AZ voting machines not legit

 The longer this goes on, the more that will come out:

“NEW DOMINION VOTING MACHINES NOT OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED

2019 Arizona Revised Statutes

Title 16 – Elections and Electors

§ 16-449 Required test of equipment and programs; notice; procedures manual

The test shall be observed by at least two election inspectors, who shall not be of the same political party, and shall be open to representatives of the political parties, candidates, the press and the public.

Neither a Libertarian Party agency Representative NOR the Republican GOP Chair Rae Chornenky was preset at this REQUIRED test and by statute there SHALL be at least 2 official observers from differing parties present to certify the machines

THE MACHINES WERE NOT OFFICIALLY CERTIFIED ACCORDING TO STATUTE”

Ignore the media’s propaganda campaign. Its whole purpose is to wear you down and demoralize you.

Watch the wives

First Salvini, now Johnson, have been betrayed by their female companions.

On Monday evening the Prime Minister offered Mr Cain the vacant job of Downing Street chief of staff.

Who else could follow Cummings out the door? 

Many of the most senior figures in Downing Street owe their loyalty to Dominic Cummings from Vote Leave days.

Lee Cain’s resignation on Wednesday night had already caused deep frustration. 

And there are fears that some could follow Mr Cummings out of the door now he has signalled his departure.

They include advisers Cleo Watson, Oliver Lewis – known as ‘Sonic’ – and data guru Ben Warner.

A source has said that while Brexit envoy Lord Frost was unhappy about Mr Cain’s departure, he has no intention of quitting as talks with Brussels enter their final stages. 

The move was backed by both Mr Cummings and the Cabinet Secretary, Simon Case, who argued that Mr Cain had been fulfilling part of the role for months.

However, news of the appointment was leaked to the Mail – prompting a furious backlash from senior Tories, who feared it would further embolden a Vote Leave faction contemptuous of the role of MPs.

Crucially, it also encountered the wrath of Ms Symonds, who dislikes Mr Cain’s abrasive style. She told her fiancé it would be a ‘mistake’ to give him a promotion.

As news of the row behind the scenes became public, Mr Cain decided his role was untenable.

He will stay in post until the end of the year, when he will be replaced as director of communications by former Mail journalist James Slack, currently Mr Johnson’s official spokesman. However, unlike Mr Cain, who was a political appointment, he will remain a civil servant. 

Tory MPs warned Mr Johnson that the chaos in No 10 was undermining public confidence in the Government.

Sir Roger Gale said it was ‘extraordinary and unacceptable that Downing Street should allow itself to be distracted by internal squabbles’ in the midst of a pandemic.

He added: ‘Frankly this is a distraction… the Prime Minister has got to get a grip on it.’

Other MPs urged Mr Johnson to ditch his special adviser.

One said: ‘If they have got rid of one of the Kray brothers they have got to get rid of Cummings as well. To use a well-known phrase, Boris should take back control and be the real Boris that so many of his genuine friends and supporters believe he can be.’

The Prime Minister also faced questions over Ms Symonds’ role in Downing Street. 

‘The question on everyone’s lips is ”who will she go after next”… it looks like senior appointments now have to be approved by Carrie,’ an insider said.

‘That is a dangerous path for the Government to go down.’

Another adviser said the episode reflected poorly on the Prime Minister. ‘It is disappointing that he has failed to return the loyalty of his most loyal lieutenant when the going got tough,’ they said.

‘It begs the question – who is making the decisions now?’

Looks like Britain has a new Lady Macbeth in the making. Boris Johnson actually looks afraid of her. Once again, the foolishness of placing any confidence in a “leader” who can’t stop chasing women is underlined.

UPDATE: And now Johnson’s best adviser has exited the sinking ship.

Boris Johnson’s chief adviser Dominic Cummings has left Number 10 with immediate effect, BBC political editor Laura Kuenssberg says. Mr Cummings spoke to the PM earlier on Friday and it was decided it was best for him to go immediately after days of turmoil, our political editor said.

Too implausible for fiction

Bestselling novelist Larry Correia, who knows fiction when he sees it, asked a number of professional auditors about the plausibility of the statistical evidence for the media-projected results of the U.S. presidential election:

I noticed yesterday that I was having lots of strangers show up to scream at me whenever I posted any information about election fraud, but they were all low information types just barfing up “fact checks” which was basically whatever the news had just told them, but none of them had the basic knowledge of how fraud works to even sorta discuss any of the actual data. So I got curious and posted the following on facebook:

One quick question, only answer if you have worked in auditing/stats/fraud/investigations/or other data analysis type fields. In your entire career, have you ever seen a case that threw up this many flags that DID NOT turn out to be fraud?

Again, flags are not proof. They are merely anomalies which would cause an auditor to check. Nor am I claiming this is a scientific poll (though I’d bet I’m still more accurate than Nate Silver!). There is of course a sampling bias as I know many of these people in meat space (and their resumes on this topic are killer) but it was also open to the public so anyone could comment and it got shared a hundred times.

The consensus thus far is overwhelming. No. Not only no but hell no.

Certified Fraud Examiner since 1992 here. I have never seen such an oversupply of red flags. 3 or 4 might be explicable or coincidence, but dozens all pointing the same way? This would be too implausible for fiction, let alone a case study.

No. In fact I would say that in about 34 years of this work it is my professional opinion that at this level it is mathematically more likely that our sun blinks out of existence as a result of every particle in it spontaneously “blinking” into another state than it is that fraud did not take place on the order of millions of votes.

Epstein didn’t kill himself. Biden didn’t win. And Q says it had to be this way.

How do you ‘show’ the public the truth?

How do you ‘safeguard’ US elections post-POTUS?

How do you ‘remove’ foreign interference and corruption and install US-owned voter ID law(s) and other safeguards? 

It had to be this way.

Sometimes you must walk through the darkness before you see the light. 

Q

This tends to confirm my hypothesis that President Trump was so confident of his reelection that he was willing to appear to put his second term at risk in order to secure free and fair elections in 2024 and beyond. After all, what is the point of winning a second term if the Swamp is simply going to undo everything you have accomplished. This would also explain the need to wait for the second term to drain the Swamp; the only way to systematically excise the full extent of the fraud was to expose it to everyone.

The statistical storm

Although the statistical evidence is rapidly turning into hard physical evidence of ballot fraud, it’s still useful to continue noting the statistical anomalies and how strongly they indicate that there is no shortage of fraud to find by refining the statistical case against Biden:

  1. TURNOUT 
  2. OUTPERFORMANCE VS. OBAMA
  3. BIDEN-ONLY BALLOTS
  4. ABSENCE OF MAIL-IN VOTE VETTING

The statistical case, in isolation, does not prove fraud. But the confluence of highly unlikely results does, emphatically, paint of picture of utter improbability.

Any one of these four factors alone would cast intense doubt upon election results.

Put all four together, and the result is a seemingly impossible statistical perfect storm.

And it is wildly ironic that the self-styled “party of science” that relies so heavily upon statistics for “proof” of racism and income inequality to turn around and reject the idea that statistics are a reasonable basis to justify further investigations into ballot fraud.

Biden didn’t win

President Trump did, and now he can prove it.

Election Fraud: @RudyGiuliani says he has uncovered enough unlawful ballots in Pennsylvania and Michigan to turn the election in favor of @realDonaldTrump.

– Lou Dobbs

This is going to be so much fun…. Listen to the whole thing. It’s crazier than you think. The votes in Georgia were being digitally processed by a Venezuelan-owned Canadian company in Barcelona. Giuliani says there are now 623,000 confirmed unlawful ballots in PA and 320,000 confirmed unlawful ballots in MI.

They got into a panic because they thought they had made up the lead, but Trump was still ahead by 120,000 votes… Now I think that number will go up, when we began in PA, we only had about 130k, now we’re up to nearly 632k. The same pattern exists in NV, AZ, GA, WI.

Russia won the Azeri-Armenian war

At least, according to the Saker’s analysis of the recent armistice between Azerbaijan and Armenia following the latest war for Nagorno-Karabakh.

  • The war which has just ended was a real bloodbath and it has seen more casualties (counting both sides) than what the Soviet Union lost in 10 years of warfare in Afghanistan
  • This war is now over, Russian peacekeepers have already been deployed along the line of contact. So far, neither side has dared to resume hostilities (more about that below).
  • There have been two days of celebrations in Baku where President Aliev has declared that the war was a triumph for Azeri forces and that Pashinian got nothing. He is right.
  • The Azeris are now declaring that they want compensation from Armenia.
  • There are now Turkish forces in Azerbaijan and Russian and Turkish forces have created a joint committee to coordinate actions.
Armenia: there is no doubt that Armenia is the biggest loser in this war. Pashinian and his gang of russophobic Sorosites has brought a real calamity upon his people. Since he came to power his anti-Russian actions included almost totally eliminating any Armenian participation on the CSTO, he completely ceased any collaboration with Russia (including in the intelligence and security domains), he purged the Armenian military and security forces from all the supposed “pro-Russian” elements, he banned Russian language schools. In contrast, Armenia has an absolutely huge US embassy with about 2000 personnel (as much as the entire Russian peacekeeping force!) and when the Azeris attacked, Pashinin refused to ask Russia for help for a full month. He did ask Trump, Merkel and Macron for help instead. Needless to say, they did exactly nothing once the crisis erupted.
Turkey: the next big loser in this war is Turkey whose objectives of bringing all Turkic nations under one neo-Ottoman empire have, predictably, crashed. 

Russia: Russia is the only true winner of this war. I know, there is a powerful Armenian lobby in the USA, in Europe and in Russia, and they are trying to present their defeat as a defeat for Russia. Frankly, I understand their bitterness and I feel sorry for them, but they are absolutely wrong. Here is why: First, Russia has now established herself as the sole power in the Caucasus which can bring about peace. 2000 US personnel in Erevan did absolutely nothing for years to really help Armenia, all they did is force suicidal russophobic policies on Armenia, that’s about it…. Another sweet spot for Russia is that she can now (truthfully) declare that color revolutions inevitably result in territorial losses (the Ukraine, Georgie and now Armenia) and political chaos (everywhere).

I can’t possibly say whether he is correct or not, but one thing is clear: the outcome of this latest conflict over Nagorno-Karabakh was considerably less successful for Armenia than the last one. It’s also rather sobering to be informed that the war was even more bloody than the much longer Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.

#Maidengate expands

SomeBitchToldMe has discovered that the systematic voter fraud based on the maiden names of married women goes considerably beyond premarital surnames:

I wasn’t thinking big enough at all. This isn’t just name changes.This isn’t just state changes. This isn’t just women.

This is anyone who has ever lived in multiple places and registered different times to vote. This is anyone who has registered in ONE place ever, but had a name change.

  • Men.
  • Women.
  • Military.
  • Divorced.
  • Married.
  • Adopted.
  • Transgendered (we’ve found at least one).

What I need you to do is check your registration and ballot status in whatever states you might have lived in under whatever names you might have gone by.

Even check aliases on your credit report that sound like you but are a little off. My name is Lauren, but I have a “Laurie” that I have been trying to get removed for nearly a year, from when I lived in Georgia. As soon as I finish writing this, I’m going to check and see if there was a ballot cast under that name.

If you do find something, please get in touch with me at maidengate@protonmail.com.

You can check your registration and ballot status by following the links provided on my website. No ads, no bullshit, just the info. Find it here:

Let’s keep this fight going.

It’s not just the dead whose votes they’re stealing.

It’s the living.

You wanted to know how you could help the God-Emperor deal with the fraud? Here is how. 

UPDATE: You want evidence? Here is your evidence. Biden didn’t win.

Fox News is the enemy

 All Deep State assets have been activated:

Fox News has given a directive to their daytime hosts to not have anyone from the Trump campaign or the White House legal team on. They have been told to not entertain or discuss any allegations of voter fraud and to keep reassuring the public that Joe Biden is the President Elect.

There has been a complete insurrection at Fox News and there are talks among the Murdoch run management of terminating the Pro-Trump hosts.

Judge Jeanine’s show was suspended a few days ago because she wanted to talk about voter fraud.

This is absolutely no surprise to me. I’ve known fox was on the other side since 2004, when my book contract for Media Whores, a book I was literally paid not to write, was cancelled after the publishing house executives took it to Fox News to get their approval of the content, which approval was not forthcoming. And that was 16 years ago, which is why I turned down interview requests by Hannity & Colmes back in 2005 and why you have never seen me make any references to watching anything on Fox News.

I didn’t expect anyone to believe me, so I didn’t spend any time trying to convince anyone. But now, the truth is obvious to everyone. This is good news. Especially when you think about how desperate they must at this point be to try to keep a lid on news that cannot possibly be hidden from the public for long.

But it’s going to be hard for many long-time Fox News fans to accept their betrayal, as this article at the American Thinker demonstrates:

Now that millions of Fox News’s loyal viewers have awakened to the network’s betrayal, what are we to think about those hosts we have let into our homes all these years?  We’ve long thought these anchors we relied upon for actual news were on the same political page as their viewers — reverence for the Constitution, law enforcement, our military, freedom, belief in American greatness, etc.

While it was clear some were not all-in Trump fans, Fox viewers assumed they shared their values.  So have they been faking all these years?  Have they gone home and made fun of Fox-watchers and voted Democrat?  Or have they now been ordered by Rupert Murdoch’s son to move left, to mimic CNN and MSNBC? 

Chris Wallace revealed himself to be a partisan leftist, an anti-Trump guy, years ago, so Fox News Sunday was no longer a must-watch program.  He really exposed his bias in that first presidential debate; that was the final blow for conservatives re: Wallace.

Wallace is as committed a leftist as little George Stephanopoulos of ABC and the moonbats on CNN and MSNBC.

But that Bret Baier, Martha MacCallum, Arthel Neville, Sandra Smith, Chris Stirewalt, et al. are suddenly all anti-Trumpers to the point of supporting a rigged election is a shock.  Were they pretending then, or are they pretending now?  

They never had any right-wing or conservative principles. At best, they were purely mercenary media whores. At worst, they were full-fledged pretenders all along. 

Sounds about right

 

It is, of course, a tremendous compliment to be compared to the victorious God-Emperor, who, it is rapidly becoming apparent to all and sundry, will serve his second term through 2024 despite the best efforts of his enemies to fraudulently steal the election. Although I will confess to being mystified that so many people seem to be under the impression that I call myself The Dark Lord. Rather like a nickname or a job title at a corporation, that’s the sort of appellation one really has to be awarded by others to be meaningful. 

But he’s right, I am good with Italy. And anyhow, I’m sure that the God-Emperor’s wartime consigliere, Donald Trump Jr., has galactic rule from 2024 through 2032 covered.

As the artist permits comments, I’d encourage you to leave one there before the SJWs and cucks start doing their thing.

No one believes Biden won

 And this is a subject of deep concern to the people that claimed Creepy Joe was a shoe-in:

Our latest YouGov/The Economist poll has a host of troubling findings about public confidence in the election.

Most shocking is that 86{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of Trump voters say that Biden “did not legitimately win the election.” 73{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} say that we’ll “never know the real outcome of this election.” 

We also see the usual patterns in attitudes about mail-in voting and fraud. 88{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of Trump voters say they believe that “illegal immigrants voted fraudulently in 2016 and tried again in 2020,” for ex, and 90{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} believed that “mail ballots are being manipulated to favor Joe Biden.” 

Republicans are also exhibiting some… concerning… attitudes about the franchise, with 46{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} saying that “some people are not smart enough to vote” (27{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} among Dems) and 43{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} saying that people should have to pass a test before voting (15{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} for Dems). 

89{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of Trump voters think he should contest the outcome of the election in court, and 62{3aedcb51dac2fbb83a885d32b07950f3050377138d02430f831f0a3ede84357a} of his voters think it will change the outcome.

Fewer than half of Americans expect there will be a peaceful transition of power to a Biden presidency.

Forget “peaceful”. There won’t be ANY transition of power to a Biden presidency and most Americans already know it. 

Because Epstein didn’t kill himself and Biden didn’t win.