotionally tied to the idea that you are too a Real American like George Washington because you are resident in a certain geography and there is a piece of paper that says you are, do you really think this is all going to end well? If so, how?

What, specifically, is the positive end result that is somehow going to be produced by establishing Mogadishu on the Mississippi and sending 30 underage Guatamalans to every town in America? Do you see America remaining the same, is it changing for the better, or for the worse? And if diversity is good, then why has every country in the world been predominantly homogenous until very recently?

Perhaps if the unfortunate Mr. Sawyer had lived long enough to bring the Ebola virus to Coon Rapids, that would be enough to convince the American public that this whole “we is the world” sentiment is fundamentally misguided. But I doubt it.