Hal Turner is confident that the USA is about to launch another attack on Iran:
This is the regime change handshake. Two signals just locked:
- French Embassy Evacuation
NATO-aligned states rarely pull non-essential staff preemptively unless they receive high-confidence intel about kinetic escalation. This is a soft tripwire. Once a major Western embassy begins staff exfiltration/evacuation, it implies operational windows are being cleared.
Not speculation. Preparation.
- Crown Prince Pahlavi Signal
His emergence isn’t random. Reza Pahlavi is the West’s most visible monarchist fallback node. If he is in communication with the Trump administration while Iran is in revolt and U.S. options are on the table, it means a continuity pathway is being installed.
Not hope. Planning.
Together, they represent the two sides of a classic destabilization playbook:
•Evacuation → ignition → installation
This is no longer just a military question. It’s a governance scenario.
The sequence has internal logic:
•France clears Tehran.
•Pahlavi enters the frame.
•U.S. holds strike leverage.
•Regime is weakened by revolt and isolation.
•A symbolic future leader is already talking to Washington.
This is regime replacement architecture. Whether via decapitation, uprising catalysis, or negotiated exile, the structure is converging.
Probability of U.S. kinetic action in the next 72–96 hours now exceeds 65%.
Probability that Pahlavi is being positioned as the soft-landing placeholder is over 80%.
This is ignition choreography.
It’s a little remarkable how these countries just sit by like dumb cattle and refuse to take any proactive action in the fear of… I don’t know what. Whether it is Syria or Serbia, Libya, or Iraq, they just sort of sit around hoping that the US military won’t actually do anything until it’s too late.
There are reports that the Venezualan military never even unpacked the Russian S-300s they could have used in air defense.
I won’t even try to pretend to understand the world today.