“They said there was nothing they could do.”

It appears there is nothing the German police can do about the invasion.

Shocking footage has surfaced online appearing to show a group of young migrants attacking two German pensioners after they stood up for a young women the men were harassing on a subway train.

Recorded on a mobile phone, the disgraceful video shows the men – of Eastern European or Arabic origin – holding one man by the arms as they verbally abuse him.

The second victim is seen grappling with one of the migrants, before he is held up by the neck and threatened….  The situation was brought under control. When the train reached the station I called the police. They said there was nothing they could do.

If there is no longer anything the police can do, I expect PEGIDA will be able to come up with a few ideas.


Go home, boy!

German grandfathers are extremely unhappy with a local mayor telling them that their granddaughters should stay out of areas with migrants and try to avoid provoking them if they want to avoid being sexually harassed.

And since we’re on the subject, don’t miss the Breitbart Migrant Crisis Live wire, which reports on the latest events taking place in the ongoing invasion of Europe.


ENOUGH NOW!

As I predicted months ago, the first stage of the nationalist response to the great orc invasion has begun. I am, however, somewhat surprised to see that it has begun in Sweden. It is a limited response; they’re only beating them up… for now:

A mob of black-clad masked men went on a rampage in and around Stockholm’s main train station last night beating up refugees and anyone who did not look like they were ethnically Swedish.

Before the attack, the group of 200 people handed out xenophobic leaflets with the message ‘Enough now’.

Swedish media reported that the thugs, allegedly linked to Sweden’s football hooligan scene, were targeting unaccompanied minors with a ‘foreign’ background.

The mob, wearing all-black balaclavas and armbands, ‘gathered with the purpose of attacking refugee children’ Stockholm police spokesman Towe Hagg said.

If the Swedish authorities are foolish enough to attempt to crack down on the anti-immigrant fighters rather than focus on respecting the “refugee children” back to their homelands, the slaughter is going to begin soon. As I warned five years ago, Anders Breivik was the harbinger of things to come.

And before the Swedish authorities decide upon their response, they should probably keep in mind that it isn’t only the migrants who will be attacked by the nationalist forces if they decide that it is the nationalists, and not the migrants, who are their enemies.

The leaflet, as translated by the Daily Mail:

ENOUGH NOW!

All over the country, reports are pouring in that the police can no longer cope with preventing and investigating the crimes which strike the Swedish people.
 

In some cases, for example, in the latest murder of a woman employed at a home for so called ‘unaccompanied minor refugees’ in Molndal, it goes as far as the National Police Commissioner choosing to show more sympathy for the perpetrator than the victim. But we refuse to accept the repeated assaults and harrassment against Swedish women.’
 

We refuse to accept the destruction of our once to safe society. When our political leadership and police show more sympathy for murderers than for their victims, there are no longer any excuses to let it happen without protest.
 

When Swedish streets are no longer safe to walk on for normal Swedes, it is our DUTY to fix the problem. This is why, today, 200 Swedish men gathered to take a stand against the north African ‘street children’ who are running rampage in and around the capital’s central station.
 

Police have clearly showed that they lack the means to stop their progress and we see no other way than to hand down the punishment they deserve ourselves. The justice system has left walk over and the contract of society is therefore broken – it is now every Swedish man’s duty to defend out public spaced against the imported criminality.
 

Those who gathered today are neither your politician, your journalist or your policeman. We are your father, your brother, your husband, your colleague, your friend and your neighbour.
 

Swedish men and women deserve safety in their everyday life and we are therefore calling on all others who also see the problem to follow in our footsteps, both in Stockholm and in other places around the country. For a better future together.

The three top-rated comments at the Daily Mail:

  • This is going to become more common across Europe as the weeks go by.
  • It’s inevitable, when politicians are unable to provide solutions, the people will.
  • If the government don’t act then of course the people will!

However, the initial indications are that the European authorities are going to double down. It appears that they either want a civil war or they have an astonishing faith in their ability to redefine observable reality.

EU leaders insist there is ‘NO LINK’ between the migrant crisis and New Year sex attacks in Cologne – and vow to bring about an end to ‘false accusations’. European Commission wants to ‘unconditionally reject’ link, minutes show. Officials are also growing concerned about possibility of a public backlash.

“Possibility”, the Lacedaemonians said.


    Mailvox: PEGIDA rising

    This is from a reader in Germany. It demonstrates how things are definitely heating up there regardless of what the mainstream media reports.

    Stationed in Germany.  Not being fluent I don’t understand all of the news commentary, but have been talking with my few German friends.  Most are definitely opposed to the mass migration that is occurring. Our area is rural and most of the Germans are blue-collar types. Think of it as the “fly-over” region of the US.  Anyway, this is the first I have heard of any demonstrations outside of the major cities of Germany.  These are right in my back yard, and if these people are stirred to action, the dominoes are falling.

    The authorities are distributing the following warnings:

    • The following areas below are to be avoided in Kaiserslautern due to the possibility of violent demonstrations this coming Saturday.  Although the assessment indicates a low possibility of violence by the Polizei, past PEGIDA events have quickly turned violent whenever counter demonstrations were also planned/present. 
    • On Saturday, 30 January 2016, precise time not yet known, the Kaiserslautern “Patriotische Europaer gegen die Islamisierung des Abendlandes” is planning a demonstration march through downtown Kaiserslautern, rallying at the “Alte Post am Hauptbahnhof”.  Preceding the march, a self-appointed “vigilante force” will patrol the downtown area.  At approximately 1300 on the same date, left wing activists will demonstrate at Am Altenhof, in front of Stiftskirche //MGRS: 32UMV1094977581// in Kaiserslautern against right-wing demonstration.  After the demonstrations in Kaiserslautern, left-wing activist planned to travel to Homburg, Germany by train to disrupt a demonstration in Homburg, further information in Paragraph 2.B. below.  HNLE expectation of violence at both events was assessed as LOW.
    • At approximately 1700 on 30 January 2016, the group “Saarlaender gegen Salafisten” will demonstrate in the area surrounding the Hauptbahnhof.  The purpose of the demonstration is “Protect our women from sexual assaults”.  Expectation of violence was unknown.  

    Don’t fear the police

    And certainly don’t count on them:

    Police flee for their lives at Swedish migrant camp after they are surrounded by screaming mob as they try to relocate ten-year-old boy ‘who had been raped multiple times’

    The attack allegedly happened in the town of Västerås in central Sweden. Staff at the refugee centre feared the 10-year-old boy was being abused. They failed to remove the child after the refugee would not let the child go. Ten police officers failed to save the child after being attacked by the mob

    I fail to see the point of being concerned about this sort of thing. They’re orcs. Raping whatever they can get their hands on is what orcs do. The important thing is to keep them outside your country; once you fail to do that, you really can’t convincingly pretend to be shocked that orcs are behaving like, well, orcs.

    Immigration is rape culture. If you allow orcs to immigrate, you are consciously welcoming the rape culture they bring with them. Having already permitted the invasion, Sweden now has three choices. 1) accept children being raped, 2) return the orcs to the orc lands, or 3) eliminate them. I would hope they have the human decency to choose the second option.

    The Swedes don’t have to like their choices to be limited to them. Reality doesn’t give a damn about good intentions.


    Musings on Immigration III

    This is the third part of a guest post on the European migrant crisis:

    In part II of this series, I considered ways the German and European authorities could attempt to handle the Migrant Crisis.  However, I rather doubt that the European Governments will have the nerve to embrace such measures.  They would have to cope with howls of outrage from the Left while balancing the suspicions of the Right that the measures utilized would eventually end up aimed at them.  Giving the government a vast amount of power may well mean, eventually, that the government will wind up using it in a manner you dislike.

    Regardless of either intentions or morality, there is a further problem.  Germany, and almost every other European Governments, has been making alarming cuts in both its police and its deployable military forces.  Even if the German government works up the nerve to order draconian measures, it may find itself unable to actually enforce them.

    Furthermore, as morale sinks within the police forces – it is unlikely that the German police very much enjoy the idea of putting down protest marches against rapist invaders – there may be a vast exodus of trained and experienced policemen. 

    Therefore, it behoves us to study the three major possibilities for Germany’s future: Fascism, Balkanisation and Caliphate.

    1. Fascism.

    Let us assume, as I expect to happen, that Merkel’s government fails to both come to grips with the crisis and convince the vast majority of Germans that it is capable and competent.  As I said in the previous article, definite proof of a government cover-up ensures that the government will not be believed by the ordinary people.  As has been noted elsewhere, that which is half-seen is all the more disturbing to the imagination!  The government’s failure will both encourage the rise of vigilante groups of the streets of Germany and, almost certainly, empower politicians who intend to ride the crisis into power.  In times of crisis, voters tend to head to the right; a competent right-wing politician (a German version of Donald Trump) may well have a good chance of being elected into power.

    He will be called a second Hitler, of course.  But how badly will that hurt his chances when Germans start asking themselves what Hitler would have done, faced with a howling mob of invaders?

    Assuming this individual gets elected, what then?

    Such a government will have few restraints.  International opinion rarely means squat to fascist dictatorships.  I imagine he would start by building up the police and security forces, then rounding up vast numbers of migrants and sealing them away in detention camps.  If there is nowhere else to put them, he may well open up the gas chambers and slaughter the migrants in job lots.  And if the situation in Germany continues, he may well be cheered as the migrants are summarily exterminated.

    He will also purge Germany of everyone he considers politically undesirable.  The thought of Merkel standing trial for treason is quite a pleasing one, along with many other left-wing morons who somehow managed to climb into power.  However, it probably won’t stop there.  The technology available to the modern world for population control and surveillance would make the Spanish Inquisitors wet their pants.  Anyone who has expressed a politically-unsound opinion on Facebook (for example) would be targeted. 

    Longer-term, he would need to come to terms with Germany’s demographic crisis.  I would expect ‘Kinder, Küche, Kirche’ to be the order of the day for German womanhood; those babies have to be born!  General freedoms would probably be strongly limited; a smart fascist wouldn’t interfere too much with personal freedoms, but political freedom would be gone, once and for all.

    There are people who would probably see this as a dream come true.  It isn’t.  The fascists might achieve their first set of objectives, but what then?  Staying in power would become a desperate imperative.  Why would anyone show them mercy when they have shown none?  Getting rid of a fascist government is far from easy.  Removing Saddam took a full-scale invasion.

    Internationally, of course, a resurgent Germany with more than a whiff of Nazism would be a nightmare reborn.  And that’s about as far as I dare take this one.

    2. Balkanisation

    If we assume that the flow of migrants is not stopped, and the government fails to contain the situation, we may see, instead, the rise of a balkanised Germany.  The original no-go zones would expand rapidly to contain the newcomers, linking up into larger and larger communities where the original law no longer runs.   Without a strong police presence, real power would come to rest in the hands of radicals, men who will paint themselves as defending their communities against very real threats.  (By this point, there will probably be constant low-level fighting on the streets of Germany, giving them a genuine cause.)  Women will be forced under the veil; children will be taught to hate the surrounding German society.

    Young German girls will be kidnapped and enslaved inside the communities.  There will be no hope of saving them from a life of rape and forced childbirth.

    And any previous accommodation with the natives will be blown away.

    This will probably cause a mass exodus of German civilians, either to safer parts of Germany (if they exist) or somewhere beyond German borders.  (The Poles might find it amusing to take German refugees, if they’re willing to behave; Putin might see advantage in doing the same.)

    Or, alternatively, ‘German’ enclaves will fight to defend themselves against both the Islamic enclaves and the government (or what remains of it).  German soldier and policemen will desert to join their communities, bringing weapons and training with them.  Muslim soldiers within the German military will probably do the same, in the other direction.  Both sides will work desperately to build up their stockpiles of weapons, as the government’s ability to do anything crumbles.

    There will be a great deal of fighting before matters settle down, particularly as the various sub-states start to form successor nations.

    Each enclave will need to control its own food supplies – although it might be possible to starve an immigrant enclave into submission – and other issues arising from its separation from Germany.  We would be looking at scenes out of the Thirty Years War, perhaps worse.  Modern society is just not organised to support a large population during a time of major disruption.  I would imagine a truly fearsome death rate as society breaks down completely.

    Long-term, who knows what will happen?

    3. Caliphate

    Tom Kratman’s Caliphate predicted a unified Islamic Empire controlling most of Europe, apart from Britain and Switzerland.  As chilling as his predictions were, there were a number of issues with them.  Muslims do not have one vast hive mind.  Different groups of Sunni terrorists/insurgents (a category that includes both ISIS and Al Qaeda) have different ideas about how best to govern territory when they finally take it.  The differences between Sunnis and Shias are far greater, with both sides determined to destroy the other.  (There is something to be said for pulling out of the Middle East and letting them kill each other.)  Finally, Arabs are often extremely racist towards other Muslims, which causes far more friction in the Muslim World. 

    A united Caliphate, therefore, is actually the least likely scenario.  I would say that it is rather more likely that there is an Islamic France and an Islamic Germany that hate each other fully as much as the natives did, between 1870 and 1945.  To have a united Caliphate would require a group that managed to gain control of the political levers without either fracturing or provoking resistance before it was too late.  In my experience, large-scale conspiracies rarely work out in practice

    Remember, neither Hitler nor Stalin had  a solid plan from Day One to take total power for themselves.  Instead, they were opportunists.  In both cases, they were riding tigers.  One slip and it would have been the end of them.

    But let us imagine, for a moment, a powerful and charismatic ‘moderate’ Muslim who manages to work his way into a position of power.  Perhaps he’s the leader of a ‘reasonable’ Islamic Party that claims to believe in the rights of everyone, even non-Muslims.  His words are enough to soothe tensions on the streets, a process made easier by steadily replacing senior police and military officers with his own men.  A handful of radicals who are too noticeable even in a tame media environment get stoned to death, just to bolster his ratings.  His party even works its way into the EU and different national politics, making it clear that they’re the good guys.  See?  Accommodation works!

    And then, one day, the coup.  The remaining non-Muslims (and Muslims who won’t toe the line) in government get rounded up.  Borders are closed, new security forces appear on the streets, Islamic Law is imposed, the nightmare begins….

    Plausible?  I hope not.

    Barring a major change in mindset, the Caliphate will rapidly start to decay, whatever happens.  The Middle-Eastern mentality is not suited to running a modern state.  However, they will inherit control of both a reasonably-modern military force and a nuclear arsenal.  Would they fire on the United States?  Or Russia?  Or Israel?

    I don’t know how Kratman envisaged his Caliphate coming into existence, but maybe it was a little like that.

    I think it’s fairly clear that none of these possibilities are very good ones.  Long-term, Germany and Europe would be in deep shit.  Even the ‘best’ of these outcomes, a fascist government, would be a nightmare on a hellish scale.  It would probably take a joint American-Russian invasion to put a stop to the reoccurrence of a historical nightmare, but almost certainly they would be too late to stop millions upon millions of people from dying, or worse.

    And considering that the Americans and Russians cannot even cooperate in the relatively smaller matters of Ukraine and Syria, how likely is it that that they will be able to act in concert regarding the fate of Germany or Europe?

    But no matter what, one thing is clear: Merkel Must Go!


    Musings On Immigration, part II

    This is the followup to the original guest post on the ongoing European Migrant Crisis. As before, I don’t agree with all of it, but it makes for an interesting starting point for debate.

    In the previous post, I discussed what I believe to be the origins of the current Migrant Crisis – and Europe’s collective inability to take measures before it was too late to prevent major trouble. In this post, I discuss steps that can – that must – be taken by European Governments, mainly Germany, but France and Britain too, to prevent the crisis from getting any further out of hand.

    The problem facing those governments, however, is difficult. Can they safeguard their populations without fatally compromising European principles?

    In Germany, the first step is all too clear: Merkel must go.

    Angela Merkel is not just a failed politician. Politicians have lost credibility before and survived; Clinton, Bush and Obama all survived crisis that threatened to bring them down. Merkel, however, not only bears a large share of the responsibility for the Migrant Crisis, but in attempting to cover up the scale of the problem she has thoroughly discredited her government. Right now, I doubt very many people in Germany would trust a word spewing from Merkel’s mouth. When the government is untrustworthy – and anyone in Germany can see the disproof in front of their eyes – it convinces people that they can no longer trust the government to take care of them.

    Merkel, not to put too fine a point on it, forgot who she was working for. A common problem among European politicians. Her duty was not to migrants, however pitiful they looked, but to the German people. A German, she failed Germany; a woman, she failed women. Her ham-fisted attempts to come to terms with the crisis have only undermined her further. For the sake of Germany, for the sake of law and order and common decency, Merkel must go.

    Having said that, there are a number of practical steps that need to be taken as soon as possible.

    First, the borders must be sealed. Unaccompanied young men must not be allowed to enter the country. The problem is already quite big enough. If worst comes to worst, those borders must be defended by gunfire. Europeans who marry non-Europeans should be denied residence rights unless they can convince officials that they have had a long-standing and genuine relationship.

    Second, there must be a full registry of illegal immigrants and migrants within Europe. This can be accomplished by making it clear that any undocumented personage found within Europe, or Germany, after a cut-off date will be summarily deported. Fingerprints and other identifying characteristics must be collected, allowing any criminal elements to be quickly identified and rapidly deported.

    Third, the police and security forces must retake control of the no-go zones. The areas must be flooded by policemen, backed up by soldiers if necessary. Any attempt to attack the police must be greeted with maximum force. Patrols must be run through the most dangerous areas, forcing local leaders to either knuckle under or send out their thugs (which will weaken them badly, when the thugs are killed or locked up in detention camps.) It must be made clear that any attempt to challenge the government’s monopoly on force will end badly.

    Fourth, all Islamist preachers and suchlike must be summarily removed from the streets and placed into detention camps. The preaching of both radical Islam and terrorist ideology must be stopped, whatever the cost. Any riots following such arrests are to be brutally crushed.

    Fifth, mosques, Islamic schools and other such institutions are to be ordered to warn immigrants of the new rules on pain of being shut down. The national languages used as the official languages; teaching materials are to be strictly vetted before they are allowed to be used in the schools. The rights of women in Western countries, for example, must be discussed openly, allowing young girls to make up their own minds about their futures.

    Sixth, and finally, there must be a zero-tolerance policy towards any migrant crimes. Small crimes – defecating on the seats, for example – must be punished by deportation (or a one-way ticket to the camps, pending deportation). Large crimes must be punished by death.

    I make no pretence that any of these measures will be easy. Islamist leaders, regardless of how hostile they are towards the outside society, will not take them lightly. Europe has made too many concessions to find it easy to retake control. The European Governments will have to build up their police forces and militaries while avoiding infiltration and grit their collective teeth against the howls of fury from the Left. Can they do it? I don’t know.

    But they must, because the alternatives are worse. Fascism, Balkanisation (aka Civil War) and Caliphate.

    I will explore these in the third post.


    Musings on Immigration, Part I

    This is a guest post from an acquaintance of mine with an interest in history. While I don’t agree with all of it, I thought his perspective was interesting and worth sharing here. – Vox

    The mass sexual assaults that blighted Cologne – and the despicable response of Cologne mayor Henriette Reker – has highlighted, once again, the danger facing Europe.  Indeed, Europe has not faced a danger like this since the final days of the Roman Empire, when the once-proud society could no longer muster the will to marshal its still quite-considerable resources and fight the barbarian incursion.  Rome committed suicide a very long time before Rome itself was stormed.

    Committed suicide?  Yes, it did; very few Romans truly believed that it was worth trying to fight to save Rome.  The elites cared nothing for the suffering of their people, who found the barbarians potential allies in the face of crushing taxation and heavy oppression; the civil bureaucracy was bloated and corrupt; the army too weak to crush the barbarians … Rome decayed from within long before the end finally came. And that, alas, may be the fate of Western Europe, unless we take steps now.

    Let me see if I can place the current danger in historical context.

    The Second World War did immense physical and psychological damage to Europe.  Physically, the continent lay in ruins; France, Denmark, the Netherlands and Norway had been invaded and occupied, Germany had been crushed and then split in two, Britain had escaped occupation, but had exhausted itself trying to win the war.  Psychologically, the continent’s self-confidence had been destroyed.  Nationalism and militarism had been thoroughly discredited.  Worse, perhaps, Europe was no longer a power in the world.  Power had passed firmly to the USA and the USSR.

    If this wasn’t bad enough, the Cold War created a whole series of additional problems.  Western Europe needed the United States, as the US was the only hope of a conventional defence against the USSR.  But Europe was (rightly) terrified of a Third World War.  The USSR might not be able to do more than limited damage to the USA, yet there was no doubt that the USSR could turn Western Europe into a radioactive wasteland.  Victory would be a meaningless phrase.  This spurred a Europe-wide policy that, on one hand, fought to keep the US engaged and, on the other hand, restrain the US from picking a fight with the USSR.

    The European nightmare was a flashpoint in East Asia – a second Korean War, perhaps – that turned into a general war.  Much of the anti-Americanism that pervades European thought owes its origins to the concern that America would trigger an unwinnable (for Europe) war.

    Meanwhile, there was also a serious need to curb the appeal of communism.    Post-war Europeans were desperate.  The USSR might not need to invade to take over.  European elites countered this by creating both a social welfare system – intent on reducing human misery, which fed radicalism – and working desperately to build up Europe’s economy, while relying on the US to guarantee security and keep the Germans in their place.

    It was into this poisoned environment that the first waves of mass migration arrived.

    There are, I should note before I go any further, two different types of immigration.  The first is the single person or handful of people who move to a new country and adapt to their new environment.  They speak the language, they marry natives and generally they repay their hosts for welcoming them.  Such immigrants are a blessing and very few people would argue otherwise.  They may look different, but they’re largely culturally identical to the natives.  Their children don’t think of themselves as anything else.

    This isn’t a comfortable process.  Moving from Britain to America, two nations that are practically cousins, can cause no end of culture shock.  The immigrant may feel overwhelmed, or out of place, and unsure if he truly wants to belong.  But the single immigrant, the isolated case, is surrounded by people from the new country.  He has no choice, but to learn to become like them – or at least to learn how to get along.

    The second type, by contrast, occurs when a large number of migrants arrives at roughly the same time.  They may have decent motives, like the first type, but they have a tendency to clump together with their own kind.  That’s human nature.  That’s why you see expatriate settlements of Westerners in many countries; they prefer the company of their fellow Westerners to the natives.  They have no strong incentive to go native.  Indeed, they may have a strong disincentive to go native, because the familiarity of home is all around them.  Being with people who think like you is comforting, particularly when you are surrounded by a much larger community that doesn’t.

    But it is this form of immigration that has caused many of our problems.  To paraphrase a line from SM Stirling, flavouring the stew is one thing, but making a whole new stew pot is quite another.

    Europe’s first wave of migrants were mainly the products of decolonisation.  For example, A large number of Indians arrived in Britain from Uganda after they were evicted by Idi Amin.  France took in a vast number of Arabs from North Africa after losing a war in Algeria and its colony there.  Their arrival was not warmly welcomed by many of the locals, which caused major problems for the elites.  A rise in nationalism would doom the planned confederation of European states (which eventually would become the European Union) and potentially reawaken dangers that had nearly ripped the continent apart twice.  Their response was to slander everyone who objected as fascists, and to draw links between them and the Nazis (it helped that some of the objectors were genuine fascists).  There was considerable grassroots opposition to immigration, but very little political opposition.

    The increasing numbers of migrants, however, started to produce a whole new stew pot of ethnic minority communities.  Their existence as potential voters, combined with concessions by politicians, allowed them to bring in even more immigrants.  Why should a family not be allowed to live in the West, they asked, when the head of the household already has permission to reside there?  Boys and girls raised in Britain, for example,  were pushed into marrying boys and girls back home, who would then apply for immigration rights as spouses of British citizens.  Instead of assimilating, the constant arrival of newcomers ensured that the communities remained isolated.

    This probably requires some explanation.  If you grow up in a minority community, much of your identity is drawn from the fact that you are not part of the majority.   You will be surrounded by people who are like you, by a tribe united against the outside world, a tribe that has strong ties to the homeland.  Doing something without being noticed by someone who will report back to your parents is extremely difficult, particularly if you are a young girl.  Many of the older folks don’t speak the native tongue.  A dissident trapped within such a community, like a girl who doesn’t want to be forced into marriage, has very little hope of leaving it. And if she does, she is cut off from the community forever.

    Indeed, one explanation for the spread of radical Islam to the young is that it has an appeal to children who are otherwise tightly controlled by their parents. They find that they can embrace the religion and use it to shame their parents who are not practicing Muslims.

    The larger the community, the less truck it has with outsiders.  It doesn’t care for outside interference, nor for outside law.  Attempts to impose even the basics of Western law in minority communities meet with heavy resistance: Western law, after all, does not run in non-Western countries.  Customs ranging from female circumcision to arranged and forced marriages were traditional, after all.

    Europe blinked. The societies that had once said: “this burning of widows is your custom; prepare the funeral pile. But my nation has also a custom.  When men burn women alive we hang them, and confiscate all their property.  My carpenters shall therefore erect gibbets on which to hang all concerned when the widow is consumed.  Let us all act according to national customs” no longer had the self-confidence to impose its will on the outsiders.  The elites were still nervous about the resurgence of nationalism, so they did their best to smooth over the problem.

    Their solution to this problem was to promote the doctrine of multiculturalism, the belief that all societies – at base – were equal.  This was based on an insultingly obvious lie and a cringingly unavoidable contradiction.  The lie was the claim that all societies were equal – a society that believes in equal rights for women is far superior to one that believes that women are second-class at best, chattel at worst – and the contradiction was that everyone believed in the doctrine of multiculturalism.  Multiculturalism, in short, was based on a premise that all cultures were of one mind on the matter of multiculturalism.  By its very nature, multiculturalism proved that multiculturalism did not work – and never could.

    And yet, those who disagreed with the premise were attacked as racists.  There was no attempt to study the problem logically – there could be no such attempt, as far as the elites were concerned – and so the problem continued to fester.  Or, put another way, European law largely surrendered control over the territories.  As native power and authority receded, elements that wanted autonomy gained in power.

    This was disastrous.  Young men raised within the communities, for example, were not taught to accept that women were equal.  Women did not have control over their own bodies.  A girl might be defended by her family, but she could not defend herself.  Young men, raised on something that might well be called rape culture and imbued with barbaric views on women, knowing better than to touch a girl with a family that might avenge her (but also might insist she married her rapist to restore the family honour), caused no end of trouble with ‘white sluts.’  This problem is hardly unique, either.  Serious sexual assaults are alarmingly common in countries where women are regarded as second-class citizens.

    There was a second effect that was not noticed at the time, although it should have been predictable.  Dissidents within the communities were either driven out or silenced.  The problem with looking for moderate Muslims is not that they don’t exist, but that any moderate Muslim with half a brain knows that if he sticks his head up he’ll lose it.  A combination of the unwillingness of the native law to defend free speech and the absolute willingness of the extremists to crush it has silenced most of the moderates.  Those who are not silent live in fear for their lives.

    The problems facing Europe now – after 9/11, after Paris, after Cologne – are twofold.  First, there is the presence of large communities that are disconnected from the native culture, that do not share its views, that are dominated by aggressive and forceful leaders intent on stamping their values on everyone else.  Attacks on natives, Jews, women and everyone who dares support Israel or speak out against Islam are increasing rapidly.  A climate of fear is spreading its wings over Europe.

    The vast majority of those communities may not be violent, but it doesn’t matter.  A relative handful of insurgents, as the British discovered in Northern Ireland, can make life difficult for the authorities for years.  Ordinary Irish citizens either supported the insurgents, even if they weren’t actual fighters themselves, or were intimidated into silence.  It is far too easy to imagine community leaders in the no-go zones refusing to hand over suspects to the police, because they would probably lose their positions – and their heads – if they did.

    The second problem, however, is the feckless behaviour of the European elites, particularly Germany.  Opening up the borders and allowing uncounted numbers of migrants, mainly young men, to enter was utterly insane.  It was preposterous to believe that they would automatically embrace European values, when they were neither raised in them nor given a strong reason to assimilate.  Instead, raised in societies where trusting someone outside your family is stupid, they represent a major danger to European society.  The European elites were willing to sacrifice the peace and safety of European citizens so they could feel good about themselves.  And the attacks on New Year’s Eve have blown their desperate attempts to cover up the scale of the problem right out of the water.

    I rather doubt the next five years are going to be peaceful.

    The question now is simple; can European governments, and Europeans themselves, muster the strength to tackle the problem before it becomes any worse?

    Frankly, there are only a handful of possible outcomes.  Resolute steps now may stem the crisis without mass slaughter and effective genocide.  This requires European governments to work up the nerve to take action and swallow the criticism they will receive from their fellow-travellers on the left.  Alternatively, strong right-wing governments may be elected, which will have a brief to crush the threat using all necessary measures.  The problem with electing a strong man, as many countries have found out to their cost, is that getting rid of him after he has served his purpose is incredibly difficult.

    But those are the cheerful options.  The others include mass flight from Europe, civil war, balkanisation and a descent into the darkness currently enwrapping the Middle East in its shroud.

    I will address the steps European Governments can take, now, to deal with the crisis in the next article.


    Kristallnacht Zwei

    I think we all know what comes next. The Germans are beginning to fight back against the invaders of their country:

    Hundreds of anti-refugee rioters have gone on the rampage in the German city of Leipzig after a demonstration where they called for asylum seekers to be deported and their nation’s borders closed.

    The attacks come just hours after Chancellor Angela Merkel admitted that Europe had lost control of the crisis. The right-wingers broke away from a largely peaceful march in the eastern city to trash the suburb of Connewitz.

    Doner kebab fast food stalls were destroyed, cars set ablaze and shop windows smashed by around 250 hooligans of LEGIDA – the local branch of PEGIDA, the anti-migrant, anti-EU organization which marched against the refugees earlier in the evening.At one point the demonstrators, who threw fireworks at police, attempted to build a barricade in a main street with signs and torn up paving stones before they were dispersed.

    Firemen had to tackle a blaze in the attic of one building set alight by a wayward rocket fired by the rioters. A bus carrying leftist pro-asylum demonstrators was also attacked and seriously damaged.

    Police said they have identified and arrested 211 of the crowd of right-wing hooligans, many of them with criminal records for violence.

    ‘This was a serious breach of the peace,’ said a police spokesman, confirming that several police officers were injured in the clashes triggered by simmering anger over the New Year’s Eve mass sex attacks against women in Cologne and several other German cities.

    ‘Rape Refugees stay away’ was one of the banners carried during the march, the wording above a silhouette of women running from knife-wielding attackers, one of whom resembled a caricature from Aladdin…. German police say the number of criminal complaints filed after the events on New Year’s Eve in Cologne has risen to 516 – 40 per cent relating to allegations of sexual assault.

    Germany’s FBI, the Federal Criminal Office, said it had information that the surrounding and sexual molestation of women was a ‘familiar phenomenon in some Arab countries.’ Now it is liaising with police in all 16 states of Germany to formulate a strategy on how to combat it in future on German streets. The minister for North Rhine-Westphalia, the German state where Cologne is located, admitted that people of foreign descent were responsible for virtually all of the violence on New Year’s Eve in the city.

    One wonders how many of those 516 criminal orcs were arrested, considering how one was shot dead attacking French police last week.

    Revolution is a process. It doesn’t come about overnight, and it is fueled by actions and counteractions alike. The anti-German “authorities”, who are clearly no longer regarded as legitimate by a significant portion of the German people, can arrest as many nationalists as they like. Not only will their actions be regarded as shamefully hypocritical in light of their refusal to arrest the orcs raping and sexually assaulting young German women, but similar tactics didn’t suffice to stop the rise of the National Socialists; you may recall where Hitler wrote the newly legalized Mein Kampf.

    They can’t arrest the entire German population, and the minute the “authorities” shed any German blood, they will become the targets of an enraged nation. This was not “a serious breach of the peace”, it was the first real evidence of the crisis of the German state.

    This is the inevitable result of multiculturalism and a feckless leadership that refuses to govern in the interests of its people.There are now two, and only two, options remaining: peaceful and democratic nationalism or violent and authoritarian ultra-nationalism.

    I pray that the multiculturalists, equalitarians, and anti-nationalists will submit and acquiesce to the former. But I expect them to stubbornly and pridefully resist, and thereby ensure the latter.


    The lies of lunatics

    Who are the Germans going to believe, the police or their lying eyes?

    Bild quoted a senior police officer in Frankfurt as saying it was standard policy to keep offences by asylum-seekers from the media.

    “There are strict orders from the chiefs not to report offences by refugees,” the unnamed officer said. “We are only allowed to answer if journalists ask specifically about such incidents.”

    The Frankfurt authorities said police spokesmen had been told to be careful when speaking about asylum-seekers.

    “Press spokesmen were warned the far-Right could exploit cases involving refugees to stoke sentiment against those seeking protection,” Michael Shaykh, a spokesman for the Hesse state interior ministry, said….

     More than 170 women have now come forward to file criminal complaints about that night,120 of them for sexual assault. But in the days that followed, most of Germany had no idea what had
    happened in the heart of one of its biggest cities, as the events went
    almost completely unreported.

    In fact the truth began to emerge
    on social media within hours. One of the first accounts was posted on
    the Facebook page of Nett-Werk Köln, a group of around 140,000 members
    who more usually share tips on party venues and advertise missing cats.

    More information emerged on Twitter, and the local Cologne newspapers
    began to report the story, but still the national media stayed away.
    Hans-Peter Freidrich, a former interior minister, has accused the media
    of imposing a “news blackout” and operating a “code of silence” over
    negative news about immigrants.

    Editors have replied that they
    were following the official account of the Cologne police that the night
    had been “peaceful”. But it has also emerged that even after the story
    hit the national media, guests on public service television were asked
    not to mention asylum-seekers in interviews about the Cologne assaults.

    A week after the incidents, government ministers and the Cologne
    authorities were still insisting there was no evidence refugees were
    involved. On Friday, suspicions against then were confirmed for the
    first time, when the federal police said asylum-seekers are among 31
    people it is seeking in connection with events inside the station that
    night. They are wanted for physical violence and theft, but not for
    sexual assault.

    Now, however, the taboo has been broken, and Mrs
    Merkel’s critics have seized on the suspected involvement of
    asylum-seekers as evidence of the failure of her “open-door” refugee
    policy.

    This is disastrous. Those who claim to care about the refugees should be clamoring to send them back, because the mood is turning openly murderous now. I very much doubt the German government is going to survive the year unscathed.

    They have no respect for the German people. And the German people are rapidly losing respect for all authority. There is very little the police could do that will fuel the fire more than telling these stupid lies about their obvious failure to maintain order.

    The Merkel government is more feckless than the Weimar Republic.