One of the things that the evolutionists like to use to disqualify Probability Zero is describing it as “AI-written”. Which is, of course, partly true. But that should frighten them, not comfort them. Because it is evidence of the strength of the book’s legitimacy, not the opposite.
Remember when they said to “Trust the science?”
Artificial intelligence finds that a quarter million cancer research papers have been faked
A 2026 study trained an AI on 2,202 cancer papers that had been identified as fake. It then applied this model to look into 2.65 million original cancer research papers published between 1999 and 2024. It flagged 261,245 papers as fake
- Over 178,000 flagged papers had Chinese institutional affiliations
- Roughly 36% of Chinese cancer research output in the dataset
- Iran was next at around 20%
This is a major problem because this can mean the medical community amplifies completely fake research and findings
“Every fabricated study sitting in a real journal is competing for attention with studies actually pointing towards a legit cure, which means the more fake noise there is, the longer it takes for the real breakthroughs to surface. And somewhere in that pile, maybe a real cure is buried under a fake AI-generated one.”
No doctors have gone to jail for this (I checked)
This also demonstrates how the fact that MITTENS isn’t peer-reviewed means nothing at all. And it’s interesting that they describe it that way, because, as it happens, it has been reviewed by a number of people, including mathematicians and physicists, as will be demonstrated later today.