Scott Adams explains that the Clown World elite just has everyone’s best interests in mind by sweeping the nonexistent files of some guy who never existed in the first place and never trafficked anyone anywhere under the table:
If you see the Epstein story as a crime story, which of course it is, you probably favor maximum disclosure of everyone and everything involved, including innocent people, like a typical court case.
If you see the Epstein story as something bigger, involving more than one nation, you might see it as a Commander in Chief issue, meaning the public is not meant to have the full story, similar to most national defense issues. We elect a president to decide — in part — what the public can safely see.
Would you favor full disclosure if you knew it would derail a peace negotiation?
Would you favor full disclosure if you knew it would end Republican control of Congress and plunge the country back into a Democrat open-border hellscape?
If you can’t say what you would give up to get the full Epstein disclosure you crave, you’re not a serious person.
Considering how wrong Scott was about the Covid vaxx, what are the odds he’s correct here?
Would you favor full disclosure if you knew it would derail a peace negotiation?
Yes. 100 percent. Most peace negotiations are fake anyhow.
Would you favor full disclosure if you knew it would end Republican control of Congress and plunge the country back into a Democrat open-border hellscape?
Yes. Republicans aren’t any better than Democrats on immigration. Reagan granted the first amnesty and five times more Democrats (15) voted no on the 1965 Naturalization Act that destroyed America than Republicans (3).