I’d heard that there were factors compromising the temperature data before, but I had no idea that it was this badly compromised:
During the past few years I recruited a team of more than 650 volunteers to visually inspect and photographically document more than 860 of these temperature stations. We were shocked by what we found. We found stations located next to the exhaust fans of air conditioning units, surrounded by asphalt parking lots and roads, on blistering-hot rooftops, and near sidewalks and buildings that absorb and radiate heat. We found 68 stations located at wastewater treatment plants, where the process of waste digestion causes temperatures to be higher than in surrounding areas.
In fact, we found that 89 percent of the stations – nearly 9 of every 10 – fail to meet the National Weather Service’s own siting requirements that stations must be 30 meters (about 100 feet) or more away from an artificial heating or radiating/reflecting heat source. In other words, 9 of every 10 stations are likely reporting higher or rising temperatures because they are badly sited.
It will be interesting to see how the AGW/CC cult attempts to discredit this information. Most likely, they’ll just ignore it, as they’ve ignored the climate science, and keep shrieking their mantra in an attempt to browbeat the ignorant. Because these days, “science” appears to be as much media propaganda as anything that even remotely resembles scientody.
This makes me wonder that if temperatures are falling despite these heat-biased factors, is it possible that excessive cooling might be in the cards?