They Tell You It’s Not Real

Both /pol/ and Dr. Mark Trozzi have been warning Americans about the scenario from The National Blueprint for Biodefense that involves a bioweapon attack that kills 280,000 Americans on July 4, 2025. Now, we all know that these “hypothetical scenarios” and “training exercises” are sometimes, though not usually, cover for the launch of the real thing. But what I found most interesting, in perusing the document, was the way in which its intrinsic falsity was clearly conveyed within the document itself.

Where, my fellow Omni-Narrational Skeptic, is the clue that this urgent biodefense blueprint is pure bureaucratic fiction?

We also believe that the United States, its allies, and partners in industry, academia, and nongovernmental organizations can eliminate pandemics entirely in 10 years by fully implementing the recommendations we made in our earlier report, The Apollo Program for Biodefense. Ending pandemics is more achievable today than landing on the Moon was in 1961.

THE APOLLO PROGRAM FOR BIODEFENSE
Technology holds great promise. Within weeks of recognizing the existence of COVID-19, scientists mapped its entire genome and developed and produced vaccines faster than ever before. They accomplished these previously unimaginable feats because of forward-looking programs (e.g., Human Genome Project, advanced research programs that previously led to many vaccines currently used to treat a variety of diseases). Nonetheless, we failed to adequately harness scientific and technological capabilities, and undermined response efforts by failing to implement new strategies and defenses. We have an unknown period to address those shortcomings before the next devastating pandemic occurs.

The need to control COVID-19 created momentum to produce many technologies that we previously lacked the will and resources to pursue before the pandemic began. We need to build on that progress and push for technological advances to protect us from the next biological threat. Our Nation rises to seemingly impossible challenges by pursuing grand programs. The United States can similarly put an end to pandemics within a decade, but only with leadership, resources, and interest that go beyond technical constraints and the usual crisis-neglect cycles.

The United States should leverage basic research portfolios to study pathogens of concern, conduct pre-clinical and clinical testing of priority and prototype pathogens, develop products to detect and treat the diseases they cause. These programs must involve domestic, international, private, and public sector partners.

The Commission proposed The Apollo Program for Biodefense in 2021 to undertake targeted research and development to detect and continually trace any new pathogen from the source, distribute rapid point-of-use tests to every household and farm in the country within days of that detection, have effective treatments already in-hand, and develop and rollout vaccines in weeks rather than years. This ambitious program, at about $10 billion annually for ten years, would be a small fraction of the trillions in costs incurred by the COVID-19 pandemic and would contribute immensely to our country’s public health, economic, and national security.

As they say, space may be the final frontier, but it’s filmed in a Hollywood basement. Which means that any “biodefense” program is almost certainly cover for domestic bioattacks on the citizenry. And we can even see whom the parties we’re supposed to believe will be responsible are.

The Department of State assesses that China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia continue to engage in biological weapons-specific or dual-use research activities, and fail to comply with the BWC. New state programs can still access caches of incompletely destroyed or buried biological weapons materials from old state programs, and then smuggle them to other regions for use by today’s militaries and terrorist organizations. Weapons that once consumed a great deal of time and resources to make now take far less, and what the United States could accomplish more than 40 years ago, others can accomplish today.

Now, despite all this documentaion, I tend to doubt that there will be any bioweapon attack on July 4th, and if there is, it will, like the Covid-19 and vaccine attacks, almost certainly be less effective than intended. It also won’t be Iran who is responsible, although obviously that’s who the next false flag will be blamed upon since Clown World still can’t quite wrap its collective head around the fact that it somehow didn’t manage to trigger its long-sought US-Iran war despite multiple attacks by Israel and by the USA itself.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Vanished Six Inches

Here is a question for you. Do you seriously believe that President Donald Trump is in the picture below, taken at the NATO summit meeting today? Even in the NBA, does anyone ever take pictures and put the 6’3″ guy in front? I should note that I very much doubt that Turkish Prime Minister Erdogan is actually 6 feet tall, just as I refuse to believe that Emmanual Macron is genuinely 5’10” as some reports have had it.

Now, we can see how tall the Short Fake Trump is since we know that Macron’s actual height is, at most, 5’7″ tall.

Based on the available analyses, Emmanuel Macron’s height is most consistently reported as 5 feet, 7 inches. Two sources confirm this measurement: one from Business Insider ranking world leaders by height and another from a World publication specifically about the French President’s height.

I think it’s interesting they had Queen Máxima of the Netherlands, the woman in the funky green superhero jumpsuit, wearing something that obscured her footwear. However, since she is 5’8″, we can be confident that she is not wearing heels or she’d be towering over both Macron and the Short Fake Trump.

I await with interest the explanations of those who claim that there are no Trump body doubles and that it is simply an inability to understand the effect of camera angles accounting for the magic disappearing six inches of President Trump’s height.

UPDATE: further confirmation. The man in between Queen Maxima and the Short Fake Trump is King Willem-Alexander of the Netherlands. According to Schweizer Illustrierte, he is 6’0″ tall.

König Willem-Alexander und Königin Maxima: Fünf Zentimeter beträgt der Grössenunterschied auch beim Holländischen Königspaar: König Willem-Alexander misst 1,83 Meter, Königin Maxima 1,78 Meter. 

DISCUSS ON SG



There is No Joe Biden

But there were certainly six fake ones. President Trump draws attention to one of the more outlandish Q assertions:

President Trump has sent the country into an uproar after sharing what his haters are calling a “conspiracy theory” regarding Joe Biden.

Trump shared a post on his Truth Social from a user called llijh. In her post, she alleges Biden was executed in 2020 and has been replaced by a clone.

The president presented the post entirely without comment.

“There is no #JoeBiden – executed in 2020. #Biden clones doubles & robotic engineered soulless mindless entities are what you see. >#Democrats dont know the difference,” the post from llijh states.

As always, the only thing that we can be certain of is that the mainstream narrative is false. So far, Clown World’s propaganda machine has already altered the Official Story enough to admit that Joe Biden was non compos mentis for the entirety of his fake term to which he was never elected in the first place. How much further it will be altered remains to be seen.

What I find most interesting is the repetition of the claim that Biden was executed, which has also been made of John McCain, Hilary Clinton, and other major political figures. We know the Deep State exists, we know there is a resistance to it that appears to be centered in military circles, particularly military intelligence, but we don’t actually know much more than that. So the fact that President Trump is drawing our attention to such things is interesting, regardless of his real reasons for doing so.

DISCUSS ON SG


Joe Biden’s Cancer

Which of the six Bidens was belatedly diagnosed with late-stage cancer?

Medical experts have declared it ‘inconceivable’ that former President Joe Biden’s ‘aggressive’ form of prostate cancer was not caught earlier by doctors.

The office of the 82-year-old former commander-in-chief announced his diagnosis Sunday, stating that Biden was suffering from a highly aggressive form of prostate cancer.

His cancer was given a Gleason score of 9 and a Grade Group of 5, a devastating stage of the rapidly-spreading disease. The diagnosis came days after doctors found a ‘small nodule’ on his prostate.

But upon hearing the news, some of America’s top doctors questioned how a former president could be diagnosed with a late stage of prostate cancer – which can be detected early with routine bloodwork recommended for all men over the age of 50.

‘It is inconceivable that this was not being followed before he left the Presidency,’ wrote Dr. Howie Forman, a professor of radiology and biomedical imaging, public health management and economics at Yale.

I think Biden #1, the real Biden, died years ago. And while it’s possible that it’s a vaxx-related turbocancer that has simply progressed much faster than normal, I suspect this is just cleaning house now that the Six Bidens are no longer politically valid.

DISCUSS ON SG


Space is Green

If Shaquille O’Neal is to be trusted, and to be honest, I trust the Big Aristotle more than I trust science these days, the Blue Origin “space flight” should have been named Greenscreen Origin:

Spade said that they had been discussing why Shaq had not been aboard the space capsule. I would assume the answer is “real estate,” but Shaq explained that the reason was because he doesn’t think it ever went to space.

“Let’s discuss it: was it real?” Shaq began. “Let me go first. I know Jeff loves Laura…”

That’s “Lauren,” Shaq.

“…He wouldn’t want anything to happen to her, so I think there was some green screen involvement there.”

Alright, that’s some good conjecture, but any evidence supporting this, DJ Diesel?

“Number two: their hair was luxurious in space,” he said. “Katy Perry’s hair didn’t move Laura’s…”

Lauren, Shaq.

“…hair didn’t move. Nobody’s hair ever moved. Then I saw when they landed, Jeff had the special key, but it was already open.

“So, I’m going to go Universal Studios green screen on this one.”

I couldn’t agree more. Now do the so-called “Moon landing” by Apollo 11 in 1969. They’re going to need a new term for those of us who no longer believe anything related to the mainstream narrative, whether it relates to events of the modern era or ancient and medieval history. Conspiracy theorist doesn’t even begin to cut it when everything is more or less fake, and at the very least, dumbed-down and rewritten in a form that retards can begin to comprehend.

I think I’d prefer to go with Omni-Narrational Skeptic. If you’ve got a mainstream narrative to sell, then I am immediately and intrinsically skeptical of it. Look what happened to the very simple term and concept of “Sigma male” and then apply that filter to every single concept or event described since the year 1700.

DISCUSS ON SG


That Explains a Lot

The NBA is fixed. Not just the playoff games, but even the team rosters. There hasn’t been an NBA draft lottery this obviously fixed since 1985, when the New York Knicks won the right to draft Patrick Ewing.

When David Stern opened the envelope containing the No.1 pick, it contained the Knicks logo. Some argue that the league froze the Knicks’ envelope so Stern could identify it. The Ringer’s Bill Simmons, who was then working for ESPN, believed in the theory that the Knicks’ envelope had a crease so the commissioner could pick it from the group.

“So you’re telling me that, out of the seven envelopes in that glass drum, during a lottery when the NBA desperately needed the most ballyhooed college center in 15 years to save the league’s marquee franchise, the commissioner coincidentally pulled out the envelope with a giant crease in the corner that happened to have the Knicks logo in it?” wrote Simmons.

Of course, Commissioner Stern denied the accusations. Some league and team officials even laughed about it. However, given what Simmons called “indisputable video evidence” and the circumstances surrounding the 1985 NBA Draft, there was enough reason to believe it was not impossible.

Now the Dallas Mavericks have “defied the odds” and despite a 1.8 percent chance, managed to win the first pick in the 2025 draft lottery.

Three months removed from the most shocking trade in league history, Dallas defied the 1.8% lottery odds and suddenly has life again.

Translation: Dallas just collected its reward from the league for gifting Luka Dončić to the league’s marquis franchise in Los Angeles. I was wondering why on Earth Dallas would ever send him to LA, but now we know what their real incentive was.

DISCUSS ON SG


What Shakespeare Really Wrote

It’s truly fascinating to see how the Official Shakespeare Story necessarily involves all sorts of conspiracy theories and ignoring nearly all the actual evidence of the documented works, while the so-called “conspiracy theory” that Shakespeare was a lesser author who plagiarized Lord Thomas North is based in rock-solid evidence of every kind, from eyewitness observation to AI literary analysis:

We now know that Shakespeare penned lesser, collaborative works and inferior stage-renditions (i.e., the bad quartos) of the literary masterpieces because that is what all documentation—all relevant title pages printed while he was alive and within a few years of his death—explicitly declared. Moreover, as we shall show now, that is clearly what many of his fellow writers knew to be the case, with Robert Greene and Ben Jonson even deriding Shakespeare’s method of close adaptation as plagiarism. Incredibly, my one goal on this substack is to confirm that all relevant Shakespeare-era documents are accurate; that there were no devious, behind-the-scenes plots; that all the recorded observations and comments about the Stratford dramatist are factual; that large groups of playwrights, printers, and publishers were not concocting, wide-ranging, multi-decade schemes meant to fool future generations of researchers. Incredibly, and despite the significant amount of controversy that this will generate, I am merely urging readers, again and again, and accept what the title pages state and what his friends and rivals wrote about him. All you have to do is just believe your eyes.

The very first reference to Shakespeare in London as an “upstart crow, beautified” with the feathers of other writers evokes Horace’s description of a plagiarist as a crow who has decorated himself with the feathers of more beautiful birds

The first widely accepted literary allusion to Shakespeare appeared in the 1592 satirical pamphlet, Greene’s Groatsworth of Wit, allegedly written by the playwright Robert Greene. It described the playwright as an upstart crow beautified with the feathers of other writers. Upstart refers to his sudden success, achieving wealth and power as a young man, and the tale of the crow that had been beautified with the feathers of other birds alluded to Horace’s classical allegory of plagiarism. The Roman poet compared a plagiarist to a crow who has decorated himself with the feathers of more beautiful birds. As New Cambridge editor J. Dover Wilson wrote about this passage, the pamphlet “was accusing Shakespeare of stealing and adapting plays upon Henry VI.” Similarly, Peter Berek agreed that the “‘upstart crow’ passage is accusing Shakespeare of being a plagiarist who takes credit for the work of other writers.”

Importantly, we have no examples of such accusations of plagiarism being hurled at any other prominent writers of the era. Indeed, we don’t even have any comments about Ben Jonson, Christopher Marlowe, Beaumont, John Fletcher, etc., that can even be confused as an allegation of plagiarism.

Ben Jonson lampoons Shakespeare as an ignorant country bumpkin
As is conventional, Ben Jonson spoofs Shakespeare in his satire Every Man Out of His Humor (1600), parodying the successful dramatist as the newly wealthy, satin-clad, uneducated, social-climbing rustic Sogliardo. Sogliardo aggressively pursues a higher social rank and purchases his coat of arms with the crest “Not without mustard”. As scholars note, Shakespeare’s social aspirations were well known, and he had recently obtained a coat of arms with the crest “Not without right.” In substituting “mustard” for “right,” Jonson probably took his cue from the “mustard scene” in The Taming of the Shrew, in which the clown, Grumio, attempting to starve Katherina, refuses to serve her beef without mustard.

H. N. Gibson, noting the similarity of the crests and the fact that “Shakespeare did aspire to gentility,” writes that “there can be little doubt that Shakespeare was one of [Jonson’s] victims in Every Man Out of His Humour.” James P. Bednarz agrees that Sogliardo is a caricature of Shakespeare, writing that Jonson was mocking Shakespeare’s “outlandish aspiration to gentility.” Katherine Duncan-Jones may have been succumbing to Stratfordolatry when she contended that “Sogliardo, a country bumpkin of manifest stupidity, could not possibly be construed as a portrait of Shakespeare,” yet she agrees that it is “impossible not to find a Shakespearean reference” in the arms, referring to it as Jonson’s “mockery” of “Shakespeare’s pursuit of gentility.”

It’s also informative to note that when modern scholars are presented with the evidence of Shakespeare’s actual writing, correctly attributed to him, they reject it because they recognize that it can’t possibly be written by the author of the works he plagiarized.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Revelation of the Mole People

PREMISE: Set in a city-sized underground bunker in Colorado three years after a doomsday event, the series follows United States Secret Service agent Xavier Collins as he seeks to discover the truth behind the killing of the President of the United States. As Xavier comes under suspicion for President Bradford’s death, he searches for answers about what really happened, and is unsure of whom he can trust as his questions lead to many shocking revelations.

It appears that the television show Paradise is an exercise of the revelation of the method practiced by the elite occultists.

Catherine Austin Fitts, who served as the assistant secretary of Housing and Urban Development for Housing between 1989 and 1990, appeared on former Fox News host Tucker Carlson’s podcast last Tuesday to claim that the United States government has spent a whopping $21 TRILLION over several years building an underground city for the wealthiest and most powerful in the country.

To help back up her allegation, the 74-year-old Fitts cited a report released by Michigan State University economist Mark Skidmore. The economist and their team said in their paper that they had uncovered $21 trillion in “unauthorized spending” in both the Department of Defense and Housing and Urban Development from 1998 to 2015.

Fitts told Tucker that money was used to develop an “underground base, city infrastructure, and transportation system” hidden from the entire country.

“We have built an extraordinary number of underground bases and, supposedly, transportation systems,” she said. “Some of these are documented as part of the national security infrastructure, but I think there are many more in the United States and all over the world.”

Fitts added that she and a team of investigators spent between 2021 and 2023 collecting “all the data and all the information on underground bases.” She estimated they had found roughly 170 in America and under the ocean around America.

Personally, I am absolutely unconcerned, mostly because I very much doubt the competence of the current globalist elite to correctly calculate or anticipate anything, up to and including an “extinction-level event”. And if that extinction-level event is the one described in The Revelation of St. John, then by all means, let the riders ride.

The Return of the King is nothing for his subjects to fear.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Intelligence War

There are various reports, which appear to be based on direct public statements by comedian Jim Davidson of having seen a video showing UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in compromising positions, that would likely lead to the end of both Starmer’s marriage and his political career:

The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom may be headed for a major scandal, as rumors intensify about explosive CCTV footage allegedly showing Keir Starmer and Lord Alli in compromising positions inside a private office. The footage reportedly captures something physical between the two, and Starmer’s wife was shown the video—prompting her to storm out and contact divorce lawyers immediately. Labour HQ is reportedly in chaos trying to figure out a way to bury the story.

If legitimate, there is virtually no accident that the video was leaked. Whether it was by the Russians in response to Starmer’s anti-Russian bellicosity, or the Europeans angry about Starmer’s lack of enthusiasm for their anti-tariff campaign, or someone else is largely irrelevant. But it will make it clear that the never-ending shadow war between intelligence agencies is heating up and there will be more secret lives of politicians being exposed.

DISCUSS ON SG