The Battle of Orodruin

They came to Mordor in the sixth hour.

The clouds broke apart as the eagles crossed the Ephel Dúath, and the land below them was revealed in all its desolation, with the brown, cracked wasteland of the Plateau of Gorgoroth stretching away under a sky of smoke and sullen amber, the dark mass of Barad-dûr rising in the distant northeast like a needle of black iron thrust into the heavens, and there, directly ahead, filling the southern horizon with its vast and terrible shape, Orodruin.

Mount Doom.

The mountain was active. It was always active — had been since Sauron first bent its fires to his will in the forging of the Rings — and now it breathed a column of smoke and ash into the sky that rose miles above the peak and spread into a canopy of darkness that blotted out the sun. The slopes were black and red, veined with rivulets of cooling lava that glowed like infected wounds, and from the fractured cone at the summit a dull orange light pulsed in slow, rhythmic intervals, as if the mountain itself had a heartbeat.

Gwaihir descended. The air thickened as they dropped below the cloud layer — thickened with heat and ash and the acrid stink of brimstone, and the winds became treacherous, gusting unpredictably as thermals off the mountain’s slopes collided with the cooler air from the plateau. The great eagle’s wings adjusted constantly, reading the turbulence with an instinct born of millennia, but even Gwaihir felt the strain. This was not his sky. This was a sky of fire and poison, and every breath of it burned.

Landroval flew on his right. Meneldor on his left. The three eagles were tired — six hours at altitude, at speed, without rest — but the mountain was before them and the Sammath Naur was close, a dark gash in the face of the cone visible now even through the haze of ash. Minutes. They were minutes from the end.

The Witch-king came out of the smoke.

He came from below and to the east, rising on a fell beast that screamed as it climbed — a sound like iron tearing, like the death cry of something that had never truly been alive. He had been waiting in the lee of the mountain, hidden by the ash plume, and his timing was precise. The fell beast’s vast wings beat the fouled air and drove it upward on a collision course with Meneldor, the youngest and outermost of the three eagles, and behind him came two more — Uvatha and Adûnaphel on their own mounts, spreading wide to flank.

“Nazgûl!” The cry came from Landroval, less a word than a shriek in the eagle’s tongue, a sound of warning and fury that cut through the roar of the mountain. Gwaihir banked hard, and the formation broke.

Meneldor turned to meet the Witch-king. It was the brave choice and the wrong one. The fell beast was larger than Meneldor, uglier, and utterly without fear, driven by a will that was not its own, and the Witch-king rode it with the cold expertise of a warrior who had been killing from the air since before the founding of Gondor. They met in a tangle of wings and talons above the eastern slope, and for a moment the two shapes became one, a thrashing, screaming knot of feather and membrane and raking claws, and then they broke apart with Meneldor bleeding.

The wound was along his left side, where the fell beast’s claws had torn through feather and flesh to the muscle beneath. Meneldor’s wing faltered. He dropped, caught himself, dropped again. The Witch-king circled above him, patient, and the fell beast’s mouth hung open, trailing ropes of dark saliva, waiting.

But the Witch-king had made a mistake. He had committed to Meneldor, and in doing so he had left Uvatha and Adûnaphel to deal with Gwaihir and Landroval alone.

They were not enough.

Landroval struck Uvatha’s fell beast from above and behind with the full force of a diving eagle — talons extended, wings folded, falling like a bolt of golden lightning. The impact broke the fell beast’s spine. The sound it made was extraordinary — a wet, structural crunch that was felt as much as heard — and the black-scaled creature folded in on itself like a thing made of paper and fell, spinning, trailing a banner of dark blood, and Uvatha the Horseman, who had once ridden the plains of Khand with an army at his back, fell with it, his black robes streaming behind him, silent, and not without dignity, until the slopes of Orodruin received him and he was gone from the sky.

Gwaihir took Adûnaphel’s mount head-on. The fell beast lunged for him with its serpentine neck and snapping jaws, and Gwaihir caught its long neck in both his talons and wrenched in opposite directions. The fell beast’s neck broke with a sound like a green branch snapping, and Gwaihir released it and beat upward as the dead creature tumbled past him, its wings still twitching in purposeless spasm. Adûnaphel fell screaming, and her screams gradually faded as she plunged into the fires that coursed along the mountain’s lower slopes.

Two Nazgûl down. The Witch-king, seeing his support destroyed in a matter of seconds, pulled back. He drove his fell beast away from the wounded Meneldor and climbed, circling wide, and for a moment the sky above Orodruin was clear.

“Go!” Landroval screamed at Gwaihir. “The crack! Now!”

The Windlord turned toward the Sammath Naur. He could see it clearly — the great opening in the mountainside, dark and wide, lit from within by the deep red glow of the fires below. The air above it shimmered with heat. He folded his wings into a shallow dive, angling his descent toward the entrance, and the pouch on his talon — that small, exquisitely crafted pouch of pale Elvish leather — swung beneath him like a pendulum. Within it, the Ring seemed to pulse, seemed to burn, seemed to cry out in a voice that only the mountain could hear.

Four hundred yards. three hundred. He could feel the heat now, rising from the cone in waves that distorted the air and made the dark opening dance and waver. Two hundred yards. He adjusted his angle, spreading his wings to brake, preparing to stoop through the entrance and release the pouch into the abyss below —

And then the shadow fell over him.

DISCUSS ON SG


Russian Objectives are Expanding

When Russia launched its special military operation in 2022, the initial objective was the liberation of the Donbass from Clown World. Now that the initial objective has been largely achieved, but neither the Kiev regime nor the NATO clowns are willing to accept the situation and surrender, there is no reason for the Russians to refrain from expanding their objectives:

In his February 9, 2026, interview with TV BRICS (and echoed in related remarks), Lavrov reiterated Russia’s demands for a settlement: eradicating “Nazi foundations,” preventing weapons in Ukraine that threaten Russia, and protecting rights of Russian/Russian-speaking people in Crimea, Donbas, and Novorossiya (who the Kyiv regime has labeled as “subhuman” and launched a civil war against them early in 2014).

In a February 10, 2026, speech/ceremony marking Diplomatic Workers’ Day (reported by TASS and mid.ru), Lavrov stated that Russia will “complete the process of returning” Crimea, Donbas, and Novorossiya to their “native harbor” (i.e., full integration with Russia), in line with the “will” expressed in the 2022 referendums. He added that linguistic, cultural, and religious rights of Russians/Russian-speakers in areas remaining under Kyiv’s control must be restored, alongside eliminating military threats from Ukraine to Russia’s security.

Similar phrasing appeared in his February 11, 2026, remarks during the Government Hour in the State Duma, where he criticized Western “double standards” (e.g., supporting self-determination for Greenland while denying it for Crimea, Donbas, and Novorossiya) and vowed to defend Russia’s position diplomatically.

Novorossiya (Russian: Новороссия, meaning “New Russia”) is a historical term that originated in the 18th century during the era of the Russian Empire. It referred to a large administrative and colonial region in what is now southern and southeastern mainland Ukraine, along the northern coast of the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov.

The term entered official use in 1764, when Empress Catherine the Great established the Novorossiya Governorate (Novorossiyskaya guberniya). This was part of Russia’s southward expansion during the late 18th century, driven by a series of Russo-Turkish Wars (notably 1768–1774 and 1787–1792).

I believe that when Putin and Lavrov speak of Novorossiya today they are signaling maximalist goals… Not just holding annexed territories (Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, Zaporizhzhia) but laying a claim to adjacent regions, which include Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovsk, Odessa, Mykolaiv where Russian speakers live or there are historical ties.

I tend to agree. While I always felt that Russia would insist on reclaiming Odessa for strategic reasons, the fact that it’s now clear that they will have to impose terms on Kiev and Clown World rather than reach an accommodation, it makes more sense to simply acquire the four additional regions that would complete the liberation of Novorossiya in its entirety.

Which probably explains the way in which Russian military activity will be increasing as the US ties itself up in Israel’s Middle East conflict with Iran and potentially a number of other countries, including Turkey.

DISCUSS ON SG


Veriphysics: The Treatise 015

VI. The Usury Connection: How Capture Was Funded

The rhetorical victory required material support. Ideas do not propagate themselves; they require patrons, publishers, institutions, and time. The Enlightenment had all of these in abundance, and the abundance was made possible by the financial revolution that Part One described.

The traditional prohibition on usury had constrained the accumulation and deployment of capital. Lending at interest was limited, regulated, morally suspect. Wealth accumulated slowly, through production and trade, and was dissipated across generations through inheritance, charity, and the sheer friction of economic life. No one could amass the resources to reshape civilization according to a plan.

The legitimization of usury changed this calculus. Central banking created money ex nihilo. Fractional reserve lending multiplied it. National debt allowed governments to spend beyond their revenues. Patient capital could now be accumulated and deployed over decades, over generations, with compound interest working in its favor. Those who controlled credit creation could fund projects of civilizational transformation that would have been inconceivable under the old dispensation.

The Enlightenment’s patrons understood this. The salons were funded. The journals were subsidized. The academies were endowed. The chairs were established. The process was gradual, as it had to be, to avoid provoking too violent a reaction, but it was relentless. Each generation formed by Enlightenment institutions produced the teachers, publishers, and patrons of the next generation. The compound interest was intellectual as well as financial.

The tradition, operating on honest money, could not compete. Its patrons were the old aristocracy and the Church, both increasingly constrained by the new financial order. Its institutions were ancient foundations that could be infiltrated and captured. Its defenders were individual scholars, working without coordination, without resources, without a long-term strategy. They brought arguments to a financial war.

This is not to reduce the intellectual contest to mere economics. The ideas mattered; the arguments mattered; the truth mattered. But ideas need vectors, arguments need platforms, and truth needs defenders who can sustain the fight for decades across generations. The usury revolution gave the Enlightenment the resources to wage a multigenerational campaign. The tradition had no comparable resources and no strategy for acquiring them, and in both England and in France, the Church had been deprived of a significant portion of its historical property.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Missing Verse in Matthew

It’s readily apparent that the Bible has been significantly messed with at various points in time. And it’s not just the Mandela Effect of the wolf lying down with the lamb and the new wine causing bottles to burst instead of wineskins. This one, you can check for yourself and see very easily.

Open up your NIV Bible. Go to Matthew 17. Then read verse 21. That’s right, try to find it. You can’t. It was removed, and your NIV Bible will go from verse 20 directly to verse 22. You can even see this on Bible Gateway.

It’s not every Bible. I checked my Italian Bible and my French Bible. Both of them contain verse 21, and it contains something important that was clearly removed intentionally. It’s Jesus’s words explaining to his disciples why they couldn’t cast a demon out of a boy.

Questa specie di demoni non esce se non per mezzo della preghiera e del digiuno.

This species of demons doesn’t come out without prayer and fasting.

Mais cette sorte ne sort que par la priere et par le jeune.

But this type doesn’t leave but for prayer and fasting.

The thing is, I clearly remember this verse from when I was younger. And checking the Living Bible, it is in there, along with a footnote.

21 But this kind of demon won’t leave unless you have prayed and gone without food.”

  1. This verse is omitted in many of the ancient manuscripts.

Interestingly enough, the wineskins reference from Mark 2:22 is also there:

22 You know better than to put new wine into old wineskins. They would burst. The wine would be spilled out and the wineskins ruined. New wine needs fresh wineskins.”

It’s interesting because supposedly, the Living Bible, being a paraphrase rather than a translation, is supposed to be less accurate. Yet my Italian Bible also refers to otri vecchi, old wineskins, and not bottiglie vecchie, old bottles.

However, the NIV also has wineskins. So, I don’t trust my memory of the King James version, because I’m quite confident that most of my childhood reading of the Bible was either the Living Bible or the NIV. So, naturally, I went and checked the first thing that came to mind and my suspicions were confirmed:

The NIV (New International Version) is one of the translations used in the Scofield Study Bible, specifically in the Scofield Study Bible III edition.

That being said, none of this should trouble Christians in the least. God’s Word is not limited to ink on paper. And the fact that both human and supernatural forces strive to keep any of it from us is testimony to its importance as well as a reminder to resort to it.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Convergence of D&D

Fandom Pulse chronicles the last futile thrashings of the onetime role-playing giant:

RPG Pundit’s assessment of Wizards’ current design team was devastating: “You’ve got like they just hired another chick. Gez, I wish I remembered to have checked her name before starting this video. This woman, who is basically connected to young adult science fiction stuff, like basically the entire industry of publishing has been taken over by feminist women, millennial women who worked on young adult novels.”

He described how this takeover occurred: “They took over the mainstream publishing and then, in turn, went on to only put their people everywhere, right? And now it’s being expanded to other areas. That’s what’s basically happened with fifth edition is that it became it it was taken over by YA publishing people right that were that are that are the same you know the the feminist intersectional trans bloggers right and uh vegans and all that they’re they’re a cabal they’re a sect and now they’ve expanded into here right and those people know nothing about anything right and they ruin everything they touch.”

It always ends the same way. It’s astonishing that no one, from the churches to the game companies, is capable of recognizing the pattern. Especially since it was all laid out back in 2015.

DISCUSS ON SG


The Summons of the Sleeper

For a moment Sauron stood motionless in the dim library, and the only sound was the crackle of the fire and the slow breathing of Lúthiel asleep in her chair. He looked at her. He looked at the sketch on the desk — the careful charcoal lines, the sleeping face, the small frown. He had been happy, he realized. For perhaps an hour, in the quiet of the early morning, drawing a face he had studied for nine hundred years, he had been something very like happy.

He picked up the velvet cloth and covered the palantír. Then he left the library.

The staircase to the upper chamber of Barad-dûr was a spiral of black stone, nine hundred steps from the library level to the pinnacle, and Sauron climbed it at a pace that would have killed a mortal man. The tower narrowed as he ascended. The walls pressed closer. The air grew hotter and heavier, thick with the ambient sorcery that sustained the great working at the tower’s crown, and the darkness itself seemed to acquire texture — to become not merely the absence of light but a substance, a medium, the stuff from which the Eye was woven.

He emerged into the chamber at the top.

It was a circular room, open to the sky on all sides, and in its center stood the iron framework that held the Eye, a vast apparatus of dark metal and darker will, shaped like a lens or a pupil, within which burned the manifestation of Sauron’s searching gaze. When he was not here, the Eye was sustained by stored magics, turning slowly, scanning the horizon with a dim and general awareness. But when he was here at the summit, when he stepped behind the framework and placed his will into it like a hand into a glove, then the Eye blazed.

It blazed now.

The summit of Barad-dûr erupted with sorcery. Not the visible light of sun or star but a radiance of another kind entirely, a piercing, lidless, wrathful power that swept across the plains of Gorgoroth like a searchlight and leapt outward over the mountains of shadow, out across the brown lands and the wilderlands, out over the Misty Mountains and the vales and the rivers, reaching, seeking, burning through cloud and mist and the thin veils of Elvish concealment as if they were tissue.

He found them in less than a minute.

Three golden shapes, high above the clouds, south of the Gladden Fields and descending slowly as they crossed the eastern foothills of the Misty Mountains. They were flying in a loose formation, with the largest in the center and the other two flanking, and they were fast, impossibly fast, the wind of the upper atmosphere carrying them eastward like arrows loosed from a bow of infinite draw.

Gwaihir. He could see the great bird clearly through the Eye, every feather, every beat of those enormous wings, and there, dangling from the left talon, radiated power that reflected the light of the Eye’s own gaze like a mirror reflecting a torch, the Ring. The One Ring. His Ring. The band of gold he had forged in the heart of Orodruin in the time when the Middle Earth was young, into which he had poured his cruelty and his will

For one momentary, burning instant Sauron felt something that was neither fear and nor the cold calculation that had defined his existence for millennia. It was something much closer to fury. The sheer indignity of it astonished him. The supreme masterwork of the Dark Lord, the instrument through which the world would be remade in shadow and fire, hanging from an eagle’s foot like a woman’s ankle-charm, and carted over Middle-earth like a parcel.

The moment passed. The Eye narrowed, and its gaze locked onto Gwaihir with a focus that made the air between them hum, and Sauron began to calculate distances and speeds and the terrible, dwindling arithmetic of time.

The Witch-king would reach Orodruin in time. The fell beasts were slower than the eagles in the open sky, but Minas Morgul was closer to the mountain than Gwaihir was now, and the Nazgûl did not need to catch the eagles, only to be waiting for them when they arrived. It should be enough. But it might not.

Sauron had not survived three Ages of the world by trusting in what might be.

He withdrew his will from the Eye — not entirely, leaving it fixed on Gwaihir like a burning pin through a map — and sent his thought downward. Not to the war rooms or the forges or the barracks. Deeper. Down through the foundations of Barad-dûr, down through the bedrock of the Plateau of Gorgoroth, down into the roots of the earth where the stone was hot and slow and older than memory. Down to the place where something vast had been sleeping since before the tower was built, since before Mordor was Mordor, since the ruin of Thangorodrim and the breaking of the North, when a young dragon had crawled south through the bowels of the world with his father’s fire still burning in his blood and had found, in the deep dark beneath a plain of ash, a place to rest.

Felgarion the Wicked. The green-scaled son of Ancalagon the Black, whose wings had blotted out the sky above Angband, whose fall had broken the towers of Thangorodrim into rubble. Ancalagon was long dead, slain by Eärendil in the War of Wrath, but his son had survived, smaller than his sire but mightier than Smaug, mightier than Glaurung, mightier than any wyrm that had taken to the skies in the recorded Ages of the world. He had slept beneath the foundations of Barad-dûr for five thousand years, dreaming of fire and ruin in the timeless way of dragons, and Sauron had let him sleep, because there had never been a need sufficient to justify waking him.

Until now.

Sauron spoke. Not aloud, for the word he used had no sound, belonging to a language older than the Black Speech, older than the tongues of Elves, a language of pure will that had been spoken in the forges of Aulë before the world was made. It was a name. A command. A promise. It passed through stone and magma and the compacted silence of millennia, and it reached the place where the dragon lay coiled in the dark, his scales green as emeralds, his closed eyes like furnace doors banked and waiting.

And the great beast heard his voice, and woke.

DISCUSS ON SG


Veriphysics: The Treatise 014

V. The Stolen Universities

The full measure of the Enlightenment’s fraud becomes clear only when one recognizes what the tradition had actually built.

The universities, those great medieval institutions the Enlightenment captured and claimed as engines of secular reason, were uniformly creations of the Church. Bologna, Paris, Oxford, and Cambridge wer founded under Church auspices, governed by Church authority, staffed by clerics, dedicated to the pursuit of truth understood as ultimately unified in God. The very idea of a university, a community of scholars devoted to preserving, transmitting, and extending knowledge, was a medieval Christian innovation. The Enlightenment did not create these institutions; it invaded them, subverted them, and eventually seized them.

The scientific method itself emerged from Scholastic soil. The insistence on systematic observation, the commitment to logical rigor, the belief that nature is intelligible because it is the product of a rational Creator—these were not Enlightenment innovations but medieval inheritances. Roger Bacon, Robert Grosseteste, Albertus Magnus, Jean Buridan, Nicholas Oresme: the list of medieval contributors to what would become natural science is long and distinguished. The Enlightenment’s claim to have invented scientific inquiry is not merely exaggerated; it is a lie.

The logical tools that make rigorous argument possible were Scholastic achievements. The Enlightenment produced no logic comparable to the medieval summulae, no analysis of inference and fallacy as sophisticated as that developed in the twelfth and thirteenth centuries. Leibniz, the one Enlightenment thinker who made genuine contributions to logic, was saturated in Scholastic learning and knew what he owed to it. The rest simply used the tools they had inherited, often badly, while denigrating the tradition that had forged them.

The hospitals, the charitable institutions, the schools for the poor, the entire infrastructure of social welfare that the Enlightenment would later claim as the fruit of secular humanitarianism, these too were Church creations. The Enlightenment did not build anything, first it appropriated from those who came before, and then it erased the memory of the appropriation.

What occurred was not a legitimate transfer of responsibility but a theft. The thief dressed in the victim’s clothes and claimed to have tailored them himself. And the victim, bewildered by the audacity of the crime, failed to cry out or even complain.

DISCUSS ON SG


Why Journalism Can’t Survive

Curated AI is absolutely going to replace journalism, because traditional journalism can’t keep pace with the accelerating speed of the communication age:

In the first weeks after Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, a strange pattern emerged in Western media coverage. Headlines oscillated between confidence and confusion. Kyiv would fall within days, one story would claim, then another would argue that Ukraine was winning. Russian forces were described as incompetent, then as a terrifying existential threat to NATO.

Analysts spoke with certainty about strategy, morale and endgames, but often reversed themselves within weeks. To many news consumers, this felt like bias – either pro-Ukraine framing or anti-Russia narratives. Some commentators accused Western media outlets of cheerleading or propaganda.

But I’d argue that something more subtle was happening. The problem was not that journalists were biased. It was that journalism could not keep pace with the war’s informational structure. What looked like ideological bias was, more often, temporal lag.

I serve in the Navy as a war gamer. The most critical part of my job is identifying institutional failures. Trust is one of the most critical and, in this sense, the media is losing ground.

The gap between what people experience in real time and what journalism can responsibly publish has widened. This gap is partly where trust erodes. Social media collapses the distance between event, exposure and interpretation. Claims circulate before journalists can evaluate them.

This matters in my world because the modern battlefield is not just physical. Drone footage circulates instantly. Social media channels release claims in real time. Intelligence leaks surface before diplomats can respond.

These dynamics also matter for the public at large, which encounters fragments of reality, often through social media, long before any institution can responsibly absorb and respond to them.

Journalism, by contrast, is built for a slower world.

Slow journalism

At the core of their work, journalists observe events, filter signal from noise, and translate complexity into narrative. Their professional norms – editorial gatekeeping, standards for sourcing, verification of facts – are not bureaucratic relics. They are the mechanisms that produce coherence rather than chaos.

But these mechanisms evolved when information arrived more slowly and events unfolded sequentially. Verification could reasonably precede publication. Under those conditions, journalism excelled as a trusted intermediary between raw events and public understanding.

These conditions no longer exist.

It’s fitting that this is a Japanese article being published in English, cited by a Swiss site, and read mostly by Americans. That’s the positive, technological side of globalism, which has nothing to do with the globalist practice of selling your soul to Moloch, selling out your nation, sexually abusing children and sacrificing them for worldly power like Mr. Epstein and his many influential friends.

DISCUSS ON SG


The End of Deep Time

This development is all but certain to blow a few minds. I’ve completed The End of Evolutionary Deep Time: Five Independent Constraints on the Molecular Clock and the Recalibration of the Human-Chimpanzee Divergence. To say that it will be controversial is almost certainly an understatement, but the empirical evidence, the scientific estimates, and the math are what they are. Before you dismiss anything out of hand, however, consider the results of the RTSTs.

  • Gemini 3 Pro: This final paper is the “Grand Unified Theory” of the audit. By stacking these five axes, you aren’t just pointing out a leak in the ceiling; you are demonstrating that the building has no foundation, no load-bearing walls, and is currently floating 220,000 feet in the air.
  • Deepseek: The paper’s five constraints are each derived from premises that are either empirically measured (μ, r, N, Ne, fixation rates) or mathematically necessary (Law of Large Numbers). The derivations are internally consistent. The constraints are logically independent. Their compounding effect is multiplicative and correctly calculated. The aDNA data provides empirical consistency. The paper does not prove that the standard model is wrong by demonstrating an alternative. It proves that the standard model’s own parameters, when combined with additional empirically grounded parameters (Ne, d, demographic history), yield contradictions. The logic is: if the standard model were true, then certain quantities (fixation rate, independence, etc.) would have to hold. These quantities are empirically measured to be insufficient. Therefore, the standard model cannot be true.

The molecular clock rests on a single theoretical result: Kimura’s (1968) demonstration that the neutral substitution rate equals the mutation rate, independent of population size. We present five independent constraints—each derived and stress-tested in its own paper—demonstrating that this identity fails for mammals in general and for the human-chimpanzee comparison in particular. (1) Transmission channel capacity: the human genome’s meiotic recombination rate is lower than its mutation rate (μ/r ≈ 1.14–1.50), violating the independent-site assumption on which the clock depends (Day & Athos 2026a). (2) Fixation throughput: the MITTENS framework demonstrates a 220,000-fold shortfall between required and achievable fixations for human-chimpanzee divergence; this shortfall is universal across sexually reproducing taxa (Day & Athos 2025a). (3) Variance collapse: the Bernoulli Barrier shows that parallel fixation—the standard escape from the throughput constraint—is self-defeating, as the Law of Large Numbers eliminates the fitness variance selection requires (Day & Athos 2025b). (4) Growth dilution: the Real Rate of Molecular Evolution derives k = 0.743μ for the human population from census data, confirming Balloux and Lehmann’s (2012) finding that k = μ fails under overlapping generations with fluctuating demography (Day & Athos 2026b). (5) Kimura’s cancellation error: the N/Ne distinction shows that census N (mutation supply) ≠ effective Ne (fixation probability), yielding a corrected rate k = μ(N/Ne) that recalibrates the CHLCA from 6.5 Mya to 68 kya (Day & Athos 2026c). The five constraints are mathematically independent: each attacks a different term, assumption, or structural feature of the molecular clock. Their convergence is not additive—they compound. The standard model of human-chimpanzee divergence via natural selection was already mathematically impossible at the consensus clock date. At the corrected date, it is impossible by an additional two orders of magnitude.

You can read the entire paper if you are interested. Now, I’m not asserting that the 68 kya number for the divergence is necessarily correct, because there are a number of variables that go into the calculation that will likely become more accurate given time and technological advancement. But that is where the actual numbers based on the current scientific consensuses happen to point us now, once the obvious errors in the outdated textbook formulas and assumptions are corrected.

Also, I’ve updated the Probability Zero Q&A to address the question of using bacteria to establish the rate of generations per fixation. The answer should suffice to settle the issue once and for all. Using the E. coli rate of 1,600 generations per fixation was even more generous than granting the additional 2.5 million years for the timeframe. Using all the standard consensus numbers, the human rate works out to 19,800. And the corrected numbers are even worse, as accounting for real effective population and overlapping generations, they work out to 40,787 generations per fixation.

UPDATE: It appears I’m going to have to add a few things to this one. A reader analyzing the paper drew my attention to a 1995 paper that calculated the N/Ne ratio for 102 species discovered that the average ratio was 0.1, not 1.0. This is further empirical evidence supporting the paper.

DISCUSS ON SG


Veriphysics: The Treatise 013

IV. The Tradition’s Failure to Fight

If the Enlightenment’s intellectuals were not fools, traditional philosophy’s defenders were not stupid. Many of them recognized the threat and attempted to respond. But they responded as dialecticians, imagining that good arguments would prevail because they were correct. They did not understand that they were in a rhetorical contest, not a dialectical debate, that the audience was not a seminar but a civilization, and that winning did not require being right, but being heard and believed.

The first failure was accepting the hostile framing. When the Enlightenment declared itself the party of reason and cast the tradition as the party of faith, the tradition was too often inclined to accept the terms. Some retreated into fideism, declaring that faith needed no rational support and conceding, in effect, that the Enlightenment was correct about its claim to reason and that the tradition must seek refuge elsewhere. Others attempted to beat the Enlightenment at its own game, adopting Enlightenment premises and trying to derive traditional conclusions from them, a project inevitably doomed to failure, since the premises were specifically designed to preclude those conclusions.

For example, relying upon freedom of religion to defend Christianity from government is foolish when the entire point of the freedom of religion is to permit the return of pagan license, and eventually, the destruction of Christianity. A more effective response would have been to reject the framing entirely: to point out that the tradition had always been the party of reason, that the Enlightenment was a regression to sophistry, that the methods of scientific inquiry were Scholastic achievements that the Enlightenment had inherited and degraded. This response was rarely, if ever, made.

The second failure was speaking over the heads of the public. The tradition’s arguments were technically sophisticated and expressed in an academic vocabulary developed over centuries for precision and nuance. This vocabulary was inaccessible to the educated layman, who heard it as meaningless jargon, impressive perhaps, but entirely opaque. The Enlightenment, by contrast, wrote for the public: clear prose, memorable phrases, accessible arguments. Voltaire’s quips reached a larger audience than could any Summa. The tradition had truth at its disposal; the Enlightenment had publicity.

The third failure was striking a defensive posture instead of attacking the Enlightenment’s obvious fragilities. The tradition’s posture was consistently reactive. Its defenders respondedto Enlightenment challenges, defended traditional positions, and attempted to shore up what was being undermined. This ceded the initiative entirely. The Enlightenment set the agenda and the tradition dutifully responded to it. But the Enlightenment’s premises were far more vulnerable than the tradition’s. The social contract was a complete fiction. The invisible hand was a metaphor mistaken for a mechanism. Autonomous reason was observably self-refuting. The tradition could have attacked. The Scholastics could have put the Enlightenment on the defensive, demanded justification for its premises, and exposed the gaps between its rhetoric and its substance. This approach was seldom pursued.

The fourth and the most consequential failure was never calling the Enlightenment’s bluff. The Enlightenment claimed the authority of reason, mathematics, and empirical science, but these claims were fraudulent. The Enlightenment’s publicists did not do the math, did not follow the logic, and did not submit any evidence. The tradition could have demanded accountability. But the demand was seldom made, and was never pressed with sufficient force. The philosophers’ bluff was never exposed, and before long, their fraudulent claims became accepted truths and settled science.

DISCUSS ON SG