Gaiman Sues Alleged Victim

But not for defamation. Oh, no, he wouldn’t want to open up that can of worms. He’s suing the woman who used to live in his house for breaking her NDA.

The author Neil Gaiman is seeking more than $500,000 from Caroline Wallner, the potter who accused him of sexual misconduct during the time she lived and worked on his property in Woodstock.
Wallner moved to Gaiman’s property in 2014 when he offered her and her ex-husband, a builder, work as caretakers. The alleged abuse occurred between 2018 and 2020, after Wallner’s marriage had fallen apart and her husband had moved out, leaving Wallner behind to take care of their three children. It was then, Wallner says, that Gaiman began to pressure her for sex in exchange for staying on the property. “‘I like our trade,’” she recalled him saying. “‘You take care of me, and I’ll take care of you.’”

Gaiman denied that he’d abused Wallner and told New York that it was she who had initiated their sexual encounters, but in 2021, Gaiman paid Wallner $275,000 in exchange for signing an extensive nondisclosure agreement that prevents her from suing Gaiman or telling anyone about her alleged experiences with him. Now, Gaiman has filed a demand for arbitration, accusing Wallner of breaching their NDA by sharing her story with the media, including with New York Magazine. In his claim, Gaiman argued that Wallner violated the confidentiality and non-disparagement provisions of their agreement and is requesting a full repayment of their settlement amount, plus attorneys’ fees and $50,000 for each interview she’s given to the media. (Wallner’s ex-husband, who signed the NDA as well, is also named in the claim, shared with New York.)

Vincent White, Wallner’s lawyer, was surprised Gaiman had filed the claim against his client. White, an employment lawyer in New York who specializes in sexual harassment in the workplace, said that in his experience, allegedly abusive men only rarely sued women for violating NDAs because the optics were so poor. When you’re trying to silence someone who’s alleging “really heinous acts,” White said, “everyone thinks, Oh, the allegation must be true. I would think he may have come to the conclusion he has nothing left to lose.”

Unless Gaiman has a gambling problem or went short on gold, there is only one reason to sue Wallner for breaking her NDA: he’s hoping to intimidate other individuals under NDA with him from breaking theirs. Which means that if he’s unsuccessful, we’re very likely going to see more alleged victims coming forward; I expect the final number to be closer to 50 than the eight who have already spoken out.

And imagine how awful and creepy a man has to be to even want to buy a woman’s silence about her experience with him, let alone pay millions of dollars for it.

DISCUSS ON SG

Failure = Replacement

It’s pretty obvious that people have paid absolutely no attention to what Owen Benjamin has been saying for years when they get their panties in a bunch about the Big Bear pointing out the utter futility of the so-called White Pride crowd. Even AC managed to completely step in it today:

Owen Benjamin says white people should be replaced because they are not having children, and so filling America with Somalians is a superior answer. I do not really know what to say here. He either cannot recognize the problem, or he is part of the problem. It is one or the other.

AC is actually the one who should have kept his mouth shut here because he is opining in obvious and utter ignorance. There has not been one single more enthusiastic advocate for young white men getting married and starting families than Big Bear. He was far ahead of me on the absolute importance of young men prioritizing marriage and children over being based, being theologically-correct, being well-informed, and every other form of knowledge.

Let’s review Owen’s actual words, as provided by the individual on Gab who was serving as his self-appointed prosecutor. This was the charge:

Jewish comedian Owen Benjamin says White Pride is a cancer, and Whites need to be replaced because they are lazy cowards. This doesn’t sound funny to me.

You want to talk about White replacement? People always do this clip where me and Joe Rogan are laughing about White replacement like it’s this big gotcha moment. And guys, it’s not a gotcha moment. Like, if you refuse to have children and you refuse to do labor, you should be replaced. Mexicans, Somalians, it doesn’t matter, you’re not valuable to society, no one owes you anything, your skin color is not a credit, it doesn’t make you special.

Right? This White Pride shit is like cancer.

“Oh, Jew, Jew”

I’m a 6’8″ blue-eyed – I look like a Nazi propaganda poster. I mean, I don’t have the jawline for that, I get it, but enough with the Jew stuff. It’s just stupid. You know that poster where the SJW, “Everyone I don’t like is literally Hitler” and it’s got Hitler like holding a blanket or something?

The Nazis are even worse. They’re like “Jew, Jew” and you’re like, what are you talking about? You’re lazy. You have no kids. You’re replacing yourself because you’re a coward. Because you can’t stay with a woman because you’re afraid of rejection. You don’t want to be up at night with a baby, you don’t want to spend your money on someone else, you don’t want to limit your lifestyle and your traveling ability, and so we need people to replace you.

Now, the truth is that Owen is actually making weaker case than I would here. Because the point is not that these people “should” be replaced, it is that they “will” be replaced and that they “are” being replaced because they a) won’t breed, b) won’t work, and c) won’t fight. For all their incessant posturing, they are essentially modern Lotus Eaters who are incapable of sustaining the civilized societies that are their birthrights.

In fact, no one who doesn’t have children has any right to even try to criticize Owen Benjamin on this subject, because unlike his childless would-be critics, Owen is the man in the arena. Owen is the man who has shown up to fight for the future. And Owen is warning the retarded elements of the Right that they are wasting all of their feeble energies on crying out for sympathy that will never be forthcoming instead of the three things it has to do to survive.

To be honest, these online pseudo-nazis are so enervated, both physically and intellectually, that it wouldn’t surprise me in the least if, in addition to lacking wives, jobs, and children, they didn’t even own any guns. Although it would surprise me if they were actually dumb enough to get vaxxed after all their constant posturing about how the world is out to get them; if they somehow managed to fail that one too, then they’re definitely going to be replaced.

The irony, of course, is that Owen is less Jewish than I am American Indian. And yet, his critics always point out his ethnic ancestry while my critics assiduously avoid mentioning mine.

In any event, the lessons of history are very clear. Societal failure inevitably dictates replacement. This has been observed to be the case everywhere from Australia to Zimbabwe. Few nations survive any period of mass migration unscathed, and more than a few are replaced entirely by the invaders. And I am unaware, to date, of any that have been preserved by weak and childless men bewailing their fate.

DISCUSS ON SG

Fake Pope Dies

Fake Pope Francis went to what one can only presume was his infernal reward this morning, thereby presenting the genuine Christians in the Catholic Church another chance to clean their house of the post-Vatican II diableristes. I’m not optimistic in this regard; neither am I judgmental as the Southern Baptists and most of the Protestant denominations are just as converged and very nearly as bad, if not worse.

Perhaps only now can we truly understand the wisdom of Jesus Christ declaring that he is wherever two or three are gathered together in his name. Because it is now obvious that there is no human organization on this Earth that is immune to corruption and convergence.

I understand all the various theological arguments in defense of this particular organization or that particular organization as the One True Church. But regardless of how convincing, or unconvincing I might find them, I just haven’t seen any sign that any of the various Christian organizations have successfully policed themselves to remain uncompromised and true to its own foundational principles, let alone the basic principles set down by Jesus Christ.

DISCUSS ON SG

Who are the Reactionaries Now?

As comically unprincipled as conservatives are, liberals are even worse. Specifically, 2.86 times worse.

Support for free trade among American liberals has more than doubled since Donald Trump won his second term as US president in November, a study has suggested. During the election campaign, Trump accused America’s trade partners of ripping off the country and vowed to impose harsh duties on them. On April 2, he made good on his threat, announcing new “reciprocal” tariffs on nearly 90 countries, saying that it would raise revenues and boost the number of jobs in the US.

After global markets reacted by dropping sharply, the president put most of the tariffs on hold for 90 days, reducing them to a baseline rate of 10%. However, the pause does not apply to China, whose exports to the US are now subject to tariffs of up to 145% amid an ongoing tit-for-tat trade war.

A poll by Polarization Research Lab, first published by the Financial Times and actively shared by social media users on Friday, has suggested that “American attitudes towards free trade have rapidly polarized” over the past several months.

In early 2024, there was some 20% support for unrestricted exports and imports among both liberals and conservatives, the study said. However, the divide on the issue between the groups, which appeared in the run up to the election, has increased dramatically since Trump’s victory, it said. According to the poll, more than 40% of leftists surveyed now say that they “strongly approve” of free trade.

Meanwhile, the number of conservatives who support free trade has decreased, albeit not as sharply, with some 13% of them still favoring it, the study suggested.

In other words, 20 percent of liberals now SUPPORT the nonsensical, societally-destructive concept of free trade solely because President Trump is against it. Conversely, only 7 percent of former free trade-supporting conservatives have changed their mind on the topic.

A pox on both their retarded houses.

DISCUSS ON SG

The Intelligence War

There are various reports, which appear to be based on direct public statements by comedian Jim Davidson of having seen a video showing UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer in compromising positions, that would likely lead to the end of both Starmer’s marriage and his political career:

The Prime Minister of the United Kingdom may be headed for a major scandal, as rumors intensify about explosive CCTV footage allegedly showing Keir Starmer and Lord Alli in compromising positions inside a private office. The footage reportedly captures something physical between the two, and Starmer’s wife was shown the video—prompting her to storm out and contact divorce lawyers immediately. Labour HQ is reportedly in chaos trying to figure out a way to bury the story.

If legitimate, there is virtually no accident that the video was leaked. Whether it was by the Russians in response to Starmer’s anti-Russian bellicosity, or the Europeans angry about Starmer’s lack of enthusiasm for their anti-tariff campaign, or someone else is largely irrelevant. But it will make it clear that the never-ending shadow war between intelligence agencies is heating up and there will be more secret lives of politicians being exposed.

DISCUSS ON SG

Jesus Has Risen

After the Sabbath, at dawn on the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb.

 There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. The guards were so afraid of him that they shook and became like dead men.

The angel said to the women, “Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. He is not here; he has risen, just as he said. Come and see the place where he lay. Then go quickly and tell his disciples: ‘He has risen from the dead and is going ahead of you into Galilee. There you will see him.’ Now I have told you.”

So the women hurried away from the tomb, afraid yet filled with joy, and ran to tell his disciples. Suddenly Jesus met them. “Greetings,” he said. They came to him, clasped his feet and worshiped him. Then Jesus said to them, “Do not be afraid. Go and tell my brothers to go to Galilee; there they will see me.”

The Guards’ Report

While the women were on their way, some of the guards went into the city and reported to the chief priests everything that had happened. When the chief priests had met with the elders and devised a plan, they gave the soldiers a large sum of money, telling them, “You are to say, ‘His disciples came during the night and stole him away while we were asleep.’ If this report gets to the governor, we will satisfy him and keep you out of trouble.” So the soldiers took the money and did as they were instructed. And this story has been widely circulated among the Jews to this very day.

The Great Commission

Then the eleven disciples went to Galilee, to the mountain where Jesus had told them to go. When they saw him, they worshiped him; but some doubted. Then Jesus came to them and said, “All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me. Therefore go and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, and teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you. And surely I am with you always, to the very end of the age.”

— Matthew 28: 1-20

DISCUSS ON SG

It’s Not Andrew Tate

There is almost certainly a reason why boys in Liverpool are refusing to speak to female teachers, and it has nothing to do with Andrew Tate.

One motion that is set to be debated at the conference calls on the union’s executive to work with teachers “to assess the risk that far-right and populist movements pose to young people”.

Andrew Tate was referenced by a number of teachers who took part in the survey, who said he had negative influence on male pupils. One teacher said she’d had 10-year-old boys “refuse to speak to [her]…because [she is] a woman”.

Another teacher said “the Andrew Tate phenomena had a huge impact on how [pupils at an all-boys school] interacted with females and males they did not see as ‘masculine'”.

The second-most-common language in Liverpool is Arabic. The second-most-common religion in Liverpool is Islam.

It’s really remarkable to observe what lengths the media will go to in order to conceal the real roots of social problems.

DISCUSS ON SG

Immigration and Empire are Degenerate

This is not news. Consider the following three paragraphs quoted from a book published more than a century ago, in 1911.

The unification of the inhabited world which forms the meaning and the greatness of the Roman Empire, is a process presenting two different sides to the observer. Kelts, Iberians, Rhaetians, Moors, Ulyrians, Thracians were to some extent civilised by the culture of Greece and Rome, and achieved by its help a great advance in economic and civic organisation as well as in education; Syrians, Egyptians, the inhabitants of Asia Minor only modified to a certain extent their manners and views in order to meet the requirements of the Empire. But if the intermixture of tribes and their permeation by Graeco-Roman culture was in one sense a great progress, it was at the same time, but from another point of view, a decline; it was accompanied by a lowering of the level of the culture which exerted the civilising influence. While conquering barbarism and native peculiarities, Graeco-Roman culture assumed various traits from its vanquished opponents, and became gross and vulgar in its turn. In the words of a biographer of Alexander Severus: good and bad were promiscuously thrust into the Empire, noble and base, and numbers of barbarians (Hist. Aug. Alex. Sev. 64).

The unification and transformation of tribes standing on low grades of civilisation leads to consequences characterised by one common feature, the simplification of aims — degeneration. This process is concealed for a while by the political and economic advantages following on the establishment of the Empire. The creation of a central authority, upholding peace and intercourse, the conjunction oft he different parts of the world into one economic system enlivened by free trade, the spread of citizenship and civil culture in wider and wider circles of population — all these benefits produced for a time a rise of prosperity which counterbalanced the excess of barbarous, imperfectly assimilated elements.

But a series of political misfortunes set in rather rapidly in the third century: invasions of barbarians, conflicts between rival candidates to the throne, competition between armies and provinces put an end to order and prosperity and threatened the very existence of the Empire. In these calamities the barbarisation of Roman culture became more and more manifest, a backward movement began in all directions, a backward movement, however, which was by no means a mere falling back into previous conditions, but gave rise to new and interesting departures.

We’ve already seen the first step: the rise in global prosperity that accompanied the neo-liberal world order. We are now well into the second step: degeneration. The third step is collapse. The historical process is inexorable and cannot be stopped except by removing all of the sources of the dyscivilizational degeneracy.

DISCUSS ON SG

Russia and the Immigration Challenge

Russia is now facing the challenge of all successful societies; how to deal with all the foreigners from less successful societies who want to benefit themselves by seeking work and opportunity there.

Russia is facing a challenge for which there is little historical precedent. The current and future influx of labor and permanent migrants from Central Asia poses questions that cannot be answered with conventional assimilation strategies. For this reason, Moscow must act early and decisively to avoid the mistakes made by Western Europe and the United States.

While discussions around migration policy spark heated debate at home and occasional diplomatic tensions with Central Asian neighbors, this is far preferable to allowing the issue to fester. Left unresolved, mass migration could pose a direct threat to Russia’s political stability and institutional coherence. That is why the response must be shaped in Moscow’s traditional style: flexible, pragmatic, and unburdened by rigid ideological dogma.

There is no shortage of cautionary tales. Western Europe’s migration dilemma stems from two primary causes: the collapse of colonial empires, and post-war economic expansion that created a demand for low-skilled labor. Former colonial powers such as France and Britain kept strong ties with their former territories and welcomed waves of migrants, only to realize later that integration would prove far more difficult than anticipated.

European states are built on the idea of the ethnically homogeneous “nation-state.” Historically, this has meant low tolerance for cultural and religious diversity. Over centuries, outsiders were either assimilated or excluded. When former colonial subjects began to settle in France, Germany, and the UK in large numbers, the response was muddled. France declared all migrants “French” with no accompanying effort to integrate them. Britain and Germany pursued a version of multiculturalism that effectively encouraged segregation under the guise of tolerance.

The United States followed a different path. Its economy was flexible, its social safety net limited. For decades, this allowed migration to be framed purely in economic terms: migrants were simply new workers. But with the rise of social and economic inequality, climate change, and political polarization, the American consensus fractured. Migrants became a political issue. Republican leaders began calling for mass deportations and border walls, while Democrats welcomed migrants as potential voters. The result: a divided electorate and an unstable political system.

Western Europe’s response has been even more fraught. In the absence of credible solutions, right-wing, anti-globalist parties have surged in popularity. But these movements are not necessarily friendly to Russia. Figures such as Marine Le Pen or Italy’s right-wing coalition may oppose liberal orthodoxy, but they remain staunchly pro-NATO and anti-Russian. Even in smaller countries such as Finland, parties that grew by campaigning against migration ended up supporting NATO expansion and promoting Russophobic policies.

This trend – a migrant crisis fueling political radicalism – is real. And it would be naive to think Russia is immune.

The USA dealt successfully with its first immigration challenge by shutting it down for more than 40 years from 1921. But relentless pressure by the immigrant lobby finally succeeded in cracking the borders open in 1965 and the USA is now thrashing about in its death throes as President Trump heroically seeks to somehow mitigate the damage while battling all of the immigrant-infested institutions and organizations that seek to put their foreign interests above those of the original nation.

In Europe, the problem has metastasized even faster; the EU is already falling apart barely twenty years after first being formed. And so it’s doubtful that the Russians will fall for the “nation of immigrants” line that was used successfully on the USA, the UK, and Sweden, given the disastrous state of all three nations that fell for it.

DISCUSS ON SG