Mailvox: the self-deportations begin

A reader reports from Texas:

Since Election Day I know of two people and their families who have self-deported back south of the border. Both were Hispanic and one I know was from Mexico. In both cases the families were middle to upper middle class. I know no details of criminality, anyone who asked them to leave, or told them to get out. One family pulled their kids out of school and vanished practically the next day.

I’m guessing that these families won’t be the last in this income bracket as moving back down south will be much easier if it is voluntary. Anyone who has lived in a border state knows that some from south of the border travel back and forth illegally with regularity. The narrative is that it’s just the poorest coming across, but that simply isn’t true. Many times they are here for the work, are educated, but with no intention of staying.

Please remember that almost two-thirds of Hispanics support Trump’s immigration policies. So don’t think that every Hispanic in the nation wants open borders. Far from it in fact. Part of the reason is that many of them did come into the country legally and spent a lot of time and money getting their citizenships. The idea that people who just happen to slip across get rewarded with a fast track to citizenship infuriates them.

Further demonstrating that the “impossibility” of returning the USA to the promised 1965 demographics is about as impossible as Donald Trump winning the presidential election.


The courage of the cuck

I will resist this Alt Right filth to my dying breath.
Mark Shea
You’re not even a speed bump, cucky. You clearly couldn’t even resist a pizza.

What I find amusing about the cucks is that they’re now rolling out the same X means Y routine against the Alt-Right that has failed so utterly against the Ctrl-Left. It used to be “Democrats are the real racists”. Now its “the Alt-Right are the real socialists” or whatever.

To which, of course, we have an obvious response: Vaihtoehto-oikeistoa ei kiinnosta mitä mieltä siitä ollaan.

It’s kind of nice having all those translations, isn’t it?

UPDATE: Perhaps I am wrong. It seems the Alt-Right is truly shaken. From Twitter:

  • Uh oh! What are we going to do? Mark Shea has vowed to resist us to his dying breath? MARK freaking SHEA!
  • Give up. We’ve lost. No one wins against Mark Shea.
  • I DON’T EVEN KNOW WHO THAT IS BUT HIS VERY NAME STRIKES TERROR INTO THE COCKLES OF MY HEART! WOE IS US! THE BATTLE IS FORLORN! FLEE!

Blacklist and block

It’s time for the Alt-Right to take the lead in showing the Right how to block and blacklist the sites of the Left. Not because we fear this, but because they fear it. Remember, they always project. This is the true story of the little boy who grew up to become Ricky Vaughn, Influencer of Elections and Alt-Right troll extraordinaire.


Change is coming

The God-Emperor Ascendant’s Fist prepares the legislative troops for the long march:

Vice President-elect Mike Pence told House Republicans in a closed-door meeting Thursday to be ready to move a lot of legislation next year.

“We’re going to move an agenda” focused on rebuilding the military and improving the economy, Pence told reporters after the meeting.

In his remarks to House Republicans, Pence talked about how he and the new administration wanted members to “buckle up,” and get ready for a speedy start on policy. He also solicited suggestions for candidates to fill administration posts.

“Donald Trump is a man of action and we’re counting on you,” Pence said, according to Ways and Means Chairman Kevin Brady. The Texas Republican said that Pence mentioned a tax overhaul and Obamacare, but didn’t get into specifics.

Pence, a former House member himself, returned to the U.S. Capitol Thursday to visit with House Republicans. He also met with top Democratic leaders in the House and Senate. Pence’s closed-door meeting with Speaker Paul Ryan and other House Republicans reflected his vital role helping President-elect Trump forge a relationship with Congress. His visit was squeezed in even as Pence is overseeing the building of a Trump administration, a transition effort seen as marked by infighting.

Pence didn’t mention Trump’s campaign promise to build a wall on the Mexican border, according to Representative Lou Barletta of Pennsylvania. But Pence said the transition is “going fantastic” and that Trump is methodically selecting his Cabinet positions, Barletta said.

Representative Chris Collins of New York, who was appointed by the transition team as its congressional liaison, said Pence also told lawmakers one of Trump’s top priorities was taking a deep dive through President Barack Obama’s executive orders. “We applaud that,” he said. “He will be reversing many of them.”

The Democrats are, without question, going to squeal like pigs being butchered and plead everything from “time-honored tradition” to racism, including appeals to the very customs they have blithely ignored in the very recent past. It is now readily apparent that this is not going to do them any good whatsoever, as the God-Emperor Ascendant has made it abundantly clear that he does not care in the slightest what the media or the SJW Left might have to say about him. Of course, I doubt he cares very much what we have to say either, except in that we are a more accurate guide to the current conceptual trends.

As I mentioned to Brian Greenberg on his show last night, Trump simply isn’t going to be impressed when they accuse his lieutenants and appointees of racism, hate crimes, crimethink, and small furry animal-molesting, because they have accused him of all the same things. My prediction: the conservative media will be licking his boots and hailing him as the next Reagan by October. The mainstream media will fall in line within a year after that, simply to avoid looking entirely out of touch.

Furthermore, everyone needs to relax about his appointees. This is not a traditional administration. It doesn’t necessarily matter what Mitt Romney or Rudy Giuliani or John Bolton think, because if they don’t do what Trump wants them to do, he’ll replace them without a moment’s hesitation and they all know it now. Look how swiftly Paul Ryan, the Speaker of the House, slapped down the idiot Republicans who wanted to bring back earmarks.

If Donald Trump was not the President-Elect, there is no way he would have done that, or succeeded so easily. I suspect that the neocons and everyone else who think they can use Trump the way they used the Bushes, the Clintons, and Obama, are about to discover that he is more capable of using them than they are of using him.

The Trump administration is looking more glorious by the day and the God-Emperor hasn’t even Ascended yet. Both Trump and Pence are showing themselves to be serious men of grim purpose and action, and while it is too soon to hail them on any accomplishments as yet, things are looking better than I had ever imagined.

UPDATE: The God-Emperor has chosen Jeff Sessions for Attorney-General. Great choice. Now set him loose to DRAIN THE SWAMP.

UPDATE: The Sessions (AG), Flynn (National Security Adviser) and Pompeo (CIA) announcements are to be formally announced later today. First Bannon, now this? The legions are practically shaking with anticipation.


Mr Dreher contemplates the red pill

When even a conservative as hopelessly, haplessly cucky as Rod Dreher is beginning to become indifferent to accusations of racism – although, he still never misses a chance to wag his finger and remind everyone that real racism is very bad – then you know we’re on the verge of a preference cascade. Dreher responds to an email from a reader named Andrew who actually has gone ahead and swallowed it at the American Conservative:

Dear Liberals, Democrats, progressives, leftists: Your use of the word “racist” doesn’t work anymore. We get it. You’re superior. You’re enlightened and we’re not. You care about diversity and we don’t. We only listen to dog whistles. We have given up trying to talk you out of your presumptions, or trying to earn your approval. We no longer consider it worth our while to reassure you that we’re not “that kind” of Republican.


But the fact is, we’re not as stupid as you think we are, and we see right through you. And if there’s one thing Trump has done, he’s given us some backbone to make our voices heard. Of course, that means “expressions of racism” will increase. (OMG!) And every child who behaves like a bully will be blamed on Trump. The fact is, we just won’t care about your freak-outs. Go ahead and caterwaul. You lost, and you deserved to lose.


I cast my vote for Trump reluctantly. Now, I couldn’t be prouder.

Thoughts?

I understand where Andrew is coming from in this e-mail, and I highlight it here to point out that a country in which people do not feel shame over racist thoughts, beliefs, and actions is a morally diminished country. I take Andrew’s point to mean that the left has accused him and people like him of racism for so many things, no matter how trivial, that the accusation doesn’t faze him anymore. I have been saying for some time now that if the alt-right grows in power and influence, it will be because ordinary people get tired of being bullied by these kinds of accusations, and choose to ally with people who might actually be bona fide racists, but who aren’t bothered by the attacks from the left.

I think Trump’s not giving a rip about political correctness was a big factor in his rise. If you’ve been reading me all year, you know that I’ve objected to his vulgarity and coarseness on many occasions. Trump lowers our discourse, and normalizes ways of talking in public that ought not be normalized. Having said that, it is undeniably true that the willingness of many on the left to demonize as bigots (racists, sexists, homophobes, Islamophobes, etc.) white people who don’t live up to strict progressive blasphemy codes has called forth contempt for the (necessary and important) taboo against racism itself.

Think of it like this: Prohibition encouraged contempt for the law. If you pass so many “laws” around normal discourse, saying to transgress them makes you an “outlaw” (= bigot), then you should not be surprised when people go full Uncle Chuckie, and cease caring.

And once people stop caring, it rapidly becomes apparent to everyone that the “necessary and important” taboo against racism is neither necessary or important. Remember, the pendulum never stops on a dime; just as the Left turned the taboo against homosexuality into a pseudo-disease, the rise of the Alt-Right will coincide with the taboo against racism transforming into something widely seen as being considerably more deleterious than “homophobia”.


It’s not your imagination

ESPN has been moving steadily leftward since it converged:

ESPN Public Editor Jim Brady on Election Eve surveyed complaints that the sports network had gone overboard with liberal pieties, frustrating long-time watchers by injecting politics onto the plahing field. He agreed with conservative complaints that ESPN had shifted leftward, though the company brass and at least one outspoken lefty personality didn’t see a problem: “One notion that virtually everyone I spoke to at ESPN dismisses is what some have perceived as unequal treatment of conservatives who make controversial statements vs. liberals who do the same.”

I used to LOVE ESPN and Sportscenter back in the glory days of Keith Olbermann and Dan Patrick. I haven’t even considered turning it on or even visiting the ESPN website for years.

But remember, SJW convergence is nothing that merits fighting. It’s a sign that there is a sizable opportunity to exploit.


Happy Birthday, Mike

Want to get Mike Cernovich a birthday present and thank him for the yeoman’s work he put in to ensure the Ascension of the God-Emperor Trump to the Cherry Blossom Throne?

  1. Buy a copy of his bestselling MAGA MINDSET in hardcover or in paperback.
  2. Give it to a friend or family member or teacher or professor to read. Tell them: this is why Donald Trump won the election.
  3. Tweet their reaction to @cernovich on Twitter or Gab.
It’s a gift that keeps on giving. In the meantime, Mike is gearing up to be the target of another hit piece. This is to be celebrated; the media only writes hit pieces about people who alarm them in some way.

הימין האלטרנטיבי, מהו

1.
הימין האלטרנטיבי הוא ימני במובן האמריקני והארופאי של המושג.  סוציאליסטים
אינם ימין אלטרנטיבי.  פרוגרסיביים אינם ימין אלטרנטיבי.  ליבראליים אינם
ימין אלטרנטיבי.  קומוניסטים, מרקסיסטים, מרקסיאנים, מרקסיסטים תרבותיים,
ונאו-שמרנים אינם ימין אלטרנטיבי.
2.
הימין
האלטרניבי מהווה אלטרנטיבה לתנועה השמרנית המיינסטרימית שבארה”ב, שלהלכה
מתומצתת בעשרת עקרונות השמרנות של ראסל קירק, אך למעשה סטתה עם הזמן לכיוון
הפרוגרסיביזם.  הוא גם מהווה אלטרנטיבה
לליברטריאניזם.
3.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי אינו גישה הגנתית בעלמא, אלא הוא דוחה על הסף את הרעיון של
תבוסה אצילה ועקרונית.  אדרבא, מדובר בפילוסופיה התקפית במלוא המובן,
הדוגלת במחשבה קדימה.  הימין האלטרנטיבי מאמין בנצחון
באמצעות התמדה, תוך מיזוג דעים עם המדע, המציאות, המסורת התרבותית, ולקחי
ההסטוריה.
4.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי מאמין כי התרבות המערבית היא הישג פסגה לאנושות, ותומך איפא
בשלושת יסודותיה: הנצרות, הלאומים האירופאיים, והמורשת היוונית-רומאית.
5.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי הוא לאומני באופן פומבי ומוצהר.  הוא תומך בכל סוגי הלאומנות
וכן בזכותם של כל עם ועם להתקיים באשר הוא באופן אחיד ובלתי מחולל מפלישה
והגירה של זרים.
6.
הימין האלטרנטיבי הוא אנטי-גלובליזציה.  הוא מתנגד לכל קבוצה הפועלת למען אידאלים ומטרות גלובליסטיים.
7.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי הוא אנטי-שוויונות. הוא דוחה על הסף את רעיון השוויונות מאותה
סיבה שהוא כופר באמונה בחדי קרן ושדונים, והיא שהשוויון הבין-אנושי לא היה
ולא נברא מעולם בשום צורה ואופן, לא מדעית,
לא חוקית, לא גשמית, לא שכלית, לא מינית, ולא רוחנית.
8.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי הוא סיאנטודי.  הוא מניח לעת עתה את נכונותן של מסקנות השוטף
של השיטה המדעית (סיאנטודיה), תוך הבנה כי א) מסקנות אלו עשויים להשתנות
בעתיד, ב) תופעת המדעיזם חשוף לשחיתות, וכי
ג) מה שנקרא הקונצנזוס המדעי כביכול, מבוסס לא על סיאנטודיה, אלא על
דמוקרטיה, ולפיכך היא לא מדעית הלכה למעשה.
9.
הימין האלטרנטיבי מאמין כי זהות > תרבות > פוליטיקה.
10.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי מתנגד לכל שלטון ומשלה של קבוצה אתנית כלשהי בידי קבוצה אחרת,
במיוחד בתוך ארצות המולדת של העמים הנשלטים.  הימין האלטרנטיבי מתנגד לכך
שקבוצה אתנית זרה בארץ תתפוס עמדה של השפעה
יתרה בחברה הילידית באמצעות נפוטיזם, שבטיות, או כל אמצעי אחר.
11.
הימין האלטרנטיבי מבין כי גיוון (תרבותי) + קרבה (פיזית) = מלחמה.
12.
לימין האלטרנטיבי לא אכפת מה אתם חושבים עליו.
13.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי דוחה את הסחר החופשי הבינלאומי ואת התנועה החופשית של בני אדם
הנצרכת לשם הסחר החופשי.  היתרונות של הסחר החופשי הלאומי אינן ראיה
ליתרונות הסחר החופשי הבינלאומי.
14.
הימין האלטרנטיבי מאמין כי יש להבטיח את קיומו של הגזע הלבן ולקיים עתיד לילדים לבנים.
15.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי אינו מאמין בעליונות הכללית של גזע, עם, אומה, או תת-גזע
כלשהו.  לכל גזע, עם, אומה, ותת-גזע אנושי נקודות חוזקה וחולשה משלו, ולו
הזכות הריבונית לשכון לבטח בקרב תרבותו הילידית,
אותה הוא מכיר ומבכר.

16.
הימין
האלטרנטיבי הוא פילוסופיה שמוקירה שלום בין עמי העולם השונים, והוא מתנגד
למלחמות שמטרתן להשליט את הערכים של עם אחד על עם אחר, וכמוהן נסיונות לאבד
עמים מסוימים באמצעות מלחמה, השמדת עם,
הגירה, או התבוללות גנטית.


The racial detente is over

This is an unusually astute article on an important reason that helps explain the rising appeal of the Alt-Right across America from the Federalist.

Privilege theory and the concept of systemic racism dealt the death blow to the détente. In embracing these theories, minorities and progressives broke their essential rule, which was to not run around calling everyone a racist. As these theories took hold, every white person became a racist who must confess that racism and actively make amends. Yet if the white woman who teaches gender studies at Barnard with the Ben Shahn drawings in her office is a racist, what chance do the rest of have?

Within the past few years, as privilege theory took hold, many whites began to think that no matter what they did they would be called racist, because, in fact, that was happening. Previously there were rules. They shifted at times, but if adhered to they largely protected one from the charge of racism. It’s like the Morrissey lyric: “is evil just something you are, or something you do.” Under the détente, racism was something you did; under privilege theory it is something you are.

That shift, from carefully directed accusations of racism for direct actions to more general charges of unconscious racism, took away the carrot for whites. Worse, it led to a defensiveness and feeling of victimization that make today’s whites in many ways much more tribal than they were 30 years ago. White people are constantly told to examine their whiteness, not to think of themselves as racially neutral. That they did, but the result was not introspection that led to reconciliation, it was a decision that white people have just as much right to think of themselves as a special interest group as anyone else….

Furthermore, the ever-present drumbeat from the Left that every conservative victory is the death throes of bad, old white people who are about to be swept away by waves of brown immigration is making many whites dig in. On a certain level, how can you blame them? They are explicitly being told that their values and way of life are under the sword. How do we expect them to react?

Well, they’re all just in the very early stages of finding out. But we will never negotiate with them again. We will never believe them again. The long, stupid, dishonest detente is over. Let a hundred meme-flowers blossom.


It’s not about you

I find it very annoying when someone decides it is an optimal use of my time to ask me to contemplate their personal situation and ascertain a) if their current political position can be characterized as Alt-Right, b) what variant of Alt-Right best describes their current political perspective, c) what the Alt-Right makes of their family situation, which inevitably involves some amount of interracial sex or adoption, d) if the Alt-Right has taken into account their family situation, which inevitably involves some amount of interracial sex or adoption, or e) if the Alt-Right is aware that its political theories violate the individual’s current theological perspective.

Allow me to direct your attention to Point 12 of the 16 Points.

12. The Alt-Right doesn’t care what you think of it.

Perhaps that needs to be revised. The Alt-Right doesn’t care about you. Or made more succinct: The Alt-Right doesn’t care.

I certainly don’t. These questions are not merely solipsistic and stupid, they are utterly beside the point. They all consist of category errors. This should be totally obvious, but as I am frequently informed that what I consider to be totally obvious is not always, in fact, the case, let me attempt to explain.

Let us say that instead of political philosophy, we are discussing political economy. Let’s say that instead of discussing the Alt-Right, we are discussing Keynesianism, I point out that it is in the interest of the economy that interest rates rise. How, then, would one regard an individual who asked the following questions?

  1. Can my current financial position be characterized as Keynesian?
  2. What variant of Keynesianism best describes my current financial position?
  3. What do Keynesians make of my financial situation, which inevitably involves some amount of debt or investment?
  4. Have Keynesians taken into account my financial situation, which inevitably involves some amount of debt or investment?
  5. Are Keynesians aware that their economic theories contradict my current theological perspective?

Now does the utter irrelevance of these questions make a little more sense? The truth or falsehood of Keynesianism does not depend on the amount one presently owes on ones’s student loan debt or credit card balance. Many people seem to be of the opinion that the legitimacy of the Alt-Right somehow depends upon whether it is good for them or not. This is, in three words, stupid, solipsistic, and erroneous.

Communism is either correct or incorrect. It doesn’t matter if it is bad for you or not. Free Trade theory is either correct or incorrect. It doesn’t matter if it is bad for you or not. And the Alt-Right is either a more correct political philosophy than Communism, Liberalism, Conservatism, or Libertarianism or it is not, regardless of whether you and your mudsharking daughter or rice-chasing son or your Filippino ex-wife or your gay Hispanic uncle or your adopted Haitian son or your adopted Korean daughter or your Jewish-Nigerian granddaughter or your Kenyan-Slovakian grandson are United States citizens or alien invaders from Mars.

Seriously, to preen and posture and pretend that your personal situation is even remotely relevant to whether diversity+proximity=war is just embarrassing. The great social forces are as indifferent to individual specimens of humanity as the Deists’ hands-off clockmaker god; as Tolstoy conclusively showed, not even Napoleon’s opinions were directly relevant to the outcome of a single battle. As a general rule, Europeans don’t want to live in Somalia, Beijing, Manila, Nairobi, or Jeddah, and the more your presence forces them to live in some facsimile of one of those places for any reason, the less they want you or anyone to do with you around them.

Now, I think there is a strong argument to be made for the Alt-Right from an individual perspective. As a mixed-race individual, I will benefit greatly from the continued existence of Western civilization. If that means I cannot live in certain Alt-White-governed areas one day, what of it? It is still of massive benefit to me, as the appearance of mobile phones, fertilizer, and modern medicine in the most hopelessly savage areas of Africa should suffice to prove.

The white nations of Europe are, collectively and historically speaking, humanity’s golden geese. It is to the long-term benefit of all Mankind to avoid killing them, or even adulterating them, through immigration, invasion, or assimilation.